Slashdot Mirror


Is That Sushi Hazardous To Your Health?

pdclarry writes "A recent study by scientists at the American Museum of Natural History and Columbia University found that a piece of tuna sushi may not be tuna at all: 'A piece of tuna sushi has the potential to be an endangered species, a fraud or a health hazard,' wrote the authors. 'All three of these cases were uncovered in this study.' The study, published in PLoS ONE examined 68 samples of tuna sushi purchased from 31 restaurants in Manhattan (New York City) and Denver, Colorado. Some of these were from endangered species, others were not as labeled, and some were not tuna at all. Of these last, five samples labeled as 'white tuna' were from a toxic fish, Escolar, which is a gempylid species banned for sale in Italy and Japan due to health concerns. 'It can cause gastrointestinal symptoms ranging from mild and rapid passage of oily yellow or orange droplets, to severe diarrhea with nausea and vomiting. The milder symptoms have been referred to as keriorrhea [i.e. flow of wax in Greek].' Fraud in sushi is not new; Slashdot also reported study on mislabeling in 2008. This new study shows that some sushi can actually make you sick. The study was also covered by Wired."

11 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Keriorrhea by pinkj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can finally be a lot more accurate about my bowel movements whenever I call in sick or I'm late for something.

  2. Buyer Beware! by Chicken_Kickers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I currently live in an inland city, hundreds of kilometers from the the nearest ocean. This is why I refuse to eat sushi at the restaurants here since the fish will not be very fresh. I am a microbiologist, so I don't even eat that much sushi anyway since I know what sort and how many bacteria will grow on uncooked fish. Regarding fake or poisonous fish, ask around first before you eat at any restaurant (not only for sushi). I am sure that bad reputation will spread very quickly. There are many websites and blogs that do restaurant reviews. Alternatively, you can make your own sushi as it is not very hard to do. If you can make a sandwich, you can definitely make sushi.

  3. Re:Possible none issue soon by Nethead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...then at least stop eating top level carnivores.

    Not to worry, I don't eat humans on Atkins.

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  4. Re:Possible none issue soon by wisty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or perhaps we should go for IVM (in-vitro meat)?

    I bet that the first commercial use for IVM will be feeding tuna, and other carnivorous livestock. That will fund the technology until it's ready for actually eating. As a bonus, we could clone rare (or maybe even extinct) species, and eat them too!

  5. Re:Possible none issue soon by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, the idea is to breed the fish and then release millions upon millions of fingerlings into the various oceans. The real problem is how we got here and what will change. Basically, countries need to change. For example, the Atlantic tuna is about collapse. The reason is that overfishing is being done. By who? Well, America and Canada have STRICT limits on Canadian/American fleets which are checked pretty thoroughly. We also have foreign ships here that are under restrictions. Most are Chinese and Japanese. The japanese ships will dock at our ports, be checked, and then take the whole load back to Japan. OTH, The Chinese ships come in, drop off their max allowed load, and then show up back in China with a full load. IOW, they are taking another load on their way back (illegal, but easy enough to pull off from what I have heard). But that is not the full issue. EU has been horrible about putting restraints on their taking of the Tuna. And those nations that do, simply look the other way when the ship is over.

    What needs to happen is that ALL OF THE NATIONS that have fisheries need to protect these. It can not be so half ass anymore.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  6. Re:Technically... by tjstork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most good Japanese restaraunts have the difference between Sushi and Sashimi on page 1 of their menu, and more Americans than you think know the difference.

    --
    This is my sig.
  7. Re:Technically... by ArundelCastle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sushi, and other words, are defined by how people use them. And in the US that means rice and raw fish wrapped in seaweed for 99% of the population. Then english language, unlike C, does not have an ansi standard. It's all fluid.

    You flurbing pizzats and your fempy ticrans. Can't even warrup a mekci bommits.

  8. Re:So technically by wisty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Butchering words is how languages grow and develop.

  9. Re:Possible none issue soon by welcher · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As it happens, saltwater aquaculture is widely practiced from Norway to Chile. It basically involves putting a cage out in the sea and growing fish in it.

    Of course, there are lots of reasons not to encourage most fish-farming like the fact that it requires huge amounts of wild fish to be caught, mulched and processed to be fed back to the "desirable" fish species that is being farmed. That is, fish farming uses more fish than it creates, thereby exacerbating the chronic overfishing problems that plague the seas.

  10. Re:Yuck! Sushi! by nacturation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So why don't you eat actual Sushi instead of Sashimi, with something like chicken if you don't like raw fish?

    The more you know...... the less food you'll hate over pure ignorance.

    Don't you think the GP knows the difference given that he specifically claims that sushi isn't as disgusting as raw fish, thereby putting them clearly into different categories?

    The better your reading comprehension...... the more able you'll be to hear that whoosh sound.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  11. Re:Technically... by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the point of the story isn't that eating mislabelled raw fish might cause disease but that a lot of raw fish is mislabelled.