Slashdot Mirror


The Technology Behind Last.fm

CNET's Crave has up a detailed interview with Last.fm's Matthew Ogle, the company's head of Web development. Reader CNETNate notes that Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world. From the interview: "We stream all music directly off our servers in London. We have a cluster of streaming nodes including a bunch of powerful machines with solid-state hard drives. We have a process that runs daily which finds the hottest music and pushes those tracks on to the SSDs streamers that sit in front of our regular platter-based streaming machines. That way, if someone is listening to one of our more popular stations, the chances are really good that these songs are coming off our high-speed SSD machines. They're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow, spinning platter." The interview is actually on two pages but pretends it's on three.

125 comments

  1. SCSI 4 LIFE! by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just replace SCSI & IDE with SSD & Platter and pretend we already did this fight 15 years ago.

    1. Re:SCSI 4 LIFE! by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      But these days people don't use run-of-the-mill insults and actual technical data to argue the issue, they prefer to use insults like "shitkocks", "butfaget" and "cawksokker" and they'd rather accuse each other of having deviant sexualities than argue over unimportant technical details (who cares what technology is best suited for a task when it is obvious that all SSD users are mactalibanfaggets because you can buy macs with SSD drives?). (Yes, I miss the days when usenet was still alive and useable).

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:SCSI 4 LIFE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that SSD is going to lose to HDD just like SCSI lost to IDE?

  2. 275,000 years? Wow. by zonker · · Score: 1, Funny

    Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world.

    I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.

  3. RTFA by Snowblindeye · · Score: 5, Informative

    Reader CNETNate notes that Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world

    Where did the submitter get that impression? Certainly not from the article. It mentions that they scrobbled 275,000 years of audio. Scrobbling is what Last.fm's client does when it takes a song you are playing from another source and uploads the meta data to them. Clearly that uses much less bandwidth than streaming a song

    So now even the submitters aren't reading TFA anymore? I know, I know... its slashdot. /sigh

    1. Re:RTFA by anthony.vo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes but the article also did say "120 million minutes of music were streamed" during the first week of their Xbox Live service launch.. which translates to 228.159 years, impressive in itself.

    2. Re:RTFA by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but who the hell knows what scrobbling is?!

      If anyone has asked me (prior to reading the above comment) if I'd ever "scrobbled" on the internet, I'd be turning my webcam away while in front of my computer a lot more.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:RTFA by CaseM · · Score: 1

      So now even the submitters aren't reading TFA anymore? I know, I know... its slashdot. /sigh

      You must be new here.

  4. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by inamorty · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd say at least an Ice-age worth.

  5. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.

    Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends. Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together, but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.

  6. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by EsJay · · Score: 3, Informative

    Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world.

    I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears

    56,904,147 plays (1,246,583 listeners)

  7. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by anthony.vo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.last.fm/charts

    They have detailed week-by-week charts going back to 2005. Lady Gaga is in fifth place this week is at 1,923,168 plays by 92,208 listeners.

    Muse, The Beatles, Radiohead, and Coldplay precede her, but that's likely due to the fact that Last.fm is based in the UK and the majority of their users from the UK* and that those bands are much much better :) What do you call someone from the UK? I wanted to say British but that excludes Northern Ireland.

  8. Memory instead of platters...? by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really hope that was an attempt to dumb it down for the article. It's a pretty poor way of describing the difference between HDDs and SSDs. After all, HDDs are a form of non-volatile memory too. They just happen to have a mechanical aspect.

    In fact, the only way in which they could stream music without having it all in memory first is if they were using a microphone and a live band. Sure, it might make for an entertaining data center, but it's not very scalable.

    1. Re:Memory instead of platters...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... if they were using a microphone and a live band. Sure, it might make for an entertaining data center, but it's not very scalable.

      Try that for a business model, RIAA!

    2. Re:Memory instead of platters...? by mariushm · · Score: 1

      ... or they could have just filled each 1u server with 8-16 GB of ram and run 1-8 memcached daemons on each cheaper than ssd, same result.

    3. Re:Memory instead of platters...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148342 for $40 each of 2GB so 8x$40=$320 for 16GB assuming of course the motherboard can handle that. Of course an 80GB Intel SSD is $299. You win.

    4. Re:Memory instead of platters...? by Quantumstate · · Score: 1

      I was assuming that they really were referring to memory. At 4mb per song you can hold 4000 songs in 16GB of ram which isn't a huge amount for a server. With 4000 songs per server for popular servers you shouldn't need to touch the disk so having fast SSD drives seems like a waste of money. I would put fast SSD drives for less popular songs since SSD is cheaper than ram in terms of storage capacity and then for very low popularity I would use hard disks if cost is that much of an issue.

    5. Re:Memory instead of platters...? by mariushm · · Score: 1

      Memory used to be much cheaper and (quality) SSD drives more expensive , only a few months ago I bought a performance 4GB kit for around 60$ (plus taxes in my country as I'm in EU). In addition, a company like last.fm would probably buy at least 1000 memory modules at a time and at such scale you would get a significant discount - 30$ or less for a 2 GB module would not surprise me.

      You would have to keep in mind that SSD drives also die, probably 1-3% of them each year, so maybe it makes more sense to just replace one dying memory module instead of a whole SSD drive. Anyway, they're just used as a big cache, they still use regular drives in storage servers to hold all the tracks...

      It's just a matter of knowing how many popular tracks are and making the right choices - if each week there are just about 5000 tracks popular out of a million, you'd have just around 30 GB of data to cache so it would be a waste to get each server a 80 GB SSD drive, it would make more sense to use 8 GB of memory per server and just hold a fourth of the tracks on each server, with 500GB-1TB drives as backup.

  9. MogileFS by Tuqui · · Score: 1

    Beyond that, our streamers are all running Linux and using MogileFS -- which is an open-source distributed file system, which is a little bit like a software RAID system.

    OMG Files a lot of files served with MogileFS.

  10. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.

    Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends. Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together, but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.

    i love it when people are being snobbish about their music taste.

  11. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    English, you insensitive clod.

  12. No thanks, last.fm by cbope · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is precisely why I rarely listen to radio, whether it's streamed or broadcast over the air. They place too much weight on "the hottest new music", and this causes otherwise good music, which may not be "today's hottest new music" to be buried in the background noise. Not to mention that "the hottest new music" then gets played over and over, 100's of times a day on popular radio stations. This get boring and monotonous really quick. While radio can be a good way to discover new bands, I rarely listen to it for long periods of time because it just repeats the same tracks over and over. It's a very lopsided system that promotes the hottest single-of-the-day at the expense of everything else.

    1. Re:No thanks, last.fm by iamapizza · · Score: 1

      Last.fm isn't exactly radio the way you describe. You give it a few seeds, not spermatozoa or those things that farmers put in the ground, and it can play related music which you might like but which isn't necessarily "the hottest new music".

      --
      Always proofread carefully to see if you any words out.
    2. Re:No thanks, last.fm by EvilIdler · · Score: 5, Informative

      Last.fm's definition of "hottest" is what people actually listen to. It's not a handful of artist names handed down from MusicMegaCorpCoLLC to be digested by the uninformed masses ;)

      I suggest looking at what Last.fm actually is. It has helped me find new music frequently. It also made me spend lots of money, which is the only real drawback. Anything you play is recorded, and musical compatibility with other members is compared to give suggestions. There might not be samples of everything on their site, but I usually find samples somewhere (Spotify is the weakest, iTunes and eMusic usually has it).

    3. Re:No thanks, last.fm by xtracto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I do use Last.fm, unfortunately they do not have a wide range of artists, at least not of my liked genre.

      Every time I start a station with say the "Satriani" artist tag, I get the exact same 20 songs (in random order), before something completely unrelated start playing. I have the same results with "Kamelot", "Stratovarius" and "Dream Theater".

      I liked it more when you could specify two or three artists. That would give you a bit of more breadth on the pool of music to listen.

      Regarding alternatives, I have tried Musicology and it is OK, the only drawback being the "web2.0" interface which I really hate.

      BTW, the LastRipper program is a good way to save Last.FM streams. I have got a lot of classical music (at 128kbps quality is good for portable players)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    4. Re:No thanks, last.fm by mister_playboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last.fm's definition of "hottest" is what people actually listen to. It's not a handful of artist names handed down from MusicMegaCorpCoLLC to be digested by the uninformed masses ;)

      The masses' musical tastes are still mostly decided by "MusicMegaCorpCoLLC", even if not directly through Last.fm.

      The same general pool of artists is popular on Last.fm as is popular on radio.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    5. Re:No thanks, last.fm by darthflo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, the only impact being the "hottest new music" has is being served from one of their SSD hosts instead of the normal streaming cluster. This is completely transparent to the user. It doesn't limit what you can listen to or even make it more likely you'll hear "hot new" music from an SSD host. It's caching of the most popular files, plain and simple.

    6. Re:No thanks, last.fm by xtracto · · Score: 1

      There might not be samples of everything on their site, [...].

      That has become the main problem for me, aside from the same 30 songs they play everytime I start a station, nothing new ever comes out.

      In order for it to work better, you must listen to whatever genres they cover better. I guess alternative, grunge, pop and rock-pop may be ok. But for heavy metal they do not have a lot of diversity, OR their recommendation algorithm is broken.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    7. Re:No thanks, last.fm by emm-tee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure if you've really missed the point, or are just trolling (making me an idiot for replying..).

      The idea of putting the "most popular" tracks on SSD is to make it more efficient to stream the tracks that are more likely to be requested.

      It's optimising the efficient use of their hardware. It doesn't have anything to do with last.fm's suggestions algorithms and does not at all mean last.fm will force these tracks on you.

      You're amusingly uninformed considering you're throwing around terms like "sheeple".

    8. Re:No thanks, last.fm by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      Last.fm isn't exactly radio the way you describe. You give it a few seeds, [...] and it can play related music.

      Yes, but no. You can 'tune' it to anything, hot or obscure as it may be. It'll play something that sounds like your seed, then something that sounds like that, then something that sounds like that, which unfortunately sounds nothing like your original seed.

      The upshot is that I do listen to Last.fm, but too frequently I need to skip and block and my few well-used stations don't ever seem to learn. Pandora does this very much better but, again unfortunately, they offer even less international access (without trickery).

    9. Re:No thanks, last.fm by KlaymenDK · · Score: 2, Informative

      I liked it more when you could specify two or three artists. That would give you a bit of more breadth on the pool of music to listen.

      But you can:
      http://www.last.fm/listen#pane=multiArtistTab

      I agree, though, at some point it will either expand its scope, loop the playlist, or just stop (saying it ran out of appropriate stuff to stream). Frankly, though, if given a narrow topic (and a finite music library), what else could it do?

    10. Re:No thanks, last.fm by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      uninformed = uniformed

      Or something.

    11. Re:No thanks, last.fm by T+Murphy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Putting in a popular artist like Satriani or Dream Theater will get popular results out (not mainstream, but still popular). I listen to the 4 artists you list (Dream Theater is most listened, Kamelot is 9th)- the bands it recommends range from 60k listens to 10's of millions. While I've found some artists from their radio, I generally use the recommendations and my neighbor list to find new music, especially for lesser-known bands. The free tracks it suggests are often from small bands, so check those out too. While some bands are obscure enough last.fm doesn't have them up to stream, they usually at least have a page for the band- using the charts for the band I can check other sites to find streamed songs.

      That said, I do agree multiple tags/artists would help the radio work better. I usually pick a band I don't know and try to piece together a playlist on imeem using their most listened chart on last.fm.

      My last.fm username is tmurph89- you have similar enough taste you might find a new band you like in my charts. If you want something different Apocalyptica is a heavy cello quartet (although their top 5 tracks are overly mainstream and wise to avoid).

    12. Re:No thanks, last.fm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are commenting on a story entitled "The Technology Behind Last.fm", and yet you're "obviously" not commenting on their technology?

    13. Re:No thanks, last.fm by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You know, there was an easy way you could make sure if what you're writing makes sense...

      http://www.last.fm/charts

      The most presented list, Weekly artist and track charts:
      1. Muse
      2. The Beatles
      3. Radiohead
      4. Coldplay
      5. Lady GaGa
      6. The Killers
      7. Red Hot Chili Peppers
      8. Metallica
      9. Michael Jackson
      10. Kings of Leon

      Heck, even hyped artists and tracks (which simply show the increase in actual listening) seem passable...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    14. Re:No thanks, last.fm by sznupi · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't do that, "playing something that sounds similar". It groups things according to tastes of its listeners, nothing more, nothing less. It outputs "people who listen to what you specified also like this"

      Which, for me, works much better than Pandora approach. The latter is so...sensible, logical...predictable. When its recommendations aren't disliked by me, it gives something which I already know.

      Last.fm tends to give quite a bit more of nice, new things which I've never heard before. They rarely sound very similar to what I specified. But do I like them? Hell yeah. And that's all that matters.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    15. Re:No thanks, last.fm by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You know, they can't just take any music they like and stream it. First it ahs to be put there by owners.

      Anyway, "text recommendations" work OK regardless.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    16. Re:No thanks, last.fm by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Because the part that everybody other are sheeple and you are soooo special is just self-delusion.

      There are certainly many people on Last.fm with similar music tastes to yours. But...their music library has some artists that yours doesn't, and which still likely fit. That's the data on which Last.fm builds recommendations.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    17. Re:No thanks, last.fm by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Really? You have at your place a popular radio which plays mostly Muse, The Beatles, Radiohead, Coldplay, The Killers, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Metallica, Kings of Leon, Nirvana, Green Day, Pink Floyd...and so on? ( http://www.last.fm/charts/artist ) Now?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:No thanks, last.fm by Xacid · · Score: 1

      I still gotta say - any time anyone in the music profession uses "hottest" to describe whatever music they're dishing out it makes me think of crunk juice, blondes, and nickelback. Needless to say - that descriptor doesn't get me very excited for a tune.

    19. Re:No thanks, last.fm by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      The same general pool of artists is popular on Last.fm as is popular on radio.

      So are you suggesting that because popular music is...popular that it is inherently "bad music" and that once anything becomes "popular" that it was due to the "uninformed masses"? Yes, there is horrible music being created and promoted that gets to the top, but do you have an inherent dislike for something just because it reaches a certain level of notoriety?

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    20. Re:No thanks, last.fm by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Dream Theater are featured heavily on Spotify. I feel lucky to have their service.

      They also have a lot of Saxon :D

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    21. Re:No thanks, last.fm by glwtta · · Score: 1

      This is why I'm pretty skeptical of such recommendation schemes.

      Our "compatibility" - for example - is SUPER (my last.fm username is the same as here), but just glancing through the charts, it seems we only have the whole prog-melodic-symphonic metal area in common (if I can lump those together for the purpose of this exercise), but that's only about half of what I listen to.

      It never seems to recommend anything worthwhile based on, for example, Gogol Bordello; and it's not like they are obscure or anything (10,000,000+ plays). And my whole "Neighborhood" is based around the different metals, since they are more popular, they pretty much drown out everything else.

      Seems like some nuance gets lost in the whole process...

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  13. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by ScoLgo · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears."

    Unfortunately, you'd probably have to measure that metric in Libraries of Congress.

    --
    "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  14. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Ansoni-San · · Score: 1

    Nothing...because it's not a country, it's a kingdom. British and Irish is the most coverage you're going to get.

  15. NOT FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    the bastard started charging $6/month for everyone a month or so back. only the US, UK and germany are temporarily free. before committing data to the service better check the TOS and decide.

    1. Re:NOT FREE by DingerX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the rest of the world has to either have already cut a deal with PayPal, or sign up their credit card to be accessed dispute-free via a simple password. Then Last.Fm is only $3/month plus any charges from fraudulent activity.

    2. Re:NOT FREE by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      Or just not use the radio service (since that isn't the only service they provide).

      Besides, $3 per month? That's peanuts for all you can hear streaming music! Its not as if streaming music over the Internet is exactly a low-bandwidth job.

    3. Re:NOT FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never use the stream, only the scrobble.

  16. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by danhuby · · Score: 1

    What do you call someone from the UK? I wanted to say British but that excludes Northern Ireland.

    'British' is used for UK residents, not just the residents of Great Britain. It therefore includes Northern Ireland. For example 'British Government' is a term often used by the UK government.

  17. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And your playlist was composed of?...

  18. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by FluffyWithTeeth · · Score: 3, Informative

    What do you call someone from the UK? I wanted to say British but that excludes Northern Ireland.

    Only if you're a republican; plenty of northern irish identify themselves as "british".

  19. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Why is that? I didn't realise that ones taste in music could be such a defining characteristic.

    Are you also this snobbish about peoples choice of software, clothing, transport?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  20. CNET and last.fm are both owned by CBS Interactive by boot_img · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... so this article is not really journalism, but rather marketing.

  21. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean it discludes Ireland, and not Northern Ireland. Yeesh

  22. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

    Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together...

    Many of those people did everything right, stayed out of trouble, never questioned authority, and are generally conscientious but lacking in personality and interesting life experience.

    Shit, at least my friends wait until they're really drunk before they break out the Toby Keith.

  23. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, you'd probably have to measure that metric in Libraries of Congress.

    I hope that's an SI unit, else you run the risk of offending the metric nazi's ;)

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  24. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Dekker3D · · Score: 2, Funny

    UKanian? ;)

  25. Memory by WGFCrafty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow, spinning platter."

    Aren't the HDDs (the one's with platters) still considered memory?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_memory

    Computer memory refers to devices that are used to store data or programs (sequences of instructions) on a temporary or permanent basis for use in an electronic digital computer.

    1. Re:Memory by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      Hmm, your dumb question masks a more interesting one: aren't SSDs still considered a storage device as far as the OS is concerned?

      In which case, doesn't the data from the SSDs still pass through the server's DIMMs before making its way onto the network? Or is there some fancy pipework which avoids this bottleneck?

    2. Re:Memory by kybred · · Score: 1

      They're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow, spinning platter."

      So does that mean that the songs sound like a 45 played at 78? Or that the ones from the hard drives sound like a 45 played at 33?

      Of course, half the /.ers here won't know what I'm talking about. :-)

    3. Re:Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously a case can be made for it if you want to be pedantic, but certainly not in regular use. We've long since relegated use of the word "memory" to RAM, differentiating it from non-volatile types of memory. This helps reduce a big point of confusion in communication between the tech-savvy and 'n00bs'.

    4. Re:Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He obviously means main memory you pedantic jackass.

    5. Re:Memory by WGFCrafty · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, your dumb questions is just a new form of my dumb question, rewritten backwards.

      See, my questions seemed non-dumb to me, especially since I'm a biology major and rely on questions concerning computer hardware/software classification specifics, to learn.

      When I "attempt" to answer your Biology related questions I'll try not to do it with such a pompous response as you so kindly did.

      G'day.

    6. Re:Memory by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      Please forgive me, I (wrongly) assume everyone here is a computer nerd. At least I didn't call you a pedantic jackass.

      There is a fundamental conceptual difference between memory and storage, which is independent of the actual material used. When a program runs, its code is first loaded into memory (probably from storage) where the CPU acts on it directly. The program can read from and write to storage, which is assumed to be more permanent, but possibly orders of magnitude slower to access. Sometimes the memory is swapped out to disk, but it has to be swapped back in again before it can actually be used.

      So my question was different to yours. Since last.fm is using solid state memory as storage, I was wondering if there was some way for it to push this data to users without first reading it into memory; ie bypassing the CPU, similar to how graphics chips can handle all those polygons and transformations without troubling the CPU much. I suspect there is, but I'm not enough of a hardware geek to know the answer.

  26. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you call someone from the UK? I wanted to say British but that excludes Northern Ireland.

    American. After all, they're called the 51st state since lil' Tony Blair and his adventures in the middle east.

  27. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Deanalator · · Score: 1

    It still confuses me why their "psytrance radio" keeps pulling in Britney Spears.

  28. Last.fm complements Spotify by jimbob666 · · Score: 1

    I've used last.fm for 4 years with about 19,000 scrobbles and this makes their recommended radio stations pretty damn good. However, I'm confused at the 'destroying Spotify' bit. To me they are completely different services that complement each other. I certainly couldn't use one without the other...

    1. Re:Last.fm complements Spotify by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      I find it quite easy to use last.fm without Spotify.

  29. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    >What do you call someone from the UK? I wanted to say British but that excludes Northern Ireland.
    That's OK, we prefer it that way.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  30. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Why is that? I didn't realise that ones taste in music could be such a defining characteristic.
    It's a generational thing I suspect. Many people of my generation (I'm mid forties) very much define people by their music, especially what they listened to in their youth. The particular sub culture you belonged to as a teen was strongly related to your musical tastes and general mindset. These days, fashion/tribe is still important but the music side less so - you can have kids who dress the same but have very different tastes in music.
    An additional point is that a lot of people get caught up with the various hype machines and buy in to certain artists even though in all truth, they're a bit crap. This marks them out to the rest of us as being a bit mindless, easily led etc.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  31. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hardly. 'English', 'Scottish', and even 'Irish' people are all really Welsh; they're just too embarrassed to admit it. Something about the silly place names...

  32. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What do you call someone from the UK? .

    a subject

  33. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A lot of her scrobbles get deleted though:
    http://playground.last.fm/unwanted

  34. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by lozzd · · Score: 1

    We actually measure our bandwidth usage in Libraries of Congress. True Story.

  35. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by timbos · · Score: 1

    discludes

    You mean excludes?

  36. Hmmm... by jimicus · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    We give the labels a breakdown of which artists should be accruing what royalties, so they have fairly good information on what they should be paying who.

    Given what we've heard about record labels, who wants to bet that when this "fairly good information" gets to the record label it is printed on nice soft paper, cut into individual sheets and then placed in the lavatories?

  37. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by MrMr · · Score: 2, Funny

    choice of software...
    You're new here?

  38. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by xtracto · · Score: 1

    It is funny that the 2nd most scrobbled artist is "The Beatles" but the do not have any of their songs :(

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  39. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

    Hardly. 'English', 'Scottish', and even 'Irish' people are all really Welsh; they're just too embarrassed to admit it. Something about the silly place names...

    And those poor Welsh souls are really wannabe Cornish!

    --
    SSC
  40. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

    If they can't appreciate Sonic Youth I don't want to know them.

  41. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

    >>>Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends. Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together, but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.
    >>>

    That's because (1) a lot of the so-called "better" music that people have recommended to me is actually boring shit, and (2) I'm not looking for boredom, put-me-to-sleep music. I'm looking for fun music. Lady Gaga is weird but fun. (3) Being familiar with music from hotties like Timberlake and Daughtry makes you popular with the ladies. Saying, "Those guys are crap" is only going to get you dumped

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  42. Duh. Sounds like they discovered caching. Definitely not a new idea.

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

    1. Re:Duh by cbope · · Score: 1

      Or hierarchical storage management (HSM). Really not new idea.

  43. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Being familiar with music from hotties like Timberlake and Daughtry makes you popular with the ladies
    Call me picky but I wouldn't be interested in a woman that liked that sort of music.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  44. Re:NOT $3 by DingerX · · Score: 1

    I'm cool with 3 bucks a month. I'm not cool with having to link my credit card to a single password held by a third party in another country. I'm particularly not cool when that third party includes among their terms that I revoke all rights to dispute with my card issuer charges that they make. I'm not at all cool with it when, as far as I can tell from the web, people regularly claim being defrauded from using their service, and wind up having little recourse.

    So, no, in terms of risk, I'd be paying far more than $3 a month.

  45. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I did not.

  46. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

    I don't care if she likes the music, but I certainly wouldn't be interested in a woman petty enough to dump someone because they dislike her favorite musician.

    --
    "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  47. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by allseason+radial · · Score: 1

    at least my friends wait until they're really drunk before they break out the Toby Keith.

    Who?

  48. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >>>This marks them out to the rest of us as being a bit mindless, easily led etc.

    I've found that those who listen to "alternative" music have the same flaws, but are merely following a different type of peer pressure (the pressure to listen to non-popular music).

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  49. ah the cornish by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    in perpetual denial of the true fount of all civilization and culture in the british isles: the isle of man

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:ah the cornish by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >the isle of man
      He's got a point - it's where Mark Kermode came from as well as umm, err... umm...
      They've got a cool annual TT race too.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    2. Re:ah the cornish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bee Gees are from the Isle of Man too. Depending on your taste and age, that could either be a good thing or a really, really horrible thing.

  50. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Only if you're a republican; plenty of northern irish identify themselves as "british".

    So why is the name of the country the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland? That name does suggest that Northern Ireland isn't part of Great Britain.

    Not trolling, just curious.

  51. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't judge them too harshly. Unless you went to school for music, or otherwise spent some quality time cultivating an appreciation for the organization of sound, you probably don't have any taste. Music seems to be the last area where anyone bothers to develop taste nowadays.

    In this age when everyone is concerned with breaking down the barriers and bucking elitism, maybe listening to pop trash makes your well-heeled friends feel folksy and good about themselves.

    I did go to school for music, and did play professionally for about a decade before I went in to IT/software, and I'm pretty confident when I observe that, for most people, the words are the music. They don't hear pitches, just lyrics.

    If the unschooled person hears something more than the lyrics, it's usually only the highest and lowest pitches at any given moment (the relationship between the bass and melody). All that western harmony in the middle spectrum is really lost on them. That's what my music cognition friends have to say about it, anyway.

  52. Re:Memory - yes and no by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

    The Wiki article would translate to what you said. But there is another view that needs to be thought about. That is "how it is connected?".

    ROM and RAM are normally connected directly to address and data buses of CPU and thought today more as memory. The disk are normally connected though an interface (some times another computer/controller) and thought as storage. This all about the PHYSICAL connection. It is also why other connections to "disks" can be created like RAM disks, iSCSI and tape-drive-disks.

    I work on a machine that OS "looks" to machine via LOGICAL view. So the disk is just one large slow virtual memory space and the RAM is just faster / closer cache of that virtual space, and cache is faster still and closer. Makes nice to add new drives since it just one big flat model. It even makes journals easy since you can have it stripe the journals over 100 drives with single option. My "current" machine is 32 processors, 640GB of memory, and 900+ disks in RAID5 clusters for 35TB of storage.

  53. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by maevius · · Score: 1

    1) There is better music and it is actually better. You're just not used to it because it's not getting hammered by the radio 24/7. 2) It's not weird, it's pop. The same pop music that is massively produced for at least the last 20 years. You might like it, I have no problem with that, but it still is just pop music. 3) It makes you popular with ladies that listen to that music only. There are many kinds of ladies with different tastes in music... I am not trying to troll, but that's the way it is

  54. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    I hope that's an SI unit, else you run the risk of offending the metric nazi's ;)

    Naw, that's not offensive.

    Try: One Kilo-Libraries of Congress is 1024 Libraries of Congress. Tremble before my usurpation of your precious, precious prefixes!

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
  55. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1

    What? Have you ever listened to the lyrics of "The Hook" by Blues Traveler? They would have a different opinion about it. The melody is the ONLY thing that matters.

  56. Take heed - Last.fm can run servers by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of all the so-called "social" sites whose services I use, Last.fm probably has the best uptime and overall availability. I think I've only seen the main Last.fm site down once or twice in over two years, and I've never seen the Scrobbling service go offline. On top of that, they can actually run a database - unlike Facebook, with its oft-inaccurate or missing data, all of my Last.fm profile is always there. Kudos to these guys for sticking to it and figuring out how to manage high loads properly instead of just whining about how inadequate the tools they have to work with are.

          --- Mr. DOS

  57. Where does the RIAA pipe fit in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So which part of the whole setup includes the direct pipe to the various RIAA labels so they can tell them when you're listening to songs you shouldn't be?

    That's right. I went there.

  58. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by colfer · · Score: 2, Informative

    What do you call someone from the UK?

    They haven't really decided. Rule of thumb, all the U.K. areas except England tend to go by their own name, and England goes by British about 50-50, depending on age, politics, etc. But what do I know? That is just my guess from observing some Wikipedia disputes over this issue.

    The "demonym" for the U.K. is "British". That includes Northern Ireland... an awkward situation. Of course, we have "Americans" meaning just the U.S. And back in the olden days, you either called the people of the USSR "Russians" (wrong) or "Soviets" (sort of wrong).

    Now all you UKians with you witty humor, just read the funny thread.

  59. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by colfer · · Score: 1

    Especially if you're USian, which did after all previously *belong* to the UK.

    Wrong, the U.K. was formed in 1800.

  60. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Bertie · · Score: 1

    Great Britain's the name of the island comprising England, Scotland and Wales. The UK is all that (and the surrounding smaller islands) plus Northern Ireland. The adjective used to cover all the UK is British. The island of Ireland is geographically part of the British Isles.

  61. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    I've found that to be less true for people who listen to alternative music, and thus had to actively seek out their music, than those who listen to the music considered mainstream. If the peer-pressure is to listen to non-popular music, I suspect you've confused causation with correlation: people who listen to non-mainstream music seek out different peers to be "pressured" by.

  62. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    I feel quite comfortable dumping someone for having generally (what I consider) bad taste in music, art, literature etc. Tastes reveal a lot more than you give credit for. (Granted, that's broader than "disliking one's favorite musician.")

  63. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    I think a lot of people educated in Western music over-emphasize the appreciation of the melodic line and phrase over rhythm. Western art music only caught up with polyrhythms used in other musical traditions in the beginning of the 20th century, and even now, few really do well with microtones. I did have a background in music theory and appreciation (and performance), but it took a course in Hindustani classical music for me to start to realize what I was missing.

  64. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Omestes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Being familiar with music from hotties like Timberlake and Daughtry makes you popular with the ladies. Saying, "Those guys are crap" is only going to get you dumped

    By "ladies" you of course mean: girls under 18, or fat old women who wear Betty Boop/Disney pajamas and form Twilight fan clubs.

    Me and my girlfriend spent many a night bonding over Slayer and Mike Patton, which suited me just fine. I'd actually be very frightened if she listened to Justin Timberlake (and whoever "Daughtery" is), since there is something very strange about a 30 year old listening to 2000's teeny-bopper music. People shouldn't be frightened of growing up.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  65. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

    If the unschooled person hears something more than the lyrics, it's usually only the highest and lowest pitches at any given moment (the relationship between the bass and melody). All that western harmony in the middle spectrum is really lost on them. That's what my music cognition friends have to say about it, anyway.

    I wouldn't considered myself really "schooled" in music. I played an instrument for 8 years during my pre-college days, but it was nothing special.

    But I'm in the exact opposite, I listen to the music's melody and harmony and almost ignore the lyrics entirely. I admit that I don't have the grasp of the complexity as someone truly schooled in music, but I don't listen to the lyrics much save for a few singers.

    Heck, I used to laugh at myself because there were a few rap songs with decent music that I liked as a kid and I never even bothered knowing the words. Yet someone else will say "but the lyrics are the whole point of a rap."

    Oh well.

  66. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Backward+Z · · Score: 1

    You know, I was right there with you knocking Lady GaGa, but there's really more to her than she lets on...

    http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=2737

    Here she is pre-fame performing at a NYU talent show: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM51qOpwcIM

    And a Metafilter comment that expresses what I want to say very well: http://www.metafilter.com/86769/Norah-Jones-Look-Out#2827870

    I considered Lady Gaga a guilty pleasure until this last video came out. I think it epitomizes all of her potential as a star and artist. All of it, down to the intentionally cheesy Europop backing, is commentary. And all of it is a mask, revealing practically nothing about the person at the helm. That's a really difficult feat to pull off, because stars tend to be insecure enough to want to be liked and respected as an icon but also as a person.

    Gaga is basically trying to keep up the illusion that there is no person under there, or at least not what we are used to thinking of as a person. There is something trans-human about her ambition that I think is perfectly timely. She's a smart person having a lark, taking it a million times farther than anyone in their right mind would attempt, and making other pop stars look like the fools and relics that they actually are. I'm surprised more people don't get or appreciate that.
    posted by hermitosis at 6:41 AM on November 18 [132 favorites ]

  67. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by spiralx · · Score: 1

    With you on that, it's very rare the lyrics get me, I'm more of a rhythm and timbre man myself... which accounts for my liking hip-hop and death metal amongst other things lol :)

  68. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by ottothecow · · Score: 1
    I always had more respect for her than other pop artists because I knew she wrote most of her own stuff (despite the fact that there was so much obvious auto-tune use)

    Since I have seen more examples of her signing without autotune in other videos and signing without autotune WHILE playing piano in the linked video, I have even more respect. Sure she does some crazy shit for attention but I bet she is making a killing doing so and will have no problem dropping into some more respectable "professional" musician roles (use her given name to get rid of the "lady gaga" factor) when her act starts to lose its draw.

    --
    Bottles.
  69. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by ottothecow · · Score: 1
    I am surprised nobody has mentioned yet how much backing slashdot's community gave this project back when it was some guy's school project named "audioscrobbler"

    I was interested to find out a couple of years ago that I had a current and active last.fm account. Turns out that my original audioscrobbler plugin on one of my computers was still alive and kicking and sent updates to the same servers (prefs/plugin were in App Data or something and got copied over with every reformat)

    --
    Bottles.
  70. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People from the UK tend to think of themselves as Scottish, Welsh, Irish or English, and as they have a history of fighting each other bloodily it's bad form to confuse them. Northern and southern English is an oft made distinction also, the north is generally thought of as working class, and the south the management classes.

    The UK is used mainly as a container name by everyone on the outside. So ideally you should find out which country someone comes from come from, and call them by that ( the cultures are quite different ). For me, I don't mind being called British, but I'd rather be called English.

  71. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by Backward+Z · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but the whole Gaga schtick, she's playing a character. She's rubbing all of our faces in it, too.

    The way I think about it: Kurt Cobain killed himself because he was completely distraught over how his music was distributed and digested. He wrote songs about cliques and fads and how shallow and empty and stupid they are... just so see those same cliques he was mocking empty-headedly became his fans and turned his band into a fad, a trend.

    He was aiming for the audience, but it sailed right over their heads. He couldn't deal with that.

    GaGa, on the other hand, is aiming over their heads. When it sails right on by, she smirks to herself and collects her paycheck. She has a whole lifetime ahead of her for other projects and I seriously, seriously doubt that she's at all married to the GaGa image. Once it runs its course, I'm sure she'll move on to something else.

  72. Re:275,000 years? Wow. by s0l1dsnak3123 · · Score: 0

    A serf.

  73. Memcached for MP3 music? I think not. by imtheguru · · Score: 1

    ... or they could have just filled each 1u server with 8-16 GB of ram and run 1-8 memcached daemons on each cheaper than ssd, same result.

    How does your suggested setup using memcache get around the problem of storing/fetching objects greater than 1MB? That is, without implementing custom interfaces for handling multiple chunks.

    From the memcache wiki page:
    http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/WhyNotMemcached

    "Memcached is terrific! But not for every situation...

    You have objects larger than 1MB.
    Memcached is not for large media and streaming huge blobs.
    "

    Cheers.

    --
    Yet Socrates himself is particularly missed.
    A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed.
    1. Re:Memcached for MP3 music? I think not. by mariushm · · Score: 1

      Any sane person would just split an mp3 file in 256-512KB chunks of data.

      This is a non-issue anyway... changing the default memcached unit size is a matter of editing a header file and recompiling the daemon server.