Visualizing RFID
jamie found a video on Warren Ellis's blog introducing a new way to visualize RFID fields. The film is by Timo Arnall and Jack Schulze. The subject is introduced in words on the BERG site (a design consultancy); the tech behind it is explored at Touch, a project that experiments with near-field communications. "This image is a photographic mapping of the readable volume of a radio field from an RFID reader. The black component in the image is an RFID reader... The camera has been fixed in its position and the reader photographed. Using a tag connected to an LED we paint in the edges of the readable volume with a long exposure and animate them to show the form."
Using their technique, we can now profile our cards to provide maximum protection with minimum tinfoil!
1. Pick up RFID chip
2. Look at it. It's an RFID chip! You have just visualized it.
3. ???
4. Profit
These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
The main reason they did this is to map out the field *interaction* between the RFID tag and the reader, which is not a trivial thing to visualize based on the two data sheets.
The determined Real Programmer can write Fortran programs in any language.
Electromagnetism is not new, no. Your link shows a field produced by a antenna, which is only a theoretical concept (abstracting away the measuring sensor).
What the pictures in TFA show is the dependency of the field vs. the direction of the measuring device, i.e. a slice of a vector field B(x).
But I do believe that the makers were not interested in the technical aspect, but a design/architectural/artistic aspect.
NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
Yes, but e.g. ISO 14443 RFID passive responses (e.g. the ones used in ICAO-specified RFID passports and paypass cards) very quickly go below ambient background noise, in effect limiting even the theoretical range to 1-2 m for all but most exotic radio-noise free environments.
Passive RFID is only half-radio, really. ;-)
The subtlety seems to be that they're not plotting an RF field, they're plotting the volume in which the passive tag will respond to an RF field (of a given strength). It's another level of abstraction. Yes, once somebody has come up with the idea then the implementation looks simple enough, but the idea is quite remarkable.
Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?