Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Create Cheap, Flexible, Plastic Flash Memory

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at the University of Tokyo, led by electrical engineering professor Takao Someya, have created a new kind of low-cost, plastic, flash memory storage device. Although not as dense or stable as its silicon cousin, the plastic flash memory is useful because of its low cost, simple manufacturing process, and potential use in e-paper or other flexible devices. To demonstrate the memory, Someya's group integrated a 676-memory-cell device with a rubber pressure sensor. The flexible sensor-memory device, which is less than 700 micrometers thick, can record pressure patterns and retain them for up to a day."

82 comments

  1. Secure content transfer by ksd1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds like a good idea for transferring content securely. The contents of the memory will degrade in a short time, making it ideal for carrying sensitive data.

    1. Re:Secure content transfer by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a good idea for transferring content securely. The contents of the memory will degrade in a short time, making it ideal for carrying sensitive data.

      Meh, its very unlikely reliable. I'm sure there are better ways.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    2. Re:Secure content transfer by noidentity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This sounds like a good idea for transferring content securely. The contents of the memory will degrade in a short time, making it ideal for carrying sensitive data.

      There's a difference between unreliably storing data after a day, and reliably destroying all data after a day.

    3. Re:Secure content transfer by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I hope it goes over better than the DivX disposable DVD things.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    4. Re:Secure content transfer by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      True, but combine it with a strong encryption and once a certain amount of data is gone the result become unrecoverable even if the actual password is something as simple as 123.

    5. Re:Secure content transfer by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      combine it with a strong encryption and once a certain amount of data is gone the result become unrecoverable even if the actual password is something as simple as 123.

      The data degradation pattern is probably consistent for each particular device. So you'd just need to save the current data, then fill the device with various patterns and see how they degrade. If you find for example that particular bits degrade into set after a day, then you know which bits to try flipping in the original data. You reduce the number of possibilites greatly. So again, you need something that reliably destroys most of the data after some amount of time.

    6. Re:Secure content transfer by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a good idea for transferring content securely. The contents of the memory will degrade in a short time, making it ideal for carrying sensitive data.

      So, how is that different from the currently available floppy disks?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    7. Re:Secure content transfer by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      This sounds like a good idea for transferring content securely. The contents of the memory will degrade in a short time, making it ideal for carrying sensitive data.

      Or you could encrypt the data and destroy the key when you don't need it anymore...

    8. Re:Secure content transfer by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      The data degradation pattern is probably consistent for each particular device.

      This is a pretty big assumption. Though the smallest feature size is pretty damn small, I would be more inclined to think the deterioration would at least resemble a normal distribution.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    9. Re:Secure content transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't *that* bad, plus, these would probably be faster, larger (memory wise) and quieter. Now get off my lawn.

    10. Re:Secure content transfer by musicunderfire · · Score: 1

      Sure its great as a cheap alternative, but I wouldn't doubt this is another case where quality is lost when the cheaper element wins over the stable, pricier one in the end.

  2. bendy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent, if this wasnt vaporware, we'd be that much closer to a roll up computer...which Im sure someone could justify over the normal old boring rigid type besides the neato factor

    1. Re:bendy by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      having a decent-sized keyboard on a portable device you can stuff in your backpack? i know it'd be great. no more lugging around huge laptop cases, a simple cylinder you can tuck somewhere will do.

    2. Re:bendy by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      They already make roll-up portable keyboards. And what does a roll-up keyboard have to do with flash memory?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:bendy by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      good point.. although i like the screen to be a decent size too. a roll-up laptop would be awesome and i've been hoping for something like this for a while.

  3. Cheap, Flexible, Plastic? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like the ethics of your typical politician.

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
    1. Re:Cheap, Flexible, Plastic? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Or what makes a great hooker? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  4. Some clarification needed from TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Organic materials offer the capability to significantly lower the price of memory," because they can be processed much more cheaply than silicon, says Yang Yang, professor of materials science and engineering at the University of California, Los Angeles, who was not involved with the work. The demonstration of plastic flash "is a very important milestone in organic memory," says Yang.

    The plastic memory was made by a team of researchers at the University of Tokyo led by electrical engineering professor Takao Someya. The key to making the plastic memory device work, says Someya, is a hybrid insulating layer made of a polymer and a metal oxide. This layer electrically isolates the metal gate in which charges are stored. An applied voltage causes the metal gates to accumulate charge--charged and uncharged gates represents binary 1s and 0s, as in silicon flash. The better the insulator works, the longer the data can be stored before the electrons leak away and the data degrades.

    Story continues below

    Someya's group starts by placing metal transistor gates on top of a plastic substrate. Then a thin layer of aluminum oxide is deposited on top and the plastic film is submerged in a solution containing an insulating polymer. The polymer finally self-assembles on the surface of the aluminum oxide. The plastic devices can endure 1,000 writing and reading cycles. In contrast, silicon flash can be written to about 100,000 times.

    I might be missing something; which part of the process is done with organic materials. I see that it's not silicon based, but perhaps I am misunderstanding their usage of organic. Regardless to that fact, though, it's still pretty interesting stuff.

    1. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by mrisaacs · · Score: 1

      "Organic materials offer the capability to significantly lower the price of memory," because they can be processed much more cheaply than silicon, says Yang Yang, professor of materials science and engineering at the University of California, Los Angeles, who was not involved with the work. The demonstration of plastic flash "is a very important milestone in organic memory," says Yang.

      The plastic memory was made by a team of researchers at the University of Tokyo led by electrical engineering professor Takao Someya. The key to making the plastic memory device work, says Someya, is a hybrid insulating layer made of a polymer and a metal oxide. This layer electrically isolates the metal gate in which charges are stored. An applied voltage causes the metal gates to accumulate charge--charged and uncharged gates represents binary 1s and 0s, as in silicon flash. The better the insulator works, the longer the data can be stored before the electrons leak away and the data degrades.

      Story continues below

      Someya's group starts by placing metal transistor gates on top of a plastic substrate. Then a thin layer of aluminum oxide is deposited on top and the plastic film is submerged in a solution containing an insulating polymer. The polymer finally self-assembles on the surface of the aluminum oxide. The plastic devices can endure 1,000 writing and reading cycles. In contrast, silicon flash can be written to about 100,000 times.

      I might be missing something; which part of the process is done with organic materials. I see that it's not silicon based, but perhaps I am misunderstanding their usage of organic. Regardless to that fact, though, it's still pretty interesting stuff.

      Plastic, which is a polymer, is usually made from oil - which is organic. Some plastic is made from vegetable matter, which is also organic.

      --
      ...carrier dead.....
    2. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by wastedlife · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think they refer to organic as in compounds containing carbon:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_compound

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    3. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by interploy · · Score: 0

      I was wondering how long it'd take for someone to take the "green" trend and apply it to something not at all meant for the label. Oil is organic in the same way uranium is organic. Yes, technically they both come from the natural world, but they hardly match the renewable/healthy/eco-friendly definition that the term organic has come to mean today. If PR folks keep following this logic, we'll soon be seeing ads for 90% organic cars and other such nonsense.

    4. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing organic food with the true meaning of organic, comes from life. Oil is organic as it is fossilized remains of things that lived many years ago. Last I checked Uranium is not organic. Think organic chemistry, not organic hippies.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    5. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Its a scientific term referring to the compounds used. Given the speaker, audience, and context it makes perfect sense. Not everything has to be co-opted by marketing bullshit.

    6. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I might be missing something; which part of the process is done with organic materials.

      Any of them dealing with materials that contain carbon.

    7. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by mrisaacs · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how long it'd take for someone to take the "green" trend and apply it to something not at all meant for the label. Oil is organic in the same way uranium is organic. Yes, technically they both come from the natural world, but they hardly match the renewable/healthy/eco-friendly definition that the term organic has come to mean today. If PR folks keep following this logic, we'll soon be seeing ads for 90% organic cars and other such nonsense.

      Uranium is a metallic element, mined as a mineral - and not organic in any sense of the word.

      Oil, or petroleum is decomposed plant and animal matter, organic sources and still organic in nature.
      The subject of the chemistry of polymers and oil based substances (as well material sourced from anything that was once alive) is Organic Chemistry.

      Organic in chemistry generally refers to anything that is or was alive. In other subjects, organic is used to describe things that are natural and not "manufactured".

      The commercial term Organic - as used for produce, does not refer to the crops themselves, it refers to the method of growing them, which does not employ industrially derived fertilizers or pesticides, and using manure, etc as fertilizers.

      In actuality the term is misleading, since most of the industrial fertilizers and pesticides are produced from organic sources, and minerals, which can be used to enrich organic crops, are inorganic substances.

      --
      ...carrier dead.....
    8. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, I got excited...for a second I thought you said "orgasmic."

    9. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Buy after refining the raw petroleum, is it still organic then? Pretty sure you can't make plastic out of unprocessed crude oil.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    10. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Informative

      I might be missing something; which part of the process is done with organic materials. I see that it's not silicon based, but perhaps I am misunderstanding their usage of organic. Regardless to that fact, though, it's still pretty interesting stuff.

      In terms of chemistry, organic refers to stuff made from carbon.

      Plastic is made from carbon.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    11. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing organic food with the true meaning of organic, comes from life. Oil is organic as it is fossilized remains of things that lived many years ago. Last I checked Uranium is not organic. Think organic chemistry, not organic hippies.

      Organic chemistry has nothing to do with life. It has to do with carbon compounds - which just so happen to appear in living things.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    12. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      I think they refer to organic as in compounds containing carbon:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_compound

      <pedant>CO2 is not organic.</pedant>

      --
      $ make available
    13. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oil is organic in the same way uranium is organic

      wat

    14. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by nasch · · Score: 1

      "Organic Chemistry is a discipline within chemistry that involves the scientific study of the structure, properties, composition, reactions, and preparation (by synthesis or by other means) of hydrocarbons and their derivatives."

      It doesn't have to have anything to do with life. For example, a chemist studying carbon compounds from an asteroid would be doing organic chemistry even if there is no life involved.

    15. Re:Some clarification needed from TFA by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      D'oh! Make that "compounds containing carbon that are considered organic, and not compounds containing carbon that are considered inorganic"

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  5. Will e-book readers be... by runyonave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the next virtual reality. What I mean is, back in the late 80s-90s, virtual reality was thought to be the technology of the future. Now they are out of date and instead somewhat replaced with augmented reality.

    Now with e-book readers, will they get replaced with the e-paper medium. With this flexible memory card and other technology such as the printable circuit board, I can see e-book readers becoming out of date.

    1. Re:Will e-book readers be... by maxume · · Score: 1

      They'll just get lighter and still only be as out of date as the material stored on them.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Will e-book readers be... by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Kindle sure sold a lot of models really fast... I don't think we can call ebook readers dead this early in the game.

      --
      $ make available
  6. The flexible fad...repeats itself... by MindPrison · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tell me that you haven't heard this before?

    - Flexible displays
    - Flexible PCB's
    - Flexible Chips

    Yes, they've been around since the 80's. But have they ever been used? No!

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by MikeMacK · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on, try and be a little flexible on this...

    2. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Yes, they've been around since the 80's. But have they ever been used? No!

      Maybe THESE flexible materials aren't affected by hair spray, which was used so much in the '80s that it actually burned a hole in the atmosphere.

    3. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Flexible Chips

      This one time my Tostitos got wet.

    4. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Flexible PCB's

      Most certainly have been used. I remember taking apart a Polaroid camera when I was a kid, and finding a flexible light brown plastic circuit with chips soldered to it.

    5. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      He hasn't been flexible since the 80s (overdosed on Richard Simmons I guess).

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by squizzar · · Score: 1

      I've seen them in mobile phones and LCD panels as well.

    7. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      Alright.

      Mention ONE brand (with model number) where the PCB, or LCD panels actually where flexible (and no, I'm not mentioning the touchpad, dialpad or keyboard membranes!)

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    8. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      Just because you can bend a PCB a few cm, doesn't mean that they're meant to be flexible.

      When I refer to "flexible LCD & PCB" I'm talking about devices that are supposed to be bent in use, such as fold-out-displays or "wrap around electronics".

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    9. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by Spykk · · Score: 1

      That joke was a little stiff...

    10. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Printers, scanners, and hard drives all make great use of flexible PCBs for the head connector "cable" - which must flex constantly while in use. They are cheaper and more durable than ribbon cables, and can have SMT components directly soldered to them (usually in hard drives where a regular PCB would be too big and heavy to go on the head.)

      for example see: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Hard_disk_platters_and_head.jpg

    11. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      One of the very common example is the laser assembly on almost any optical disc reader. This is easy to forget about, even though it most definitely uses a flexible PCB. It's not just for connection, either, because the PCB connects to the laser, often has the adjustment potentiometer soldered on, and connects to the optical pickup block and the focus coils.

      Back of lens unit on Sony DSC camera

      Odometer with large flexible PCB

      Video game controller with flexi-PCB layer over rigid PCB, with plenty of SMT components.

      The two main benefits of a flexible PCB that I can see: ability to fit into non-planar space, and ability to solder all components onto PCB, even though component leads don't terminate in a planar space.

    12. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Hard Drives uses flex PCB in the head assembly for the amplifier as well as wiring harness. The PCB itself is also used as a spring. That's ANY brands and ANY sizes.

      Old dot matrix print heads, laptop LCD signals, PC keyboard (with conductive ink), most of the LCD panels uses flex PCB as a high density flexible ribbon cable.

      My old 300MB hard drive and the last PCB I designed uses a rigid + Flex PCB.

    13. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Combo breaker!

      --
      $ make available
    14. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      Granted, those are indeed flexible, god knows I've pulled a few lasers out of DVD-burners & Motors for robotics out of printers.

      But it STILL isn't really a flexible PCB with Flexible Chips! It's more like a stiff flat-cable with components attached here and there.

      I wasn't clear enough, my bad - so here:

      A totally flexible PCB, with Flexible chips, so you can eg. wrap it around your wrist, again and again, without damaging it over time, this is very hard to manufacture, let alone a flexible OLED display.

      Have you seen a e-ink screen lately that actually bends (not counting carefully watched prototypes)? I haven't.

      Have you seen a hand held screen with flexible PCB and flexible screen, with flexible components, so you can bend it like a piece of transparent plastic paper? (The future predicted e-papers)... No? Me neither. This is what I meant, not flexible "pcb-cables" used in dvd-players, printers & whatnot.

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    15. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by meza · · Score: 1

      Could you give an example or references to a flexible chip invented in the 80's? (which was your initial assumption). I'm honestly just very curious. Maybe then we can figure out why it's still being developed as the "next big thing".

    16. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm as curious as you on this area, hence why I call the "fad" card, as we've been filled with news on these stretchable, bendable chips for years, on science tv, documentaries, and whatever magazine you could read before Internet were for anyone.

      There are (was / is) several ways to make chips flexible. The old 80's method was to keep the silicon chip itself ridgid while the the housing itself would be flexible - and the pcb itself of course, flexible resistors are a bit tricky since the resistance varies with the stretching - but this could be solved with wired resistors - flexing between the conductive/resisting wire itself, yet again - posing tear-wear issues.

      Last year they came up with actual twistable sillicon chip - meaning that the actual IC-Core could be flexible as well:

      http://www.engadget.com/2008/03/28/stretchy-silicon-circuits-wrap-around-complex-shapes-like-your/

      If you look at the various OLED demos. of either e-paper or OLED displays that are flexible, they STILL pose the same tear and wear issues as silicon chips would have, they simply won't last (yet) - but strangely enough - this stuff pops up like it was fantastic news - every year, and unsurprisingly - very few actual products come out of it.

      You tell me.

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    17. Re:The flexible fad...repeats itself... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      OK, I see now, you're talking about the "wow look at this amazing tech!" rather than "inside these devices are flexible plastic circuits, but you'll never see them, or even guess they are in there" as the ones I linked to. Yes, you're talking of something where everything is basically printed on, such that it is as flexible as a plastic sheet with any other kind of printing.

  7. Possible use: by RandoX · · Score: 1

    White House email archives.

    1. Re:Possible use: by Gerb · · Score: 1

      Nah, not necessary anymore: Bush and Cheney are gone.

      --
      There's no place like 127.0.0.1
    2. Re:Possible use: by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      Cause Obama and Biden are so open and transparent. Right?

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    3. Re:Possible use: by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Attempting to parse Biden-speak is like trying to brute force 512-bit encryption.

    4. Re:Possible use: by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Just the other day the gov't held a Closed meeting on openness. Now that's change I can believe in

  8. A flexible friend by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    Just think of the applications of plastic memory. Completely undetectable by the security scanners at airports, you can have your high security decryption key on you without having a USB key confiscated to see what is on it, possibly revealing your decryption key. One in the eye to the security nut-jobs who like to confiscate things to see what's on them under pretext of crime prevention / terror.

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:A flexible friend by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      "Someya's group starts by placing metal transistor gates on top of a plastic substrate. Then a thin layer of aluminum oxide is deposited on top and the plastic film is submerged in a solution containing an insulating polymer."

      I think this might just show on a airport metal detector, but I could be wrong.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    2. Re:A flexible friend by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      It would probably show up just as much as, say, the reflective tape on your biking backpack. Which just happens to be taping down the memory chip.

    3. Re:A flexible friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if I'm the only one who looked a TFS, read this comment subject, and thought 'blow up doll'.

      Major let down, by the way...

    4. Re:A flexible friend by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What? Silicon isn't detectable by security scanners, and a micro SD card is small enough to hide anywhere.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:A flexible friend by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea, or just wear it under your belt, then you could most likely make it through a metal detector with it on.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  9. Another revolutionary cheap flexible thing. Yawn. by SOdhner · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing about awesome revolutionary inventions that are cheap, flexible, and tiny. Super efficient solar panels, screens, memory, everything.

    And yet, somehow, years pass and I never see them actually used in consumer electronics.

    Obviously that's not always the case. E-Ink is something I would have put into that category had it never materialized, for example. But in a general sense I just have trouble getting excited these days.

  10. Note to submitter by julesh · · Score: 0

    "Flash" is the name of a specific technology that stores data in the charge accumulated on the gate of a MOSFET. The term you're looking for to describe what this invention is is "EEPROM", which is the category of devices of which Flash is the best known.

    Basically, your comment makes you look stupid, like people who call photocopiers "xeroxes" or vacuum cleaners "hoovers".

    1. Re:Note to submitter by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Try not to offend the guy, I'd hate to have to grab him a kleenex.

    2. Re:Note to submitter by julesh · · Score: 1

      Err.. OK, now I've RTFA it seams this _is_ flash memory. The summary is misleading in suggesting that pressure is used in the storage; the prototype was used with a pressure sensor to provide an example application.

    3. Re:Note to submitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Made sense to me

    4. Re:Note to submitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try not to offend the guy, I'd hate to have to grab him a kleenex.

      Don't worry, he's teflon. It bounces off him like a trampoline.

    5. Re:Note to submitter by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Your mistake has nothing to do with the summary and everything with you trying to feel superior by correcting people.

      In other words: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7zfnbdyAW8

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Note to submitter by mrnobo1024 · · Score: 1

      "EEPROM" is generally only used to refer to nonvolatile memories where individual bits can be erased. Flash memory has to be erased an entire block at a time (where a block is some size much larger than 1 bit).

  11. Re:Another revolutionary cheap flexible thing. Yaw by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing about awesome revolutionary inventions that are cheap, flexible, and tiny. Super efficient solar panels, screens, memory, everything. And yet, somehow, years pass and I never see them actually used in consumer electronics.

    You're just not paying attention. Think back 10 years, and try to figure out how big a device would have had to be in order to perform the same functions as, for example, an iPhone. It would be at least 5 times as thick. Would have cost an thousands of dollars, too. 20 years ago you would have needed a backpack to cart it around in. Technology progresses in small steps, so that you tend to miss it unless you're actually paying attention. It's not until you look at old photographs or videos that you realize how much has changed.

  12. Flexible polymer data storage != A new concept. by Skratchez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like it has a ways to go before it catches up with Silly Putty. It's been encoding newsprint for decades, and I believe it would definitely hold the content for more than a day. I hope Rupert Murdoch doesn't get wise to this "technology".

  13. Modern day scribes? by jbarr · · Score: 1

    This could potentially solve both the unemployment problem AND the DRM problem.

    Just scribes to write the articles, and the company doesn't have to worry about the reader passing along copies because after a day, they'll be unreadable!

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  14. Speed? Density? by Ren+Hoak · · Score: 1

    Cheap is nice. Short term memory -- too close to home for anyone over 40, but one day isn't bad. How fast is it to access, and how large is it relative to Si storage? Those may both be answered in TFA, but I'm too lazy to check. +1 Honesty?

    If this is as fast as traditional large storage formats, and it doesn't take considerably more space, it could be interesting to see this applied to swap space or /tmp type storage... especially if the 1 day reliability can be extended through a refresh cycle.

  15. Mystic writing pad by earlymon · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    Ethan Miller, professor of computer science at the University of California, Santa Cruz, says that plastic memory might be incorporated into e-paper. "Suppose you have a sheet with memory and a pressure sensor underneath it--you could write something and store the data, without a scanner," he says.

    Yes, this is very cool. I owned the analog versions some years back:

    http://elab.eserver.org/hfl0257.html

    And

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_paper

    Now, if you think I'm taking a cheap shot - I'm not. The magic tablet and carbon paper technologies were quite significant and did shape our communications - they both broadened the writing medium.

    This, now, like the things above, possibly becoming cheap enough for ubiquitous use, could have the same effect.

    So - this is one case where "neener neener neener, we had that before" isn't an inaccurate catcall - it's really to say, "neener neener neener, we had that before - and we told everyone we would need it again!"

    I for one hope that this doesn't become more forgotten vaporware.

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  16. Re:Another revolutionary cheap flexible thing. Yaw by SOdhner · · Score: 1

    Technology progresses in small steps, so that you tend to miss it unless you're actually paying attention.

    I'll agree that that factors into it, yeah - but I'm not talking about the speeding up and shrinking down of technology in general. It's hard to draw the line clearly, but there are inventions that bring an all-new aspect into it (often lately it's about being flexible and made out of pocket lint so that it costs nothing / can be printed out / is biodegradeable) and that's what doesn't show.

    The gradual trend of things getting smaller and faster is a different story, and one I'm pretty pleased with.

  17. Cheap, plastic flash memory? by ascari · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the standard schwag at every tech conference...

  18. Storage density? by marciot · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this is a useful for some applications, but at 676 bits on that large piece of plastic, this thing probably does not even rival core memory in terms of storage density. They got a lot of shrinking to do before this thing can store even one MP3 file.

  19. Tape Cassettes by idji · · Score: 1

    Remember those tape cassettes that went the way of the dinosaurs when CD burners got cheap. They were also plastic and metal oxides. Seems we are just coming back in circles and recycling technologies at the next level.