Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Links Malware Rates To Pirated Windows

CWmike writes "Microsoft said today that computers in countries with high rates of software piracy are more likely to be infected because users are leery of applying security patches. 'There is a direct correlation between piracy and the malware infection rate,' said Jeff Williams, head manager of the Microsoft Malware Protection Center. Highlighting research that showed worms to be the most prevalent computer security problem today, Williams said the link between PC infection rates and piracy is due to the hesitancy of users of pirated software to use Windows Update. China's piracy rate is more than four times that of the US, but the use of Windows Update in China is significantly below that in this country. Same for Brazil and France. But Microsoft's own data doesn't always support William's contention that piracy, and the hesitancy to use Windows Update, leads to more infected PCs. China, for example, boasted a malware infection rate — as defined by the number of computers cleaned for each 1,000 executions of the MSRT — of just 6.7 per thousand, significantly below the global average of 8.7 or the US's rate of 8.2. France's infection rate of 7.9 in the first half of 2009 was also below the worldwide average."

11 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Just suppose... by jack2000 · · Score: 4, Informative
    It is actually possible to install patches without running headfirst into WGA. Infact there are TWO ways:
    • When choosing mode of autoupdate choose the one that requires you to choose which patches to download and install, WGA is one of the Security patches you uncheck it and it goes away forever.
    • Have security patches installed in redistributed form, they are available from MS or even torrent sites
  2. Re:safer users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    In Brazil several computer stores sell PCs wirh a pirated version of windows pre-installed. So it's very likely that a lot of those 'computer pirates' are computer iliterates. Also, pirate versions of any popular application, movies and songs can be easily bought on the streets at broad day light -- not in dark alleys. So, if a person sees "Computer with genuine MS Windows XP" it's not unlikely that they would ask the salesman "can you make it cheaper if you sell it with a pirated version of windows?", even if it's a complete layperson. I believe that things are a bit different in the US, where you have to have at least heard about p2p technology in order to enjoy pirate software.

  3. Re:What!?!? by harryjohnston · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it were me analyzing the data I'm afraid I would have to conclude that users who use windows update more often and use official copies of windows(US users) are more likely to receive a malware infection than users on pirated copies without using windows update(China).

    Except that those who don't use Windows Update aren't included in the statistics. (Well, unless they manually download and run the MSRT, but that can't be a statistically significant number.)

  4. Re:Always on Internet connections?.. by Tynin · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just got done working on my grandparents machine. They only have dial up, with one phone line in the house. They connect, check their email via POP3, and disconnect. They had 336 viruses that I could find (many of them worms). I don't think connection times matter that much, especially since this was over a 56k modem only connected a few times a week for 10-20 minutes at a shot.

  5. Re:MS Fuud by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Informative
    NO other security-conscious application these days dares to publish anything but the latest security-patched version.

    I, on the other hand, am inclined to think otherwise.

    I don't think that anybody in their right mind would call Fedora Linux lacking in security, but if you were to download the install DVD for Fedora 11, the latest version, what you'd get is exactly what you'd have downloaded on the first day it was available. Then, after installation, you'd have to download all the updates needed to bring your system up to date. How is this different from what Microsoft does?

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  6. Re:So.... by pyrbrand · · Score: 5, Informative

    Security patches are not subject to the Genuine Advantage check. People running pirated software are just less likely to run windows update because they are scared that it will somehow invalidate their pirated install. Also, as you note, installing pirated software, including Windows, is a risk in itself as much pirated software has been prepackaged with malware.

  7. Re:MS Fuud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can download Fedora 11 ISOs with all updates to a recent date here: spins.fedoraunity.org

    I can find no similar site for Windows XP, Vista, or any other MS product.

    So yeah, no difference between Fedora and Windows at all. :rolleyes:

  8. Re:Penance? by shentino · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or maybe the folks who don't give a shit about pirating windows also don't give a shit that their rooted machines are causing mayhem.

  9. Re:Seems to be what microsoft wanted by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just call the support number and tell them. They'll give you the call up key and you're good to go. There is a solution for these things, and it takes all of 10 minutes. Stop pirating software for no reason.

  10. Re:Seems to be what microsoft wanted by TheJabberwocky · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently if you activate Windows on 4 different motherboards with 3 different CPUs, 4 different types of memory, 3 different GPUs, 6 different HDD setups, from 3 different IPs/ISPs, they find it suspicious and refuse to give you a new key.

    ... and tried to reactivate again on a new board with a new CPU + GPU + RAM + more HDDs.

    Microsoft found it suspicious - too suspicious - and yet I'm in the right, because my XP key was only in use on a single machine.

    Ummm.... If you've removed every single origional component and replaced them with new components how is that the same computer?

  11. Re:Seems to be what microsoft wanted by BikeHelmet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ummm.... If you've removed every single origional component and replaced them with new components how is that the same computer?

    Same case? :P

    I sold lots of parts, and moved old parts to a different computer. The Ubuntu PC I gave to my parents was made from old parts in a new case with a new PSU. Just because I did a total overhaul of my gaming PC doesn't mean it isn't the same rig. I have a gaming PC, and a work PC - I upgrade them both periodically, and I bought Windows licenses for both. I don't appreciate Microsoft disabling my key. :/