Slashdot Mirror


US Air Force Confirms New Stealth Aircraft

DesScorp writes "Aviation Week reports that the USAF has confirmed the existence of a new, formerly secret stealth aircraft, designated RQ-170 Sentinel, developed at Lockheed's legendary Skunk Works. Rumors of a secret new jet have been flying since 2007, with longtime aviation journalist Bill Sweetman dubbing the possible aircraft 'The Beast of Kandahar' because of the urban legend-like reports from Afghanistan. The aircraft is a UAV, a pilot-less drone that appears to have some kind of reconnaissance-only mission for the time being. It's a tailless flying wing that resembles a fighter-sized B-2 bomber."

7 of 287 comments (clear)

  1. Re:top secret by Kagura · · Score: 3, Informative

    In any case, here's a photo of the RQ-170 Sentinel.

    Any ideas on why they need such a secret and stealthy UAV in Afghanistan for? Obviously they weren't too worried about it if this Bill Sweetman guy was able to see it at the Kandahar International Airport.

  2. Makes sense. by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative

    Makes sense. A stealthed recon aircraft should be small. Recon is mostly flying preprogrammed flight paths, so the pilot doesn't make many decisions. Hence a moderate-sized UAV.

    The Air Force guys hate it, but UAVs are getting the job done. The Army is going for more automation; they use autoland on their Predators, and have far fewer crashes than the USAF stick jocks who land the things manually.

  3. Re:top secret by Kagura · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's another photo that is much higher quality.

  4. Re:Is it really that necessary? by glueball · · Score: 5, Informative

    Who had an Air Force?

    Korea=yes, for the duration
    Viet Nam= yes, for the duration
    Cold War = yes, the USSR and USA often flew matching flights.
    Iraq I = yes (for about 20 minutes)
    Al Qaeda = yes (4 planes for about 90 minutes)
    Iraq II = yes (for about 3 minutes)

    For the Future:
    Iran=yes (F-14s, thank you Jimmy Carter), MiG 29

  5. Re:Is it really that necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    He's carrying a gun, mortar, and/or RPG. And he's in a group of several other guys like him. And he's moving toward a military checkpoint or installation. And he keeps ducking behind cover, thinking it will hide him.

  6. Re:Possible Reasons Why by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are better pictures out there, including one of it on the ground.

    At least people think its the RQ-170, if its not, there are two strange planes out there.

    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2009/12/kandahars-loch-ness-mystery-pl.html

  7. Re:top secret by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Informative

    Disclosure: I am formerly an F-117 avionics technician, of what used to be the 37th Tactical Fighter Wing at Tonopah Test Range, NV (the original home of the F-117 Nighthawk). That said, I've been a civilian for nearly 20 years, but...

    The USAF 'fessed up to the existence of the F-117 in 1988 (and included a fuzzy-at-best photograph). That was what they were "really" working on at the time. Better stuff (cf. the B-2) came out later, and from other projects. Before 1988, we were considered to be working on an A-7 avionics upgrade program - my old orders still reflect that (while my old training records had a ton of phrases reading "see classified master"). After 1988, the A-7s were quietly sent back to the Arizona boneyard they came out of, and we were officially working on the Stealth Fighter from that point on. There was no "really working on" bit to it - that's what we were doing.

    Now it may or may not be true that they are/were/will-be working on something else. Those may come out in due time, or they may be quietly buried or shelved if they don't work out. Fact is, there may well be more than one project in motion, but the confirmation or denial of those projects simply will not happen unless/until the USAF says something about 'em individually and in particular. Even during my 'tenure', we only knew about our baby - we didn't talk to others about our doings, and they didn't talk to us about theirs.

    Sorry, but that's just the way it is *shrug*. It's weird, it's secretive, and you just got along in spite of it. If I were a betting man, I'd say that the odds were excellent of other projects going on... but you and I won't know about them until the gov't is good and ready to say something about 'em.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?