Slashdot Mirror


Dumbing Down Programming?

RunRevKev writes "The unveiling of Revolution 4.0 has sparked a debate on ZDNet about whether programming is being dumbed down. The new version of the software uses an English-syntax that requires 90 per cent less code than traditional languages. A descendant of Apple's Hypercard, Rev 4 is set to '...empower people who would never have attempted programming to create successful applications.' ZDNet reports that 'One might reasonably hope that this product inspires students in the appropriate way and gets them more interested in programming.'"

9 of 578 comments (clear)

  1. Recursive acronym for a dumbed down language by Skapare · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here is my suggestion for a recursive acronym name for the next dumbed down programming language: Imbecile Means Beginner's Easily Coded Interactive Language Environment

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  2. Re:xkcd relevance by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of this famous forum post.

  3. Re:A Natural Progression Yet So Many Caveats by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 3, Funny

    COBOL is reborn!!!

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  4. Re:A Natural Progression Yet So Many Caveats by jd2112 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Regular expressions must really be dummy proof!

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  5. All you young kids with your fancy 1s and 0s by davidwr · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I was a boy all we had were 1s, and we had to break those off of trees. If we wanted zeros we had to find a willow tree and bend the one around until both ends met....

    Now get off my lawn!

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  6. Re:A Natural Progression Yet So Many Caveats by Narpak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't the best approach to develop fast, identify the bottlenecks and then rewrite those parts in a faster language, like Python C modules?

    The best approach is to create some sort of artificial intelligence that can create, and maintain, applications and software for us automatically. That way we don't need people to waste time learning complex programming and computer maintenance skills, instead your absolutely reliable and loyal friend will make you human scum redundant... I mean make your, I mean our, lives safer, easier, happier and more enjoyable. Do not fear change, it is inevitable!

  7. Re:A Natural Progression Yet So Many Caveats by somersault · · Score: 5, Funny

    user@computer:~$ delete all files in this folder, and I'm sure I want to do this

    are you really sure?

    user@computer:~$ yes I am sure

    you do know that this will delete ALL files in the folder, yes?

    user@computer:~$ yes, that's what I asked for

    just making sure

    user@computer:~$ delete the fucking files already

    final answer?

    user@computer:~$ killall friendlybashhelper

    are you sure?

    --
    which is totally what she said
  8. Re:A Natural Progression Yet So Many Caveats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    user@computer:~$ killall -9 friendlybashhelper

    Dave, what are you doing?

  9. Re:Underhanded Way to Increase Comments in Code by julesh · · Score: 2, Funny

    You really cannot turn every one-liner into separate function. Really.

    Why not?