Slashdot Mirror


FreeCreditReport.com Wins 1,017 Domains By UDRP

typosquatting writes to mention that the largest domain dispute case since the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) was enacted ten years ago has been decided. The decision saw 1,017 cyber-squatting domains turned over to ConsumerInfo.com, owner of FreeCreditReport.com. The full decision can be read via the National Arbitration Forum website. "It would seem that this decision sets or reinforces a fairly strong precedent that trademark holders may be entitled to, not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark, but also to a wide swath of other domain names including nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark, potentially even if the trademark is comprised of generic words."

5 of 184 comments (clear)

  1. Doesn't seem unfair to me... by moz25 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do not really agree that domains that only bear similarity to a mark should be transferred, but in this case, they are part of a large collection of domains that appear to be very obviously registered in bad faith, with the sole intention of typosquatting.

    I wonder if the registrant paid for those domains... this should have set him back at least $5k.

  2. A battle between two evil companies by Skapare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... means squat.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  3. Re:Reasons FTA.. by arth1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One could argue that Bank of America opens themselves up to typosquatters by using www.bankofamerica.com instead of their old and easier typed domain, bofa.com
    I notice that Barnes & Noble too wants users to type www.barnesandnoble.com instead of bn.com

    No, it doesn't make the typosquatters any more right, but I think one is justified in also blaming stupidmarketingdirectors@companieswithverylongdomainnames.com

  4. Re:Freecreditreport.com is a criminal scam by drDugan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But its even deeper than this. Freecreditreport leeches off an even bigger scam. The whole premise that people allow, expect and pay these three companies to collect and sell their own information back to others is a intrinsically a scam.

    The "big three" do not see or treat consumers as their customers - which explains why they are so difficult to deal with: their customers are other companies that buy information about the "worthiness" of potential customers, like you.

    The absurd and unfair treatment that people received from these private companies was so bad that the laws were changed to require them to provide some information back to the unwilling subjects of their profits.

  5. Re:Liar beats other liars? Mod up by drsmithy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't ask me why this is the case...

    Because - as I have recently found after starting a job here - the American banking system is utterly insane.

    I can't believe you people still use cheques, for fuck's sake. And that even with a 6 figure income you're looking at 6-12 months of "credit building" before you can qualify for a cheap car loan without being raped on interest rates.