Slashdot Mirror


EU Recommends Noise Limits On MP3 Players

A story at the BBC notes increasing pressure from the European Commission to set standards that would limit the maximum volume on portable MP3 players. Their reasoning is that it would protect users from damaging their hearing after listening to loud music for extended periods. Quoting: "This follows a report last year warning that up to 10m people in the EU face permanent hearing loss from listening to loud music for prolonged periods. EU experts want the default maximum setting to be 85 decibels, according to BBC One's Politics Show. Users would be able to override this setting to reach a top limit of 100 decibels. ... Some personal players examined in testing facilities have been found to reach 120 decibels, the equivalent of a jet taking off, and no safety default level currently applies, although manufacturers are obliged to print information about risks in the instruction manuals. Modern personal players are seen as more dangerous than stationary players or old-fashioned cassette or disk players because they can store hours of music and are often listened to while in traffic with the volume very high to drown out outside noise."

25 of 360 comments (clear)

  1. But how to do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But how to do that?
    The effect used to play at 85db is not the same across all headphones.
    The small tiny ones that comes with the player normaly need less effect to reach 85db then if you get some nice big headphones with better sound.

    1. Re:But how to do that? by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's an interesting point/question. The output of one set of headphones will be different from another set of earbuds. There would have to be some sort of end-user calibration process to get it right. And given how many people still have electronic devices that blink "12:00" I think any such requirement would result in a failure and a lot of wasted money for the added functionality.

    2. Re:But how to do that? by SpooForBrains · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, what would happen is that the levels would be calibrated either arbitrarily, or with whatever standard earbuds come with the device.

      Those of us that go out and buy decent earphones will then just have to deal with them being too quiet, and no one important enough will give a shit.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    3. Re:But how to do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because you couldn't possibly be responsible for your own behavior.

      Funny how telling someone to take responsibility for his own behavior has now become the best way to avoid taking responsibility for one's own actions.

    4. Re:But how to do that? by yankpop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's common to see musicians playing with plugs stuck in their ears so they don't drive themselves stone deaf, while they obviously consider it perfectly OK for them to obliterate the hearing of customers frequenting the place.

      To be fair, the musicians are essentially standing on top of the speakers, while the audience members can choose how close they are to the stage. And the musicians have to deal with the noise almost daily, while most of the people in the audience are there once a week or less. And the audience members that are regulars tend to have ear plugs too. So it's not fair to point at ear plugs as a sign of the band's lack of concern for their fans. All of which assumes what look like ear plugs are not actually ear bud monitors that allow the musicians to hear more, not less, of the music.

      yp.

    5. Re:But how to do that? by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > By that logic, this regulation of mp3 player volume level shouldn't exist
      > either because the owners of the players should be responsible for their
      > own actions and turn down the volume.

      You're very quick.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:But how to do that? by torkus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And add the cost of "standardization" to all mp3 players? They'll all have to be certified? Just to have everyone who wants loud music immediately turn off the protection?

      Or they could ... I don't know ... let people make their own decisions OR let parents educate their kids OR leave all the retarded "you might hurt your ears" literature that every audio device already includes...

      Really, this is just all nanny state crap. Utterly unnecessary and a waste of time and effort that could be better spent on things that actually MATTER.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  2. Do what we say, not what we do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hearing loss is bad if it is caused by MP3 players, but it's okay when it's caused by police using crowd control devices against innocent civilians.

    1. Re:Do what we say, not what we do by fbjon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hearing loss is bad if it is caused by MP3 players, but it's okay when it's caused by police using crowd control devices against innocent civilians.

      How does hearing loss result from that?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:Do what we say, not what we do by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only that, but isn't it equally "hypocritical" that people get fined for speeding, while police cars drive as fast as they need during a chase?

      No, but it is very hypocritical for them to pull you over after they have been speeding for no reason whatsoever. I routinely see these Anointed Ones drive very fast without any flashing lights that signal, "We have an emergency here." I have also had these guys tailgate me in an attempt to get me to drive faster than the speed limit.

      --
      SSC
  3. Better Headphones by secondsun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since we are going the consumer protect route, wouldn't it be better for headphones/ear buds to require noise cancelling technologies so the music doesn't have to be turned up as high?

    That would make it harder to hear things while driving, but you shouldn't have headphones in while driving.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    1. Re:Better Headphones by SBrach · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They aren't magic. You can still hear. Besides, if hearing is your main truck avoidance mechanism, you've got other problems.

  4. And how will this work? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The volume that you get out of phones depends on the voltage sent to the phones, which the volume dial regulates, but also the impedance and sensitivity of the phones, which it can't. So whatever limit you set won't work in all cases. If you limit it to 85dB for ultra efficient phones like the Ultimate Ears UE5s (21 ohms, 119dB/mw) it will be extremely silent on Sennheiser 580s (300 ohms, 97dB/mw). Likewise set the limit on the Sennheisers, and the UEs would still be able to go to extremely excessive volumes.

    This just can't be done. Unless you force players to accept only a certain headphone, you can't limit the output in this manner. The range of headphone is extremely wide. With speakers this is mildly feasible since most speakers are 8 ohms (though there are plenty of 4 ohm ones, and some 12 or higher) and generally in the range of 85-90dB/watt (though there are speakers over 100dB/watt). However with headphones the variation is too much.

    This will do nothing useful.

  5. The problem COULD be elsewhere.. by MindPrison · · Score: 3, Insightful

    many of my peers are listening to VERY loud music at the clubs, in their home, in their cars - with ridiculous oversized stereos etc. I'm pretty sure that the MP3 players alone won't make a difference at all.

    I'm in my 40's now, and I've been listening to MP3 players (including the first Walkmans/MiniDisc Players) since the beginning of my childhood, more than others...because I wasn't allowed to play loud music, and I found a great personal "peace" in listening to these - as loud as I wanted - wherever I wanted, any time.

    This never damaged my hearing in any way, I've had my hearing checked regularly, and guess what - despite always using headphones - yes - even today...to avoid problems with my neighbors - I still hear like a 20 year old. Responsive at 18 khz or better, while my peers - can't even detect a 15 khz tone, and they always play loud music on their speakers...which I don't even have.

    Go figure...

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:The problem COULD be elsewhere.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      head phones don't need to be turned as loud to hear the whole sound. With speakers, unless they are positioned right you need to turn it up much more.

  6. +1, funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SkullCandy? Really guys? Do yourself a favor and go pick up a pair of Sennheiser CX-300 II's. They will blow what you have away and only cost ~$35. SkullCandy is overpriced trash.

  7. Nanny state by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since when is a government in charge of proper parenting? Have we now delegated "common sense" to bureaucrats?

    I certainly remember my parents warning me of the dangers of listening to loud music. I have warned my children. Because children rarely listen, I often have to reinforce this warning, and even take their iPods away when I catch them. This is called parenting. It's not 100% successful. My children are not drilled soldiers and so they don't always listen to me. That's normal. I didn't always listen to my parents, either. However it's my job to keep trying.

          The possibilities for one human to harm himself or others are limitless. Are we going to have to legislate each one? Every single law a government makes takes away something from the people. Yes it's stupid to deafen yourself by listening to loud music. However PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED TO BE STUPID. Laws normally help prevent or settle dispute between citizens. It's not right that you play your music on your stereo at full volume in your crowded downtown neighborhood at 3am. Not everyone out of your 400 neighbors is in a partying mood. It's not right that you drive drunk and plow your car into another because of your intoxication. It's not right that everyone in the airplane has to put up with your stench if you haven't quit smoking yet. However who is harmed, apart from yourself, if you wear headphones and crank up the volume?

          The real danger here, I believe, is that sort of legislation that is trying to accomplish one thing - perhaps some legislator is tired of listening to the tinny sounds of people's MP3 players cranked at full volume in public - under the guise of something else - "oh we're doing it to save people from themselves".

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  8. Re:Wish they would regulate TV channels first. by gbarules2999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a pity that "just pirate it" isn't a typical reposnce for most issues people have with content they consume, isn't it?

  9. Re:Rock On, Dudes! by value_added · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My chronic tinnitus aside, if you limit my decibelage, I will find a way to crank it.

    Kids today. ;-)

    You may want to consider that as you get older, your hearing will start to go (you're obviously one of those who are on an accelerated path). Just as importantly, the music you're cranking up today will be forgotten. And if it is remembered, the memories will cause a sudden flush of embarrassment when realise what you regularly listened to was crap, and it was way too loud.

    Now get off my lawn.

  10. Re:Wish they would regulate TV channels first. by rizole · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a pity that conventional broadcast media make content consumption so much less convienient, accessible and satisfying than "just pirate it."

  11. Noise-cancelling noise by Jay+L · · Score: 2, Insightful

    require noise cancelling technologies

    Gah, I hope not. Noise-cancelling headphones make me feel like I'm in some pressure chamber. I've seen it mentioned by others, but I've never found out if it's because they really do increase absolute pressure when they play the cancelling waveform, or if it's just a psychoacoustic thing from comb-filtering. Either way, it hurts, and things that hurt your ears tend to harm your ears.

  12. What can't I f**king decide for myself? by Raisey-raison · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hearing loss is bad if it is caused by MP3 players, but it's okay when it's caused by police using crowd control devices against innocent civilians.

    Yeah the cops get free reign. They also don't seem to care about the ill effects of being beaten up by a cop - really nasty health consequences there.

    Why can't the government get out of my business??? If I choose turn the volume too high - its MY problem. Leave ME alone!!!

    It's just like religion, opposition to abortion and stem cells on the political right - if you don't want to have an overly loud mp3 player, then turn down the volume (for yourself). Leave everyone else alone.

    Another example of the destruction of personal liberty.

    1. Re:What can't I f**king decide for myself? by Itninja · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The issues comes in a few decades from now. When YOUR problem destroys your hearing and you go on the government dole. Then it becomes MY problem. Why should I have to pay for your disability welfare?

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  13. Re:Dear government by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...except here's a case where people don't actually know what's good or bad for them because the threshold for pain is higher than the threshold for damage, and it's not the Government coming out ad hoc on this issue, it was ear doctors who specialize in this field who have come out and said this needs to be done.

    What makes me really hopeful about this case is there's a place on earth where science holds sway with politics, not the other way around

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  14. Re:Dear government by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    or stop shipping MP3 players that go to 11 because that can hurt your god damned hearing. 85db is enough, if you want more, you can build an inline headphone amp, or buy one. Volume creeps up when you're trying to block out external noise and focus, you can listen to noises that don't cause pain, but are causing damage.

    Governments mandate product safety guidelines all the the time anyway. It's not like the Government's not saying you can't listen to loud music, it's just saying that music player vendors can't ship out music players that harm ear drums

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.