Slashdot Mirror


MythTV 0.22 Released

uyguremre writes "After a little over a year and a half in the making, the developers of MythTV announced that MythTV 0.22 is now available. There have been a lot of large changes since 0.21, including a port from Qt v3 to Qt v4 and a major UI rewrite to convert to MythTV's new MythUI user interface libary. As always, this release adds support for some new hardware, in this case VDPAU video acceleration, DVB-S2, and the Hauppauge HD-PVR. The MythUI toolkit allows themes much greater control over the user interface and today we're announcing a competition to design new themes for MythTV. With the new release comes a theming competition too. For a more complete list of changes and new features, read the Release Notes on the wiki."

6 of 329 comments (clear)

  1. Re:does anyone still use it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given XBMC is not a DVR, and MythTV is, yes, those of us who don't steal our content still use MythTV.

  2. .01 Really? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, let's get this right, in this update they have:
    - Major back-end changes
    - Major UI rewrite
    - Significant new hardware support
    - Also, apparently a more powerful themes toolkit

    And this isn't even worth a .1 version increment. It's a .01

    Really, if the version numbers are going to be this meaningless for tracking significant changes they should at least name them or come up with some other system. Something that let's people get interested and involved in the project and excited about the new release.

    1. Re:.01 Really? by Telvin_3d · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, let's put it another way. Say you tried it at .20 and found that it was interesting but still too rough for your needs. Now, you are browsing around and see in passing that the current version is .22. Now, based on that .02 difference do you think that it has gone through major changes and deserves a second look or has it just been tweaked a little?

      No, don't go overboard. It doesn't need to be silly but it does need to provide a realistic feel of how the project is progressing. If your release notes are including the words 'major' and 'significant' and 'large changes' and 'major rewrite' it might be a good clue that it's worth going up by an entire .1

      Or since I'm sure all these didn't happen over night or perfectly in sync it may have called for some internal development releases that would have this public release be 2.5 or something.

      Or, yes, give it a name. It works for Ubuntu.

  3. Is it still same config nightmare? by distantbody · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do I still have to f**k around with 100 combinations/restarts of Qt, ffmpeg, XVideo, XvMC, libmpeg2, xv-blit, opengl, xlib, xshm, directfb, directx ...all whilst not being able to see the f**king mouse cursor and having to hit 'next' five times just to change one setting?

  4. Re:Could be one of the best HD DVRs out there... by wagnerrp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get back to me when MythTV allows support for CableCard tuners.

    MythTV has supported DVB-C CA modules for some time. Get back to me when someone releases CableCard drivers for Linux.

  5. Fuck that! by thijsh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Recording transmitted content has been a much used fair use right since the invention of the tape deck... And since then the industry has complained about, and tried to take away that right by imposing limits on each new technology that does basically the same.

    It's basically a fancy VCR! There is nothing wrong or illegal with it... what is worrying though is that geeks are actually scared of exercising their rights, and are scared of legal repercussions by companies that are taking away your rights.

    Why is it that when it comes to media people are scared to stand up for their rights, but when someone tries to 'limit free speech' all hell breaks loose... It's both a right, as is the right to be safe from unwarranted legal action that will bankrupt you whether you're right legally and/or morally.