Google Patent Reveals New Data Center Innovations

miller60 writes "'Google is seeking to patent a system that provides precision cooling inside racks of servers, automatically adjusting to temperature changes while reducing the energy required to run chillers.' The cooling design uses an adjustable piping system featuring 'air wands' that provide small amounts of cold air to components within a server tray. The cooling design, which could help Google reduce the power bill for its servers, reinforces Google's focus on data center innovation as a competitive advantage. Check out the patent application and a diagram of the system."

Comments

Soon

[MichaelSmith]

There have been 17000 youtube searches for Natalie Portman naked in the last 450 milliseconds. We need a burst of cold air on rack 1000001, processor 304 on the second chip on the third stick of RAM.

Re:Soon

[Interoperable]

Well...the Natalie Portman chip is hot...

Re:Does this pass the "Evil" smell test?

[Anonymous Psychopath]

Hmmm... Is creating patents for things like this "evil"? Seeking to prevent others from saving energy (unless they pay a toll) is not good for this planet, and I'm not sure if passes for "good".

Just pretend they never had the idea at all and nothing has changed. There, feel better?

I know it's popular to bash Google around these parts, but you're really reaching.

Re:Does this pass the "Evil" smell test?

[Theaetetus]

As a person who is handy carving things out of wood who might happen to one day create a sitting device for my own person use that is identical to your stool, would I be expected to have to pay you, even if i had never seen your stool?

I don't see how, as an individual, I would not be allowed to make for my own use anything i am physically capable of making with my own materials and tools.

Because this is a civilization rather than a libertarian anarchy? Why should you be able to enjoy the fruits of my labor and sweat of my inventive brow without paying me a reasonable license fee?

As for "never seen my stool", there is such a thing as innocent infringement... For one, you can't be liable for indirect infringement without intention to infringe. For two, damages tend to be lower: if you're truly innocent, I'd get the cost of one stool out of you.

Re:At least we know the DB servers are cool

[miller60]

Yes, we were down. The previous database turned out to be a girly man database. We're back now with a (hopefully) manlier database.

Re:Does this pass the "Evil" smell test?

[j1m 5n0w]

Also, they're not stopping anyone from using it

That's pretty much the only thing you can do with a patent, stop someone else from using it. (Licensing is just an agreement not to exercise that power.)

I see several explanations for Google applying for a patent:

• They want licensing revenue (unlikely)
• They want to patent the technique before someone else does (possible, but they could have simply published the technique)
• They want an arsenal of patents they never intend to enforce, but they can use as a threat against companies whose patents Google is infringing (more likely - this is pretty much standard practice in the corporate world these days)
• They patented the technique out of pure bureaucratic inertia - it's just what corporations typically do in this situation, as it's the least-risk choice (also likely)

I wouldn't consider any of these particularly evil, but it is inconvenient for smaller organizations who might want to use the technique, but don't want to go through the hassle of negotiating with Google (who might just ignore their request for licensing).

Re:No matter how innovative

[Enderandrew]

Google is a for-profit company that does a lot of work for open standards, FOSS, and charities that they don't have to.

You insist they must do it for PR, yet their PR campaign has been so successful with you. They don't even go out of their way to toot their own horn, to the extent that most people have never heard of the things that Google offers up freely.

Google is not a company like any other.

Re:No matter how innovative

[General Wesc]

It's a pure marketing stunt, not an attempt to bring about some egalitarian utopia.

Repeat after me: Google is a for-profit company. like any other.

Repeat after me: for-profit companies are run by people, not an infallible profit-maximizing robot.

Re:Same heat flow

[Mr. Suck]

You are right - you need to remove exactly as much heat as the equipment is generating. The energy savings with this scheme is due to the fact efficiency of chillers is lowest when asked to produce coldest output. Traditional data centers keep the hot parts cold by keeping everything very cold. Efficiency is improved if you can run your chiller at a higher output temperature and compensate for the reduced effectiveness of the warmer air by directing it where it is most needed.