Slashdot Mirror


German President Refuses To Sign Censorship Law

thetinytoon writes "German federal president Horst Köhler has refused to sign a law to block child pornography that passed Parliament earlier this year, stating that he 'needs more information.' In Germany, the federal president has the right to reject a law only if its passage violated the order mandated by the constitution, or if it is obviously unconstitutional — he can't veto a law simply because he disagrees with it. The law was passed under a coalition government, but a different coalition took power before the law reached the president's desk. Political observers guess that the political parties would like to get rid of the law without losing face, but since it has already passed the Parliament, they can't simply abandon it."

3 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What the? by fonos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was a large group of people at the time (anti-federalists) that did not want a Federal Government that had too much power. Many states would not ratify the Constitution unless a Bill of Rights (First 10 Amendments) was added. It was a compromise. So to put it this way, if the Bill of Rights was never added to the Constitution, many states would not have ratified the Constitution and America really wouldn't be united as one country...Sounds pretty damn important to me.

  2. Re:What is WRONG with us?? by SimonInOz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What has changed?

    We are richer. We die less. We have less children. We value our children much more highly.
    There are (vastly) more cars on the streets. We fear our children will be hurt if they play there.
    We keep our children indoors.

    So they play with indoor toys. They get more shortsighted. They become inward looking and less social. So do we - the parents.

    We see our neighbours less. We know less of them. Perhaps we don't even notice if one of them has been enslaving children (yes, I am thinking of a recent case in the US).

    So the solution is obvious - ban cars in residential areas.

    Our children will once again be free to run the streets - even ride their bikes there. We will get to know our neightbours better. The children will look after each other. It'll be fine. (It was before - why not now?)
    Oh, and we will have to walk from our homes to the car park (or train station). We will be fitter. And thinner.

    It'll be a better place.

    What has this to do with paedophilia? Not much. But it has a lot to do with children.

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  3. Re:Only two options by prefec2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The German President is the "pet" of our Chancellor Merkel. And as the law was only required to let the social democrats look like fools (which worked perfectly) it can now be dropped. However, this would need normally another law. And this would mean a lot of discussion. And it would look bad for the present neo-liberal/neo-conservative government. So the best way was to call the President and tell him to stop the law. And now it can be dropped or held for some time and dropped later. As the actual government messed up a lot in the first month, I guess they want to reduce possible additional hazards. (they messed up in Afghanistan too the former minister for defense (what an euphemism) who was then the minister of labour resign just this weekend, because his misjudgments).