Slashdot Mirror


Martian Methane May Be Created By Lifeforms

Following our recent discussions about the growing evidence pointing to possible life on Mars, reader skywatcher2501 writes with news of a study that has ruled out one possible explanation for the levels of methane seen on that planet — that it might be replenished by disintegrating meteors entering the atmosphere. So two theories remain: either the gas is created as a by-product of reactions between volcanic rock and water, or it is a by-product of a lifeform's metabolism.

7 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. Even more compelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Methane concentrations peak in an area on the planet opposite the famous face on mars.

  2. Re:Questions: by Yetihehe · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem is that on mars all methane should vanish in months due to oxidizing soil. Therefore something must be replenishing it.

    --
    Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  3. option C by __aanonl8035 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "So two theories remain: either the gas is created as a by-product of reactions between volcanic rock and water, or it is a by-product of a lifeform's metabolism."

    Or C: There is some, as of yet, unidentified method of methane production.

  4. Re:crap by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well from a purely scientific standpoint I'd say there's merit in preserving and studying life forms that have evolved in complete isolation from anything on Earth.

    Wouldn't you?

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  5. Re:Questions: by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem is that on mars all methane should vanish in months due to oxidizing soil. Therefore something must be replenishing it.

    Its a more complicated problem than that. First of all, there is no viable explanation for a source, assuming no lifeforms on mars, no active volcanoes, not enough meteors... Secondly, methane is localized and produced at weird rates, almost like weather... errr growing seasons... Third, methane is photochemically unstable in UV, it should all disappear in a couple centuries, except it is measured as disappearing much more quickly, VERY coincidentally about the timeframe of one martian year, so grasping at straws, it must be "oxidizing soil" or something. Fourthly the ESA guys claim when they detect methane, it also coincidentally comes along with yummy water vapor (actually, probably fizzy carbonated water crossed with stinky swamp gas)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Mars#Methane

    Now it is refreshing after the quack climatologists basically making stuff up to "prove" their hypothesis, to see that real scientists studying mars are very carefully and appropriately skeptical about declaring martian life. But eventually Occams Razor kicks in and the complicated non-life workarounds become more ridiculous than admitting it makes more sense to assume there's life on mars. I think that tipping point is extremely close.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  6. Re:Is it possible? by Orleron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Decay" implies the breakdown of biological tissue by... you guessed it, micro-organisms. In places where there is not much bacteria, like the antarctic, things that die do not decay noticeably over hundreds of years or more.
    So, I doubt decay from dead things is producing the methane.

  7. Re:Life on Mars by realityimpaired · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mars has about 1/2 the radius of the Earth and about 1/10th the mass, which means a significantly smaller gravitational field, even at the surface (about 1/3 the gravity at the surface, and remember that it falls off proportionately to the square of the distance from the center of mass).

    While Mars doesn't have a magnetic field any more, I suspect that the reason that Mars's atmosphere is so much thinner than our own has more to do with the lack of mass and corresponding gravity well to hold the gases in than it does the solar wind blowing it away. Recall that Mercury has a magnetic field, and it doesn't really help the planet hold its atmosphere. And lest you think that's because it's so close to the Sun, and thus the subject of stronger solar winds, I'll point out that Ganymede also has a permanent magnetic field and a very thin atmosphere, but its surface pressure is so low that if it were created in a bell jar here on Earth, it would be considered a vacuum.