Slashdot Mirror
The Voynich Manuscript May Have Been Decoded
MBCook sends word on a possible solution to the mystery of the Voynich Manuscript, which we last visited nearly 6 years ago. "The Voynich Manuscript has confounded attempts to decode it for nearly 100 years. A person named Edith Sherwood, who has previously suggested a possible link to DaVinci, has a new idea: perhaps the text is simply anagrams of Italian words. There are three pages of examples from the herb section of the book, showing the original text, the plaintext Italian words, and the English equivalents. Has someone cracked the code?"
Using my botnet, I finally cracked the message! It's just the same phrase over and over again...
Drink More Ovaltine
Anyone have a clue what it means?
Oh, that was Voynich Manuscript...that's different. Never mind.
Wasn't Voynich Manuscript already solved by Randall Munroe?
Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
It says:
Pound pastrami, can kraut,six bagels--bring home for Emma."
Like we need another lame Dan Brown book+movie.
Also, http://xkcd.com/593/
UTF-8: There and Back Again
It's a cook book!
So she has apparently decoded a manuscript written in a language she does not read (medieval Italian) does not know what a medieval herbal looks like, is not a botanist, a linguist or anything else that would be helpful to decoding a medieval manuscript of any kind .....
For her next trick she will disprove Einstein, and prove the world is flat .....
Puteulanus fenestra mortis
Hypothesis: Leonardo Da Vinci had a son (perhaps named Bartolomeo). As punishment for Bart's mischief, Leonardo ordered him to write 300 pages' worth of "Non rivelero il segreto di mio padre" using Da Vinci's secret script in mirror image.
Set your phasers on "funky"!
In fact, the working hypothesis of TFA's Author is that the manuscript may have been written by a young - still child - Leonardo, playing around with anagrams and trying to make an imaginary book out of common plants.
Not that far from children playing "Druids & Dicotyledon 1st Edition"
"Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
Seriously, also on page 4, "mushroom"? OK, you could argue that's like the stem of a mushroom. So why are the very similar figures on previous pages marked "forget" (eh? unless in some medieval italian slang that apparently both dante and da vinci spoke a "forget" was a mushroom of some sort), "waste" (eh? this is the bit of the mushroom, or forget, that you're meant to waste? seriously?), "rapid" (evidently if you eat this particular mushroom, or forget, you rapidly produce waste) or two question marks
Makes totally sense. Magic mushrooms. Like, dude, if you eat them shrooms, you'll get rapidly wasted and forget about all that shit'n'stuff, like totally, man.
Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
The link is at least more likely than to Leonardo da Gary Indiana.
or Leonardo da Ninja Turtle
now it just brings out the "Dan Brown is the realz" crowd and other conspiracy nutters.
Dan Brown IS real. You Dan Brown deniers are the real conspiracy nuts. "It's a ghost-writer" "It's plagiarized from aliens" "My dog is Dan Brown" Nutters all.
In case you don't want to read the article, here are the first two lines they decoded:
But what if we need to differentiate him from the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle?
Someone is about to get their ass kicked for saying that!