Robbery Suspect Cleared By Facebook Alibi
postermmxvicom writes "Rodney Bradford has been cleared of robbery charges because of a Facebook update. The defense was able to prove that the update was made from his father's house, 13 miles away from the crime committed one minute earlier. Lawyer John G. Browning said, 'This is the first case that I’m aware of in which a Facebook update has been used as alibi evidence. We are going to see more of that because of how prevalent social networking has become.' Surely, this must be media hype, since it would not be a difficult alibi to fake."
$ at now + 30 minutes
at> curl -d 'status=lol watching tv' http://www.facebook.com
at> <EOT>
job 1 at 2009-11-14 15:36
Now, who to murder first?
But what happens when scripting becomes involved..
Write a script to make a "hey.. not out murdering my wife's lover" post then destroy/shred itself whilst you're out doing your chainsaw work.
So basically,
I can go commit any crime I want, as long as I use a remote desktop/VNC program to remote into my PC at home from my smart phone and post something to Facebook immediately afterward?
SWEET! Time to to rob that bank!
Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
Not robbing
Say you want to go burglarize someone's house, but you need to make it appear that you're posting on Facebook from your parents' basement? Well there's an app for that too!
---
DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
This decision just gave the IP address sword its second edge.
On the one hand, they were using IP addresses to identify and prosecute people for 'illegal' downloading and accessing child porn. Now, someone was aquitted based on their IP address.
Interesting indeed. Probably now, the authorities will realize the futility of using IP addresses as evidence.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Most evidence, with enough effort, can be faked. We usually call those conspiracies.
It would be a great amount of effort for a small robbery to perform this task and to get the corroborating evidence. There is very reasonable doubt that he committed the crime.
SIG: HUP
They did consider VPN's and Proxies and fairies too.
They also had witnesses, aka Real People, who also testified he was at his fathers house.
It was corroborating evidence, not the piece the case hinged on.
Once again, Facebook verified what multiple REAL PEOPLE were telling the cops. It wasn't the only piece of evidence.
You love how ignorant people are of the legal profession, I love how people like you are so pompous and know-it-all's they can't even read the article.
I could have been cleared, but I posted as an Anonymous Coward.
Well, it is within the realm of the possible that somebody sat down and applied Occams razor to the possible scenarios: The first scenario involves this bloke (1) planning to rob somebody, (2) setting up a proxy or vpn service and (3) some people conspiring to give false evidence. The second scenario: The bloke was at home and nobody lied.