Slashdot Mirror


Eee Keyboard Details Released

Details on the new Eee keyboard, previously held secret during the FCC filing, have now been made available. You can now take a look at the innards and a full spec sheet detailing exactly what is being promised. "Beneath the 5-inch, 800 x 480 pixel touch panel (with stylus) we'll be getting Windows XP Home running on an Intel Atom N270, 945GSE / ICH7-M chipset with Broadcom AV-VD905 video decoder, 1GB of DDR2 memory, either 16GB or 32GB of flash storage, 4-hour battery, Bluetooth, 802.11b/g/n WiFi, gigabit Ethernet, HDMI and VGA outputs, integrated stereo speakers and mic, 3x USB, headphone and mic jacks, and external WiFi / UWB antenna. The Eee Keyboard's on-board Ultra-Wideband (UWB) throws 720p content to your TV within a 5-meter range (10-meters for non-video transmissions) via a UWB receiver packing 2x USB ports, another mini-USB port, audio out, and HDMI."

166 comments

  1. Don't bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will be no linux driver for it.

    1. Re:Don't bother by ickleberry · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. Asus brought Linux into the mainstream with the Eee 70x series 'netbooks' (as much as I hate that term, 'tiny laptop' is better) and promptly stabbed it in the back.

    2. Re:Don't bother by zorro-z · · Score: 1

      Agreed, that is a pity. I bought a refurbed Eee 900 a few months back specifically b/c of its being a linux box. Now, I get the pure geek fun of being able to test various distros via ISOs + UNetBootIn, w/no licensing issues whatsoever.

      I am curious, though, to see how much Asus embraces Google Chrome OS; it seems as if they may do so enthusiastically. Chrome OS, if it's all it's cut out to be, would be perfect for an Eee, making it effectively into a mobile thin client. Don't forget that Chrome OS is basically linux w/a Google clown suit.

      --
      -Z
    3. Re:Don't bother by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In this application, the UWB interface basically replaces two wires. It goes from the computer to a breakout box with 1 HDMI and a few USB ports. Essentially, one HDMI cable and one USB cable going to a USB hub.

      If the whole mass is implemented as a "UWB interface device" linux support would be a real surprise. I'd probably be just like wireless in the bad old days, only worse. However, they could also, in principle, have encapsulated the whole UWB bit behind standard looking interfaces. If all the host computer sees is a USB port and an HDMI port, with the UWB silently replacing the usual wires, then software support should be more or less automatic(although, there probably will be some little pairing interface to be figured out).

    4. Re:Don't bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Would it have been better if they had just not bothered with Linux at all?

      Seriously, all you people do is whine.

    5. Re:Don't bother by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Completely untrue. Sure, some of us are whiny, but a good percentage are also bitter and vengeful.

    6. Re:Don't bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would it have been better if they had just not bothered with Linux at all?

      Seriously, all you people do is whine.

      I am posting anonumously to preserve my spent mod points in this article. Why is this a troll? It is a valid question. Asus tried with Linux and the hand of MS smacked them across the face for it and they relented. Do they not deserve some praise or at the very least some sort of acknowledgement that they even tried to begin with? I am sure Asus would be happy to continue to sell the Linux versions because there is a customer base with demand and very little cost to Asus to meet that demand. You all make it sound like Asus did this because they were playing a sick joke on everyone.

    7. Re:Don't bother by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I like Eeebuntu.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:Don't bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey don't leave out those of us that are violent and psychotic!

    9. Re:Don't bother by noundi · · Score: 1

      Would it have been better if they had just not bothered with Linux at all?

      Seriously, all you people do is whine.

      I am posting anonumously to preserve my spent mod points in this article. Why is this a troll? It is a valid question. Asus tried with Linux and the hand of MS smacked them across the face for it and they relented. Do they not deserve some praise or at the very least some sort of acknowledgement that they even tried to begin with? I am sure Asus would be happy to continue to sell the Linux versions because there is a customer base with demand and very little cost to Asus to meet that demand. You all make it sound like Asus did this because they were playing a sick joke on everyone.

      You make a good point, the AC to whom you replied to did not. To answer your question: 12-year-olds posting silly nonsense usually get marked troll.

      --
      I am the lawn!
    10. Re:Don't bother by zorro-z · · Score: 1

      I use Crunchbang (aka #!) on my Eee, both for its performance + for its name being a perfect description of my, shall we say, checkered relationship w/technology.

      --
      -Z
    11. Re:Don't bother by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to know how well it will actually work with Linux, especially in regards to it mostly having to control two screens at once, one of which mostly intended for navigation.

      This device actually looks like something I'd want due to its compactness. The Windows thing is a small drawback, though.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
  2. More "Eee" again by ickleberry · · Score: 1

    Just when you thought releasing another "Eee" branded product would be like flogging the skeleton of a dead horse

  3. The C64 is back! by BumbaCLot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How hard would it be to build a cheaper version to teach kids programming?

    1. Re:The C64 is back! by Scutter · · Score: 4, Funny

      How hard would it be to build a cheaper version to teach kids programming?

      6? Maybe 7? I don't know, what scale are we using?

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    2. Re:The C64 is back! by tepples · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Just buy any netbook and install IDLE, the official Tk-based editor for Python programs.
      • Under Windows: Install Python from Python.org; IDLE comes inside.
      • Under Ubuntu: sudo apt-get install idle
      • Under Xandros, the Linux distro that comes on some Eee PC notebooks, you might want to do what I did a week after I bought mine: Wipe the drive, install Ubuntu, and follow the Ubuntu instructions.
    3. Re:The C64 is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there already are $15 computers built into a keyboard for kids.
      Called 'TV computers' or somesuch. Based on a NES.

      http://picasaweb.google.co.in/dereklomas/TVComputer#5256799083697212402

      There was some project a while back to make an OLPC competitor useing them. I don't know how it panned out.

    4. Re:The C64 is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already got a device with a keyboard and a 1024x600 screen, with an Atom n270, 1GB RAM, 16GB flash, wifi, bluetooth, VGA port, stereo speakers (but only mono mic), 3x USB, a spare SD slot... etc... Mine was on-sale at a big-box stationary chain for $240 .. the only thig it seems to be missing from the specs is the UWB TV hookup... but my TV doesn't have UWB anyways...

      As for the shadowrun similarity... I have a USB serial adapter and console cable and frequently get asked to "jack in" to network routers by remote troubleshooters...

    5. Re:The C64 is back! by gnick · · Score: 2, Funny

      A scale from 1 to 10 with 4 being the most difficult. 7 sounds about right - More difficult than installing programming tools on a regular computer or laptop and restricting the kid's permissions, but less difficult than naturally breeding a man-bear-pig.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    6. Re:The C64 is back! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Probably depends on whether you are Jeri Ellsworth or not. More broadly, it really depends on whether you actually want "a C64 to teach kids programming" or "to teach kids programming" and whether you insist on building it or not.

      There are several modern remakes of the C64, usually sold for gaming, some of which can have a keyboard modded on. Those are probably your cheapest bet and definitely your best bet if you actually want a C64. Second cheapest(at least in the developed world) would be your bog-standard-Wintel-box-circa-5-years-ago free for the taking from whoever is throwing it away today. Third cheapest would be, depending on the day, either the second cheapest option purchased from a refurb vendor, or a netbook on sale.

      There is a lot to be said for making things, if one is interested; but as a means of putting programming tools in front of children, it hasn't really been economically sensible in some time.

    7. Re:The C64 is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Am I the only one that just tried to picture a useful difficulty scale that peaks at 4?

      And then tried to figure out which side of 4 "naturally" combining 3 different species would fall on?

    8. Re:The C64 is back! by Abreu · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Seconded, contrary to the Anonymous coward, I believe that Python is the best programming language for kids.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    9. Re:The C64 is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'd go for the cleaner syntax of ruby instead. And somebody is sure gonna mention lisp/scheme now :D

    10. Re:The C64 is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Python is a fad language. In another couple of years it'll be as dead as BSD and BeOS are.

    11. Re:The C64 is back! by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      > but less difficult than naturally breeding a man-bear-pig

      Difficult sure, but fun? You betcha!

    12. Re:The C64 is back! by Haxamanish · · Score: 1

      Also install Pygame for them to make it true fun.

      About the indentation remark by the AC above: I expected I would hate Python's indentation rule, but I actually love it. Liberated from BEGIN & END or { & }.

    13. Re:The C64 is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww, somebody's favorite language isn't as popular.

      The only thing wrong with Python is speed, and that's what C/C++ extensions are for. Otherwise it's goddamn awesome and getting better with a huge range of new stuff from Py3k to Unladen Swallow to IronPython to PyPy.

    14. Re:The C64 is back! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only one that just tried to picture a useful difficulty scale that peaks at 4?

      Ironically, picturing such a scale peaks at 5, and devising it peaks at pi and a bit.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:The C64 is back! by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Awww, somebody's favorite language isn't as popular.

      I use COBAL you insensitive clod.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    16. Re:The C64 is back! by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      i'd go for the cleaner syntax of ruby instead.

      Hahahahaha.

      -deep breath-

      Hahahahahahahahaha

    17. Re:The C64 is back! by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 1

      Your TV doesn't need UWB, they have a separate box that receives UWB and turns it into HDMI for you to plug into your TV.

    18. Re:The C64 is back! by stjobe · · Score: 1

      I use COBAL you insensitive clod.

      COBAL? Compania Bananera Atlantica Ltda?

      The programming language is COBOL, COmmon Business Oriented Language, as you would've known if you really did use it instead of making one-liners on Slashdot, you young whippersnapper.

      Now get off my lawn!

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    19. Re:The C64 is back! by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      Radians or degrees?

    20. Re:The C64 is back! by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Easy - just convince some company that isn't married to Microsoft like Asus is to build one that's compatible with any OS suitable for teaching kids with.

    21. Re:The C64 is back! by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I tried to learn COBOL. Ow.
      I found ADA and LISP less painful.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    22. Re:The C64 is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pi is a number, you fucking gibbon.

  4. Shadowrun by vertinox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this remind anyone of the Shadowrunner decks?

    Maybe if I get this, Vuzix Wrap Eyewear, a neon green mohawk, and leather jacket I can start calling myself a "Decker" ;)

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:Shadowrun by wolfsdaughter · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the exact same thing ... http://www.geocities.com/grinningkat/Elven_Decker.jpg

      --
      "Are they made from real Girl Scouts?" ~Wednesday Addams
    2. Re:Shadowrun by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      Decker was the first word I thought when I saw it.

    3. Re:Shadowrun by MoralHazard · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't know about that. But you could certainly start calling yourself "celibate", at that point.

    4. Re:Shadowrun by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Yep. Looking forward to nabbing one and taking it apart :)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    5. Re:Shadowrun by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      more like a Commodore 64

  5. Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk? by Pysslingen · · Score: 1

    Thought the days of keyboard integrated computers were long gone, primarily because of how exposed the keyboard is.... But apparently some companies prefer to not learn these lessons. Who is the target market?

    1. Re:Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk? by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not quite. There is a tiny niche product called a laptop that not only combines keyboard and computer in one, but the display too. Really poor design.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    2. Re:Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I hear some of them laptops have greater than 800 x 480, too. They even have the display above the keyboard -- not off to one side.

    3. Re:Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk? by Al+Dimond · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the target is something like the iMac and Mac Mini markets. As for keyboard-integrated computers, what about laptops, which are practically the only computers sold today? And, while we're on the subject, I've lately been wondering why so many good laptop technologies have never made it onto desktop machines. I, for one, would love to have a small battery in my desktop box for when the power went out (I've lived some places that had really crummy power connections) and something like a laptop battery would be smaller, cheaper, and better-integrated with a standard desktop OS than a UPS. And most of the components don't really need a full-sized case. Full-sized hard drives and power supplies, by my understanding, are legitimately better than mini hard drives and external power bricks... and video cards, for people that care about graphics. I really don't, which saves me some space... so why can't I buy, right off the shelf, a small-form-factor desktop PC with quality desktop components where they matter and tiny ones where they don't? With a laptop-style battery, great ACPI support out of the box, and practically noiseless (unless I'm running a compile job)?

    4. Re:Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk? by cupantae · · Score: 1

      It's going full circle for design but progressing in performance. Next will be really fast tape drives with >1TB storage instead of optical drives.

      This does make me strangely nostalgic, though, since the first computer I ever used was an Amstrad CPC 464.

      --
      --
    5. Re:Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the specs on LTO4 and LTO5. A TB of tape is easy to ask for. However, with drives in the $2500 range, don't expect it to replace your $20 dvd burner any time soon.

    6. Re:Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk? by bendodge · · Score: 1

      Except for the battery, you're looking for the EEE Box.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    7. Re:Mechanica Stress and Spilt Milk? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      and ``wow, what a wonderful keyboard'' never comes to my mind when I think of ASUS (Eee in particular).

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  6. Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2! by ClayJar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My very first computer was a TRS-80 Color Computer 2. It was basically a computer in a keyboard that I connected to the TV. Now, decades later, I will soon be able to buy a computer built into a keyboard that will display on my TV.

    "What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." Ecclesiastes 1:9 (NIV)

    Of course, if this can handle "HD" YouTube, Netflix streaming, and other online sources, it might actually be worth looking into as an alternative to building my own low-power box for the TV. At least worth keeping an eye open, I suppose.

    1. Re:Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I like generic stuff like that, because it's so vague as to always be right. Which makes it useless.

      Although I'm not sure the internet has been done before.

    2. Re:Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2! by oh2 · · Score: 1

      Well, I for one think its very cool. I might buy one just because its shiny.

      --

      Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

    3. Re:Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2! by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I had one of those too! (I even pestered my parents for the cassette deck for saving programs!)

      This sounds like a good idea for a "living room" computer, using Mythbuntu or something similar...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2! by ukemike · · Score: 1

      "What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." Ecclesiastes 1:9

      This has all happened before and it will all happen again." Battlestar Galactica.

      --
      -- QED
    5. Re:Wow, it's my TRS-80 Color Computer 2! by Megane · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn, you whippersnapper! MY first computer was a Model I (except there was no "model" yet), and this looks much more like one of those. You can even put a logo on the right side of the keyboard to enhance the experience. The only thing missing is an expansion box larger than the main computer, connected by a cranky ribbon cable. And having to turn off the thing whenever the family wanted to watch channel 12 on the TV.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  7. What would you use this for? by Unoti · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, my creativity is running a little dry here. Why would I want this? Is the idea to keep this by the couch and use it as my living room computer, and run video off it to my TV wirelessly with UWB?

    1. Re:What would you use this for? by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      touchtypetutor?

    2. Re:What would you use this for? by Chickan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Basically yes, use it to play your cartoons or movies of choice, while checking your email. I'll stick to my mythbox personally though. Screen is too small to be useful without hooking it up to your TV, and if you are doing that its main advantage is size alone.

    3. Re:What would you use this for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      touchtypetutor?

      Parsing... parsing... ah! You said "touch type tutor." Not "touchy petutor."

      I was wondering what the heck that was.

    4. Re:What would you use this for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's bigger and higher res than the iPhone screen, which is not exactly useless...

      Still, the idea is to use the small screen to control the 2nd display (the TV) without having to squint to read the options on the 720p screen. Also, being able to check e-mail, pop up a web site, etc, which still streaming the video or audio to your TV is nice. Also, it's highly portable, always open (no clamshell), and easy to clide behind or under a big screen TV (not as bulky as a netbook). A set-top box with a bluetooth keyboard is probably more ideal in most situations, however, being able to get a few extra UWB receivers and move this around from room to room without decabling is a nice touch if you have a few TVs.

    5. Re:What would you use this for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS!
      The screen is way too small to be of any use.

      I would have preferred a wider screen in the center, splitting the keyboard in half.
      Also, if you could fold the keyboard down the middle (on either side of the screen), this would have been massively more useful.
      This is the reason why i won't bother getting it.

    6. Re:What would you use this for? by Bat+Country · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Educational gaming machine go!

      Let your kid browse the internet in the living room while you read - thus glancing up regularly and supervising to make sure nobody has goatse'd them.

      Show your friends the latest stupid thing you found on Youtube.

      Attached USB + Controller + Stella = Living room Atari 2600 which can be easily attached and put away when you're done (less easily accomplished in these days of LCD TVs without coax).

      Cheap television + keyboard computer = information kiosk. Tired of your friends getting drunk and wanting to use Google on your computer to settle disputes on random shit? Stick one of those in your living room on a pedestal. Call it "The Last Word."

      Have a little too much money? Do you like having whiteboards but you consider them lower-class? Buy a large format flat screen television, something cheap which can hack 720p clearance from some home theater "everything must go" sale, stick it on the wall and use this thing on a cheap pedestal table as an art easel. Encourage people to graffiti on your wall with the stylus on the attached screen.

      Attach a webcam to one and stick it up in your windowsill and take time lapses of the seasons. Hell, if it's cheap enough, put one in each window.

      Or just use one for the same thing you'd use an EEEpc other than reading on the bus to work.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
    7. Re:What would you use this for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking it was an awkward portmanteau of "touchy" and "computer" so you're not alone

    8. Re:What would you use this for? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. Pretty much. Have you ever hooked your computer up to one of these new-fangled high-definition LCD televisions? If you set the resolution right (few people do), it's as sharp as any other LCD monitor. Only HUGE. I've had a big 1080p panel hooked up to my gaming computer for years and it's awesome. And it's great for regular tasks, too.

    9. Re:What would you use this for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking to watch porn I downloaded on the TV.

    10. Re:What would you use this for? by craagz · · Score: 1

      thus glancing up regularly and supervising to make sure nobody has goatse'd them.

      You wouldn't be able to prevent them being goatse'd, unless you have a premonition of reading goatse links hidden behind a spate of URL shortening services.

      You can only turn off the TV and console the poor kids.

  8. It doesn't really require an HDTV, but... by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    My very first computer was a TRS-80 Color Computer 2. It was basically a computer in a keyboard that I connected to the TV.

    Presumably an SDTV, over RF or composite cable.

    Now, decades later, I will soon be able to buy a computer built into a keyboard that will display on my TV.

    Perhaps your TV is an HDTV and will work with one of the video outputs (VGA, HDMI) on the computer. But a lot of the U.S. market still uses SDTV, and in order to connect the VGA output to an SDTV, you need a special $40 cable that I don't think is included.

    1. Re:It doesn't really require an HDTV, but... by MBCook · · Score: 1

      But a lot of the U.S. market still uses SDTV

      I don't think that's the market. This seems targeted purely at enthusiasts and early adopters. This computer fills a very limited role.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  9. 10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Informative

    So, if it's not sending a video signal, I presume that I'm getting audio only? And this would be useful how...

    Okay, I just RTFA. Unlike the "cool" option of actually transmitting low power ATSC on an (unused) channel, which would make this potentially useful, it requires a hardwired dongle (UWB receiver) at any TV you want to connect. So the "any TV" just turned into "any TV you decide you want to buy a dongle for and manually wire up to receive the proprietary signal." An, of course, that's where the 10m comes in, since the UWB receiver has USB ports on it (for those who are cool enough to have one of these, and so antiquated that the have a wired printer).

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV? by Interoperable · · Score: 1

      Yeah I fail to see the utility. If you need to have something plugged into your TV anyway why not plug in an Eee Box and use a wireless keyboard. It doesn't really gain the advantages of a laptop since it needs an external screen and an Eee Box plus a thin keyboard probably take up less space.

      --
      So if this is the future...where's my jet pack?
    2. Re:10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it has to do with the strength of the signal. For rapid screen updates (without horrid latency) you need to be within 16 feet of the TV. Up to 32 feet away, you can still get a semi-static display, just not watching 60 FPS video.

    3. Re:10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV? by ahecht · · Score: 1

      I know it's Slashdot and we don't read the articles, but at least read the first sentence of the summary:

      Beneath the 5-inch, 800 x 480 pixel touch panel (with stylus)

    4. Re:10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      "the UWB receiver has USB ports on it (for those who are cool enough to have one of these, and so antiquated that the have a wired printer)"

      Or, more plausibly, one's interest in having a DVD/blu-ray/big HDD loaded with rips drive is limited when walking around the house; but significant when next to the TV...

    5. Re:10 meters for non-video transmission to a TV? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Unlike the "cool" option of actually transmitting low power ATSC on an (unused) channel

      I'm not sure that the FCC would like this very much.

  10. XP? by clang_jangle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just the other day there was a story about how MS was refusing to patch a vulnerability in XP's ssh implementation (ISTR it was particularly bad for paypal users). Plus we've all heard the crowing about 7 being good to go on netbooks (though as someone who's been testing the RC for work, I do find that one a bit hard to believe -- it's still bloaty and takes more resources than the average netbook can provide). Yet MS is going to continue to push XP for the EEE? I'm confused... Is this their acknowledgement that win7 is not fit for netbooks? Then shouldn't they be patching the problems in XP, if they're going to keep pushing it?

    --
    Caveat Utilitor
    1. Re:XP? by lambent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SSL, not SSH. And the SSL vulnerability in XP in supposedly worked-around by running a firewall (for the purpose of this discussion, the POS that ships with XP is supposed to be a firewall).

    2. Re:XP? by vxvxvxvx · · Score: 1

      On the one hand they're claiming XP is obsolete. On the other, they're still pushing it even on yet unreleased devices. My only assumption can be that this Eee keyboard is obsolete and that I should hold out for a linux based one.

    3. Re:XP? by clang_jangle · · Score: 1, Informative

      SSL, not SSH.

      Thanks, yes I realized that right after I hit "submit". If I try to ssh into a paypal server I might end up with a whole other set of problems... :)

      the SSL vulnerability in XP in supposedly worked-around by running a firewall

      I didn't see that here, guess I'll go RTFA.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    4. Re:XP? by Eil · · Score: 1

      The Microsoft way: Damn if you do, damned if you don't.

      (It's why I use Linux. You aren't damned either way.)

    5. Re:XP? by cenc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you figure out how to do it, Please post. It would finally be a secure connection to pay pal I can trust. Now if I could just trust pay pal.

    6. Re:XP? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Pretty much my thought.

      Shiny new computer, latest hardware, almost decade old software (and by now two generations behind what MS has on offer).

      Sad, truly sad, from all sides. ASUS for not installing some up-to-date software on it, MS for not being able to write an operating system that runs on anything less than top-of-the-line state of the art hardware.

  11. ITS 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    WHY ARE WE STILL USING KEYBOARDS?!! die die die die die death to all keyboards!

    1. Re:ITS 2009 by wed128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sorry to feed the troll...but i'd like to hear an alternative?

    2. Re:ITS 2009 by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      I suck on the bare USB cable for text input.
      There is even a linux driver for me in recent kernels.

    3. Re:ITS 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:ITS 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Same here.
      I use a a keyboard because:
      (OK, hand writing recognition)
      A) I type faster than I write
      (speech-to-text)
      B) When I'm at the office I don't want people to be interrupted by my talking (we have someone who talks on the phone to her family for long periods of time, it is extremely annoying even though they stuck her back in her own room).
      C) We sometimes have people out front waiting to be helped and they might hear someone dictating to their computer. (Law office, I don't think some people would want that)
      (to the virtual keyboard)
      D) I don't look at my keyboard when I type. I don't need to look at the screen, I just type and will even hit backspace to correct things even though I haven't looked at the screen.

      Umm, can't think of any other main reasons at the moment.

    5. Re:ITS 2009 by Abreu · · Score: 1
      --
      No sig for the moment.
    6. Re:ITS 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB? What year is it, 2008? Get with the times man, and learn to talk bluetooth with your brain

  12. Yup by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    No one escapes the commodore amiga/64/128 form factor all in one.

    No one.

    --
    meh
  13. too many outputs by viridari · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The computer should just be a small non-descript box in the entertainment center rack. The keyboard/touchpad should operate without cables, on commodity AA rechargeable batteries. I know this thing has some wireless capabilities but the ports on there are pretty useless to me. Put the expensive stuff in the rack, and let me have a cheap disposable keyboard/pointer on the table where it's likely to have beer or coffee spilled on it from guests.

    1. Re:too many outputs by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I keep saying ... "All computers should be black and rack mount". Curvy cases that you can't stack are pretty on their own, but useless around other equipment. The same goes for routers (Linksys 160N, I'm looking at you). You'd think we'd be at the point where manufacturers would not be charging a premium for rackable equipment. It doesn't even need to be truly rack mount, just a similar form-factor, like audio/video equipment.

  14. Good choice going with SSD by BikeHelmet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about you, but my HTPC's wireless keyboard gets beat around and dropped quite a bit. I wouldn't want to subject an HDD to that.

    My personal feelings... I question the usefulness of this over a dedicated Ion box with a wireless keyboard.

    1. Re:Good choice going with SSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hey Mr Safetyhat RTFA! "either 16GB or 32GB of flash storage"

  15. I know it wouldn't quite contain the name, but... by cupantae · · Score: 1

    they should have called it the KeeeyPC

    --
    --
  16. WebTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this different from WebTV?

  17. it's got a fan! by Locutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    holy cow, they still need a fan on those things? Can't wait to hear these things rattling around after a couple of years when the bearings start going out. They should release an ARM version IMO.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    1. Re:it's got a fan! by Haxamanish · · Score: 1

      They should release an ARM version IMO.

      such as the Acorn A3000 series?

    2. Re:it's got a fan! by Locutus · · Score: 1

      convert that puppy to take a Gumstix Overo line of CPU/SoC boards and that's exactly what I'm talking about but with an updated CPU.

      Wouldn't it be nice to get a folding keyboard setup with an ARM CPU socket/slot baseboard for whatever this Eee Keyboard usage pattern really is?

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  18. 800 x 480? by sfled · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude, if this keeps up, screens will soon have the height and width ratios of freakin' banner ads.

    Just saying.

    --
    I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
    1. Re:800 x 480? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      From the pictures, it looks like 480 (width) by 800 (height). Though this is not exactly your typical computer screen, which of course must be wide to be optimal for watching movies, rather than something like reading and writing.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:800 x 480? by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      The aspect ratio of a 800 x 480 screen is about half-way between WUXGA (1920 x 1200) and full HD (1920 x 1080), which seems to be equally common on monitors these days. So 800 x 480 is hardly an unprecedented step.

  19. Where's my Delorian???? by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm back in the 80's!!!

    http://www.geekwithlaptop.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/radio-shack-trs-80-model-100-mobile-computer.jpg

    http://www.phys.uwosh.edu/mike/calcs/pc1.html

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7b/Sharp-PC1500-IMG_0306.JPG

    All they need with that thing is a thermal printer and someone with frizzy hair!

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:Where's my Delorian???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really really despise people who can't take 3 seconds to make a link.... grrrr

    2. Re:Where's my Delorian???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Where's my Delorian???? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      I really despise people who are too lazy to take 3 seconds to C&P a link... grrrr

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  20. Major obvious flaw by davevt5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is built for people who are right handed. That vast majority of people that matter to me are left-handed.

    Any chance there will be a version sold at the Leftorium?

    1. Re:Major obvious flaw by Abreu · · Score: 1
      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:Major obvious flaw by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Correction: this is built for people who use the touchpad with their right hand. (I am right handed, but I mouse on the left, so I can keep my right hand on the keyboard. Or penis, depending on the situation.)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Major obvious flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheese and rice, just turn the thing around, is that hard for you?! ;-)

    4. Re:Major obvious flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't what to know what situations cause you to put your penis on the keyboard.

    5. Re:Major obvious flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you hit multiple keys at once when you are using your penis on the keyboard?

    6. Re:Major obvious flaw by ibmjones · · Score: 1

      Where is the mod for TMI?

    7. Re:Major obvious flaw by heson · · Score: 1

      tricky emacs combos.

    8. Re:Major obvious flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am right handed, but I mouse on the left, so I can keep my right hand on the keyboard.

      Wow, I didn't know there was anyone else out there who did this. Why did you start, did you first compute on a lefty's machine like I did?

    9. Re:Major obvious flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you are honest.....now if I can only get the image out of my head.

    10. Re:Major obvious flaw by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I think it was a hint from a high school teacher, and I tried it out of curiosity. Later I found out pretty good evicende on why it works.

      For one thing, when you are right handed, your left hand is more spatially/visually oriented, because it is more strongly connected to the right hemisphere. Everyone who plays the guitar should know this -- they are using the 'wrong' hand on the neck.

      I also think about the general idea that you should be making the most of your body, like using both CPUs on a dual core machine if you happen to have one.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  21. But ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... does it run Linux?

    1. Re:But ... by MrMr · · Score: 1

      You mean does it run Windows 7?

    2. Re:But ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I mean: Does it HURD?

  22. OH FFS It's an Amiga! by tjstork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like the idea of the keyboard only form factor PC like 80's boxes wired to TVs, but do you think they could do the Amiga like thing and put in a 1GB kick butt graphics card into it... :-)

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:OH FFS It's an Amiga! by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      Why would you want a 1gig video card in what's essentially a monitor-less netbook? You certainly don't need it for the video storage, and it's not like this has enough horsepower to run an video intensive games. Seem like it would just drive the cost up needlessly.

    2. Re:OH FFS It's an Amiga! by tjstork · · Score: 1

      You certainly don't need it for the video storage, and it's not like this has enough horsepower to run an video intensive games. Seem like it would just drive the cost up needlessly.

      Yeah, you are right. We would should probably have a core i7 in there, and wire it up to the hdtv, and that would be an amiga like thing.

      --
      This is my sig.
  23. Just what I want by Posting=!Working · · Score: 1

    I always wanted an IBM PCjr. keyboard with a touchscreen and a way to hook it up to your TV.

    I mean, I know the 80's retro look is in, but do they have to bring back all the crappy stuff from the 80's too?

    --
    This sentence no verb.
  24. Why not Linux? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was excited until I read Windows XP Home.

    Look, I know a bunch of people run Windows. But on an Atom CPU, 1GB memory, 16GB (smallest) flash drive, I just don't see Windows being that great. I'm sure Windows will run, but how well?

    Ah well, I suppose I can easily wipe this and put Fedora on it ... I just wish Eee put a Linux option on more of their gear, installed out-of-the-box. Even if I wipe whatever Linux they give me and put another distro on it, I'd love to send a message by buying the Linux option.

    To compare, I'm running an older Dell subnotebook with 1GB memory, booting Fedora 11 from an 8GB consumer flash drive. Works great, very fast!

    1. Re:Why not Linux? by dbet · · Score: 1

      That's my question. The entire netbook industry, for example, went from its Linux origins to >90% shipping with XP now. What's the incentive? Unless they think they can sell more with Windows since its a familiar name and Linux sounds too technical.

    2. Re:Why not Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they feel that they need to cater to the lowest common denominator, and that is the Windows demographic.

      These people want to use anything that moves to replace the virus-infested hellbox hiding in every room in their house, just so they can do it all again.

      People complain if they can't install their PopCap games.
      People complain if they can't turn it on and see their 'meadow'.
      People complain if they can't find their 'Start' button.

      Sad thing is, I'm actually not making those types of complaints up. I've heard them all, at least 5 times each.

    3. Re:Why not Linux? by erogenizer · · Score: 0

      So write the code yourself OSS boy. Mr. XP

    4. Re:Why not Linux? by dbIII · · Score: 3, Informative

      I just wish Eee put a Linux option on more of their gear

      Well, there was that trade show where the CEO was singing the praises of the eeepc with linux in the morning, had lunch with some MS people, and then apologisedto the audience and press for selling pre-installed linux machines instead of XP. Whatever happened in that meeting was enough for a CEO to publicly embarrass himself so you can bet that it's a policy handed directly from the top to not have linux on these things for as long as whatever promises, threats or inducements hold.
      It's a pity because while people complain about the distro (xandros) it was actually set up with a very good interface for people that are not very familiar with computers.

    5. Re:Why not Linux? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      You are talking about a system of about 10 years ago on hardware of about 2-3 years ago. It should run, and it should run pretty well and at least be fast. I'd not be too worried about that: this netbook is still way more powerful that even top-line PC's from when Win XP was released.

    6. Re:Why not Linux? by Arker · · Score: 1

      I agree, putting windows on this thing makes it utterly pointless. The Xandros version that my EeePC came with was rough and needed work. Not a *lot* of work, mostly stuff I could do myself given perhaps a week or two to focus on it, but obviously that isnt really close enough. Windows isnt much better in that respect, and totally unsuited otherwise. I dont discount the allegations some sort of dirty trick or payoff was involved - with MS that is always a safe bet.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    7. Re:Why not Linux? by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      The reason most of the netbook companies have cut back on Linux models is simple:

      People weren't buying them.

      At the local Best Buy, when they still carried Linux models the Windows versions were almost always sold out and there were always a few Linux models on the shelf.

      And now they don't stock any Linux models at all.

      From a retailer or manufacturer's point of view it doesn't really matter how good something is if no one's buying it.

    8. Re:Why not Linux? by Jim+Hall · · Score: 3, Funny

      So write the code yourself OSS boy. Mr. XP

      Hi, Mr Troll.

      Thanks, but I already have. Need anything else?

    9. Re:Why not Linux? by ledow · · Score: 1

      Oh, I just PMSL. I even read Mr Hall's original comment the first time round and didn't notice the name and I just spotted this comment. How wonderful.

  25. Doe it have enough power to be useful? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    It's a netbook that has to be plugged in. Atom NT270 + Intel 945G Maybe the broadcom chip helps things along, but the specs seem a bit underwhelming. Does it struggle to maintain framerate at 720p?

  26. Really big PDA! by bruciferofbrm · · Score: 1

    Compared to some of the PDAs I have owned over the years, this is pretty darn competitive.

    My Zaurus (5500) runs linux, and has a tiny but workable keyboard, but battery life sucks at just over an hour.

    My Sony Clie had better battery life, and a funky keyboard, but was PALM OS, and had SONY own design for connectors.

    My Windows CE PDA taught me that 'just cause it uses the word "Windows" does not mean it works that same or runs anything you have'.

    So this has a good keyboard (not just for thumbs!), runs a real version of Windows. Has a touch screen. Even has connectors you can plug things into you might actually want to anyway. Has 4 hours battery life (umm.. maybe), and can work with your TV.

    This is like the PDA dream come true.

    Heck, they haven't been 'pocket sized' for quite some time. So this ones a little bigger. So?

    Hmmm.. If you can convince your library to setup some wireless HDMI TVs, then all they need is the WIFI network (they probably already setup) and you can bring your own computer!

    Who needs laptops now? :-)

    Also Hmmm... Who will write the first USB slave app that turns this into a real keyboard (HID device) for another computer and lets you do two things at once like a KVM does?

    1. Re:Really big PDA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who will write the first USB slave app that turns this into a real keyboard (HID device) for another computer and lets you do two things at once like a KVM does?

      The problem is not a software one, it's a hardware one. This thing does not have a male USB cord that hooks into the keyboard, it only has female USB ports that connect to the motherboard. Granted, you could get a USB MM cable/genderchanger/whatever, but that would not be original to this device - I'm sure plenty of people have written programs that have a USB port emulate a keyboard controller (can't be bothered checking). However, that's still not a very good solution because it requires extra hardware. What you COULD do is install everyone's favourite multi-platform FOSS KVM-over-LAN program, . It's trivial to set-up, and can be made to accept keystrokes as the KVM trigger (though I've only ever used the cursor-to-edge trigger, so I'm not sure how well that works). Not only that, but since it's network, it can be run over wireless - so you don't even need to carry a cord around to use this thing!

  27. 1982 called - by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

    They want their PC back. If only it would play Summer Games.

  28. in combination with a wearable display by kievit · · Score: 1

    When you have toy like this or somesuch, then you do not need a regular screen. A screenless laptop plus wearable display seems to me a nice solution for mobile computing. Of course the laptop should have a battery life of 8h then. Which should actually be easy, because I would expect those display goggles to use less power than a regular screen.

    As a side note: for tall people like me this would be kind of ideal for computing in an airplane. Unless I'm in an exit row or bulk head seat there is no way I can see my regular laptop screen. With display goggles that problem is completely solved.

  29. Moblin by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Windows is the easy option BUT MS puts all sorts of restrictions on it, it is the reason Intel is pushing Moblin, so that powerfull netbooks can be made without the cost of Vista/7

    The incentive is that 90% (statistic pulled out of my ass) of the customers just want something they are familiar with.

    A shop isn't going to stock 1 linux netbook for 9 windows netbooks, unsure of wether it will ever sell it. It is just simpler to ship 100% windows boxes knowing that large group of Linux fans will simply wipe windows because they are used to it.

    We can only hope that MS shoots itself in the foot with its insane restrictions on netbooks forcing manufacturers that want to push the envolope to either pay the premium for Vista/7 or be out performed by companies that do dare to go linux.

    Google linux netbooks, those companies are out there. The few and the brave. Buy from them, it is a called voting with your dollars.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Moblin by kost · · Score: 1

      Google linux netbooks, those companies are out there. The few and the brave. Buy from them, it is a called voting with your dollars.

      There is only one problem. In our country, for example, you cannot find Linux powered netbooks easily any more. Only Windows.Hard to vote with our dollars :(

      --
      Vlatko Kosturjak - Kost
  30. Been there, done that by awtbfb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mac mini, bluetooth keyboard and mouse. It is small, doesn't look ugly under your TV, has a super quiet fan, and you can get plenty of video adapters for whatever TV you have. It also has a DVD drive, so you can toss your DVD player. You can even get an EyeTV USB-stick add-on for DVR capability and export capability to your iPod/PMP. If you really want, you can even run a long USB extension cable to your couch so you can plug in a joystick and play video games. Likewise, you can also set it up as a home media server and/or remote access gateway when you're out and about.

    Basically, you can do just about anything with one box.

    1. Re:Been there, done that by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only problem with the Mac Mini is that it's pricey. You can get a similarly-small ION-based dual-Atom box for $330 (including 2GB of memory, disk, and DVD drive), just over half the price of the Mac Mini.

      Or, if you're even cheaper, you can build a full-size Pentium Dual-Core box for around $250, which has the added advantage of multiple SATA ports and plenty of room for extra disks (presumably you want your media box to be able to store media). Of course, it won't fit nicely under your TV.

    2. Re:Been there, done that by cpotoso · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're basically describing my setup! Apple mac mini bought of craigslist for $200 (core 2 duo 1.83 GHz, 2 GB Ram, 80 GB HD---soon to be upgraded to 1TB when I have time), plus bluetooth kbd and mouse (both use standard AA batteries), and elgato eyetv hybrid ATSC tuner. Nice setup!!!

    3. Re:Been there, done that by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      The fan maybe quiet, but it's very ineffective. I loaded coretemp and was truly scared of what i saw. 60 C+ temperatures for both cores when idle. My Q9550 overclocked to 3.4 ghz with good cooling idles at 41 C. Most overlockers don't recommend getting your cores over 70 C, so if mac mini idles at 60 it will probably easily hit 80 C under load.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  31. I'm waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... for the follow-on version with improved artificial intelligence; the AIeee!

  32. $10 cable by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16882339047

    And it's only that high because I'm too lazy to look at other sources.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  33. Hey! by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

    I AM a naturally-bred man-bear-pig, you insensitive clod! Reset your scale to a measurement more appropriate!

    Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go feed my mother..

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
  34. ...might not work with the Eee by tepples · · Score: 1

    The AUD-2350 cable is called a "dumb cable". It does no scan conversion; instead, it's for those few video chipsets that can already output composite or S-Video over the VGA connector. (The reviews at the right side of the page on NewEgg show that not all video chipsets can do this.) Until people actually buy this Eee Keyboard and see whether its video chipset supports the cable, I'd recommend the Sewell scan converter for someone who wants a cable that Just Works.

  35. Is easy. by Tei · · Score: 1

    Well.. is obvious that will continue pushing XP, since you can't fit Windows 7 in a netbook with 2GB of RAM. Once netbooks get powerfull and cheap enough to have 4GB and a +2GHz CPU, then will stop pushing XP, let it die, and push very hard Windows 7.

    I have a eepc 701, and I am very happy with my eebuntu. I have tried Windows 7 in my desktop computer trough vmware, and W7 is garbage. Also, my eepc has 4 GB of disk. I don't see how Windows 7 would install on my netbook at all, since seems Windows 7 OS takes 10GB of the hard disk.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

    1. Re:Is easy. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I'm running 7 on an Eee 1000HA with 2 GB RAM. It runs just as well as XP did - maybe better. Of course, I don't have an SSD, so space is not a concern.

  36. uh, why? by Tom · · Score: 1

    And I want a 20 pounds keyboard running an 8 year old windos version for what, exactly? So I can watch YouTube on a tiny, cheap screen instead of a good display?

    I dig an OLED keyboard with software-reprogrammable keys. Cool thing - switching to a foreign language or Dvorak in software.

    But a screen in the keyboard just eludes me. Why would I want to look at the keyboard - again, after spending a few years learning to touch-type?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:uh, why? by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      This might, possibly, make a decent Home Theater PC/media center type thing. It's got a relatively small form factor (although, of course, there *are* smaller PCs). It's got HDMI out (I didn't really check what kind of video chip this has installed, but if it's got HDMI out, one would hope that it has a video chip that can handle decoding 1080p video). The little screen means, that, potentially, a media center software vendor can have a User Interface which runs on the small screen, so that your TV just continues to show full-screen video while you do things like checking a program guide, or otherwise are doing 'control' tasks.

      Still, I think you'd be better off with a very small HTPC with no built-in keyboard, and use a wireless (IR or BlueTooth, perhaps) keyboard externally. Just keep the wireless keyboard in a box or bin beside, behind, or underneath the couch/chair - grab it out to interact, and while your watching a movie or show, stow the keyboard back in the bin/box.

  37. Oh, we are back to ZX spectrum by dindi · · Score: 1

    So we are back in those times where the computer was the keyboard, or the keyboard was the computer? And we can look at it on the TV. I miss my 12'' Junosty brand russian B&W set I used with my ZX Spectrum and Commodore later on.

    There was a break-in a few years ago in a Hungarian computer lab, and the geniuses thought they were in that era by the way. So they stole all the computers ... well, that is what they thought while taking all the keyboards instead..

  38. Type A or B ? by arielCo · · Score: 1

    I may just have found you a buddy

    --
    This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
  39. Yesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, with all that space in the keyboard, do they need a huge wireless antennae adapter to hang out and get broken...

  40. My big question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I use this as a keyboard?

    It would be an awesome input device, I could use the little screen as a tray or notifier or task switcher or extended clipboard or whatever, for the purpose of controlling a *real* computer.

    Somehow I suspect I'd have to hack some kind of VNC or whatever in there instead of the simple expedient of plugging it into a USB port to get the actual keyboard part.

  41. sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think my blind geek friend would dig this. I've seen him several times on his laptop, with his screen completely blank, except for backlight, and I'm thinking, if they only made laptops without screens, you could totally save on weight and power. But, I thought, there's no market for blind people, so nobody's going to make a laptop without a screen. Well, this has a small screen, but it still has me excited. Too bad it uses Windows, but he can always install gentoo.

  42. This reminds me of.... by ogdenk · · Score: 1

    The Atari 800XL/130XE
    The Atari ST
    The Amiga 500
    The Commodore 64/128
    The Spectrum
    etc....etc....

    I actually kinda miss that sort of compact form factor for computers with everything integrated under the keyboard. It really does make good sense for a machine designed to be unexpandable. If this takes off I'm going to kick myself for not trying to market my similar hack with a mini-ITX board (no LCD however).

    If it's cheap enough, I'd buy one. My kids would love it.

  43. Commodore 64 by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    "I'm baaaaack!!"

  44. Re:Commodore 64 by Murpster · · Score: 1

    The old computer-in-keyboard idea that Commodore, Atari, Tandy etc had was a pretty good one. Glad to see a return.

  45. Like DRM for your keyboard... by marciot · · Score: 1

    This is just an evil ploy to sell you a keyboard which doesn't work with the computer *you* want to be able to plug it into.

  46. As long as it isn't a Logitech keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0