Slashdot Mirror


D&D On Google Wave

Jon Stokes at the Opposable Thumbs blog relates his experience using Google Wave as a platform for Dungeons and Dragons — the true test of success for any new communications technology. A post at Spirits of Eden lists some of Wave's strengths for gaming. Quoting: "The few games I'm following typically have at least three waves: one for recruiting and general discussion, another for out-of-character interactions ('table talk'), and the main wave where the actual in-character gaming takes place. Individual players are also encouraged to start waves between themselves for any conversations that the GM shouldn't be privy to. Character sheets can be posted in a private wave between a player and the GM, and character biographies can go anywhere where the other players can get access to them. The waves are persistent, accessible to anyone who's added to them, and include the ability to track changes, so they ultimately work quite well as a medium for the non-tactical parts of an RPG. A newcomer can jump right in and get up-to-speed on past interactions, and a GM or industrious player can constantly maintain the official record of play by going back and fixing errors, formatting text, adding and deleting material, and reorganizing posts."

14 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Kinda sounds like by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IRC (sans logging)

    "The few games I'm following typically have at least three channels: one for recruiting and general discussion, another for out-of-character interactions ('table talk'), and the main channel where the actual in-character gaming takes place. Individual players are also encouraged to private message between themselves for any conversations that the GM shouldn't be privy to. Character sheets can be posted in a private message between a player and the GM, and character biographies can go anywhere where the other players can get access to them."

    I'm sorry but I still dont get all the hype, to me it's just a bastard child of IRC and a Wiki.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Kinda sounds like by twoshortplanks · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sorry but I still dont get all the hype, to me it's just a bastard child of IRC and a Wiki.

      Yes! That's exactly what it is. You say that like this development of new technology is a bad thing. Do you need to hand in your geek card?

      --
      -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    2. Re:Kinda sounds like by GryMor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Persistent wikified irc with integrated permissions management?

      That, right there, is a killer app.

      --
      Realities just a bunch of bits.
    3. Re:Kinda sounds like by Canazza · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it's not really the development of a new technology, it's the hybridisation of everything that's come before - IRC, IM, Wiki's, Email - into one flexible platform. It's certainly an interesting idea, but what it needs is the ability to forcibly narrow down the parameters so you can *if you want* lock it into a pure Wiki, or IRC clone or whatever.

      It might, however, be one of those kid in a candy shop style affairs where the kid can have as much candy as he wants, but doesn't know where to start, eats everything, pukes and makes a mess.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    4. Re:Kinda sounds like by Shikaku · · Score: 4, Funny

      So it's really IRC++?

    5. Re:Kinda sounds like by Leolo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With version control, play-back capability, distributed storage, and a well documented pluggin API.

      Wave blows me away.

      The fact that so many people chime in with "I don't get it" is probably an indication of how revolutionary it is.

    6. Re:Kinda sounds like by osgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I still don't get it. Cell phones are just regular phone but without the wires.

      I still don't get it. The web is just like gopher/ftp but you with pictures.

      I still don't get it. The iPhone is just a bastard child of a cell phone and a pda.

      What you don't get is that almost all new products that really take off are amalgamations of pre-existing technologies. Yeah, Google Wave is just a really neat way to put together IRC, Wiki, and Email. Its impact will be huge. A couple of years from now, even your mom will be talking about sending you a Wave. Numerous imitators and Wave server implementations will be around. Waves and wave-like concepts will be omnipresent.

    7. Re:Kinda sounds like by hclewk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, a backhoe does nothing that a shovel couldn't... It's just a lot better at some things (moving lots of dirt). I use wave on a regular basis for project collaboration. One of the best things about wave is that you don't have to respond in a linear fashion. So, this is a conversation that could happen in IRC:

      Sally: When I [description of what she did] I get the error message [some random error message]
      Sally: Also, if I [description of what she did] the program [description of how the program fails]
      Jack: Well, on that first issue, what happens if you [some thing to try]
      Jack: And for that second issue.....

      With wave, jack can respond directly to each of sally's messages (or even a particular part of a message) so Sally knows exactly what Jack is talking about without Jack having to clarify. As Jack finish up things from his to-do list, he just deletes the threads from the wave, as they are always accessible via Replay (which lets you see all previous states of the wave), keeping the wave nice and clean. And if Sally isn't online when jack deletes something, it will be obvious to her what Jack deleted (it's marked with strikeout, and is removed after the next time she views the wave) when she comes back online so she knows what he's finished.

      Not to mention that there are gadgets and robots and waves are embeddable (though the apis are in early stages at the moment).

      Does IRC do all that?

  2. More like forums, really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pretty much all of the described things (three separate threads. Private messages. Logs.) are exactly as they would be in PbP (play by post, usually on a forum) game. In addition, RPG oriented forums (Myth-Weavers, GiantITP...) often have dicerollers, character sheet managers, etc... Those could be added as gadgets here too, I guess. But nothing there seems revolutionary as in offering anything new.

    I think that the point is easiness of use compared to other options and stuff like that. Rather than letting you do something new, wave lets you do all the old stuff in one program instead of having multiple ones. One useful scenario for this could be: A PbP game that is played normally on forums, but on wave you see "Ah, those two guys are online now", send them a message "Want to do some playing in real time?" and begin chatting with them. Much easier than telling them to fire up IRC, connect to a server, etc. (especially if they aren't "computer people").

    So I could see wave potentially being useful for this (like many other things). There just has been too much hype about it so people first act more among the lines of "This will cure cancer and HIV and everything!" and then go "Uh, this isn't THAT awesome. We'll need to desperately look for things in which this is superior to other mediums!" instead of going "Oh, a new alternative for forums and chats. Neat. I'm sure we'll come up with some interesting uses for this over time."

    I have been designing a program to play DnD over the internet lately. One with battlemaps, chats, dicerollers, stuff like that. I am aware of OpenRPG and similar products but I'm not completely happy with them (the UI, the functionality, a lot of things) so I've decided to write my own one. I think that writing a wave plugin for the missing stuff instead might be worth giving some thought.

  3. Great! by declain · · Score: 5, Funny

    I put on my robe and wizard hat.

    1. Re:Great! by polle404 · · Score: 4, Informative

      yeah, i was thinking of that one as well...

      http://bash.org/?104383

      --

      ~men are from earth. women are from earth. deal with it.~
  4. Re:Not going to catch on by wall0159 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Those of us with beta accounts are familiar with the fact that its slow, clumsy and unexciting. "

    can this be rephrased as:
    "Too slow. Steeper learning curve than email. Lame."
    ?

  5. Re:The killer gazebo, FYI, no, not you, them. by MRe_nl · · Score: 5, Funny

    ED: You see a well groomed garden. In the middle, on a small hill, you see a gazebo.
    ERIC: A gazebo? What color is it?
    ED: [pause] It's white, Eric.
    ERIC: How far away is it?
    ED: About 50 yards.
    ERIC: How big is it?
    ED: [pause] It's about 30 ft across, 15 ft high, with a pointed top.
    ERIC: I use my sword to detect good on it.
    ED: It's not good, Eric. It's a gazebo.
    ERIC: [pause] I call out to it.
    ED: It won't answer. It's a gazebo.
    ERIC: [pause] I sheathe my sword and draw my bow and arrows. Does it respond in any way?
    ED: No, Eric, it's a gazebo!
    ERIC: I shoot it with my bow. [roll to hit] What happened?
    ED: There is now a gazebo with an arrow sticking out of it.
    ERIC: [pause] Wasn't it wounded?
    ED: OF COURSE NOT, ERIC! IT'S A GAZEBO!
    ERIC: [whimper] But that was a +3 arrow!
    ED: It's a gazebo, Eric, a GAZEBO! If you really want to try to destroy it, you could try to chop it with an axe, I suppose, or you could try to burn it, but I don't know why anybody would even try. It's a @#$%!! gazebo!
    ERIC: [long pause. He has no axe or fire spells.] I run away.
    ED: [thoroughly frustrated] It's too late. You've awakened the gazebo. It catches you and eats you.
    ERIC: [reaching for his dice] Maybe I'll roll up a fire-using mage so I can avenge my Paladin.

    --
    "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
  6. Privacy and the real-time web by giladpn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google Wave has one huge advantage IMO.

    Lots of us get along fine with email, for 1:1 and 1:n communication, mailing lists, the works. So OK email misses the "wall" or "real time web" effect were everybody can see what everyone else is posting. But email works.
    And the really big deal about email is the standards - I can use outlook yesterday, gmail today, and yahoo mail tomorrow. I can move my stuff among vendors and keep my stuff from years back. Because everyone must stick to standards.

    Trouble is there is an insidious conspiracy to make email uncool. Its led by the hordes of Facebook-ers and lately Tweet-ers. Like, I mean, do you really want to spend your life tweet-ing your latest embarrasing whatever to the world at large? But lets face it - the pressure is on bigtime. If you're not there you don't exist. Talk about peer pressure - the most obvious success of the social realtime web is the use of peer pressure to force everyone on board.:-(

    Now along comes wave. Google Wave is basically email on steroids, with a "wall / real time web" capability thrown in. You can be totally private or you can be totally public or any combo in between. Nice. And oh yes you also get media richness.
    And the Facebook-ers and Tweet-ers can't claim its uncool; actually you can one-up 'em - they're old hat.

    Finally. Privacy is back (at least when you want it).
    Now they just need to reintroduce standards. Is anyone listening?