Slashdot Mirror


EU Demands Canada Rework Its Copyright, Patent Law

An anonymous reader writes "The draft intellectual property text of the EU - Canada Trade Agreement has leaked, with news that the EU is demanding that Canada fundamentally alter copyright, patent, and trademark law. The laundry list of demands includes copyright term extension, WIPO ratification, DMCA-style legislation, resale rights, new enforcement provisions, and following patent, trademark, and design law treaties. The net result is that when combined with the ACTA requirements, Canadian copyright law may cease to be Canadian." Reader TheTurtlesMoves stresses the "first sale doctrine" aspect of the Canada - EU negotiations. Once an artist sells a creative work, should she get a cut of any future resales of that same work? The EU says yes at least for some types of works, and it wants Canada to see things its way. "Europe's Directive 2001/84/EC says that the right covers only 'works of graphic or plastic art such as pictures, collages, paintings, drawings, engravings, prints, lithographs, sculptures, tapestries, ceramics, glassware and photographs, provided they are made by the artist himself or are copies considered to be original works of art.'"

9 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. I hope Canada stands up to this and says NO: by pecosdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They have enough asinine copyright laws as it is. Seriously? An extra charge on blank optical and tape media because it "might" be used to pirate? Does this go for hard drives and bandwidth? I'm with the current US and Canada system. The artist don't benefit much, it's the royalty houses are the ones that really benefit. Don't they get enough from performance, broadcast, sales, etc..? Artist can go broke trying to collect their money.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    1. Re:I hope Canada stands up to this and says NO: by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      An extra charge on blank optical and tape media because it "might" be used to pirate?

      I actually like this system, because it gives me implied governmental approval to copy as I see fit.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  2. Just as a Matter of Principal by sycodon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just as a matter of principal, Canada should give them a nice hearty "F**k you, eh!"
     

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  3. As a Canadian... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Canadian, to all foreign powers who demand we change our laws to match yours, I say fuck you. Get your house in order before you tell us how to get ours in order.

  4. Re:Cue the apologists... by HarrySquatter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I might be paranoid, but I don't believe the US had nothing to do with this.

    Because otherwise the EU wouldn't be pushing for this? Are you joking? The EU hardly is a utopia when it comes to copyrights.

  5. International Bullying by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Canada should not allow itself to be bullied into adopting bad copyright law. While the European Union appears quite eager to be as bad (or worse) than the United States in terms of harmful copyright legislation, I sincerely hope Canada will put its citizens interests above those of copyright holders. I'm not against globalization, but countries must sometimes defend their sovereignty for the sake of their citizens.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
  6. Re:Cue the apologists... by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    US politicians are simply cheaper to bribe than EU politicians due to the weak dollar.

    I won't worry about America until our politicians start only accepting bribes in Euros.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  7. What a load of crap by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is not what international law is at all. International law is the stuff that happens in The Hague and it has been around a long time and is desperately needed. It governs such silly every day things as trade. If you trade between countries (between sets of laws) which one goes? Well, that is what international law is for.

    And it is in Holland because Holland was ONCE a world-power (yes really) but lost that status but still had a need to maintain its trading empire. So while the british and other powers settled trade disputes with the law of the biggest gun(boat) Holland needed something more.

    International law is an entirely different beast then this, what we are talking about here are treaties. It may look the same, but it is fundementally different.

    In fact, the current system is so wrong because it seeks to bypass laws altogether. The media companies are waging a very complex war against basic law by trying to get a new set of laws introduced by means that were never intended. Trade treaties were supposed to be "We sell you X and you don't charge for it and we allow you sell us Y without charging tariffs on it". Not "you will subject your citizens to our laws".

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  8. This is a real threat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Forget about the small ragtag bands of Middle Eastern terrorists. They aren't a real threat to freedom and democracy.

    Legislation like this, pushed by supranational organizations, is. It is a far, far bigger threat to everybody's freedom and the democracy of Western nations than any terrorist organization.