Slashdot Mirror


New Superconductor World Record Surpasses 250K

myrrdyn writes to tell us that a new superconductivity record high of 254 Kelvin (-19C, -2F) has been recorded. According to the article this is the first time a superconductive state has been observed at a temperature comparable to a household freezer. "This achievement was accomplished by combining two previously successful structure types: the upper part of a 9212/2212C and the lower part of a 1223. The chemical elements remain the same as those used in the 242K material announced in May 2009. The host compound has the formula (Tl4Ba)Ba2Ca2Cu7Oy and is believed to attain 254K superconductivity when a 9223 structure forms"

12 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. A couple visions for the future by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you have some time to read, I'll explain my vision for the future: If we put solar panels across the desert, we'll need to have a transmission line to get it to places where people live. I reason that a super conductive line would do the trick. It is costly in terms of energy to cool the lines, but if you have an excess of energy to begin with, it could actually cost less than the loss of power you get in copper lines. Basically you just leech off the super conductive line for cooling.

    The demand for energy will only increase with time regardless of conservation efforts, and this isn't a bad thing. The more energy we have, the cheaper transportation and food is which in turn lets people have more money for charity to help people who need food. So creating a surplus of energy soon could have worldwide benefits instead of just keeping up with demand.

    I have a second vision that goes along with solar in the desert and superconductivity lines. It is tidal/solar near the coast, to fuel up hydrogen tanker trucks. These hydrogen tanker trucks could run on hydrogen themselves and take the energy inland. In the same processing plant that creates the hydrogen from electricity, they could also produce clean water for countries that need that as a critical resource.

    Both of these visions takes a little bit of technological advancement, but not too much from what we have. My key question would be: Would this new superconductor be possible to mass produce, and could it be used as a new transmission line?

    1. Re:A couple visions for the future by NoYob · · Score: 5, Funny
      Which leads to my vision of the future.

      After the proletarian revolt, all the women kill most of the men in their sleep. They go off and create the solar/hydrogen economy that the grandparent mentioned, creating a solar Amazonian paradise. Where are the men that are left? Well, they keep small villages of them where the men sit around and drink beer and watch Spike TV all day. Then when the women are ready to mate, they have a champion from each village fight one another to the death. Then said champion mates with all the Amazons that want to have a child. After which, he is torn from limb from limb in a Baccean orgy - still alive and conscious.

      For pleasure of course, the women are really lesbians and the men aren't allowed to watch.

      See what your proletarian revolt leads to! Female happiness!

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
  2. NO PATENT PROTECTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From TFA:
    This discovery is being released into the public domain without patent protection in order to encourage additional research.

    Amazingly cool. (No pun intended.)

  3. Ceramic cables by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...it is a ceramic, which can hardly be used as a cable conductor.

    You mean except for the ceramic cables that are already in use? I think your "information" may be a wee bit out of date.

  4. Re:Not likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My favorite quote from TFA is, "This discovery is being released into the public domain without patent protection in order to encourage additional research."

  5. Re:Bad summary by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 5, Informative

    What is "the upper part of a 9212/2212C and the lower part of a 1223?"

    9212/2212C and 1223 are structure names. Would you like an introductory crystallography text with your summary next time? It would, after all, save you the onerous effort of following the article link.

    And I don't believe there's an element known as Oy.

    O-sub-y, indicating an indefinite ratio of oxygen.

  6. Bullshit by deglr6328 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You want me to believe a wildly high superconductor Tc claim using a link to a shady website that looks like it was designed in 1996, without any link to a paper or an author, without any reference to where the discovery was made, without any notes about secondary confirmation, without any other reference in the media except one lamo blog and without any real formal publication at all? Here's what every physicist reading this article right now is thinking: STFU. If you get a near room temp Tc superconductor working, you better be on the front page of a rushed to print edition of Nature that someone just ran down the hall to shove in my hand, or I'm not even going to give you the time of day.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    1. Re:Bullshit by Timmmm · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree. No mention of a paper, or any corroboration. Is this guy ( http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/view_profile.php?userid=4422 ) claiming that he's discovered it? By the way, comedy quote from that page:

      "I think there is a strong possibility of extraterrestrial life based on a passage in the Bible. The Lord talks about gathering His creation from the ends of the Universe."

  7. Re:Bad summary by Snarfangel · · Score: 5, Funny

    What is "the upper part of a 9212/2212C and the lower part of a 1223?" And I don't believe there's an element known as Oy.

    When combined with the element Vey, it forms Exasperatium.

    --
    This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
  8. Re:famous last words? by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 5, Funny

    "254K should be warm enough for anyone"

    I want one that works at 640 K, so I can use it to replace the heating element in my oven. Because superconductors make everything more efficient.

  9. Re:We're getting closer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sigh... I know this is Slashdot, but how about reaching as far as your keyboard and throwing a few obvious keywords at Google?
    From en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission:
    "Transmission and distribution losses in the USA were estimated at 7.2% in 1995"
    Re-sigh.

  10. Re:Bad summary by Compuser · · Score: 5, Informative

    My PhD thesis was on studies of these materials. Some things the guy says make it sound like he has some bit of a clue (like the fact that such materials are indeed very sensitive to water). other things he says make him a crackpot (his webpage for instance says: "Since outer space is full of superconducting elements and compounds, I think they could help explain the increasing expansion rate of the universe (through strong diamagnetism).").
    Making high purity materials like these takes big expensive furnaces and people who know how to use them (very few in the entire world). The method he describes is unsuitable for making decent single crystals and so his samples will not yield much meaningful bulk information. Working with stuff like Tl is tough because it is so toxic and so making these crystals is doubly difficult, especially in the US with so many safety regulations. Just on that basis alone, it is hard to believe he has the material he says he does. When he says "The volume fraction of this material is very low." it is a huge red flag that he knows not what his sample is. The research community has been all about getting purity up over the last couple of decades and many results with less pure samples did not hold up to these refinements.
    As far as physics goes, there is much research out there suggesting that some superconductivity survives in established cuprates above bulk T_c. Even besides that, the electronic states in these materials above T_c are screwed up. My research showed some very interesting electronic phases directly. Thus, a small jump in a poorly evaluated variable may be there but cannot necessarily be taken seriously as an indication of bulk superconducting order even if it is measured carefully.
    On top of which, his graphs are your typical crank type graphs. What am I supposed to conclude from voltage vs. temperature? How is that related to resistivity? What are the units? If the material is just synthesized, then how is crystal structure already known? Which beamline was used?
    In short, wake me up when one of three or four reputable sample growers (BSCCO crystals are mostly grown in Japan btw, and Tl stuff used to be grown in Russia a lot, from what I heard because of lack of safety oversight there) makes a good crystal and shows something interesting going on.