Slashdot Mirror


GNOME 3 Delayed Until September 2010

supersloshy writes "Contrary to popular opinion, GNOME 3 will not be released in March next year. It has been delayed until September 2010, six months later. According to the news message, this is because 'our community wants GNOME 3.0 to be fully working for users and why we believe September is more appropriate.' GNOME 3's main goal is to re-define the ways people interact with the desktop, mainly through a new UI design (currently called 'GNOME Shell'), while GNOME 2.30, set for release in March, will have a focus on being stable. An early visual tour of GNOME 3 has been posted at Digitizor."

6 of 419 comments (clear)

  1. Problems on the horizon for Gnome 3! by Akir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, lots of people will be in an uproar! There are millions of problems with Gnome 3! For starters, it won't be enough like KDE 3, so everyone will think it's broken when there's really no problems with it!

  2. Re:How can xterm be improved? by XanC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You're looking for Yakuake. It's just like Quake: hit the tilde and a command console drops down from the top.

  3. Not going to comment about the actual product... by asaz989 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...but from an Ubuntu scheduling perspective this sounds like good news. The last thing Ubuntu needs for its next LTS release (10.04) is a big new jump to GNOME 3. It'll be nice to have an LTS that will let less bleeding-edge users wait until GNOME 3 has a year and a half of polish, integration, and (most importantly) actual user feedback to upgrade, while still retaining full support

    Plus, it'll be just plain interesting to see how Mark Shuttleworth reacts to this frankly rather iffy-looking overhaul. (Oh well, so much for not commenting about it.) Although let's be nice - the screenshots in the link seem to be design mockups, while in the actual screencasts they seem to have solved the billions-of-elipses problem.

  4. Re:Who needs GNOME when Windows is affordable by dokebi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yeah, yeah. Windows control 99.99% of germs, I mean desktop computers.

    I've been freed from Windows for about 4 years now, and there is no way in hell i am going back. I barely tolerate it on my netbook (hardware driver issues), and I install linux on all of my other machines now for these reasons:
    1. I spend 95% of my non-work computing time in Firefox.
    2. I spend 95% of my work computing time in Firefox and Eclipse.
    3. The other 8%, there are linux software for those.
    4. I use Virtualbox for the 2% of the time I _need_ Windows.

    In return for not using Windows, I gain:
    1. I don't worry about firewalls, or anti-virus software.
    2. Complete incremental backup of computer to network drive, usb drive, whatever.
    3. nfs, and sshfs. They really are awesome. Windows/mac users don't even know what they are missing.

    And most importantly:
    4. New OS every few months, FREE. FOREVER..

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  5. Please fix the window manager by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting
    • I have two applications A and B in different workspaces
    • Drag app A to the same workspace as app B
    • Workspace shows B
    • Click on A in the task bar (window list)
    • Application A minimises. I expect it to come to the front.
  6. NO JOHN RINGO NO. by argent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm seeing this kind of "MMO style" user interface more and more, where the desktop becomes more and more obscured by locked down immovable user interface elements. I've gotten used to the task bar on Windows and the Menu Bar on the Mac and the Panel, I can deal with that, there's one box and it's pretty small and I can stuff everything into it... but Microsoft keeps turning menus into big obtrusive blocks (ribbons and sidebars and the start panel and so on) and this new Gnome scheme seems to be putting this horrid scheme on steroids.

    No, no, no, ten thousand times, no.