Slashdot Mirror


Best Way To Clear Your Name Online?

An anonymous reader writes "About fifteen years ago, I did something that I've come to regret on a university computer system. I was subsequently interviewed by a Federal law enforcement agency, although no charges were pressed and I have no criminal record as a result of my actions. At the time, I discussed the matter with a friend of mine who went on to mention it briefly in a text file zine with a small distribution list. I've generally tried to keep a low profile online and until recently there's been very little information about me available from the major search engines. Unfortunately, that zine mention was picked up by textfiles.com at some point and mirrored across the world. I've tried to address this with the owner of the site, but couldn't get anywhere. Even if my name in the source file is altered, cached copies will continue to link me with my youthful mistake. Have any other Slashdot readers had a similar experience? What practical steps would your readers recommend to prevent this information from hurting me? I am concerned that future employers may hold my past actions against me should they look for me online as part of their screening process."

27 of 888 comments (clear)

  1. Nothing you can do... by Servaas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once its on the net, its on the net.

    1. Re:Nothing you can do... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That doesn't mean you can't do what the PR agents do: generate higher-profile positive information. That makes it harder to encounter the negative stuff casually. It also changes the balance in the perception of the individual concerned if the negative stuff does also come to light.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    2. Re:Nothing you can do... by Grail · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any employer that chooses to judge an employee by good or bad stuff they did 10 years ago, is stark raving insane.

      10 years ago, the person didn't have two children and a spouse and a house with a 30 year mortgage. That kind of change in life status changes people's priorities. 15 years ago she might have been a party animal, with photos on Facebook showing her drunken charades with a bunch of equally sillly friends, these days she might not even touch alcohol since her dedication to her children is more important to her.

      People do change.

  2. I Don't Worry by headkase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And I'm an idiot to this day. Any employer who would hold a youth mistake against you is also an idiot. Especially when you can google their name in return... Nobody is free of skeletons, just try not to have some real bad ones.

    --
    Shh.
  3. Not keeping low profile? by Lord+Lode · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not sure how bad it is, but if someone types your name in google and the ONLY thing they find is that one thing you don't, then it'll stand out. Try to use your name for everything, so that those things appear first in the results.

    1. Re:Not keeping low profile? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What? "Please cease and desist publishing this information about me that is true and was once published in a magazine."

      I think you mean 'ask politely', because I highly doubt a cease and desist would do much here beyond get you laughed at and provoke a lawyer to write a nice letter explaining the concept of the First Amendment to you.

  4. How common is your name? by Mal-2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you're "John Smith", I think it will be pretty easy to disclaim being the SAME John Smith unless there are a lot of other matching details.

    On the other hand, if your last name is "Szczerbiak", maybe you can make a case for wanting to simplify the spelling and change it.

    Basically those are the first two options I can think of -- dodge, and go stand somewhere else.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  5. Use it in the interview.. by Manip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did you ever consider taking what you did and using it as a reason they SHOULD hire you?

    1. Re:Use it in the interview.. by pyster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You have to remember that the BBS days were full of hack/phreak/anarchy. Many of us were terrible children. If a kid did half the shit we did, or lied about doing, they would be carted off to gitmo never to be seen again. hell, they want to charge you with a crime for just having 'anarchy' files today.

  6. smokescreen by resfilter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if you manage to smokescreen your online identity with huge amount of positive material that bears your name (i.e. get your name on a lot of popular projects), with lots of cross linking, you will at the very least bury it into non-existance as far as search engines are concerned.

    if it's result number 999 on google, i doubt your average employer will read that far into it, and if they do, the amount of positive things that have been said about you will probably outweigh the one negative result

    and i'm not sure of US law in this manner, but is it legal to deny someone a job opportunity based on an alleged crime for which they were completely pardoned?

  7. The best thing you can do is post on /. by The+Real+Nem · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You just awoke a sleeping giant. As we speak thousands of once idle keyboards are feverishly trying away to unravel the mystery of just who you are and what you did - you even told them where to look. How fond were you of your name?

  8. Re:welleee by theIsovist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps he has, but depending on the severity of his college mistake, he could find it hard to ever get another job again. Thanks to the internet's ability to never forget, he's doomed to be repeatedly punished for something he may have already paid for.

  9. Re:welleee by kalirion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Any prospective employer will appreciate the explanation that you gave us.

    That's supposed to be sarcasm, right?

  10. Re:welleee by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Be a man and take responsibility for your actions.

    Employers turn down applicants because of photos showing the applicant drinking beer in college. He was interviewed by law enforcement and no charges were filed according to the summary. It sounds like he did take responsibility already. Being denied employment for something trivial isn't "taking responsibility for one's actions," it's being screwed over.

    At some point employers are going to realize they're hiring -people- and that all of their employees have had lapses in judgement, and maybe then they'll have reasonable standards. For now though, many seem to think that if their lapses in judgment haven't made it onto the internet, that means they didn't happen, so they should only hire people with absolutely no dirt on their online profile.

  11. Re:I see the other end of this problem rather ofte by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    do you tell people before you put the pictures up that you can't be bothered to tweak a few pages every 2 months when it becomes desirable for the pictures to come down again?

    Or set the site up so that none of the pictures stay up for more than 12 months? (If people want them, they can snaffle them while they're still up)

    Or why not set up your robots.txt so that only the frontpage gets indexed?

    If you put potentially damaging pictures of people up on your website, you need to be responsible enough beforehand to recognise that you will need to 'budget' more time later to take them down again. If you can't do that, don't put the pictures up.

    --
    FGD 135
  12. Re:welleee by eiMichael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yep. Everyone who breaks from the status quo should be punished by everyone with an axe to grind in perpetuity forever and ever.

    We have enough "innocent" people that we don't need those "guilty" people to help us.</sarcasm>

  13. Re:welleee by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or you could just be honest and say that he had done some stupid things in the past but behaved well during the time he worked for you.

    It's no more your job to crucify somebody as it is to defend them.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  14. Re:welleee by Yadyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Employers turn down applicants because of photos showing the applicant drinking beer in college.

    I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to work for any place that turned me down because of some brief Google image search. That kind of shallow screening tells me all I need to know about them. "Unfortunate reality" be damned, I'm allowed to have a private life outside of work, thankyouverymuch.

    At any rate, it sounds like this guy needs to smother this one little bad brief mention from years ago with a ton of really good, awesome stuff. What exactly are you doing now? Nothing? Is a law enforcement interview really the most exciting and noteworthy thing you've done in the last few years? If so, then maybe that should be on the first page of results when they Google your name.

  15. Re:welleee by Aqualung812 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd certainly lean towards the one that never got caught for anything... even if he's just as devious, at least he's not dumb enough to get caught!

    No, I want the one that would get caught. I don't need someone stealing from me, I want to catch them. At the same time, I'm not going to force my employees to do something illegal, so their ability to break the law well doesn't help.

    --
    Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
  16. Re:welleee by Restil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, in all fairness, it wasn't one mistake, it was at least two. First, he screwed up. Then, after that had more or less blown over, he decided to brag about it.. I mean "mentioned it to a friend who published the details of the exploit using real names". Congrats. You're notorious now. You have your street cred.

    If you're REALLY concerned, take comfort in the fact that you are not the only one to ever screw up, and with luck and a long period of time without a history of further screwups, past indiscretions will be all but forgotten.

    However, as I see it, you have three options. Either forget about it and hope nobody finds out, embrace it as a life lesson and show how you used the fallout from that event to learn to better take responsibility for your actions.... Or bury it. Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  17. Re:welleee by b96miata · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The point is, there's a difference between saying "Michael Vick should be allowed to play in the NFL, provided any team wants him" and "All references to his arrest, trial and conviction should be purged from the archives"

    This guy did some stuff in his past that got him checked out by the feds, and people found out about it. It's up to potential employers to decide whether or not that is relevant to them. I may agree that the past should often just be left as the past, but I don't think that means everyone else has to share my opinion, or be denied the opportunity to form their own. (which is essentially what the OP wants)

  18. Re:welleee by RichardJenkins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Publish a huge volume of information to the internet using your real name so eventually anyone searching for you will only find the good stuff and hopefully will get bored before they find that one blemish.

    THAT's why I go for +5 insightful

  19. Information Overload is your freind. by Forge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Recommendations must, above all else be honest in regards to what YOU know.

    As the response above suggests you can say "He did some stupid things in the past, but later he worked very well for me, and I think based on this that he is now a high quality person." Yada... Yadd..

    Lay the facts on the table along with your opinion.

    As for the original topic. The AC's mistake was keeping a low profile online. HR will be suspicious of anyone with no online identity at all. Especially for tech jobs. However. Let's say you apply for a Sysadmin position, and they search on your name. That search brings back a flood of discussions, forum posts and debates, most of them technology related. After the 1st few pages of boredom they will announce: "This guy is a geek and spends his online time in the company of geeks."

    An ancient blog post about a criminal investigation would probably get lost in the torrent.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    1. Re:Information Overload is your freind. by xaxa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When I was ~16 I Googled my name, and the top result was a guide to different kinds of cannabis, drug equipment etc. The second result was an Amazon recommendation list for the same. The third was an online petition to legalise weed.
      None of these were me, it's some American guy with the same name.

      I set up my own website, and posted on some technical mailing lists about a year later. Soon after that, and the drug guy's links are several pages along in the Google hits.

  20. Re:welleee by Tynam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    True, but social behaviour can - and does - change over time. It is, demonstrably, useful to fight for less-unjust patterns of behaviour - if you've identified one. Is life fair? Obviously not. Can it be made less-unfair, with effort? Yes.

  21. Re:welleee by dadorg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The internet never forgets. The offending material will always be there. The best thing to do is to bury it. Become an active participant on multiple forums, everything from albacore tuna fishing to zoology (avoid politics and religion). Use your real, full name. Post as much as you can type. In about a year, a search for you will turn up 20 pages of friendly links, most people will stop after page 3. The offending articles will be stale dated and buried at the bottom of the pile. Post to professional forums the most but also non-professional forums so they see that you have a real life as well. You could also try to publish some articles in professional journals (online and dead tree), they should score higher than forum posts. Good Luck.

    --
    Morality is herd instinct in the individual. Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, section 116
  22. Re:welleee by GrpA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Keeping in mind that a LOT of people did stupid things when they were younger and never got caught or had their name linked with what they did.

    I find that the people who hold onto blame the longest are the same people who were the ones that "Didn't get caught" and they almost feel compelled to point the finger to move attention away from their own activities.

    Anyway, sad to say but life's like that... Most people are bigoted to some extent and you can't change that... Move from job to job and prove your worth. Do the opposite to what you were linked with. Give people a reason to believe you've changed and use them as a reference.

    GrpA.

    --
    Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?