Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Acknowledges Theft of Code From Plurk

adeelarshad82 writes with news that Microsoft has acknowledged and taken responsibility for the theft of code belonging to Plurk.com, although the company also said it was the work of a Chinese vendor. Yesterday we discussed Plurk's blog post accusing Microsoft of copying their UI and code for Microsoft's Chinese microblogging site, Juku. Microsoft has now taken the site down and indefinitely suspended Juku's beta.

6 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. They're on a roll lately. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I feel like accusing them of sleeping with my mother if I knew they would publicly admit to doing so.

  2. Blaming somebody else is not taking responsibility by NoKaOi · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    While I'm sure this is a valid reason - that their contractors ripped of the code - is that an excuse to absolve them of blame? Hell no! MS needs to held responsible. What incentive do they have to prevent this kind of thing in the future if they aren't forced to take responsibility? And by responsibility, I don't mean blaming it on their contractor. This is a big "duh" that this is going to happen when you outsource to a country where the labor is cheap and cheating is culturally acceptable such that nobody gives a damn if they get caught. I've had to work with Indian contractors who ripped off code, which we identified thanks to just a little bit of diligence on our part because we actually want to know what we're releasing and charging our customers for.

    Companies need to be held responsible for overseeing what their contractors are doing. Blaming the contractor != taking responsibility. That it was their contractors who stole might be the reason, but it is ABSOLUTELY NOT AN EXCUSE!

  3. Re:a world without copyright by selven · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    What's wrong with ripping off code? If Microsoft rips off code from these people and these people rip off code from microsoft in return, both (and by extension the end users) benefit.

  4. Re:What...? by Toonol · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The headline was written by 'adeelarshad82'. Please point out where that SAME ONE PERSON has advocated removing copyright for movies and music. Otherwise, please acknowledge the GP as correct.

  5. Re:Blaming somebody else is not taking responsibil by amicusNYCL · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Having a corporate culture/pride/ethics that would make code theft unlikely

    How exactly do you propose that Microsoft force Chinese programmers to work according to their ethics? That's like MS opening a shop in Mexico and trying to explain to everyone that they no longer take naps in the middle of the work day, or opening a shop in Saudi Arabia where they get a vacation on Christmas but not Ramadan.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  6. Re:a world without copyright by sexconker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And no, we don't need to respect closed source

    Why not? Because you don't want to?
    Fuck you.

    People write closed source code for a living. It is a real, tangible product with real, tangible costs.

    How about I go to your house and just take what I want?