Slashdot Mirror


Negroponte Hints At Paper-Like Design For XO-3

waderoush writes "In May 2008, Nicholas Negroponte, chairman of the One Laptop Per Child Foundation, unveiled an e-book like design for the second-generation XO Laptop, consisting of a pair of facing touchscreens. In a new e-mail interview, Negroponte says that design has been thrown out, and that instead the foundation is working on version '1.75' of the existing green-and-white laptop with a more powerful processor, as well as a '3.0' version that would look 'more like a sheet of paper.' Negroponte also addressed a range of other questions about the OLPC project, including the significance of the project to make 1.6 million e-books readable on the XO laptop and the organization's push to reach more children in Latin America, Africa, Afghanistan, and Pakistan."

53 of 69 comments (clear)

  1. It makes sense by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that in any third-world country access to "open source" text books on any subject at zero extra cost would be more important than the actual "educational computer" functionality. It makes sense that the primary design goal should be that it is a good ebook reader. It looks neat and at $75 it is a fraction of the cost of current readers ... I want one!

    1. Re:It makes sense by skgrey · · Score: 1

      I understand the desire for a laptop device that is able to do more than read textbooks. The audience is kids in school, both starting out and more advanced. You want software that also helps the kids learn to read, do math, and possibly watch some basics videos about the world.

      My three year old is able to sit down with my iPod touch and run through a variety of games. He knows how to unlock it, scroll through the menus, and choose which game he wants. There are coloring games, letter and number games, and shape games. He is also starting to do the same on my laptop. Learning with this type of technology has come much more naturally than the flashcards and flat books.

      Sure an ebook reader is a great possibility, but I think part of the point is to engage the children as well and teach them in more constructive ways than just flat reading.

    2. Re:It makes sense by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

      E-book readers will be the killer app for next year's net-tablets, IMO. The good ones will likely use Pixel Qi screens. As for OLPC, they're doing great pioneering work, which launched the netbook phenomenon. Pixel Qi will provide OLPC the paper-like screens at cost. In e-book mode, the battery should last days, not hours, and with the overall reductions in cost for the multi-touch display, processor (can you say ARM?), and power system, net tablets for under $100 may just be possible. Frankly, I'll hold out for a $250 10" tablet that looks like Apple designed it, but runs Ubuntu Netbook Remix. It'll read like e-paper, but also can play HD videos.

      --
      Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
    3. Re:It makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Exactly. I am so tired of hearing this guy try to get attention. Please, produce something useful or disappear.

    4. Re:It makes sense by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      "Dear kind sir, I am the three-year-old child of millionaire skgrey. My father's bank accounts are overflowing, and I would like to share some of my family's good fortune while he is distracted by slashdot. I merely need some bank account numbers of yours for good faith to proceed with this gifting.

      "With great hope,
      Junior"

      Please don't let your kid get too curious with the laptop!

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    5. Re:It makes sense by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      Dear Mr. Negroponte,

        Want to help third-world countries to get affordable laptops for their children? Here is a reasonable way to do it:

      • Ask Dell, Asus, HP, Lenovo, Sony, Apple, and whoever else for the lowest priced laptop they and their OEM manufacturer partners can offer. Compare the specs, the best offer at the lowest price wins the contract for the next 3 years. If there is no good offer, order at the OEM manufacturers directly. (But there will be a good offer.)
      • Put Ubuntu (fresh standard install, nothing else) and a few hundred essential textbooks on it.
      • Make deals with governments/politicians to make sure the laptops get distributed in a halfway fair manner.
      • Repeat after 3 years.

      If the children in those countries feel a need for it, I'm sure they're smart enough to write some "sugar" interface or similar trash themselves. and if they need Windows(tm) I'm sure they'll figure out where to find it.

    6. Re:It makes sense by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      • Make deals with governments/politicians to make sure the laptops get distributed in a halfway fair manner.

      Program crashed. Politicians != fairness. Impossible instruction given.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    7. Re:It makes sense by gumbi+west · · Score: 1
      Wow, never been modded down as troll before. I guess my point was this: OLPC appears to judge success by laptops distributed (and money donated). I think this is a poor measure of success. A better measure would be education improved, so studies showing that children who were given OLPC laptops had showed to some sort of improvement over children who were not (obviously, you would need to do randomized treatment assignment to figure this out). But ultimately, you want them to be better at some sort of occupation (child rearing, farming, manufacturing, trade) and so the real results would have to be measured much later.

      Even this would not really give you the answer to the real question you want to know though, is this use of $200 better than another use. i.e. would safe drinking water, treatments for diseases, or some other program help more?

    8. Re:It makes sense by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      Sorry, here is an example of the sort of confused logic--units is the only measure of success? really?

    9. Re:It makes sense by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, knowing Negroponte this thing will be running Windows Vista by next year.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  2. Great vision, but is technology the answer? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the OLPC website:

    Mission Statement: To create educational opportunities for the world's poorest children by providing each child with a rugged, low-cost, low-power, connected laptop with content and software designed for collaborative, joyful, self-empowered learning. When children have access to this type of tool they get engaged in their own education. They learn, share, create, and collaborate. They become connected to each other, to the world and to a brighter future.

    They even go on to say that this is about education, not laptops. So why are they working on building these devices when if all they want is a cheap Panasonic Toughbook? It seems that instead of trying to build cheaper devices, they could partner with a company (like Panasonic) to provide this kind of technology on the cheap.

    By focusing so much on the technology, we are forgetting that the purpose of these devices is to enable kids around the world to become more connected. This can be done with an old Toshiba Satellite laptop from 2001, you don't need the latest and greatest software to access the Internet.

    1. Re:Great vision, but is technology the answer? by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh come on, how are they going to get a good education on a Toshiba laptop from 2001? YouTube will barely render on one of those things, and will be really choppy, to say nothing of the fact that they'll only be able to see the lowest quality porn. I mean really, haven't these people suffered enough?

    2. Re:Great vision, but is technology the answer? by TheGreatOrangePeel · · Score: 1

      Well, I see a slew of problems with using Toughbooks from 2001, but I think the point that's easiest to make without writing a whole college length essay on the matter is that it'd be hard to collect 50,000 (the number of OLPCs sold to Mexico) Toughbooks, let alone the 260,000 sold to Peru (soruce). Even if they did have Toshiba or some other company make brand new machines, doing so at the $100 that they were originally shooting for would be impossible as no such machine existed at that price point when OLPC started.

    3. Re:Great vision, but is technology the answer? by renoX · · Score: 1

      >So why are they working on building these devices when if all they want is a cheap Panasonic Toughbook?

      Probably because being rugged isn't good enough for their need and they also want to have laptops which are: low power and readable outdoor..

    4. Re:Great vision, but is technology the answer? by Daniel+Serodio · · Score: 1

      Of the the most compelling (for its market) features of the OLPC is its tiny energy consumption, which can even be recharged with a hand crank. Some of these people don't even have an energy outlet at home.
      Try that with a 2001 Toshiba Satellite.

    5. Re:Great vision, but is technology the answer? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It seems that instead of trying to build cheaper devices, they could partner with a company (like Panasonic) to provide this kind of technology on the cheap.

      Wait, so instead of partnering with companies to produce a cheaper laptop, they should partner with companies to produce a laptop, but cheaper?

      Yeah, they're already working with existing companies on designing these things. They have a variety of specific needs. They want them to be rugged but lightweight, since they'll be used by children. They need them to use very little power, since the idea is to use give them to children in areas where power infrastructure isn't good. On top of all their other engineering needs, they need them to be cheap.

      Do you really think that they'd have bothered with all this if normal hardware manufacturers were providing lightweight, rugged $75 laptops that were readable in sunlight and powered by hand-crank? Do you think they would have received so much support?

    6. Re:Great vision, but is technology the answer? by fyoder · · Score: 1

      It's questionable whether a publicly traded company like Panasonic could do it, unless they argued that the good will generated by a massive at cost project is of sufficient benefit to share holders to justify it. Part of the power of OLPC, potentially, is that it doesn't have to generate a profit.

      Of course, the downside to that is that they can more easily do stupid things, like not take a profit where its available by exploiting demand in the first world and marketing it there as well, instead doing some weird buy two get one thing.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
  3. Sorry what? by Nursie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dual screens? E-paper? Touchable displays?

    Surely what you really need to make it cheap is cheap components and low R&D costs. Toughen up a netbook for god's sake! At the time the last OLPC came to everyone's attention, it was a fairly revolutionary idea. Then Asus released the Eee range and others quickly followed suit. Nearly all of them make the OLPC look like last year's trash and for not much price difference.

    1. Re:Sorry what? by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      At the time the last OLPC came to everyone's attention, it was a fairly revolutionary idea. Then Asus released the Eee range and others quickly followed suit. Nearly all of them make the OLPC look like last year's trash and for not much price difference.

      Exactly. The lesson here is that if you really want private enterprise to do something, you have to set up a nonprofit to do it first and give it away to poor people. That way, the for-profit companies will think you're threatening their turf (even if they had no intention of doing whatever it is you're doing in the first place), and they'll go out of their way to compete with you (and crush you).

      So, I suggest we form a non-profit company called "one trip to Mars for every child" and announce we're going to be designing a spacecraft to take poor children on trips to Mars. I predict Boeing and Lockheed will have competing Martian colonies with twice-daily commuter service within a year.

    2. Re:Sorry what? by acklenx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Without the OLPC driving, the industry had no interest in net books. And they still don't have much interest in durable netbooks. And, well, the cost does matter. And since the cost does matter I would question the dual screens on the device (assuming added a second screen makes it more expensive). It doesn't need to look and feel like a book - certainly not for people that haven't ever held a book. And even for those that have - let go of the past.

      --
      Never let a mediocre career stand in the way of a good time
    3. Re:Sorry what? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      The screens are about $20 a piece, so a second screen, which doubles the screen area, is only $20 more - MINUS the cost of building a cover (folding the screens serves that purpose). So the incremental cost is less than $20. It's too bad they dropped the two-screen model ... it's a good idea. If you've ever worked with dual monitors on your computer, going back to one is unthinkable. It just works so much better.

    4. Re:Sorry what? by c · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > I suggest we form a non-profit company called "one trip to Mars for every child"
      > and announce we're going to be designing a spacecraft to take poor children on trips
      > to Mars. I predict Boeing and Lockheed will have competing Martian colonies with
      > twice-daily commuter service within a year.

      As a counter-example, I'd point out that your scheme hasn't been a huge success for the plethora of "three square meals a day, clean water and some clothing for every child" non-profits. It could just be they need a snappier name...

      c.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    5. Re:Sorry what? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Can we start a "50Mbps for every child" right here in the US, and maybe get some decent internet?

      I'm serious. It works.

    6. Re:Sorry what? by chocomilko · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The lesson here is that if you really want private enterprise to do something, you have to set up a nonprofit to do it first and give it away to poor people. That way, the for-profit companies will think you're threatening their turf (even if they had no intention of doing whatever it is you're doing in the first place), and they'll go out of their way to compete with you (and crush you).

      Funny AND true!

    7. Re:Sorry what? by c · · Score: 1

      > You kidding me? Look at how many privately run prisons there are in the US.

      As bad as the incarceration rates are in the US, I haven't heard about a whole lot of children in them. Then again, who knows what RIAA/MPAA lobbyists are doing behind the scenes...

      c.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    8. Re:Sorry what? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "Without the OLPC driving, the industry had no interest in net books."

      So the fact that OLPC computers have been so profitable convinced the industry to make netbooks?

    9. Re:Sorry what? by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Did they ever get the manufacturing cost under $100?

      I saw an old EEE (Celeron - 600mhz?) going for $135 new a month back.

  4. Epic Sales 101 failure. EPIC. by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's that you say? You have a better version coming next year? Well, thanks for being so honest - we'll put our checkbook back in our pocket rather than giving you money for the obsolescent model now.

    Oh, what? There'll be an another new version soon after that? Well, that's just great! Give us a call back if and when it's ever available - we'll do lunch.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  5. 2 displays == 2x the cost by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    So why not make individual units which can optionally be connected together to then function as a 2-display unit?

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:2 displays == 2x the cost by dargaud · · Score: 1

      So why not make individual units which can optionally be connected together to then function as a 2-display unit?

      Sounds like a great idea. Is there a tablet PC / cell phone that when put next to another one will act as an extended double screen for one of the devices ? Put 12 cell phones together for a normal size (albeit mozaicized and overpriced) monitor. Bonus points if they guess their positions relative to each others.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    2. Re:2 displays == 2x the cost by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      2 displays == 2x the cost

      That's only true if the entire cost comes from a single display. It's like saying that having 2 GB of RAM in your computer makes it twice as expensive as it would be if it had 1 GB of RAM.

  6. Re:Priorities by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

    Yah, at least make the laptop edible!

  7. Re:Priorities by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    When you're a computer scientist, your most effective path to help others is to leverage your computer science knowledge. Attempting to fix the world hunger problem without the appropriate background would be a foolish waste of time.

    Then again OLPC has been a foolish waste of time so far, so it may not have mattered either way.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  8. Re:Priorities by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

    Yea, because keeping them ignorant of computers, unable to access huge amounts of knowledge about farming, irrigation, planting techniques, home building techniques, and plumbing best practices is the way we want to go here. I suppose to you it's best if we just shovel rice at them until we fall on hard times as a society ourselves and aren't able to anymore, then they just starve to death.

    To you all the internet is is Facebook and porn I guess, but if you start googling things about how to build the base foundations of a society I think you would be surprised. There is a plethora of information from road building to aqueduct construction on the internet.

  9. Re:Priorities by daveime · · Score: 1

    huge amounts of knowledge about farming, irrigation, planting techniques, home building techniques, and plumbing best practices is going to change fuck all in a place like Ethiopia when all they need is rain !

    Sometimes, unfortunately, shovelling rice at them is all that can keep them alive.

  10. Re:Priorities by znu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously? I thought the world had gotten past the notion that computers were frivolous toys or first-world luxuries.

    The truth is, food aid doesn't really work, at least by itself. You feed the current population, don't solve any of the systemic problems that led to the hunger, and you end up with another generation of hungry people.

    What the developing world needs is development and mass empowerment. And that means, among other things, education. If you know of a tool that packs more educational potential into a less expensive package than a $100 networked computer system that's resistant to the elements, requires little or no supporting infrastructure, and can be preloaded with large quantities of information relevant to the populations it's given to, please name it.

    --
    This space unintentionally left unblank.
  11. Re:Priorities by b0bby · · Score: 1

    Imagine if it were possible to do more than one thing at a time. Then we could provide food aid as needed, AND work on raising education levels.

    Nah, it'd never work.

  12. Re:Priorities by daveime · · Score: 1

    Yes, unfortunately, in a place like Ethiopia which is so volatile weather-wise, and so much of the basic necessities like food and clean water is dependent on having a good rainfall each year, the best (and possibly most cost effective) thing in the long run they could do is move everyone somewhere else, and cordon off the whole damn place as uninhabitable.

  13. Modded funny but I think you were close by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Only a non-profit could take the risk of a new form factor that no one thought they would need or want. Laptops kept getting bigger and bigger. Who knew people would once again want to put up with tiny keys and bizarre resolutions. Actually there are many who bemoan some of the sacrifices now.

    I am still awaiting the netbook craze to settle down into a form which the majority thinks is both very portable and easily accessible. Its getting close.

    As for why N. wants a new device, because its far easier to get money for tech than books.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  14. Re:Epic Sales 101 failure. EPIC. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    What's that you say? You have a better version coming next year? Well, thanks for being so honest - we'll put our checkbook back in our pocket rather than giving you money for the obsolescent model now.

    And what reasonable company doesn't come out with a "better version" of whatever they sell next year?

  15. Re:Priorities by Dragonslicer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just can't help thinking that sorting out such basic problems as hunger and poverty...

    The only real solution to these problems is education. Everything else is just a temporary fix.

  16. Not everyone is starving or rich by js_sebastian · · Score: 1

    huge amounts of knowledge about farming, irrigation, planting techniques, home building techniques, and plumbing best practices is going to change fuck all in a place like Ethiopia when all they need is rain !

    Sometimes, unfortunately, shovelling rice at them is all that can keep them alive.

    The world is not neatly divided into "have an SUV" and "on the brink of starvation". The OLPC project (now rebranded to lowercase olpc according to TFA, for whatever bizarre reason) is targeted at places where children have their basic food needs fulfilled, and have a school they can go to that at least sometimes gets electricity. One of the biggest deployments is in Peru, for instance. If you feel that shoveling rice at ethiopians is the only worthy humanitarian cause, please put your time and/or money where your mouth is and do something about it.

  17. Re:Priorities by pwfffff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I just can't help thinking that sorting out such basic problems as hunger and poverty should be slightly higher on the list than whether they can play Facebook and post on Twitter."

    Shouldn't it also be more important than you posting on /. then? How many orphans have YOU fed today?

  18. Re:Priorities by cusco · · Score: 2, Informative

    Paruro, Peru, is a beautiful town of about 5,000, high in the Andes. It's the sort of place that hasn't existed in in the US for a century, where there are more horses than cars, everyone cooks with firewood, and children and dogs run loose in the streets. They have an Internet cafe there, all of a dozen PCs sharing a satellite link. While stopping in occasionally to check my work email I saw kids enrolling in classes in the University in Arequipa (otherwise two day's travel each way to enroll), a grandma in Lima met her first grandbaby on webcam, farmers checking prices to see whether it was better to sell in Cusco or Abancay, merchants checking on the status of goods they had ordered, THE mechanic looking up a manual for a backhoe, a mother chatting with her daughter in the university in Paris, and a lady looking for patterns for wedding dresses. If you think the Internet's just good for porn you have no imagination at all.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  19. Fixed it for you by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    When you're a computer scientist, your funnest path to help others is to leverage your computer science knowledge.

  20. Re:Priorities by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    What exactly are plumbing's best practices as applied to an old well a few miles away?

  21. Re:Priorities by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    Considering that the developed world hasn't been able to provide food for everyone who needs it why should we add another task to not complete?

    You know, I believe I've worked at start-ups like that ... they didn't make it.

  22. Re:Priorities by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, most of the systemic problems developed because of the actions of more developed nations. Education can't solve it beyond the extent that some lucky ones might be able to escape and become part of the system.

  23. Re:Epic Sales 101 failure. EPIC. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    They don't make a point of marketing it to end customers - and in this case, the governments are the purchasers - until they're ready to sell it though. In particular, they don't boast about how much cheaper it'll be than the current model. Really, there's not much else Negroponte could do to kill sales of the XO 1 other than boasting that the XO "1.75" will cause 30% less cancer.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  24. Great post by zogger · · Score: 1

    Really. After all this time I still see all these other posts where people *just don't get it* on why being connected to the net, or why being able to give kids hundreds of textbooks on a little machine, etc, isn't valuable. The folks here in the US who live rural get the same routine, from apparently the same sort of people, "why should they need or want broadband way out there" etc. It's like, if you aren't already rich (by entire world standards), live in a heavily urban area, and have all the toys and gadgets and gizmos and technology you can want, that you are supposed to remain stuck at the "send them bags of food then forget about it" levels forever. "Oh look Buffy, how quaint, those cute little backward natives are playing on a computer. Why, there are still goats walking in the street, this is unacceptable though, they should be stripped of those time wasting machines that they couldn't possibly understand or make intelligent use of, and made to go back the way they were!"

    Really, it sounds just like that to me sometimes.

    I find it rather patronizing/condescending and jingoistic (in a broad sense) and really quite naive of those people to keep thinking that. Access to the net and having access to a computer are just a wonderful thing for *everyone*, you at least get a shot at doing something useful with it, like your examples, it doesn't matter where they are. And for kids in some poor area, it just might give them a little hope, some fun, some education, and who knows from there, but to feel part of the 21st century has to be enabling to a large degree, even if the rest of your life is more rough than not..

  25. The attention whore problem by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The trouble with the OLPC is that it's mostly a vehicle so that Negroponte can hang out with heads of state and such. Actually shipping product is secondary. It's all about national-level deals. Remember when OLPC had a "buy 2, get 1, give 1" program, and they botched basic order fulfillment?

    Those things should be in bubble-packs alongside the graphing calculators, with the price down to the original $99 by now. They don't need a fancier model. They need a cheaper model. They're being run over by the netbook industry. Netbooks are down to $100 if you buy in bulk from China. Look on Alibaba.

  26. Re:Priorities by geekangel · · Score: 1

    Twitter in the third world:

    What are you doing?

    Starving to death

    What are you doing?

    Still starving to death

    What are you doing?

    ...

  27. beside Negropontes motives by kubitus · · Score: 1
    the new OLPC has what I dreamed of:

    -

    two screens making up two pages like a book - allow me to read as I am used to.

    two screens allowing one for reference data, the other for the input to an application -

    - or in the case of lecture - one page for the teacher, one for the student

    one of the sreens duplicating as touch sensitive keyboard allow me to enter my text

    and 1.6 Mio books available plus the Gutenberg Project allow me to read ( as lot )

    I would have preferred a lower-power-guzzling CPU

    and as an option solar cell case to allow me to read my SF stories on the beach without dying batteries!