Slashdot Mirror


Ryan Gordon Wants To Bring Universal Binaries To Linux

wisesifu writes "One of the interesting features of Mac OS X is its 'universal binaries' feature that allows a single binary file to run natively on both PowerPC and Intel x86 platforms. While this comes at a cost of a larger binary file, it's convenient on the end-user and on software vendors for distributing their applications. While Linux has lacked such support for fat binaries, Ryan Gordon has decided this should be changed."

5 of 487 comments (clear)

  1. Gee, just 14 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    after the diminse of NeXTStep!

    (c)Innovation!!(tm)(R)

  2. Re:Linking problems by martin-boundary · · Score: 3, Funny

    Could this technology also help binaries to link against multiple versions of standard libraries (glibc, libstdc++)?

    I think FatELF is too skinny for that. You want SantaELF, which links all those libraries statically in each binary...

  3. Re:Only useful for non-free applications by selven · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thank god English is free of that stupid distinction.

  4. Re:Only useful for non-free applications by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
    Free has meant 'no charge' for a lot longer than it has meant 'free (as in liberated) software'.

    Yes, that's right. That's why a 'freeman' was someone you didn't have to pay for his work, whereas a 'slave' was, er...

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  5. Re:Use the source, Luke! by Thuktun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now why would I want to do anything that fucktarded, when I can just use the source? And if I needed cross-platform that badly, I can always ship ONE java app with ONE instance of data. The '90s called, they want their obsolete fat and universal binaries back.

    The elusive (+1 Insightful, -1 Flamebait) post makes a brief appearance, flashing its brightly-colored plumage, before disappearing back into the brush.