Slashdot Mirror


Congress May Require ISPs To Block Certain Fraud Sites

FutureDomain writes "A bill which just passed the House Financial Services Committee would require Internet Service Providers to block access to sites hosting financial scams that pose as members of the government-backed Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC). The bill, called the Investor Protection Act and sponsored by Paul Kanjorski (D-PA), is broad enough to block not only websites, but email and any other 'electronic material.' 'Internet providers are also worried that Kanjorski's requirement — and the accompanying civil penalties and injunctions — would apply even if the blocking is not technically feasible.'"

3 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. Re:OpenDNS by stonedcat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You realize of course we'd also have to stop people from using dangerous third party dns services for their own protection..

    --
    You can't take the sky from me.
  2. Re:good or bad? by kungfugleek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When they came for the fraud sites, I did not speak up because I was not a fraud site....

  3. Re:One thing to say by acedotcom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you high? The DMCA started with the best of intentions. Now it is used to stifle people criticism and control content. i can only assume you are some kind of troll, because you surely realize that as soon as you start blanketing one corner of the internet with "fraud protection", you move to "counterfeit assurance" and then "piracy control" until you finally get to "free speech countermeasures". if this is the internet you want, please, setup your own intranet and leave the rest of us out of it. i'll take the scammers any day over oppression.

    --
    they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!