Slashdot Mirror


Contributors Leaving Wikipedia In Record Numbers

Hugh Pickens writes "CNET reports that the volunteers who create Wikipedia's pages, check facts and adapt the site are abandoning Wikipedia in unprecedented numbers, with tens of thousands of editors going 'dead' — no longer actively contributing and updating the site — a trend many experts believe could threaten Wikipedia's future. In the first three months of 2009, the English-language version of Wikipedia suffered a net loss of 49,000 contributors, compared with a loss of about 4,900 during the same period in 2008. 'If you don't have enough people to take care of the project it could vanish quickly,' says Felipe Ortega at the Universidad Rey Juan Carlos in Madrid, who created a computer system to analyze the editing history of more than three million active Wikipedia contributors in ten different languages. 'We're not in that situation yet. But eventually, if the negative trends follow, we could be in that situation.' Contributors are becoming disenchanted with the process of adding to the site, which is becoming increasingly difficult says Andrew Dalby, author of The World and Wikipedia: How We are Editing Reality and a regular editor of the site. 'There is an increase of bureaucracy and rules. Wikipedia grew because of the lack of rules. That has been forgotten. The rules are regarded as irritating and useless by many contributors.' Arguments over various articles have also taken their toll. 'Many people are getting burnt out when they have to debate about the contents of certain articles again and again,' adds Ortega."

11 of 632 comments (clear)

  1. New wiki user by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    No need to keep posting slashdot stories on Wikipedia's impending demise. Just follow this new user page on wikipedia.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  2. I'm wondering if it degrades. by NoYob · · Score: 5, Funny
    Can you imagine if it degrades?

    Kid's paper after using Wiki as his source:

    George W. Bush, the US' first retarded President, started wars in the Middle East to help his Vice President's (Dick Cheney) portfolio.

    Of course, they'll be folks on the other side:

    Barak Obama, America's first Socialist President along with the Wicked Witch of the West, Nancy Pelosi, turned the US into a bankrupt shell of its former self.

    Then, there will be others....

    Ray Vaness, the World's greatest porn actress, has been a great influence on American politics.

    Now, just think of all those little kids putting references to porn actresses into their school papers and bringing them home?

    I for on welcome the chaos that may ensue.

    --
    It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
  3. Mark Cuban's Plan to Save Wikipedia by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mr. Wales, I think that if you approached Mark Cuban and asked him to give Wikipedia editors a cool million dollars each not to leave, you could save Wikipedia.

    Boy, dreaming up solutions when you perceive financiers to be bottomless pits of money with no brains sure is easy!

    --
    My work here is dung.
  4. Re:As a long-time contributor by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Funny

    You forgot one important factor - Wikipedia the RPG going into open beta. When newbies are numbed by the maze of rules (many contradictory, many obscure) and are repeatedly ganked as they cross out of the starting zone... They aren't likely to hang around. The outright hostility of the upper level players to any not in their clique leads to a hostile environment for those that do stay. And lastly, the willingness of the GM's to stand behind those that lie, cheat, and steal takes it's toll on the few that remain.

  5. In other news.... by hitnrunrambler · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the first 3 months of 2009 49,000 people who did nothing but patrol wikipedia all day were downsized because of the economy; raising questions of how the Internet will survive without the uselessly employed.

  6. best encyclopedia by jDeepbeep · · Score: 4, Funny

    it'd be the best encyclopedia around for quite some time yet.

    citation needed

    --
    Reply to That ||
  7. Re:It's finished, dummies by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Funny
  8. Re:It's finished, dummies by VJ42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Having said that, I don't think even with their draconian and arbitrary relevancy policies that they're anywhere near the end of everything that would fit on the site.

    Wikipedia is home to this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fictional_ducks the rules can't be that draconian

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  9. This is a worry? by Zadaz · · Score: 2, Funny

    After you build the house you don't keep the builders around. That would be awkward.

  10. Re:It's finished, dummies by BryanL · · Score: 2, Funny
    I think you are confusing draconian policies with "drake-onian" policies.

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/drake

  11. Re:Wikipedia:Statistics by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2, Funny

    After all, the probability of it coming from some some jobless person in his underpants, who is very insecure and defensive of the own reality, and has built his happy-place, is pretty close to 100%. ;)

    I'm not wearing any underpants, you insensitive clod!