Slashdot Mirror


Real-LIfe Distributed-Snooping Web Game To Launch In Britain

corerunner writes "A new internet game is about to be launched which allows 'super snooper' players to plug into the nation's CCTV cameras and report on members of the public committing crimes. The 'Internet Eyes' service involves players scouring thousands of CCTV cameras installed in shops, businesses and town centres across Britain looking for law-breakers. Players who help catch the most criminals each month will win cash prizes up to £1,000."

9 of 419 comments (clear)

  1. So we can't afford Patrolling Police Officers... by lbalbalba · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But we *can* afford prizes up to £1,000 for public citizens that are effectively doing police work ? This world is getting way too weird for me... Or perhaps im just getting old :)

  2. Re:So we can't afford Patrolling Police Officers.. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, this is dangerous. Very Stasi-like. This is a disturbing trend in official and informal law-enforcement because it encourages things like community-based harassment. People will band together and participate in government-sanctioned stalking of atheists, commies, homosexuals, or whomever else they just don't like.

    It is simply turning the people against each other to distract them from their discontent with their government.

  3. No. RTFA. by professorguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    You don't get to choose which camera you see each session. In fact, the location is 'secret' (though you may be able to figure it out). Single person surveillance won't work.

  4. Read the article by Tobor+the+Eighth+Man · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is an opt-in service where specific people can pay a fee to have their cameras monitored by the game's players. It has no connection with the CCTV network already installed by British officials. It's basically just a very stupid and sensational business venture that will probably fail, because who's going to be willing to pay 20 quid a week for random internet people to watch their CCTV?

  5. Re:So we can't afford Patrolling Police Officers.. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Interesting


    In addition to all the above legitimate concerns, add sexual harrasment and a live "hot girl at location X" Twitter feed or whatever. Not to mention filming and recording of partners, ex's, bullying victims, etc. And if you thought "happy slapping" with a phone camera was something, wait till you see what people can do when broadcast live on the Internet. If a group wants to harras you, it's going to much easier for them to do so, as you say. What do you think will happen with a system like this in the hands of Anonymous or some group like them.

    Of course you might be able to use this to monitor the police, but if so, expect them to implement controls on that asap.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  6. Re:So we can't afford Patrolling Police Officers.. by radtea · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any ideas what happens to reports on cops committing crimes?

    I'd say they disappear down the memory hole, but users will be able to capture the video they are using locally, and repost on YouTube for fun and profit.

    Ergo, this program will be shut down within weeks as it reveals cops committing crimes. Either that, or the feeds will be scrubbed of all police presence "for the protection of our hardworking constables on the street" prior to distributing them.

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  7. Blackmail, casing future robberies, cyber-stalking by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is that the CCTV cameras have proven to be very ineffective in deterring crime.

    The MOST effective has been cops patrolling - either walking the beat, on bikes, horse, or patrol car.

    This is going to increase crime:

    1. Blackmail, David Letterman - style - "I saw what you did and I have a video. Either give me $$$ or I tell the cops which camera, and the timestamp";
    2. Recruiting kids for crime - "Hey, I see you guys are always hanging around here - want to make some $$$ selling drugs?"
    3. Casing future "jobs" - "Hey look - they close shop at 9pm, and then there's the last person to leave at 10pm, and on Thursdays they then go and make the night deposit - let's relieve them of that burden."
    4. Cyber-stalking.

    This is just taking a bad idea and making it worse.

  8. Re:So we can't afford Patrolling Police Officers.. by dstech · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In 1984, citizens were encouraged to spy on each other and report possible dissidents to the authorities. So yes, this is very Orwellian.

    RTFN

  9. Re:So we can't afford Patrolling Police Officers.. by noundi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In 1984, citizens were encouraged to spy on each other and report possible dissidents to the authorities. So yes, this is very Orwellian.

    RTFN

    I did read the novel, but there's a big difference. The citizens in 1984 were never allowed to view surveillance, so they were never on an equal scale as the government. And fundamentally this is what frightens people, that someone with an upper hand controlls you. When that upper hand is given to everyone the concept isn't the same, and you taking things out of context doesn't make it so.

    --
    I am the lawn!