Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Aims To Close Performance Gap With Internet Explorer 9

Barence writes "Microsoft has unveiled the first details of Internet Explorer 9, promising that it will close the performance gap on rival browsers. The major newcomer is a revamped rendering engine that will tap the power of the PC's graphics card to accelerate text and graphics performance. 'We're changing IE to use the DirectX family of Windows APIs to enable many advances for web developers,' explains Internet Explorer's general manager, Dean Hachamovitch. As well as improving performance, Microsoft claims the hardware acceleration will enhance the appearance and readability of fonts on the web, with sub-pixel positioning that eradicates the jagged edges on large typefaces."

21 of 477 comments (clear)

  1. Sub Pixel rendering, really? by Rashkae · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft claims the hardware acceleration will enhance the appearance and readability of fonts on the web, with sub-pixel positioning that eradicates the jagged edges on large typefaces

    Anyone else get the feeling Dean hasn't really been keeping up with recent developments? If that's IE's general manager, it explains much.

    1. Re:Sub Pixel rendering, really? by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

      Subpixel rendering (turning on or off R,G,B elements) is a cool concept. It almost makes me want to give-up my CRT for an LCD. Almost. In reality my eyes can't see those pixels smaller than 1024x800 resolution, so it makes no difference anyway. And I can't believe we're now on IE9. I just upgraded to version 7 last month! Next you're going to tell me XP-SP2 is not the latest OS. ;-)

      Aside -

      I just tried the K-MELEON web browser for a few weeks. I don't recommend it. Despite claims that it's "ultrafast" it keeps freezing-up for 4-5 seconds while pages are downloading. That's rather frustrating when you're trying to highlight text and the computer does not respond. Firefox or Opera are the best ones (IMHO).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Sub Pixel rendering, really? by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Next you're going to tell me XP-SP2 is not the latest OS."

      Nah after XP there was a huge gap and then Windows 7 came out with NOTHING INBETWEEN.

  2. With a fast CPU and a dual GPU setup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...users will finally be able to browse the Crysis website with acceptable framerates.

  3. Re:Performance gap but not Conformance gap by Bottles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because it's more efficiently coded.

  4. Awesome! by wandazulu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now it will incorrectly render my pages twice as fast!

    Seriously, IE has become a verb with me and my web developer friends. We even use it in general conversation: "That guy cut me off and I told him to go IE himself."

    1. Re:Awesome! by Jeff+Carr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. I, and I'm sure many others, spent countless hours studying web technologies in the late 90's. I was starting to become quite an expert in typography, accessibility, interface design, and the myriad of technologies necessary to create complete web applications. Then I started trying to develop standards based web pages that worked in IE.

      So, now I'm a database developer.

      --
      The television will not be revolutionized.
  5. Re:Performance gap but not Conformance gap by Corbets · · Score: 5, Funny

    The ACID conformance is still at a dismal 30% compared to 90% of chrome, Safari and Opera.

    The internet willstill be divided into 2 - the Microsoft world and the Real, Normal world.

    Shame, really. So many years, and the leopard has yet to change its spots.

    So buy a snow leopard instead....

  6. Re:Forget performance by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uh... you're in the wrong place. This is where we bitch about IE, not Firefox.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  7. Re:IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    For IE to be successful, they need to port it to a proper operating system.

  8. Re:How about... by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Spell check is not a luxury, its a necessity

    For those who can't spell.

  9. Re:Add-On System by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    IE also has a lot of add ons. Browse the web with it for a while and you will effortlessly collect lots of them.

  10. Re:Performance gap but not Conformance gap by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because the real world is a line from (-INF,0) to (+INF,0). The imaginary world is the entire complex plane EXCEPT that line where y=0i.

    Because given a bounded area containing a road and a chicken, according to Brownian motion the probability of the chicken crossing the road rises to exactly 1.

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
  11. Meta moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What the hell is with the dude who modded everything in this thread 'troll'?

    It's amusingly ironic that your next line states:

    I used to metamod like crazy. The new system makes no sense, and I refuse to continue.

    So, effectively, you don't like the moderation, but you aren't willing to do anything.

    Or does making comments about moderation count as metamoderation now? (And, if so, does making comments about the comments about moderation count as meta-metamoderation?)

    (I'd post this under my own name, but I have to be AC or I'll undo my moderation...)

  12. Re:IE by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

    That depends on the OS.

    You do have a point there. But I can count on 1 finger how many OS's Microsoft is targeting with IE.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  13. Re:Performance gap but not Conformance gap by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's silly. ACID shows if something works or not. Benchmarks are speed tests that can be wildly inaccurate compared to real world testing. I mean it isn't like browsers are faking it (btw this is my browser: http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/acid3-465.png .. unlike most browsers its not en executable, just open it in any image viewing app) as graphics card companies have.

    I don't think 100% is necessary mind you. I do think a passing grade is a good thing.

  14. IE is also an injection by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 4, Funny

    as in, "The web developer screamed 'IEEEEEEE!' as he lept to his death in frustration." This is known as an injection attack and is becoming increasingly common.

    --
    Think global, act loco
  15. Re:Performance gap but not Conformance gap by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why do people realise how stupid benchmarks are, yet parrot on about ACID all day?

    I don't like tomatoes, but I like unit testing. I thought I'd mention that as long as we're tossing out non-sequiturs.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  16. Re:IE will suck less? by Aklyon · · Score: 3, Funny

    how many times will it need to suck less before it reaches the non-suckiness of Firefox and Chrome? 42?

    IE42, still IE, but doesn't suck this time! Really!

    --
    I reserve the right to have a physical object so I can sell it later, and recover my money.
  17. Re:Performance gap but not Conformance gap by pugugly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Drunk, with no helmet, crashed?

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
  18. Re:Help with history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why doesn't blink work in Firefox 3? That's a Mozilla-based browser

    Because the first thing the Mozilla developers probably did as soon as they got ahold of the source was find and remove any code related to the most annoying tag in existence.