Canadian Blood Services Promotes Pseudoscience
trianglecat writes "The not-for-profit agency Canadian Blood Services has a section of their website based on the Japanese cultural belief of ketsueki-gata, which claims that a person's blood group determines or predicts their personality type. Disappointing for a self-proclaimed 'science-based' organization. The Ottawa Skeptics, based in the nation's capital, appear to be taking some action."
The thin edge of the wedge with this sort of thing is its popularity with the public at large. I'm sure the logic at CBS HQ was (unless the staff are themselves woo peddlers) "Well, yeah, it's pop-nonsense; but if it will draw attention, we'll get more blood donors, and we really need all of those we can get." That can be a compelling argument, and the compromise can seem so harmless at the time.
You also see this sort of thing happen when otherwise respectable medical schools will get endowed institutes in nonsenseology because some big donor has $200 million; but also believes that squirting coffee up his ass cures cancer.
This seems like a fairly harmless "just for fun" type thing. This is like ripping on someone for reading a fortune cookie.
It's not even that. It's a way to break the ice with people who would be bored to tears with "facts" about blood. It's meant for fun, not education, other than educating people that giving blood is a good thing.
It's not the Canadian Blood Service's job to teach every person on the planet every fact about blood nor are they required to UNteach every superstition.
As for the "skeptics", they need to get a life or borrow a sense of humor. And get some honesty . The disclaimer they say you'll miss if you blink was quite visible to this reader, even while blinking.
It's a shame that organizations who claim to have such high purposes waste their time and image by ranting about such stupid meaningless things.
When I'm asked what sign I was born under I usually respond that I'm not sure but it probably said something like "Maternity Ward". Depending on the response you can then easily tell whether it is worth continuing a conversation....
I posted a comment in a discussion group. If you call that "ranting", and equate that to producing a website denouncing what I commented about, well, that's your issue to deal with. Most people would recognize a difference.
What sort of Ottawa-based issues do you think that the Ottawa Skeptics should be spending time on instead, OOI?
I really don't care what they rant about, I'm just pointing out the stupidity and waste of time demonstrated by their active opposition to something so meaningless in the long run. If they want to look stupid by using a shotgun approach to a mosquito, well, that's fine with me. They can make all the mountains out of molehills they want, as long as they accept the resulting impression they leave on bystanders.