Slashdot Mirror


No Hand-Held Devices In Ontario Cars

NIK282000 writes "To cut down on accidents caused by drivers who aren't paying attention, in Ontario it is now a ticketable offense to text, email, or navigate with your GPS while driving. But it seems to me that they have thrown the baby out with the bathwater, because it is now also a $500 fine to change your radio station, change songs on your MP3 player, or even drink your morning coffee. It can also be enforced to the point where changing the climate controls on your dash can get you fined because it requires you to take your hands off the wheel. Though this was a good idea, it seems to have been taken a little too far."

24 of 584 comments (clear)

  1. They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    People here have been ticketed for eating apples or sipping water, while stopped at traffic lights.

    Eventually, somebody will realise that people with the first frigging clue about driving (and a self-preservation instinct) do these things WHEN IT IS SAFE TO DO SO. It's the people without the first clue of driving who need the attention of the authorities, and these people are ingineous at finding ways of being dangerous while driving exactly 'by the book'. Cops should pull people who are obviously being a danger (all over the road, near misses etc etc), rather than based on a tickbox system (is speed >X? Is driver doing activity Y?) as seems to be increasingly the case in many areas.

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    1. Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's easier and more profitable to ticket almost law abiding citizens than hard core criminals.

    2. Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book by fredjh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Politicians create additional laws so they can take credit for them. Yes, most places already have these laws, but it's better for the politicians to create new ones instead of reminding people about the existing ones or encouraging better enforcement, which wouldn't get them much publicity.

      --
      Stupid, sexy Flanders.
    3. Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book by AndGodSed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because "Driving without care or attention" has two possible problems.

      1 - It is easier for a cop to say "I am fining you because you are talking on your cell while driving" as opposed to "I am fining you for driving without care or attention because you are talking on your cellphone while driving" and to make the point without wasting both parties time.

      2 - "Driving without care or attention" leaves too much room for subjective argumentation - "But I can drive just as well while on the cell as when I am not!" and in (1) above it can become really problematic.

    4. Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book by itsdapead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do none of these places have an offense of "driving without due care or attention" which would suffice,

      Yeah, but that involves the police gathering evidence and making a case that a driver was not in control of their vehicle. These new offences are mainly "fixed penalty" jobs that bypass all that tedious stuff about "due process" and "a fair hearing", and are absolutely brilliant for soft-targetting people sitting in traffic jams (much easier than catching that idiot in a BMW as he zooms past).

      On the bright side, maybe eventually the police will be given powers to simply arrest anybody driving a white van or a large German car.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    5. Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except for the fact that accidents per mile driven have been decreasing and are at an all time low in the USA...

      But you keep calling other people idiots.

    6. Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Less accidents, despite the increase in electronic devices...

      And this has nothing to do with the fact that cars these days have better safety features?

      Also a device like a GPS may actually decrease accidents, because it reduces stress... You no longer have to worry about getting lost, and try to read a map as you drive (you used to see this a lot - people with maps open on their steering wheel as they drove), you just relax and let the GPS guide you, no stress.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Informative

      I call bullshit on this article summary. The legislation specifically targets hand held electronic devices, and specifically excludes devices that are built directly into the vehicle. You are explicitly allowed take your hands off the wheel to adjust your radio, your climate control, your CB radio, etc. You are explicitly allowed to use your GPS if it is attached to your dash. You are allowed to drink a coffee, you are allowed to eat a chocolate bar, you are allowed to smoke a cigarette. Just don't smoke a cigarette with one hand and drink a coffee with the other while driving with your knee.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    8. Re:They've taken a leaf out of the UK's book by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Um, no. You rear ended a truck because you gunned your gas without paying attention to what was in front of you. Pulling out the fritter at the red light wasn't the issue - not returning your attention to the road when the time came was.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  2. RTFS by Hammer · · Score: 5, Informative

    The law applies to handheld electronic devices. So unless your coffee mug is electronic or your climate control is handheld you are probably fine with coffee and a nice temp in your car

    1. Re:RTFS by mcdonald.or · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed it does. If the GPS is attached to the window, or dash mounted it can be used. If however you cause an accident by setting the address as you drive, you get the $1000 fine and points on your license.

      However, the biggest problem I have with this new law, is not that it exists, I live in Ontario and cheer that it is in place, is that it does not apply to police officers. They are allowed to use hand held devices (such as cell phones) while they are driving. What is it that makes a copper less likely to be distracted by a hand held device than you or me?

    2. Re:RTFS by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Informative

      However, the biggest problem I have with this new law, is not that it exists, I live in Ontario and cheer that it is in place, is that it does not apply to police officers. They are allowed to use hand held devices (such as cell phones) while they are driving. What is it that makes a copper less likely to be distracted by a hand held device than you or me?

      The law contains exceptions for EVERYONE to use a cell phone to call 911. So whether it's you calling the police, or the police calling the police, it's the same rules.

      FTFA:

      Hands-free Bluetooth devices are O.K., and you'll be allowed to use any phone in the event of an emergency to call 911

      I don't see any real problem here ... the REAL problem I see is that you get bus drivers, etc., still yacking on their cell phones despite the laws in place.

  3. And In Related News: by AtomicSnarl · · Score: 4, Funny

    A Canadian truck driver has been fined for smoking in his own truck. His truck is a "workplace" you see, and you're not allowed to smoke at work.

    Beware! Definitions have consequences!

    --
    Pacifist paratroopers yell, "Ghandi!" when they jump.
  4. Really? by noundi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Though this was a good idea, it seems to have been taken a little too far.

    Here's how I reason. Regardless if I can or cannot drive perfectly well while drinking coffee with one hand, for all I know this could be completely fatal in your case. And if keeping the right to drink my morning coffee while driving potentially means losing my legs or even my life simply because you also had those rights, then it's a very, very, very small price to pay.

    --
    I am the lawn!
    1. Re:Really? by noundi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I too would much prefer a more broad rule.

      I find people talking on cellphones tend to be looking roughly straight ahead. Attention is diverted, but it's not as bad as a lot of other situations.

      All my close calls involved other devices. One woman was putting on lipstick. Another guy was changing a CD. Another pulled into a 3-way intersection while looking for sunglasses.

      I was able to swerve (slightly) into the wrong lane to avoid all three, but in busier locations that'd make the situation far worse. I happen to live in a small city in BC(<100k people), but in a large city of millions, with dozens of lanes of traffic, you just can't pull off the moves I did. It'd mean bad accidents, so I fully understand the desire to prevent it.

      Regarding cellphones... many young people can operate them without looking at the screen or phone, and can drop them in an instant if necessary to grab the wheel. I'm really worried about other stuff more. Anything that takes your eyes off the road...

      (Oh, and FYI - I'm responsible and pull over when making calls. You like to drink morning coffee huh, on the way to work? Well screw you!)

      You're right. But really we're repeating what has been stated as plain fucking truth long ago: people think they are much better drivers than they actually are. So this means one thing, the responsibility (even though possible in the case of a few more intelligent people) cannot be put on the driver. The driver shouldn't be allowed to evaluate if "this is a good time to speak in the phone" or "this is a good time to drink my coffee" or "this is a good time to change the CD". It should simply be forbidden because the driver makes the common mistake of thinking he's safe because of his alleged awesome driving skills. Leaving the rest of us at danger, not only drivers but also pedestrians/cyclists and even property.

      --
      I am the lawn!
  5. Correct. The summary should be tagged "troll" by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The summary is totally misleading. I have yet to see a car with handheld climate control, and any decent modern car has built in radio and media player. Ontario has not banned built-in or dashboard-attached GPS.

    On the other hand there is a lot of evidence that using handheld devices while driving is dangerous, and in our rather busier UK traffic anybody drinking coffee while driving is a risk to everybody else.

    However the summary and some of the responses show part of a trend. "Libertarianism" translating as "I should be allowed to do whatever I want, but stop those other idiots". Once you reach the age of 40 it becomes apparent that young drivers are crap and greatly overestimate their skills and their road attentiveness. As a colleague of mind once remarked "when I think how I used to drive when i was younger and put my family at risk, my blood runs cold". I expect lots of posts here slagging off Ontario, but they are right - and remember kids, you can't post a retraction to Slashdot from the cemetary.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  6. Re:It does not go too far by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, lets ban everything that could ever create a risk in any situation. Theoretically, I could be distracted by reading your post on /. and not see an anyry badger lunging at me from next to my desk. Therefore, your posting on /. needs to be banned.

    In fact, lets also ban the posession of slippery substances (if dropped on the floor they could cause somebody to slip and crack their skull open) etc etc etc

    'Safe driving' is about awareness, being aware of the traffic around you and the road conditions, etc. It is NOT about a 'list of things you should never do, because in some situations they might be dangerous'.

    I myself have nearly been hit by people distracted by road signs, FFS. By your logic road signs should be banned.

    As for

    Any driver involved in an accident while their car was moving should immediately have their license suspended and car impounded until cause can be determined. If they are at fault charged and if convicted of a simple infraction their license revoked. If injury or worse is caused they should be jailed. They are a danger to others.

    , yeah, nice way to never ever find out the true cause of any accident because everyone involved is desperately trying to cover their asses against people like you. Go and read 'Road Accidents - Prevent or Punish' by J J Leeming, and then read it again.

    --
    This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
  7. Terrible Summary by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good gawd, that summary is terrible. To say it's not even vaguely accurate is an understatement. The list of what is and what is not allowed is available here.

    Copy/pasting for those not interested in downloading the pdf:

    What would not be allowed while driving, unless the vehicle is pulled off the roadway or lawfully parked
    * Hand-held wireless communications devices such as cell phones, smartphones
    * Hand-held electronic entertainment devices such as iPods, or other portable MP3 players, or portable games
    * Texting and emailing
    * Viewing display screens on devices not required for driving such as a laptop or DVD player

    What would be allowed while driving
    * Hands-free wireless communications devices with an earpiece or Bluetooth device
    * 911 calls
    * Pressing the button of a hand-held device to activate hands-free mode for incoming or outbound calls
    * GPS units mounted on dashboards
    * Collision avoidance systems
    * Use by emergency services personnel such as police, fire and ambulance
    * Logistical transportation tracking devices used for commercial vehicles

  8. Re:It does not go too far by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Any driver involved in an accident while their car was moving should immediately have their license suspended and car impounded until cause can be determined."

    So under your proposed law, if someone hits you and the cop isn't sure, you lose your license until he is. And if he makes a mistake and finds you to be at fault, you lose your license?

    No, that's far too extreme. You've gone beyond simple safety precautions and up into revenge.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  9. Re:I'm a west coast Canadian by KillerBob · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, 'blame Canada' - to put it in context, most Canadians west of Ontario, view Ontario in the same way most Americans view France - that is, hopelessly and utterly broken. So stuff like this isn't a surprise - I don't mean to troll, but those easterners are about as blissfully statist as you can get and still be called a democracy.

    You do realize that this particular law is in place in Ontario and Quebec because we were following suit from Alberta and BC?

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  10. Get off your high horse by syousef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So no, this law does not go too far, in fact it does not go far enough. It should mandate that anyone found driving while distracted be charged with reckless endangerment of human life.

    Anyone who claims they've never driven while distracted is a complete and utter moron. Mod it flamebait, I don't give a fuck but you sir are a fuckwit. It'd be more effective to ban babies from being in the car since an infant in a car seat who has just vomited and is about to choke to death is a far greater distraction than changing the fucking radio station.

    I'm almost surprised you haven't suggested that cars need to be banned period.

    The correct solution by the way is to teach people how to cope with distractions. AND TEST the driver for being able to cope with distractions. Life is full of them and pretending they don't exist is far more culpable than changing a radio station.

    Everyone has a right to travel. No one has the right to endanger others.

    First of all there is no "right to travel". Secondly the two are not compatible. There is a risk to yourself and others around you when you travel. It can be minimised NOT eliminated.

    Those that do endanger others need to be held accountable for their actions

    You mean like existing dangerous driving laws?

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  11. Re:Man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can pick your friends and you can pick your nose but you can't pick your friend's nose.

  12. Re:Man! by Tezcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm frankly relieved that I don't have Mod points, as I don't know if I would mark this as funny or insightful.

  13. Re:WTF? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 4, Funny
    This is all well and good -- but unfortunately the real world is not so idealistic. You see, most people have these things called 'jobs', and often these so-called 'jobs' require people to work on very tight schedules. To comply with these schedules some people must do some crazy things some times, like take their cup of coffee to go on the way to work.

    How do you change gear?

    Well, you see, most cars coming out nowadays have something called an 'automatic transmission'. The car actually changes gears for you! I know, I know, this sounds like science fiction, but it's true. These new future cars also have these things called cup holders, which will literally hold your cup for you! That will leave both of your hands completely, 100% unburdened by your coffee until you find a good time to take a sip! Wow!

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine