Element 114 Verified

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Posted by kdawson on Tuesday October 20, 2009 @02:00PM from the cento-do-deco-quaternium dept.

ExRex writes "A team at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has observed the production of superheavy element 114, confirming the results of researchers at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia. Those researchers first reported producing element 114 in 1999. Such independent verification is important, particularly given the evidence of fabricated results for other superheavy elements. If you're a subscriber to Physical Review Letters, you can download the full article."

13 of 142 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

The Russians found it? by cryfreedomlove · 2009-10-20 14:03 · Score: 4, Funny

Mr. President, we cannot allow an Element 114 gap!
just great. by stupidsocialscientis · 2009-10-20 14:07 · Score: 5, Funny

now i need a new periodic table

--
Well, as far as Sig's go, Freud was a doozy.
1. Re:just great. by Robin47 · 2009-10-20 14:08 · Score: 3, Funny
  
  Use a sharpie.
2. Re:just great. by Anonymous Coward · 2009-10-20 14:10 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  ...yes, that's why it's called a periodic table: every now and then you need to replace it. Otherwise it would have been called a permanent table. :)
3. Re:just great. by Anonymous Coward · 2009-10-20 14:32 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  ...yes, that's why it's called a periodic table: every now and then you need to replace it. Otherwise it would have been called a permanent table. :)
  No, it's because some people get all PMSey when you change one little thing.
4. Re:just great. by schon · 2009-10-20 14:43 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  Here ya go. This one's guaranteed to never need updating. :)
But what about Element 115? by __aagctu1952 · 2009-10-20 14:07 · Score: 4, Funny

Fine, fine, element 114 has been verified. Now, if they could just get a move on with element 115, we could make our UFO Power Sources work and finally get those Firestorms into the air. We're practically defenseless against the sectoids!
Re:And why is this important? by sleeponthemic · 2009-10-20 14:30 · Score: 4, Funny

Why do you think people are searching for very large prime numbers?
The nookie.. obviously.

--
I record my sleeptalking
Re:Pics or it didn't happen. by bertoelcon · 2009-10-20 14:49 · Score: 3, Funny

And if ya' got some time, how about some unobtainium?
You can get pics of hot girls through an easy google image search.

--
Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
Re:Why the need to 'discover' the elements? by FatdogHaiku · 2009-10-20 15:53 · Score: 4, Funny

You know! The FORMULA:

You put some protons in,
and pull some neutrons out,
then you toss in some electrons,
and you shake it all about.
You publish real quick just in case your funding is in doubt.
And that's what it's all about!

Tip your waitpeople, I'll be here all week!

--
You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
Hey let's put it in the LHC by istartedi · 2009-10-20 16:03 · Score: 4, Funny

Hey let's put it in the LHC and see what hap(&(*%&* NO CARRIER.

--
For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
Re:114? Wow man... by k3vlar · 2009-10-20 20:36 · Score: 5, Funny

That's HEAVY.
There's that word again; "heavy". Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the earth's gravitational pull?

--
Unlike porn, which yada yada rimshot hey-ooh!
Re:Why the need to 'discover' the elements? by growse · 2009-10-20 20:56 · Score: 3, Funny

You failed chemistry, didn't you?

--
There is nothing interesting going on at my blog