Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Step Down After CRU Hack Fallout

An anonymous reader writes "In the wake of the recent release of thousands of private files and emails after a server of the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia was hacked, Prof. Phil Jones is stepping down as head of the CRU. Prof. Michael Mann, another prominent climate scientist, is also under inquiry by Penn State University."

6 of 874 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Politics by b1t+r0t · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why we need to act NOW to return the glaciers to the same state they were in 30,000 years ago.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  2. Climategate? Bah!!! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 4, Funny

    I prefer the term Warmaquiddick.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  3. Re:Politics by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Beach Party?

    --
    There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
  4. Re:Politics by CannonballHead · · Score: 4, Funny

    IIRC.

    You, sir, are old!

  5. Re:Politics by mi · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's why we need to act NOW to return the glaciers to the same state they were in 30,000 years ago.

    The "NOW" has to be pictured with a multi-colored fist raised in anger against the oppressors.

    While at it, the humanity also ought to rise against the evil Big Business (as opposite to the beloved "Mom and Pop" shops suffering from Wal-Mart), who contribute to the Continental Drift. Because every time a plane takes off on one continent and lands on another, the continents are pulled farther and farther away from the positions they were in before humanity appeared.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  6. What is the motivation to fabricate AGW? by jayme0227 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously there is plenty of monetary motivation to deny AGW, but what is the motivation to fabricate it? I just don't see it. At best you could say that these scientists were duped into believing that AGW was real and, now that they know the "truth," are trying to hide that they were wrong, but this is far from compelling considering the sheer number of scientists involved all trying to dupe each other.

    What am I missing?

    --
    But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.