Slashdot Mirror
Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 Pager Messages
An anonymous reader writes "Wikileaks is preparing to release 500,000 intercepted pager messages from a 24-hour period encompassing the September 11 terrorist attacks. The messages show emergency services springing into action and computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse. Wikileaks implies this data came from an organised collection effort."
Now watch Obama try to censor the TRUTH of Italian conspiracy against AMERICA that is PROVEN BEYOND DOUBT by these NEW REVELATIONS!!!!!
UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
SMS is unreliable? Where?
In the 15 years I've been using it, only New Years Eve at midnight caused any problems. This was a long time ago too. I don't remember it happening for the last few years.
15 minutes wait? Where?
I do transactions online, and SMS messages come in as quick as email. Argos, Tesco Top-ups - instant.
Voice mail texts me after a missed call. Instant.
Me thinks you live in a 3rd world country, or one that is very backward.
This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
For one thing, I can tell you that flight 93 was not brought down by terrorists. A friend of mine works at Center, and he told me that the air force shot down flight 93. You don't get a nine mile debris trail from a turnover crash. It was blown apart at high altitude.
The official story is probably just patriotic propaganda.
Don't know anything about the rest of the 9/11 attacks. Would be pretty hard to hide incriminating evidence though. Contrary to popular belief, people don't just follow orders and do what they're told. If there was evidence of government collusion with the terrorists, it would have shown up by now. People talk.
You don't get a nine mile debris trail from a turnover crash.It was blown apart at high altitude.
The airplane was undergoing violent maneuvers prior to the crash (which would have thrown off parts of the plane) and apparently started at 40,000 feet. Nine miles isn't much considering what was happening.
I could see wings breaking away, but the fuselage is designed to stay together. Real life isn't like Lost. The tail fins break away, not the whole end of the plane.
And even violent maneuvering wouldn't cause the kind of damage shown in photographs of the debris. It takes a lot of force to knock the wings off a plane. They support the entire weight of the plane, remember. The wings are what hold it up. They also have a mandated threshold much higher than the final weight of the plane. That said, flight 93 wasn't a brand new airplane. Inspections and repairs are usually very thorough, but are far from perfect.
Air pressure changes and buffeting forces wouldn't be enough, even in a bad spiral. I think the only times I've seen wings break away were in water crashes, and then only as the plane entered the water. Though I've only seen five crashes (two water; one with moderate wing damage), so it doesn't give the best sampling.
Nice try. Pathetic.
North of Citgo.
www.thepentacon.com
The plane which allegedly hit the Pentagon flew on the NORTH side of the Citgo gas station, meaning it couldn't have hit the downed lightpoles.
Therefore the lightpoles must have been planted.
Therefore the U.S. government committed the attacks, the plane never hit the Pentagon, and there was a bomb inside the Pentagon.