Slashdot Mirror


PayPal Offers $150,000 In Developer Challenge

blackbearnh writes "As previously reported on Slashdot, PayPal recently released a series of new APIs that allow developers to embed PayPal into their web sites and applications without requiring the user to go to the PayPal web site to complete the transaction. To encourage developers to use these new APIs, PayPal is offering two prizes totaling $150,000 for interesting new applications. The entry deadline to register ideas is December 16th, and O'Reilly has an interview with the director of the PayPal Developer Network that covers the details of the contest. In it, Naveed Anwar talks about why PayPal is throwing money at developers. 'When Facebook opened up their platform, it allowed people to work in that particular environment, in the Facebook environment. When the iPhone opened up their platform, they allowed people to work in their environment which was build the applications on the iPhone. When PayPal was looking at opening up its platform, we are not limited by one particular area. We go into the enterprises. We go into social networking. We go into all the places where payment as a solution is needed. And if we can actually reduce that barrier of entry — because at the end of the day, when anyone is building out a business and anyone is building out an application, they're looking at ways of monetizing it.'"

18 of 80 comments (clear)

  1. What? by bcmm · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From TFA:

    When the iPhone opened up their platform

    What? Grammar aside, if that's true, it's rather more newsworthy than this somewhat confused story,

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  2. Wait... by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Entering my PayPal login details on some random webpage, without even the convenience of being able to verify the https://www.paypal.com/ in the address bar?

    Phishing begins in 3... 2... 1...

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    1. Re:Wait... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Which is why the current paypal system works better. I dont have to buy a Security certificate for my web store. you order your crap and buy it on my non-secure site, and when it needs to be secure, it drops you to paypal where you verify the amount and click on "yes, send the money"

      I have ZERO interest in using their new system if it will cost me more money by having to buy a cert I really do not need.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Wait... by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, is the above wrong... even if the site is "trustworthy" today and they ship the product, they shouldn't be collecting your password. They could then use that to buy some cool shit from walmart.com two years later and you'd have no idea what happened and not even have the simple protections your regular old visa card offers. I suspect the paypal API uses OAuth or some kind of token system or else it'd be totally crazy.

      --
      Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
    3. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only reason I use paypal is because I don't trust the website I am on with my credit card. Now I have to log into that site and expose my credentials to that untrusted site. No thank you.

      For paypal this could be great. Customer finds their bank account emptied and paypal will point fingers at the website they logged into. They are just transferring liability with this imo.

    4. Re:Wait... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly my thoughts when I heard this. I once implemented half a dozen pretty different payment APIs into a web page.
      There are only two ways to make this secure:

      1. Direct the user to PayPal, and then let PayPal direct him back, sending a special encrypted session id and/or data forth and back.
      2. Embedding a Java applet in the page, which has a certificate, and so can communicate directly with PayPal (encrypted) and your server (also encrypted). Then call a Javascript function, to load the next page, where, depending on the server session state, it shows if you payed or not. (Can also be done right in the applet.) The nice thing here is, that the browser and the JVM can build a strong separation between the page and the embedded applet, essentially sandboxing them.

      I prefer the first variant though, because
      1. It does not require and plug-ins, and even runs in Lynx.
      2. With payment providers offering to brand their payment page in the originating site’s style (while still making clear that this is the payment provider’s page), there is no point in embedding it in the own page anyway.

      Mind you that I implemented both solutions back in 2003/4. So this is very old news, except apparently for PayPal, who seem to have a NIH syndrome.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:Wait... by arose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or do you really believe they would develop something less secure?

      It's not a matter of belief. Those who are paying attention know this is worse.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  3. Re:Lame way to underpay. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't consider it a ploy at all. Essentially this is what Developers and Producers have wanted from PayPal for a LONG time. There are ways to store your paypal account info in other services (Steam comes to mind) but you always had to go to the paypal site to complete the transaction.

    Paypal has never been anything but a processing center. All it ever did was hold your bank accounts and Credit cards online so that you don't have to enter that number in more than one place on the internet. All it ever did was keep the #'s secure, in a sort of "I'll give paypal my money if paypal pays for the product" - thus you only ever have to trust 1 person online. If you ever thought it was anything different, you were sadly mistaken.

    Anyways, this is good, it's kind of a "Here's what you asked for" and a little kicker to make sure the rest of the world knows, to help it take off quicker.

  4. Re:Lame way to underpay. by phantomcircuit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Paypal has never been anything but a processing center. All it ever did was hold your bank accounts and Credit cards online so that you don't have to enter that number in more than one place on the internet. All it ever did was keep the #'s secure, in a sort of "I'll give paypal my money if paypal pays for the product" - thus you only ever have to trust 1 person online. If you ever thought it was anything different, you were sadly mistaken.

    This new API completely removes that benefit. this makes it so that any paypal merchant can randomly charge whatever they want to my account. Previously I would have had to explicitly approve the transaction.

  5. Now you can finally pay for a lapdance by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    by sticking your cell phone into the strippers ass. Thats pretty much the only useful thing I can think of.

  6. Re:Lame way to underpay. by Abreu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nah, the real problem is that, even if you "win the Challenge" you will win a Paypal account with $150,000usd

    ...which will be promptly frozen for an imaginary reason

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  7. How to monetize this feature by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Call it a feature that lowers bandwidth costs by reducing overhead incurred by page redirects

    Give it away for free for 6 months, then charge a 0.5% convenience fee on all transactions.

    For fun, in 1 year, start charging a 0.5% legacy implementation fee on all old-style transactions.

    There you go. Where's my $150k?

  8. Re:Lame way to underpay. by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After hearing so many stories about PayPal requiring people to sign away rights like credit card chargebacks,

    You can still do a charge-back to Paypal if you paid with a CC. Of course, PP will probably cancel your account if you do that, but that's why you shouldn't trust your PP account too much, and just use it for buying shit on Ebay. If you need to rely on it more than that, then open multiple Paypal accounts; use one for selling, one for buying, etc. That way, if PP closes one, you'll still have the other one.

    and their allegedly arbitrary process of deciding without warning and without due process that you're committing "fradulent" activities, which of course entitles them to take the money from your account or freeze it

    Yes, this is why you should NEVER link Paypal to your main bank account. That's just stupid. Instead, have a separate bank account (at a different bank or credit union even), and link your PP account to that. Never keep any substantial amount of money there; just use it as a place to move money to/from your Paypal account. For instance, if you sell a lot of stuff, have a single PP account just for selling, and link that to an empty bank account. Periodically (every few hundred $$$ or so), transfer money from your PP account to the bank account, then withdraw it (in person or by check, whatever's easier) and move it to your main account that way. Don't give PP a path to your main store of funds, that's just asking for trouble.

    PAYPAL IS FOR ***.

    I won't comment on that, but anyone that trusts PP too much is asking for trouble IMO. However, it is pretty much a "necessary evil" for a lot of online transactions. I have my own little web store I sell some widgets on, and PP is the only realistic way to get money from people all over the world without asking them to send me money orders, which would result in very few sales, or having to pay thousands of $$$ to set up a credit card merchant account (these fees are probably more money than I've made selling my little widgets). It's entirely possible to use PP and set yourself up so that you're protected in case they try to screw you over.

  9. PayPal is a scam, should be regulated, FTC asleap by lanner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    PayPal operates like, and should be regulated like, a bank. The way they have treated their customers, like me, and many, many, many others, should be a warning to all; You can't afford to do business with PayPal. They will seize your money, and when they do, it will be months before you see a resolution. The horror stories are true: I know, I have mine.

  10. Re:PayPal is a scam by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mod parent up. PayPal needs to become a regulated bank. Until then, take your business elsewhere, to sites that accept credit cards. If someone can't qualify for a merchant account, you probably don't want to deal with them anyway.

  11. Re:Price Floor by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are literally billions of dollars waiting to be spent in increments as low as fractions of a cent at a time, and yet the infrastructure and fee systems are keeping that commerce from taking place.

    Infrastructure costs money. Today you can go anywhere - to a store or on the internet - and purchase something with a credit card and the tranaction will be approved in a matter of seconds. It took many years and LOTS of money to create that infrastructure.

    And that's the problem with transactions involving a payment of only a few cents (or fraction of cents). The fee you have to charge in order to pay for all that infrastructure is considerably more than the cost of the transaction itself. The "price floor" is not imaginary or arbitrary, it is real and it is dictated by the cost of the infrastructure needed to handle transactions.

  12. Re:Lame way to underpay. by nospam007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Paypal has never been anything but a processing center. "

    Actually it's a bank located in Luxembourg since a couple of years.

    http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2007/tc20070614_606853.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories

  13. Re:PayPal is a scam, should be regulated, FTC asle by tvjunky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know about the US, but in Europe PayPal's User Agreement says that it is "licensed as a Luxembourg credit institution". Also I don't really get where all the hate for PayPal comes from.
    Yes I read a dozen times that they froze the account of SomethingAwful or some loud-mouthed bloggers under dubious circumstances, but for me it always worked just fine. Actually I really like PayPal because it allows me to send a seller money that is instantly credited to his account, without trust issues on either side or credit card processing for the seller.
    I also like the security of going to PayPal's site so I can verify the payment, which is why I am quite sceptical of this API change. But apart from that I really don't see how PayPal is bad in any way for me as an ordinary customer.