Slashdot Mirror


"Three Strikes" To Go Ahead In Britain

David Gerard writes "Lord Peter Mandelson has carefully ignored the Gowers Report and the Carter Report, instead taking the advice of his good friend David Geffen and announcing that 'three strikes and you're out' will become law in Britain. The Open Rights Group has, of course, hit the roof. Oh, and never mind MI5 and the police pointing out that widespread encryption will become normal, hampering their efforts to keep up with little things like impending terrorist atrocities. Still, worth it to stop a few Lily Allen tracks being shared, right?"

32 of 294 comments (clear)

  1. Three Strikes on /. by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can we also have a 3 strikes law on Slashdot for dupes??

  2. Seriously, write to them by kazade84 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've contacted my MP. The open rights group has a brief PDF to send to them so they are clued up. Ask them to back EDM 1997.

    More info here: http://www.openrightsgroup.org/campaigns/ask-your-mp-to-help-protect-our-freedoms-on-the-net

    1. Re:Seriously, write to them by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you think they care at all what the people think? If anything proves that any form of democracy is not at work here, this does. Business interests are guiding, directing and even controlling government all over the world. The world may be pissed off at the U.S. government, but one only has to look to the "Military Industrial Complex" for why things are the way they are.

    2. Re:Seriously, write to them by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but one only has to look to the "Military Industrial Complex" for why things are the way they are.

      I think the M-I complex is more complicated. Defense contractors in the U.S. are smart about creating jobs in the states of legislators whose votes they need. This in turn builds up public support in those states for the defense programs that might not be in the overall national interest (militarily and/or fiscally).

      So one might argue that when the constituents are being parochial and myopic in their support for various spending, that is democracy in action. And it can lead to abysmal results.

    3. Re:Seriously, write to them by jimicus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you think they care at all what the people think? If anything proves that any form of democracy is not at work here, this does. Business interests are guiding, directing and even controlling government all over the world. The world may be pissed off at the U.S. government, but one only has to look to the "Military Industrial Complex" for why things are the way they are.

      Oh the leading party cares very much what people think - though usually more if "what people think" is dramatically at odds with "what they want to do". In such cases, they'll spend inordinate amounts of money (oh, and where does that money come from...?) to tell people what to think. See also: ID cards.

      Furthermore, individual MPs are frequently so loyal to their party that no matter how braindead the idea, most will still fall into line and vote for it. My own MP is part of the incumbent party and I don't think she has ever said so much as a single word against any of the government's policies. There's no earthly way she's going to rock the boat over an issue like this.

    4. Re:Seriously, write to them by Smegly · · Score: 4, Informative

      I disagree - I happen to work for a massive piece of this 'M-I Complex', and we're dying here. All the major aerospace and defense companies are going through a seriously hard time and shedding people or outsourcing like mad.

      If it were as simple as this, I wouldn't be looking for work :)

      Looks like you missed the parent posters point. You would most likely vote to keep your job in the Military Industrial Complex. Even if you say you would not, and claim to be one of the few that understands the big picture that the MIC is a very bad deal for everyone, it would be a hard stretch to imagine the majority of your suffering co-workers and all other dependent's in your state following your lead.

      I doubt America will ever shake the shackles of the MIC - people are too motivated by self interest (as in, I want a Job, thanks), and things have only gone waaay downhill since Eisenhower warned how bad things could get, so its not like nobody didn't see it coming

    5. Re:Seriously, write to them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We sign their cheques!

      Given that this is politicians we're talking about, you don't - the cheques are pre-signed for you, the only thing that's yours in all this is the obligation to pay.

    6. Re:Seriously, write to them by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually pre WWII he probably would have said "America? Where they have to make work because they have no jobs? they are not a threat.". You have to remember America wasn't some big super power then, IIRC our military was something like 58th because we had let so much just rot after WWI.

      What made America a threat was the fact that we had enough raw materials we could make war without anyone else coming to our aid. If we wouldn't have brought supplies to Britain the wolf packs would have starved them out. of course whether we could do that again in a time of total war is debatable, as our oil fields have long since run dry and it would probably take a decade or more to get something like ANWR producing, even if we hurried it as part of the war effort.

      So while I agree that our industrial might is gone, it wasn't very great then either. We were just able to convert existing businesses, such as having Ford cranking out tanks, and having the raw materials, that gave us an advantage once the Japs hit Pearl. Whether or not Pearl was a result of Roosevelt purposely stirring up shit with the Japs in the hopes of getting us in the war when many preferred neutrality is a debate for another day.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  3. Encryption is a bad thing? by xtal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not sure if this place has changed over the years, but I'm all for encryption becoming the norm.

    For legitimate law enforcement needs, search warrants and traffic analysis are not impeded.

    In fact, draconian enforcement of copyright would be the best thing ever - it would illustrate the absurdity of the status quo.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Encryption is a bad thing? by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whilst mentioning encryption causes people to post that f'ing cartoon with the $5 wrench adnauseum, the fact is, even fairly weak encryption whilst data transits though your ISP goes a long long way.

      That's why the spy agencies are against it. The best way to avoid an arms race is to simply avoid raising the stakes so the other side remains blissfully ignorant. If things are good now, not rocking the boat is the best solution.

      For example, a certain bone-headed ISP which one of my relatives uses, enforces using their outgoing mail server for "anti-spam reasons".
      Do they log all outgoing emails? You can bet they do. SMTP over SSL raises the bar just high enough that they don't bother any more.

      MOst ISPs block outgoing SMTP, for spam reasons. Despite this, an annoyingly large amount of spam still comes from outgoing SMTP connections, enough so that sending email from a dynamic connection is mostly useless anyhow because of the dynamic IP blocklists.

      The solution is to either use the ISP's mailserver, or your own mailserver at your hosting provider using stuff like Authenticated SMTP, which, surprise, uses a different port. It's an intentional workaround, because either your mail is going through your ISP (who can detect if you're sending 1000 emails a day 24/7), or your hosting provider (ditto, if the spambot is smart enough to steal your SMTP authetication details). Since all modern email clients support this standard, it's just a setup issue. And Authenticated SMTP can use SSL (to protect login credentials) if you're inclined.

  4. they need something based on the rules of cricket by ffflala · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US 3-strikes rule is based on a concept from baseball, and as a result probably makes little sense in the UK. I'm surprised they didn't go with something more appropriate, like a "bowled, leg-before-wicket, or hit-wicket" and you're out rule.

  5. New rule by T+Murphy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I propose the three strikes law three strikes law. A politician gets a strike for mentioning the three strikes law in a non-derisive manner, and gets banned from government after three strikes.

  6. Can't Wait by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't wait for some motivated group to deliver a clear message to politicians through a concerted effort to get politicians and their employees cut off from the internet simply by accusing them, three times, of copyright violations. Perhaps, once politicians and their staff are cut off from the online world, they'll begin to realize just how moronic this law is. When a simple accusation carries the weight of punishment, the possibilities of abuse are egregious.

    Ah, the days of "innocent until proven guilty" seem like a distant memory now...

    1. Re:Can't Wait by Marcika · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All that would accomplish is immunity for politicians and their staff from this law.

      Unlikely. The UK doesn't go in for granting politicians legal immunity, even when this would be of great benefit for the party in power. I don't know if there are any formal rules in this area though.

      Of course, if anyone does decide to use the three-strikes approach, could they please use it against some media types too? Might as well get some benefit out of a bad law...

      They don't have formal legal immunity, but if anything like this would happen, the police chiefs and the attorney general would likely determine that it is not 'in the public interest' to prosecute or punish politicians or other powerful people. (Just like it happens when an MP or minister falsifies expenses or commits other kinds of fraud.)

    2. Re:Can't Wait by bloobloo · · Score: 4, Informative

      European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6.2

      "2.Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law."

      The ECHR is part of British law.

  7. And one for Mandleson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "minister" resposible for this was forced out of office twice for misconduct, he has no place even being in public office.

    1. Re:And one for Mandleson? by Smegly · · Score: 5, Informative
      Some misconduct links for the unelected Mandleson: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson#Recent_controversies
      but wikipedia is missing some other controversy:
      From Lord Mandelson: Whitehall's Emperor, or just a team player?

      "Unelected yet holding a raft of political positions, including that of cabinet minister, Mandelson is the TV executive who learned to play both the Labour party and the UK system. Previously forced out of Blair's cabinet office twice, once for mortgage fraud and once for abusing his power to help chums get passports, Blair nevertheless then gifted Mandelson the job of Britain's European Commissioner for Trade in 2004 where he hob nobbed on yachts with Microsoft executives and Russian oligarths wanting favours, and then inexplicably returned to the UK in 2008 a very rich man.... Who says the public sector doesn't pay?!! Even the UK citizenship of Mandelson's Brazilian boyfriend stinks of favourtism and misconduct. Reinaldo Avila da Silva came to Britain in 1996 aged 22 on a student visa and was picked up by the then 43 year old Mandelson pretty much on his first night out. Da Silva had no right to British citizenship in 2005, indeed it was apparent that he had overstayed his visa and as such was an illegal immigrant. No worries, a few phone calls from Mandelson and da Silva was safely clutching a shiny new British passport. "

  8. Re:they need something based on the rules of crick by Spad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not a good idea, it'd take 5 days to make a decision and probably end in a draw.

  9. Three strikes in Politics.. by malkavian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, considering "Mandy" has already been forced to resign from Labour twice already for scandals (involving borrowing money from someone he was supposed to be investigating to buy a lovely house in central london among other activities), one wonders if he's caught with his hand in the cookie jar yet again, will this third strike resignation force his exclusion from Politics?
    Allegedly, he'd shown no interest in this whatsoever before going for a meal at a lovely retreat owned by a movie producer, and a few days holiday.. On his return, this was basically mandated with no consultation.
    Yay for unelected politicians who keep coming back despite being forced to resign in shame.

  10. Re:Agreed - ban encryption. by killmenow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure this is an attempt to be funny, but don't be surprised. When this 3 strikes thing doesn't prop up profits for the copyright regime like they expect, and the cops start yammering about the crypto tech used by the bad guys making it harder for them to do their job, banning encryption WILL be the next step. Remember the "hey, let's force back doors in all encryption schemes" the US government was trying to pass not too long ago? Clipper chip ring a bell? Skipjack? Key escrow? It will be done.

  11. Lily Allen wikipedia article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    BTW, there's an editor on wikipedia who keeps on moving the detail about Lily Allen's stance on copyright infringement into a subsection labelled "Social Activism' on her page. Hardly social activism I would think to speak out about something that is in her own financial interest.

  12. Re:Agreed - ban encryption. by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    RIPA already allows the UK police to rubber-hose your password out of you.

    The interesting thing will be SSL and Tor-based stuff, which doesn't require you to even have a password to use.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  13. Mandelson is waiting for his third strike by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    In other news, serial resigner, unelected jobsworth, and general insult to the democratic process "Lord" Peter Mandelson, having been appointed to high government office on a technicality by serial bad decision maker, unelected jobsworth, and general insult to the democractic process Gordon Brown, will shortly be resigning, again, having demonstrated a stunning lack of competence in public office, again.

    Sorry, we've got an update: the Labour Party are going to get hammered so badly in the general election next year that they might actually come third, the current administration is already in lame duck mode, and Mandelson's views are all but irrelevant.

    Frankly, I'm more worried about what David Cameron and his crew are going to do when they get in. If memory serves, they have publicly backed screwing the people in favour of Big Media pretty much any time the question has come up, also directly contravening overwhelming public sentiment expressed to Gowers et al.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  14. Widespread Encryption by DanMelks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...And I say we need to be encrypting our traffic anyway. The average computer contains more than enough processing power, and the average 'pipe' width can easily handle the extra resources needed for widespread use of encryption in day-to-day use.

    In addition, the recent trend in government is towards snooping and perv-ish behavior: China with its "great" firewall, USA with its unwarranted spying and packet sniffing, and now the UK with its new "three-strikes" policies. I pay my ISP a significant sum of money to deliver me 1s and 0s as fast as they can, and there are very, very few exceptions in which they have a need to know what those 1s and 0s add up to.

    I call upon the open source community to lead the way -- while I would love to see the big leagues (Microsoft, Apple, etc) apply their tonnage behind such a problem, pigs are more likely to fly first. How hard would it be for a browser to automatically attempt to negotiate a secure connection for every visited web page and only use normal, unencrypted access when a secure connection fails or cannot be completed in a secure amount of time? People running web servers would not have to make major modifications, only implement a new protocol.

  15. Re:Whoever wrote TFS is retarded by Spad · · Score: 4, Informative

    It wasn't railing against encryption, it was pointing out that both the police & the intelligence services have voiced their disapproval over the "Three Strikes" idea because it's likely to increase the use of encryption and therefore make their lives more difficult. i.e. It's not just a load of pirates that Mandy's ignored on this one.

  16. Level of Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If one person in a family is accused of pirating, the whole household gets cut off?

    If one person in a company is accused of pirating while at work, the whole company gets cut off?

    If one person in a ministry is accused of pirating while at work, the whole ministry gets cut off?

    Who is _allowed_ to accuse?

  17. Re:Hey Britons by kevinNCSU · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow Britain, you just got told to take "more aggressive action" by CANADIANS. Talk about called out.

  18. Re:they need something based on the rules of crick by Kozz · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd been trying to make this joke all week, but despite reading the wiki page on Cricket, I couldn't write the joke to make it sound like I knew what I was talking about. Three strikes and I suppose now *I'm* out.

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  19. Re: 25 years for three golf clubs by stewbacca · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Three strikes" laws -- particularly the California version that allows petty crimes to trigger the third strike -- are problematic. There are varying levels of severity for felonies, some that deserve life sentences, some that deserve probation, and everything in between.

    One guy commits two two heinous felonies, somehow lawyers his way out of long prison terms, and another guy, a) steals a purse, b) hits a parked car and runs away, and c) steals bubble gum from the store goes to prison for life. I'm not sure how any sane, thinking person on this planet can't see the glaring flaw with this system.

  20. Mandelscum by AdmV0rl0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These bastards, and that slimy scumbag Mandelson have spend the past 13 years utterly ruining everything, every institution, way of life, habitat, hobby, social fabric and this?

    Basically, people are slowly concluding a few things, some are less than good, but for every action, there is a reaction, clearly 13 years too late. Vote anyone but these bastards, and tell them why at every moment they bang on your door or come to your doorstep. Vote BNP, UKIP, Con, Lib - ANYONE but these slimy dark forces shits.

    Their brand of nanny state 1984 insanity, and mass persecution of population, drivers, and all the rest, and their enforced political correctness and multiculturalism, and devolution, and EU fanatisism, and the rest is DEAD. OVER. FINISHED.

    Its the worst government the UK has had in any modern times, and people cannot wait to be rid of them.

    --
    We`re all equal .. Just some of us are less equal than others.
  21. Jumping the gun by Zoxed · · Score: 4, Informative

    The title ' "Three Strikes" To Go Ahead In Britain ' is, err, a little misleading (what, on /. ? never).

    My understanding is that the policy is being proposed form inclusion in a new bill. AFAIK this then has to be bounced between The House of Commons and the Lords and finally signed by HRM before it is law. And this assumes it is not removed and/or amended in this process.

  22. Lily Allen - hypocrite? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the Lily Allen, Social Activism page and section:

    Lily Allen came out in strong support for disconnecting offenders. Creating a blog entitled "It's Not Alright" against file sharing, it subsequently came to light that she had copied text directly from the Techdirt website of an interview with 50 Cent. This led to an exchange on the internet, which culminated in accusations being made that Ms. Allen had infringed on other artists' copyrights by creating mix tapes early in her career, that she then made available via her website.

    Pot? Kettle is on the phone...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .