Casino Denies Man $166 Million Jackpot
An anonymous reader writes 'After having played on the slot machine for over 30 minutes, Bill Seebeck was ecstatic when he hit the $166 million jackpot. However, The Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Tampa was less than enthusiastic, telling Seeback his win was a mistake because the machine malfunctioned. Thus, the casino refused to pay Seebeck his prize as the machine was only supposed to have a maximum pay out of $99K. Currently, the casino refuses to pay out even that amount.'
First ones up against the wall when the revolution comes.
San Francisco Photographers
The Casino took the same CHANCE of the machine malfunctioning the same way this man took a Chance with his money. And after it all, the random sequence of events said the man should win, not the Casino.
If the machine was clearly marked as having a $99K max payout, he should get the $99K. If it didn't, he should get the $166 million and if the Seminoles won't pay, they should end up in jail as racketeers.
If I were Nevada gambling commission, I would rule that when a Casion claims a win doesn't count because the machine was not working, they must pay the 'winner' all coins the machine took in since the day they can prove it worked (i.e. when it last serviced). Because since that time, they have been accepting profit from a broken machine.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
Nothing new here.
The tribes like the money, but hate to pay out.
I work in the industry (posting anonymously because I know people who read this).
Funny thing is, the exact bug that caused it was known about for a year, and Seminole personnel were either clueless or thinking it'd never actually happen in THEIR casino. I won't go into details (NDAs and such), but it is a good reminder to make sure your software is performing proper integrity checks on incoming data packets.
And by the way, once this story hit the news, the casino settled out of court.
In other news, Greedo McGreedly Insurance Company denies to pay for woman's life saving appendectomy, claiming that having an appendix is a 'prior condition' and paying for its removal shouldn't fall on their shoulders.
The woman said that she had paid her dues for 20 years, only going to the doctor once or twice for unrelated causes.
Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
Indian givers.
sorry.
How many acres of stolen and pillaged land that $166M can buy back.