Slashdot Mirror


National Data Breach Law Advances

Trailrunner7 writes "Two separate bills that would require organizations to notify consumers when their personal information has been compromised have made their way out of committee in the Senate, a critical step toward the creation of a national data-breach notification bill. But the Data Breach Notification Act, S.139, exempts federal agencies and other organizations subject to the bill from disclosing a breach if the data involved in the breach was encrypted. This is a clause that has caused some controversy, as some experts say that simply encrypting data does not render it useless. Also, S.139 would grant an exemption for data that 'was rendered indecipherable through the use of best practices or methods, such as redaction, access controls, or other such mechanisms, that are widely accepted as an effective industry practice, or an effective industry standard.' That is a very broad exemption that could become a sticking point as the bill moves along. The terms 'access controls' and 'other such mechanisms' encompass a huge number of technologies."

1 of 51 comments (clear)

  1. Why industry standards? by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    rendered indecipherable through the use of best practices or methods, such as redaction, access controls, or other such mechanisms, that are widely accepted as an effective industry practice, or an effective industry standard

    Doesn't ISO (International Organization for Standardization) have... standards for these kinds of things?

    Industry standards are the corporate version of "all the other kids are doing it".
    And seriously, I don't think self-regulation (aka industry standards) is going to cut it for data security.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!