Has Sci-Fi Run Out of Steam?
Barence writes "Science fiction has long inspired real-world technology, but are the authors of sci-fi stories finally running out of steam? PC Pro has traced the history of sci-fi's influence on real-world technology, from Jules Verne to Snow Crash, but suggests that writers have run out of ideas when it comes to inspiring tomorrow's products. 'Since Snow Crash, no novel has had quite the same impact on the computing world, and you might argue that sci-fi and hi-tech are drifting further apart,' PC Pro claims. Author Charles Stross tells the magazine that he began writing a sci-fi novel in 2005 and 'made some predictions, thinking that in ten years they'd either be laughable or they'd have come true. The weird bit? Most of them came true already, by 2009.'"
Yeah, that's why everybody's switching to steampunk. Plenty of steam.
Comment of the year
. I can come up with my own deus ex machinas, thank you.
The correct plural form of deus ex machina is deii ex machina, not deus ex machinas. OMG, they dont seem to teach anything in Latin classes these days. Now etgay utoy foay ymay awnlay.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
I'm monotheistic but believe in multiple machines, you insensitive clod!
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
How can Sylar pick-up a person and throw him against a wall? Newton's Law dictates that Sylar should be pushed backward with an equal force (recoil)
I take it you've never been bowling, for fear of being hurled back out through the front doors when you throw the ball down the alley?
which is totally what she said
Of course, with nanotechnology the trees will be tiny, tiny trees. So we will be more likely to see the forest than the trees.
"Romanes eunt domus"? "People called Romanes they go the house"?
If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
I pray every day.
You are welcome on my lawn.