Slashdot Mirror
NASA's LCROSS Moon Impact Mission Provides Great Data
Several sources are sending us reports of NASA's recent LCROSS Moon impact mission. While the visual results seem to be less than stunning, LCROSS Principal Investigator Anthony Colaprete said the initial results produced "the data we need," but refused to say anything about "water or no water." "The goal of this dual impact was to have the Centaur upper stage impact first, allowing the LCROSS spacecraft to observe close-up the results of the impact. In fairness, the view from LCROSS as it approached the moon was amazing — even though there was no obvious visual evidence of impact, which early data from the infrared camera on the craft indicates did occur. What happens next is a whole lot of math and science. The LCROSS spacecraft included nine individual science instruments. This suite of instruments consisted of one visible camera, two near-infrared cameras, two mid-infrared cameras, a visible light spectrometer, two near-infrared spectrometers, and a photometer. All nine of those instruments were gathering data simultaneously and streaming that data back to Earth."
For great justice!
Mess not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup.
The moon has a completely insurmountable 1.2 second ping.
Even if a first generation move to the moon, their kids won't put up with a 1.2+ second ping in halo, and will move back to earth when they are 16.
So you see, it won't be sustainable.
"I have just signed legislation outlawing the Moon. We begin bombing in 5 minutes."
Anybody want my mod points?
It might be worth pointing to the mission site or project site at NASA.
10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10
... or does this posting say almost nothing? "We blew up a crater on the moon, and boy our data is great. Check back with you guys later."
Is this just NASA-speak for "We haven't analyzed the data yet but we wanted to make some sort of comment anyways"?
There's a nice sequence of screen-grabs showing the journey into lunar oblivion plus summary of the post-impact press conference here.
It was strange not seeing any massive impact plume like expected, but seems they got spectroscopic data which is what really matters. You got the sense that all the journos were disappointed there wasn't a big KABOOM with all those questions asked about it in the press conference.
If you listened to the conspiracy idiots recently you would think we did blow up the moon.
i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
followed by "a whole lot of math and science".
Pure orgasm.
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
Jim: This just in, we have confirmed reports that the two NASA probes that slammed into the moon earlier today have irrevocably changed the moons trajectory in such a way that it will intersect with Earth's. Scientist's calculated that impact will oc
All nine of those instruments were gathering data simultaneously and streaming that data back to Earth.
Unfortunately, this high volume of data alerted the MPAA/RIAA that copyright theft was in progress, and their lawyers ordered a DMCA take down order to cut off data transmission from the moon. So not all the data was received.
The Moon must appear in court in order for its data service to be restored.
Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
At least they didn't miss!
!#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
- We didn't miss the aim point.
- None of the instruments malfunctioned.
- We didn't lose the data on the way back.
- We'll tell you what it means once we're done analyzing and checking it.
In still other words "The project passed THE major milestone and is on track with nothing broken."
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
I think they honestly expected a bigger flash. Something that could be seen by a 10" or 12" telescope. Instead, the smallest telescope I heard say "we saw the impact" was MMT, which has a 256" aperature.