Slashdot Mirror


China Enforces Even Stricter Regulation On Games

eldavojohn writes "Chinese gamers have a pretty hard life. From crackdowns on 'undesirable' games to bans on gangster games to delayed World of Warcraft expansions, they suffer. The worst part is that in order to qualify for operating in China, you face a maze of conflicting bureaucracy and regulation. Well, it just got a little worse. Now, if you want to operate, you need to hire a 'specialist' to oversee content, and you need to 'enhance socialist values' in your game. They also want to limit in-game marriages and how many player-versus-player combat sessions one can engage in. The circular issued from China's Ministry of Culture contained all the vague verbiage giving them easier reign over who operates and who doesn't. It's a large market, but is it worth the gamble to game developers?"

45 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. Good for them! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny

    I heard they are banning all Wii games with the word "Party" in the title.

    1. Re:Good for them! by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard they are banning all Wii games with the word "Party" in the title.

      Will they at least let people play Dance Dance Cultural Revolution?

    2. Re:Good for them! by ArundelCastle · · Score: 2, Funny

      I heard they are banning all Wii games with the word "Party" in the title.

      Will they at least let people play Dance Dance Cultural Revolution?

      Sorry, they've just declared Dance Dancing as activity against the State because it involves standing in a Square.

  2. Of course by Improv · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are plenty of game developers that would love to capture part of the Chinese market. It's mainly developers that operate a bit too close to prohibited levels of hedonism and a few other touchy subjects that will have problems, and it's not like Chinese need games tailored to them - people taking the effort to make a game could go worldwide if their game won't work in China.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  3. nuts by Tom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a large market, but is it worth the gamble to game developers?

    Are you nuts? It's a market that in a few years will be 5-10 times larger than the US market, taking into account that asian cultures are more open to gaming in general (see Korea for example). If there is any single market in the world that's worth it, it's China.

    Other industry has been there, done that. Car manufacturers all knew after the initial surprises that if they open a factory in China, their blueprints will be copied and another chinese factory somewhere else will produce the same cars for a cheaper price. Some stayed out of China for that reason. Until the chinese began to buy cars. Then, they had no choice but to do it, because they couldn't sell on the chinese market without having a chinese factory. They did it knowing full well the damage they'd sustain.

    Frankly, ten years from now, game developers will probably wonder whether it's worth the trouble anymore translating their games for the US market.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:nuts by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But developing a game that pushes Socialist values and limits various gameplay could essentially RUIN your sales in every country BUT China.

      Is China > 50% of the market?

      Will China be > 50% of the market?

    2. Re:nuts by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But developing a game that pushes Socialist values and limits various gameplay could essentially RUIN your sales in every country BUT China.

      Game? Sales? China? They pay for games in China? Who'd of thunk it....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:nuts by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think that it'll take 10 years. Their present system is, at least, classifiable as "crony capitalism with state intervention", and the proles(both city and country) are getting the shaft to a degree that would please any sneering Dickensian oligarch(though, since they are getting the same shit slice of a larger pie, their anger hasn't yet become unmanageable).

    4. Re:nuts by Applekid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But developing a game that pushes Socialist values and limits various gameplay could essentially RUIN your sales in every country BUT China.


      #ifdef REGION_CHINA
              gameRules.PVP = false;
              gameRules.GroupRules.Max += 5;
      #endif

      If Duke Nukem puffs on a cigar to a backdrop of the US flag in a cutscene, I'd see either the content re-rendered with a different flag texture or just removed outright. The commercial response to censorship will be the cheapest and shortest workaround to get within the law, not a group-up redesign.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    5. Re:nuts by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      haha, people have been saying this since Tiena square. Not happening any time soon; however there form of socialist/market is very interesting, and due mostly to Tienanmen square.

      There socialist i the half of income from imports goes into a giant savings that is used to establish and maintain a global business presence.

      In effect, any single US company is competing with the whole of China. If we don't adapt to that, then we will be doomed. As long as people are lying about something as simple and obvious as getting health care to people, I don't see it being a good political move to suggest taxing imports for the sole reason of leveraging industry from verses, or supporting a solid business ground work in 3rd world countries going to fly.

      The US and China are heading to the same point, but from different sides. The only question where will that point be?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:nuts by Mr+Otobor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Frankly, ten years from now, game developers will probably wonder whether it's worth the trouble anymore translating their games for the US market.

      Well, that hardly seems likely, even if the US is still "only" the number one market in 10 years :) (Maybe a different story 20 - 30 years out.)

      While I could imagine a collapse of UK/US to just "ENG", but I seriously doubt the English speaking market is going anywhere (UK, US, AU, CA, NZ, de facto second language for many in India, lots of other people who don't get to have games/manuals/books/etc. translated to their native language as part of the standard 8 or 10 translations done for most modern products.) Perhaps in another 100 or 200 years, English and Chinese will have begun to merge for real (if Chingrish isn't already on that path) but you're going to continue to have a huge English market if for no other reason than right now 400million+ speak English as a first language, and the majority of those are in countries that are not under any kind of population pressure or serious resource pressure (think US and Canada.). Also, you forget the language diversity within China... out of 1.2 billion "only" 850+ million speak Mandarin as a first language.

      China is rising, yeah, the US is going down, yeah, blah, blah, blah. It makes a nice headline and gets peoples' emotions up a bit, but the truth is more like, "China is rising and the US is... rising much more slowly. But is way, way far out ahead." Anyway, did anyone really thing the world could remain so massively imbalanced in power and prestige forever? (The answer, apparently, at least if you listen to news and posts like this, is "Yes.")

    7. Re:nuts by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You say this like the Chinese government could actually control 1.2 billion people if they really & truly yearned to be free.

      The population of China is like the elephant that can be fettered with a thin rope, because heavy chains were used during it's youth. They can only be restricted as much as they *let* themselves be restricted.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    8. Re:nuts by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That goes without say. But "socialist values"? C'mon, China hasn't been socialist for quite a while now.

      Don't equate socialist with dictatorship. There are socialist dictatorships, but there are also socialist societies that are no dictatorships as well as dictatorships that are anything but socialist.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:nuts by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly what does controlling information and oppressing citizens have to do with Socialism?

      For that matter, what does the government of the PRC have to do with Socialism? Their situation looks a lot more like crony capitalism and kleptocracy mixed with old fashioned totalitarianism than a system where the workers control the means of production and allocate resources toward the common good...

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    10. Re:nuts by mckinnsb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It goes just a little deeper than that.

      You have to consider the fact that games like Grand Theft Auto 4 and Assassin's Creed are not even capable of being released in China - not just because of particular things in the game which could be set by a configuration file or bypassed with a boolean (the main character is Slavic, shooting of 'Triad' gang members), but because of the raw nature of the gameplay itself. Granted, GTA IV is a very visceral example, but with these new restrictions, China is now going to have a say in the gameplay of every game that is released in China - and game developers are going to have to pay for it. To be honest, only huge software companies (Blizzard, Electronic Arts) are going to find developing a game for China profitable, because these "bureaucratic fees" are going to crowd out everyone else - and they are going to have to design these games specifically for China. The root poster is right - these new games are probably going to be much tamer than their non-Chinese counterparts, and will probably sell horribly outside of China, and will likely not be translated. The cultural wall remains.

    11. Re:nuts by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>>Is China > 50% of the market?
      >>>Will China be > 50% of the market?

      1.3 billion Chinese versus 0.4 billion Americans/Canadians + 0.5 billion Europeans + 0.1 Japanese
      57% > 43%

      Yes China will be >50% of the developed world's market. That's assuming they don't stumble due to an oil crisis (oil becoming scarce) which would prevent them from reaching US/EU/JP level of advancement.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:nuts by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yearning to be free?!? Where did that idea come from? Chinese people aren't "yearning" for anything. As a matter of fact, they are intensely grateful to their government for making the present prosperity possible. It's better in China today than it has been at any time in their 5000 years of history, and it's only improving. It's a damn sight better than the Mao years when he murdered tens of millions and the lucky ones merely froze in unheated factories and classrooms. Oh, maybe they should go back to Chiang Kai-Shek and the warlords? Let's see...Empress Cixi? Nope, unmitigated disaster there, too. Unequal treaties, Opium wars, should I keep going back? The government could decree that every citizen gets a boot to the head daily from the security guards at every community entrance, and they'd still proclaim loudly that China is better off than it has ever been - and they'd be right. And the reason is the government. If the government wanted, the entire nation would still be living in poverty. 1.3 billion starving poor: the Chinese called it "1949-1976".

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    13. Re:nuts by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, this is probably the most ignorant comment I've seen in a thread absolutely chock full of them. Where the F is India in your little calculation? Brazil? Moreover, a single Westerner has the buying power of many Chinese.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re:nuts by Rakishi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean China should be growing more slowly and incompetently?

      Compared to India, China has been way ahead in terms of economic growth. It took India two decades and a major economic disaster to even approach China's growth and it's still not rivaling it despite another two decades. You know why it took so long? Because India's government was blocked from implementing economic reforms. Yeah, really useful form of government they had.

    15. Re:nuts by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Informative
      Zheng He was on a mission to make the barbarians pay tribute to the center of the universe, the Chinese emperor. I'm not sure such things are a good idea. Moreover, the emperor squandered treasure on the useless fleets that would have better been spent on things like flood control and grain for starving peasants after there was no flood control and the rivers destroyed everything. The Chinese have an expression, "to eat bitterness" which means that you're a peasant who's totally screwed in life and not going anywhere. This expression is thousands of years old.

      China is just getting back to it's historical place as #1 in the world.
      They never were #1 in the world, they were #1 in China. They simply don't care about the rest of the world, everyone who is not Chinese and one of God's chosen people is a barbarian. Even referring to China as a single nation is disingenuous.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  4. Re:No PVP? by tilandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't worry, as with all business in China you just have to know who to bribe.

  5. Best Plan Ever? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about I develop a game that caters EXACTLY what the Chinese government would like, and then they use their overpowered censorship and propoganda to promote it and only it...

    Question Marks

    Profit?

    1. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Reason58 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a very profitable idea but you might want to consult with IBM about how history views those who comply with fascism for monetary return.

      I would definitely compare IBM's assistance in identifying, tracking and cataloging people for the Nazis during the Holocaust to PvP restrictions in World of Warcraft.

    2. Re:Best Plan Ever? by Eevee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can assure you that no matter how history views IBM, it hasn't affected IBM's stock prices one bit.

    3. Re:Best Plan Ever? by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I disagree with your assertion. China, with its definite nationalism and its growing corporatism, really is starting to look a lot more National Socialist than socialist. There are some facets of historical fascism that China does not match, but not even all of the reputedly fascist regimes had all of those facets. For instance, strong racism was more of a specialization of Nazi Germany. Fascist states likely Italy and Vichy France, pretty much followed the German lead on racism. Spanish fascism was much less racial and more of a religious/corporatist alliance.

      The great hallmarks of fascism are totalitarianism, nationalism and coordination of the economy by cooperating with big business instead of taking it over. There is also a concept of strength being its own goal. China does not really have a long history of corporations like the West does, but once it does have this sort of basis, it could well turn into something very close to the structure of the fascist countries of the 20th Century. Certainly, China is very much looking to increase its strength in as many ways as possible, and is certainly not against doing so at the expense of other nations.

      Needless to say, with a country as big as China and the fact that it is rapidly becoming a gigantic market that the old fascist countries could never dream of being, China's system may well merit its own label, but I think fascist is certainly a more accurate term than communist, or even socialist. After all, as someone pointed, there are socialist states and parties that are democratic and not overly nationalist.

  6. Re:No PVP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    PvP cuts into the gold-farming time - gotta keep pushing the GDP up!

  7. Huge Market, really? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a software market in China? I mean one that generatess actual money, and doesn't just pirate everything?

    I guess 2% of a billion is a pretty big number.

  8. Re:All about palm greasing by boldtbanan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mod parent up. This law is basically saying "You must hit all of these subjective benchmarks." That's code for "You must pay us enough money to agree that you are hitting all of these subjective benchmarks."

    Laws are rarely about what's good for the people. They're usually about what's good for the lawmakers. Occasionally the two coincide.

  9. Re:lol by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By "take games seriously" are you referring to the people in their 20s that still spend all their spare time playing games? They need to grow up?

    Or do you mean the people that think games have are extremely influential on people... you think they need to grow up?

    Whether or not PvP is good or bad is one argument, but arguing that games don't really influence people is ridiculous. If nothing else, it consumes their time, for better or worse. Games - and all entertainment - is not a neutral activity, just as reading a book isn't. Movies, games, and books (and TV, radio, etc) all influence people; game creators, movie producers, and authors can push behaviors, points, agendas, etc. It's not the medium that makes something "neutral" or non-influential.

  10. How to enhance socialist values in games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. If you are playing the Call of Duty campaign and you pick up an ammo pack, you only get 1/10 of the ammo and the rest go to your NPC squadmates. If you point out that they are idiotic clowns that never pick up ammo to give to you in return, it's "Game Over" as you are sent to a reeducation camp to rid you of your bourgeoiseity.

    2. In Resident Evil, all the money you collect to buy items will instead be melted down to produce a golden plow. Instead, which weapons you get in the store depends on how badly you have played before. If you want that rocket launcher, you had better get shot up quite a bit before you visit. Make sure you drop those health packs behind a corner.

    3. In Betrayal at Krondor, if you haggle too much with a merchant, you are seeking to exploit your position of privilege to subdue to rights of the worker, and the labour union of every store on the world map will make their merchants refuse to sell to you.

    4. In Super Mario Bros., there's no point in playing, because the princess gets her just dessert after gorging on the paltry meals of the people. The revised edition has Bowser wear a top hat, and you are saving a revolutionary songwriter.

    5. In Zelda, you can only play the game once a year. This is because everyone in the game must take a turn in being allowed to use the sword, which is the only sword in existence. It is bourgeoise to claim that just because your parents were such-and-such, and you found a sword that someone else left in the forest, you should be allowed to keep it away from being shared with the people.

    6. In Harvest Moon, the amount of money you get allocated will be lower the more you produce. This is because everyone should give according to ability and receive according to need, and since you obviously dig like a freaking maniac while nobody else in the village does, you have just proved that you are able to dig like a freaking maniac which nobody else has. Since you were a capitalist before, it should be expected that you conceal part of the produce.

    1. Re:How to enhance socialist values in games by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're talking typical theory, socialism is simply a transitionary stage towards communism.

            Canada and Sweden prove you wrong. Both countries have very strong social values (incredibly high income tax, many other taxes, amazing benefits for the unemployed/unemployable, subsidized health care, education, etc). Neither country is on the verge of turning "communist" any time soon.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  11. With all the rules and regulations they have.... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You could make a video game of getting guy developing and publishing a video game in China.

    Oh the Onion'y of it all.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  12. Bribes by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Informative

    The funny thing is, by reading Slashdot, one gets the impression that the CCP (and thus the gummint) has clamped down on everything.

    Yet, I know people who travel there regularly and they state, you can get anything you want as long as you know where to go or who to talk to. Much is readily available in stores which is supposedly banned.

    China may pass laws, but the enforcement is a whole different matter.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Bribes by longfalcon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you're kidding right?

      Bribery and corruption are accepted in many Eastern (and Middle Eastern) cultures. everyone does it, and if you don't, you don't get to play.

      when someone tries the same thing in the US or Europe, they always end up facing charges or at the very least looking for work somewhere else. if money buys immunity, then why did Enron, Worldcom, Madoff, etc. all end up prosecuted?

    2. Re:Bribes by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So it's like our country - tons of laws that are rarely enforced, until the politicians decide to "make an example" of someone and then they use those laws to arrest anyone they desire to arrest, because we're ALL guilty to breaking at least one law. China's more like us than different.

      BTW, why isn't China bankrupt yet? Perhaps it's because they watched the Soviet Union communist government fall, and they decided to evolve into a fascist state (privately-owned capitalist companies, but with strict centralized control).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Bribes by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Informative


      There's a few sad exceptions I know of - all to do with the British arms industry. Last year, BAE was being investigated for bribery to a Saudi Prince (well known corrupt tosser Prince Bandar, but the British Government intervened directly to halt the investigation. Everybody and their dog knows that BAE are guilty - and the bribes amount to US$2bn. TheNew Labour government would eat poo if BAE Systems told them to. They have no pride where that company is concerned.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:Bribes by ajs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      my point is that as a culture, the West as made an effort to rein in these abuses by the rule of law, as it makes our economy a less-dangerous place to do business than, say, a country that will nullify your contracts

      You have an overly optimistic or perhaps an overly localized view. Is it perhaps the case that you are inured to the ritualized abuse that we engage in as a matter of course?

      Do you work for a company that employs lobbyists? Does your company comply with certification requirements by "working with" regulatory agencies to craft inspection guidelines? Do you think that money among other considerations doesn't get exchanged? Do you think it only happens in small quantities? Do you wonder how one goes about getting the best contracts with U.S. government interests overseas? Have you ever seen a company's executive management go through an IPO? Do you think that that process is not an outright manipulation of the market, favoring only a small faction of the largest investors in order to concentrate and maintain their position of wealth and power?

      We do have a more open system than some. We have a far more corrupt system that institutionalizes bribery than others.

    5. Re:Bribes by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      when someone tries the same thing in the US or Europe, they always end up facing charges or at the very least looking for work somewhere else. if money buys immunity, then why did Enron, Worldcom, Madoff, etc. all end up prosecuted?

      Madoff? REALLY are you that brainwashed? Do you have any idea how long that man was stealing money? The only reason ANYTHING happened to him was because of the crash.

      Enron? EVIL CEO Skilling is being held in a low-security prison in Englewood, Colorado. Enron's bankruptcy in 2001 eliminated more than 5,000 jobs and $1 billion in employee retirement funds. Skilling was sentenced to 24 years and 4 months but that's being reduced sloowly now that no one is paying attention. I think it's now down to 15 years after an appeal. 15 years in club fed translates into what? 7 years? He'll be out and cashing in his hidden assets before you make 1/10,000 of it and all he had to do was spend a few years kicking back and watching TV? HA count me in!

      You really should start making a list and checking up every year or so after the news has stopped caring.. Honestly that is a great idea for a website.. Hell maybe I will make one. It could be the next google.... Anyone wanna give me some startup money? I'll triple it within a year! Promise...

      As far as the rest. Do your own damn googling... I know you wont and even if you do have these people get out with no one ever even noticing.

      Keep living in your fairytale land where everyone gets a fair trail and justice is always severed. It must be a nice delusion, hell, maybe it's all those anti-depressants or something in those TV-dinners... Yumm...

    6. Re:Bribes by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The biggest difference between bribery and corruption in China and in the West. When the finally do prosecute the people who took bribes and corrupted government they also pursue those people who paid the bribes, in fact the greater focus is on the one paying the bribe. In China where corruption charges are largely driven by politics (the majority are corrupt when your out of favour, you just get convicted for it) the people paying the bribes are pretty much forgotten about.

      As for China being a large market, that is a delusion, it might be a populace market but when you wages are cents on the dollar compared to western wages, that $40 game even when your forced to work a twelve hour day 6 days a week, is a whole lot of money letting alone dumping on top the cost of hardware and for online stuff and network connections.

      Which is why those in control of the corporo-fascist power structure like to so fiercely protect what little there is of it. China's market is pure and simple the ruthless exploitation of it's work force and environment in which they live and, this will continue until it collapse under the socio-economic and environmental pressures.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  13. Blah blah blah from the government by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I suppose y'all should have figured it out by now, but if not I'll spell it out and use small words. The Chinese government loves to pass new laws and announce new strategies. There is usually great fanfare, the press bleating like the contemptible sheep they are (the Chinese state-controlled press bleats too) and great discussions on the net as millions of electrons give their last and break up into neutrinos and photons. Then, six months later, nobody has heard of the act or law or whatever, because it's not enforced. This is the "secret" (pretty freaking obvious) of the Chinese government.

    They want you to be in violation of something. With all the legislation, it is impossible to comply with every single law without driving yourself out of business. Everyone knows it, and the Chinese government (at central, provincial, city, and district levels, which are all different and have little relation with each other) knows it too. They like knowing that they can shut you down at any time, but are usually content to let things go as long as you play ball. This kind of ball-play can be laissez faire for years or it can be an "I am altering the deal, pray I don't alter it further" kind of situation. You really have no way of knowing how it will turn out, and the government likes it like that. This is why it's so important to have buddies in government who can warn you of upcoming problems or give you some lamb's blood to mark yourself so the inspectors pass you over. I had one high muckety-muck vice-director of the municipal propaganda ministry hold my product in his hand as if he were weighing it, and said it was about 80% legal. I couldn't puzzle it out, either it's legal or illegal, how can legality be a percentage, and a guess at that! Later I got it...I felt pretty dumb. It was obvious, only my cultural blinders kept me from seeing it.

    And to those of you who are already hitting "reply" to say "durr, just like my country only my country is much worse", do you have a ministry of culture whose job it is to enhance socialist values? With lawyers and truncheons if necessary? You can joke all you like about capitalism taking over but there are plenty of true-believer Mao-worshipping socialists in the government.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  14. Desireable means their profit and agenda first. by Bob_Who · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its called a dogmatic National Interest. Welcom to international super power politics and self interest. Its how we all feel indignantly justified in our ethnocentric human nature. If the media is from a "foreign" undesirable culture then please feel free to steal it since we won't let you buy it, and you are a criminal anyway. But the legitimate stuff that they sell, first and foremost. America just can't seem to wrap their minds around the fact that China, the most populous nation by far, is not a democracy. If it we're, they'd out vote us every time. Which is exactly how they handle us anyway. Its like trying to push a sleepy grumpy Yak up a mountain with a twig. Moooooo.

  15. That's the China fallacy by Xaedalus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "China's going to be a HUGE market!" is the China fallacy, which operates with the assumption that consumers in China are like consumers elsewhere, and that as soon as they get money they will become a gold mine.

    That is a fallacy that's been going on for three to four hundred plus years, and contributed directly to the downfall of the Qing Emperor, the Open Door policy, and all the other problems that China's been trying to recover from for the last hundred years. See, China's culture is very nationalistic and one of their flaws is that they believe they are the center of the Earth. In the mercantile age, that meant that China always exported its goods but would only accept silver from the West because western goods were always seen as 'inferior'. It almost bankrupted the British Empire, and did significant economic damage to the other Western countries, so they retaliated by basically taking over China's ports (and the whole country) to boot.

    To assume that once THIS happens then China will open up to the West is wrong. China will continue what it's doing right now with the currency, and with it's trade policies: accepting money (in the form of Treasury debt and other convertibles) and exporting its goods without buying our goods, because they do not want to be 'dependent' on us. This is at the heart of the Chinese currency manipulation problem - that China is doing exactly what it did 200+ years ago - hoarding monetary assets while not accepting imports from us and slowly bankrupting us. They're not doing it out of spite, they're doing it because to them, all other countries and cultures are 'inferior' to a degree and they want to be the center of the world - and the center never accepts help from the edges.

    That's why the best route for developers is to ignore China. Don't buy into the fallacy, because then you force China to accept your goods, and in doing so, you fix the imbalance.

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    1. Re:That's the China fallacy by kklein · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone else knows Chinese history!!!

      Yes, to everything you said. Just a little low-hanging fruit that you missed (but probably know), though:

      China doesn't just believe they are the center of the Earth; that's what the country is named. Westerners often wax quaint and endearing to the "Middle Kingdom," but that first character can mean "middle," but here it means "central." It isn't "Middle Kingdom;" it's "Central Nation!"

      The emperor used to make Western envoys dance for his pleasure to secure trade contracts. All these European trade ministers in the court, trying to dance around and amuse the emperor more than the last... And we're still doing it.

      The only chance the West would have ever had to have fair dealings with China would have been if we let Japan take it over. Now, I'm not saying we should have done that (we were right to stop them, of course), but it might have made more sense from a business perspective.

  16. Re:No PVP? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "One of the things I have always found troubling about Westerners doing business in emerging market countries is that they sometimes take an almost perverse pride in discussing payoffs to government officials. It is as though their having paid a bribe is a symbol of their international sophistication and insider knowledge. Yet, countless times when I am told of the bribe, I know the very same thing could almost certainly have been accomplished without a bribe." --Source

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  17. Mechwarrior 3 by jgtg32a · · Score: 2, Funny

    MW3 has been out for a while and I don't remember House Liao being mentioned.