Slashdot Mirror


Ford's New Cars To Be Wi-Fi Hotspots

clang_jangle writes "Autoblog and others are reporting on Ford's planned extension to its in-vehicle SYNC multimedia systems — to enable SYNC-equipped Fords as rolling Wi-Fi hotspots. Customers would use their existing cellular USB modems, so for already equipped road warriers there would be no extra monthly charges. While there are other ways to get your car online (Autonet Mobile review here), the SYNC system does look especially simple and practical. Last year BMW made some noise about FOSS for their cars, but they seem to have since stopped talking about it. Will we see a FOSS option for automotive infotainment systems in the future?" The capabilities of SYNC even without W-Fi look potentially pretty distracting. Unless Wi-Fi is blacked out for the driver, the safety implications of this development are worrisome.

196 comments

  1. This is different how? by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This isn't really that much different than what's available presently. The same idiots that text and drive will have a new possibility. Anybody with any degree of prudence will use this at most to update directions on their GPS in real time. Well, while driving, when you're not driving it's pretty much fair game for whatever you want to use it for.

    1. Re:This is different how? by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 3, Informative

      sync has built in text to speech and will reply with a set of 15 predefined responses. Sync is much better than standard texting regarding safety.

      Lets also not ignore:

      Auto dial 9/11 when you get in an accident, car health reports, voice only GPS with up to date road conditions and rerouting, Heuristics of said GPS that learns your typical routs, voice commands for making calls, stereo bluetooth support for devices with that capability.... and next year they will open the SDK up, allowing even greater integration between smartphone apps and the sync system through custom apps meant to communicate with the app on the phone.

    2. Re:This is different how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Text and drive, talk and drive, Play WoW and drive, whatever. I'm trying to figure out how to get my horn to blare, "HANG THE FUCK UP AND DRIVE!" since I only seem to use it in conjunction with one of the aforementioned anymore.

    3. Re:This is different how? by trapnest · · Score: 2, Funny

      9/11 is a date.
      911 is a phone number.

    4. Re:This is different how? by frosty_tsm · · Score: 4, Funny

      9/11 is a date. 911 is a phone number.

      Go easy on him. He's from a Red state.

    5. Re:This is different how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sort of ironic that the frosty piss post is modded as redundant even though it's first and actually more meaningful that frosty piss.

    6. Re:This is different how? by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was that the best you could do? I would have at least mocked him by saying "Ford now allows time travel?".

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    7. Re:This is different how? by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      You can tell he's Russian?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    8. Re:This is different how? by trapnest · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's not nice to call someone communist just because they made a mistake in typing. :(

    9. Re:This is different how? by trapnest · · Score: 1

      I guess I normally don't associate "dialing" with time travel.

    10. Re:This is different how? by ls671 · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Heuristics of said GPS that learns your typical routs

      What's the use of this feature ?

      I mean if I already know the route, what is the advantage of teaching it to the GPS ?

      I assumed that one typically wanted the GPS to show him the route to follow, not the other way around ;-))

      Thinking of it, this may be useful if you are getting old and/or beginning to forget your routes, teach them to the GPS while you still can ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    11. Re:This is different how? by ls671 · · Score: 1

      > I guess I normally don't associate "dialing" with time travel.

      some Stargate fans might do ! ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    12. Re:This is different how? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Stargate +Solar Flare = fixed that for you

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    13. Re:This is different how? by sleeper0 · · Score: 1

      Probably helpful to the thief if your car is stolen, they can head right to your house while you're still trying to find out if it's been towed even if you don't actively tell the car where your home is.

    14. Re:This is different how? by ogl_codemonkey · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with being a communist?

    15. Re:This is different how? by TBoon · · Score: 1

      I assumed that one typically wanted the GPS to show him the route to follow, not the other way around ;-)

      My Garmin has built in bluetooth handsfree and MP3 player. On familiar routes that is my primary use for the unit, with the safety camera warnings and trip-data as nice secondary features. It is quite annoying to have the GPS tell me to turn around so I can make a turn that would take me 15 minutes extra. (My arrival estimate actually drops when it gives up and eventually agrees with my route). I actually see no reason why (higher end) offline units can't do the same. However, with an online unit gathering *anonymous* user-tracks, it could improve the accuracy of the routing for when you actually need it to tell you how to get to somewhere you've never been before.

    16. Re:This is different how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said red, not blue.

    17. Re:This is different how? by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      Traffic.

    18. Re:This is different how? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      9/11 is a date.
      911 is a phone number.

      Hand in your geek card, dude. 9/11 is zero (or if you're a mathematician, it's a rational number).

    19. Re:This is different how? by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      He said communist, not socialist.

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    20. Re:This is different how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if you don't know how to use basic calculator (programmers calculator in fact shows 0)
      9/11 = 0.8181818181818181818 ...

      maybe I missed the joke?

    21. Re:This is different how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, with an online unit gathering *anonymous* user-tracks, it could improve the accuracy of the routing for when you actually need it to tell you how to get to somewhere you've never been before.

      That sounds like routing table hell. Going that direction, soon we'll need multi-processor GPS's with several gigs of RAM. Still, that is no doubt the direction it will take at some point in the future.

    22. Re:This is different how? by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      not sure how the / was added. Must be phantom hand syndrome.

    23. Re:This is different how? by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      It knows current traffic conditions and can automatically inform you of problems along your rout to work for instance

    24. Re:This is different how? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      It happens when you divide integers instead of floating-point numbers.

    25. Re:This is different how? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      A couple notes:

      All the stuff you listed for Sync is basically available on every OnStar equipped car in the world except for maybe stereo bluetooth, which is okay since anytime bluetooth is involved you're just talking different levels of shitty.

      The SDK for Sync already available for the previous 'versions' of sync under a different name.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    26. Re:This is different how? by Z80a · · Score: 1

      but can the ford calculate the next suitable solar flare AND dial a Stargate remotely to do that?

    27. Re:This is different how? by trapnest · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of mentioning something about solar flares in my original comment, but lack of sleep/caffeine prevented me from thinking of a good one.

    28. Re:This is different how? by trapnest · · Score: 1

      Only if Samantha Carter is driving.

    29. Re:This is different how? by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Sync doesn't require a monthly fee for those features and, instead, uses your existing cell connection. I pay plenty enough for my data plan, and would prefer not to pay for another cell plan to run my vehicle nav/assist system.

    30. Re:This is different how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      p0rn while driving!

    31. Re:This is different how? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I thought 9/11 was a JENGA promotion. http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/9/11

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    32. Re:This is different how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny. However, it really is useful. It can automatically check for road and traffic conditions, for instance.

    33. Re:This is different how? by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      Only if Samantha Carter is driving.

      Aaaah . . Samantha Carter . . .is so .. .yummy . . !!.
      *drools on keyboard*

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    34. Re:This is different how? by Jesse_vd · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much what Tomtom's IQ Routes is. It comes with all but their cheapest units, even the iPhone app

    35. Re:This is different how? by Jesse_vd · · Score: 1

      oops replied to wrong comment

    36. Re:This is different how? by Jesse_vd · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much what Tomtom's IQ Routes is. It comes with all but their cheapest units, even the iPhone app adding this so maybe it will let me post....?

    37. Re:This is different how? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Compiled with other routes traffic flow can be taken into consideration and recommend clearer routes, on the fly.

      Also, if you deviated to far from your normal routine, people could be alerted.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    38. Re:This is different how? by trapnest · · Score: 1

      True that.

  2. safe? by whoever57 · · Score: 2, Funny

    combined with this product, what's the problem?

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:safe? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1
      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:safe? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      . . . and this related product is hard to beat: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/B0014BYKVO/ref=dp_otherviews_1?ie=UTF8&s=automotive&img=1

      . . . and to think that we used to complain about chicks putting on make-up at traffic lights . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:safe? by gearloos · · Score: 1

      Hehe now thats some funny ass stuff right there. Bad thing is I can see some bonehead using that steering wheel desk!

      --
      "Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
    4. Re:safe? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      That product is easy to mock, but detractors don't seem to realize that it's perfectly reasonable to stop the car and pull out a laptop. You might want a good place to put it.

  3. Linked with WiMax? by myfreelunch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Linked with WiMax, this might be useful. 3G speeds are just too slow.

    1. Re:Linked with WiMax? by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      You don't use 3G, do you? I typically get around 120-160 KB / sec with 3G.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:Linked with WiMax? by trapnest · · Score: 1

      Even on EDGE (T-Mobile) the speed is more then enough for basic tasks. (IM, IRC, email, weather, checking slashdot... Not likely to get first post though... )

    3. Re:Linked with WiMax? by WoLpH · · Score: 1

      3G too slow? I get over 500KiB/s when downloading something in the train here. When it comes down to basic surfing, anything beyond 2Mbps is good enough for me.

    4. Re:Linked with WiMax? by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      Well, but then you have to factor in the speed of the train itself. Mostly, cars don't move as fast, so your overall speed will be correspondingly slower. ;-)

    5. Re:Linked with WiMax? by Adm.Wiggin · · Score: 1

      And you're pleased with that? 120 KB / sec is not very enjoyable. Beats the socks off 56Kbps or 28Kbps, however. I guess it's all about frame of reference.

  4. What the hell is a "road warrier"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thet is wot I cowl bed spilling.

    1. Re:What the hell is a "road warrier"? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Hey, look, a Kiwi!

  5. Leo's new Mustang by vrmlguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Leo Laporte (host of This Week in Tech) recently bought a 2010 SYNC-equipped Mustang, and seems to like it a lot. (Of course, Ford is an advertiser, but otoh he bought the Mustang with his own money.) http://leoville.com/to-the-twitmobile

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:Leo's new Mustang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've been using sync in my 08 focus for over a year now and its really quite badass. hands free voice navigation of my ipod is priceless and frankly a hell of alot safer then fiddling with the ipod to change tunes while playing it via one of those radio adapter or line in thingies. and the phone support is pretty nice too.

    2. Re:Leo's new Mustang by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just got a image in my head of Leo Laporte happily tooling around town in a Mustang, wearing one of those hideous Hawaiian shirts he used to wear on The Screen Savers. Now that's a funny image.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. god damn self driving cars by earls · · Score: 5, Funny

    The god damn mother fucking cars should talk to each other with their fucking radios and space the fuck out . What the fuck is so fucking hard about this and or not typing profFUCK anyway then you don't need stop lights. the driver can just sit back. the fucking gps/laser range/wireless car comm drives thef ucking car fuck

    1. Re:god damn self driving cars by Chrutil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, decaf.

    2. Re:god damn self driving cars by citab · · Score: 1

      wow, maybe someone needs to program the nearest "AA" meeting location into the GPS of their Self-Driving Car and let it take them there.

    3. Re:god damn self driving cars by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      wow, maybe someone needs to program the nearest "AA" meeting location into the GPS of their Self-Driving Car and let it take them there.

      Frankly, I think couple of brews are exactly what this guy needs.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:god damn self driving cars by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think he'd be better off at a TA meeting (Tourette's Anonymous).

    5. Re:god damn self driving cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he just needs to get fucked...

    6. Re:god damn self driving cars by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      you don't pay attention to the darpa challenge winners do you?

    7. Re:god damn self driving cars by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      He's got a fucking point.

    8. Re:god damn self driving cars by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Here's why. Imagine your car, full to the brim of GPS, rangefingers and inter-car communication - it's completely ready to drive in harmony with other road users and speed you to your destination.

      Then, it tries to switch lanes whilst doing 70mph down the motorway and gets walloped by the lorry coming up on the outside because a) the rearward facing rangefinders can't see into the other lane and b) the lorry driver hasn't bothered to fit £3,000 worth of gear so that his cab can tell your car what it's doing.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  7. Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by ickleberry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, what good is this to anyone? if you're in the car you would just use your SIM-locked USB modem that you pay 59.99 a month for and if you are outside the car then you would hardly stay connected long enough to send an email before the car you are stealing bandwidth from goes out of range.

    I never quite understood this idea behind putting the latest technological gimmick into a car. 802.11g will be obsolete in a few years, 802.11n soon after. The car should last 20 years so that means half way through its expected service life the wifi, the USB connection and the built-in GPS will be almost completely worthless.

    If i want my car to have a Wifi AP I will throw my own wifi equipment in the back. same with phones, GPS, all that stuff. Give me a bare minimum car such as the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrightspeed_X1Wrightspeed X1 but with the most efficient power system, the best batteries available and the highest quality components that won't break. Not putting worthless consumer electronic gimmicks onto a chassis that is supposed to last 20 years.

    1. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by mirix · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Since when do American cars made since 1980 last 20 years?

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    2. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by owlnation · · Score: 1

      The car should last 20 years

      You've obviously never owned a Ford. I'd be willing to bet current wireless standards will be around longer than most new Fords.

    3. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you honestly believe that the best batteries available today won't be considered worthless in 10 years? There is no technology that is in a car today that is going to be anything more than a joke in the 20 years span your talking about. I'll go as far as to say that 802.11n will still be more respectable in 20 years than anything you'll put in a car today.

    4. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by mirix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I should add, I agree with your sentiment entirely. I always get a kick out of ads that portray having a ipod dock or a 1/8" audio jack to be the main selling point of a $30k vehicle.
      Completely ridiculous.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    5. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone (including manufacturers) suppose the only upgradeable component of a car's electronic system should be the radio? What's the harm in allowing the wireless module to be replaced with a better one in a few years?

    6. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You live somewhere without road salt.

    7. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by camperdave · · Score: 1

      if you are outside the car then you would hardly stay connected long enough to send an email before the car you are stealing bandwidth from goes out of range.

      Not necessarily.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      1. Agreeing with yourself? Nice.

      2. You'd be shocked at how shallow a lot of car buyers are. They go onto the lot not knowing what they want other than "a new car". You and me, well we'd do some research beforehand, but not everyone. The wealthier the buyer, the less they research. I can well understand getting a car with an iPod dock being the deciding factor - when you can have any car, the most important thing is to be trendy. And hell, you'll just get another new car next year, or the year after at most. It's one of the many destructive characteristics of inherited wealth (we used to call these folks aristocrats, but now they're called trust fundies or whatever), not caring what you spend because you didn't earn any of it anyway. I mean, can you imagine an aristocrat crowing about how much money she saved on a reliable vehicle that got 5 stars in Consumer Reports? Hell no! Now imagine the same person taking her friend for a ride and exultantly saying, "Check this out - a slot for my iPod! And they had just the color that I wanted!"

      Working class people shop for cars by what they can afford per month, the unfortunate saps.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still driving an 88. It might be because I'm cheap, but I still get 30mpg and don't see the point of these newer cars that can't match that.

    10. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of after market upgrades? Custom kits? Replacement electronics? It's an industry in the billions.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    11. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      I have a 1983 Jeep CJ7 that still runs well, but that be a little close for the margin though.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    12. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, what good is this to anyone? if you're in the car you would just use your SIM-locked USB modem that you pay 59.99 a month for and if you are outside the car then you would hardly stay connected long enough to send an email before the car you are stealing bandwidth from goes out of range

      Forgot to add this in my other post. Anyway, what about car pools? Multiple passengers with laptops sharing the same modem. How about devices that have Wi-fi but no practical USB port? Book readers, MP3, PSP/DS, XBox/PS3/Wii...

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    13. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by ickleberry · · Score: 1

      for those situations wouldn't a portable device with similar wifi/3G functionality be more useful than something that is for some reason permanently attached to a car?

    14. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never owned a Ford. I'd be willing to bet current wireless standards will be around longer than most new Fords.

      Modern Fords have higher initial quality ratings higher than Toyota's. Try to keep up with the times.

    15. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Equivalent in functionality yea, but not "set and forget" though. I think it appeals to the appliance mindset: always available. My car has a built in radio even though I could easily bring my own radio. It's convenient not having to worry about it and knowing it's always there. Also if the car is a company car, no one has to worry about who has the Wifi/3g thingy or chase down the person who has it.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    16. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      I would assume he meant he was agreeing with with his GP, not with himself.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    17. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      If i want my car to have a Wifi AP I will throw my own wifi equipment in the back

      Not much equipment needed. Personally, I just take my rooted G1 running Cyanogenmod and run any of a number of WAP apps. For that matter, the Cyanogenmod firmware has USB tethering built-in.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    18. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never owned a Ford. I'd be willing to bet current wireless standards will be around longer than most new Fords.

      Modern Fords have higher initial quality ratings higher than Toyota's. Try to keep up with the times.

      Factory Outlet Rolling Defects? Toy Autos?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    19. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by mirix · · Score: 1

      The CJs aren't much different from the jeeps fielded in WWII, so I think that exempts them from post-1980, whether manufactured then or not. if that makes sense. ;-)

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    20. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      The AMC Jeeps in general are very sturdy and easy to keep running, but parts are like a mix-mash of GM and Ford. The Chrysler Jeeps on the other hand are more "delicate". I think it was by having made them from military vehicle designs kept them sturdy. They also happen to be really good for offroad for that reason too.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    21. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I've got a ford and it runs just fine with 90k miles on it, the only repairs i have put into it were the result of an unfortunate mailbox incident and normal wear items like plugs, wires and tires.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    22. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      my friend has a "new" jeep with only around 30k on it, the (manual) transmission pops out of gear when it gets hot.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    23. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 0

      Since people with sense still own them. My 1982 Ford runs like a dream. I have less money in upkeep costs than I do with my brand new Expedition. And I have even less many than my brother has in his 10 year old toyota.

    24. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fix Or Repair Daily
      Found On Road Dead
      Found On Road Dying ...

    25. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford has quietly been improving its quality and reliability over the last few years, I wouldn't knock it until you've tried it. I'm sure that you enjoy buying the ludicrously overpriced replacement parts for your non-domestically produced vehicle.

      And while I'm sure the current wireless standard will be around longer than most new Fords, it's the associated hardware that I would be worried about...

      Disclaimer - I drive a 1995 Ford Taurus with 165,000 miles on it - still going strong.

    26. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Fuck you. Current Fords are rock solid.

    27. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      douch bags who think American cars suck are about as intelligent as the douchbags who think BJs from hookers is a sex life.

    28. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      radios weren't replaceable when they were first added to cars either.

    29. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I love the loan policy on the air cards for the PC and then when you go to get them from the person who is suppose to loan them, her list is full of people who have had them for months.

    30. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, what good is this to anyone? if you're in the car you would just use your SIM-locked USB modem that you pay 59.99 a month for and if you are outside the car then you would hardly stay connected long enough to send an email before the car you are stealing bandwidth from goes out of range.

      Because everyone else in the car can also use your SIM locked USB dongle via wifi? Because instead of one laptop using the dongle at a time, everything in the car can? And you're not going to have an unsecured hotspot in your car accessing your cell phone data plan, so no one is leeching off you.

      I never quite understood this idea behind putting the latest technological gimmick into a car. 802.11g will be obsolete in a few years, 802.11n soon after. The car should last 20 years so that means half way through its expected service life the wifi, the USB connection and the built-in GPS will be almost completely worthless.

      Simply put, no, it won't. Wifi will still be used, as will USB, hell I've been using Firewire for at least 15 years and its far less popular than USB or wifi.

      If i want my car to have a Wifi AP I will throw my own wifi equipment in the back. same with phones, GPS, all that stuff. Give me a bare minimum car such as the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrightspeed_X1 [wikipedia.org]Wrightspeed X1 but with the most efficient power system, the best batteries available and the highest quality components that won't break. Not putting worthless consumer electronic gimmicks onto a chassis that is supposed to last 20 years.

      Go ahead ... do it ... tell us how nicely integrated into the car you can get it, and tell us about all your issues with power controllers, inverters for power, wiring it all up without making a mess. Then tell me how long it lasts. Go ahead, get whatever you want for car computer hardware and put it in your dash ... Give it 2 years then tell us about how its working for you. Made it 2? Okay, give it 5.

      The car computer environment is far different than you think it is. The software sucks ass, feels like a kludge across the board because well, it is. The hardware is over priced and unreliable when you stuff it in a car that ranges between well below freezing in the winter to 150 degrees in the summer in a unshaded parking lot or under your dash taking heat off the firewall (The real one in your car, not software for networking).

      You aren't going to go buy anything that has the same level of ruggedness as the hardware they install at the factory, nor are you going to find anything that feels nearly as natural or looks nearly as good. I've been futzing with mine for the last 3 years as indash GPS wasn't an option for my car from the factory. Yes I can do wifi over cell, voice guided GPS, voice activated control of the PC, watch movies on the indash display, all sorts of shit you couldn't possibly imagine. You know what, I'd still rather have a factory system rather than the hacks I've put together based on someone elses shitty hacks.

      Nor are you going to have your car for 20 years. If you're following all the latest and greatest geek tech, theres a good chance you aren't still driving a 20 year old car, with the exception of maybe a classic, in which case this doesn't apply to you anyway, you're already accepting that you're going out of normal bounds. Likewise, if you are driving a 20 year old car, theres a good chance your computer hardware isn't bleeding edge either.

      Your post wreaks of someone who has no idea what he/she is talking about, or has even looked into at all.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    31. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Settle down fanboy, nobody cares about you and your gay ass Focus.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    32. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by cerberusss · · Score: 2

      I always get a kick out of ads that portray having a ipod dock or a 1/8" audio jack to be the main selling point of a $30k vehicle.

      I can see how people do not see any quality differences between cars anymore. They're all pretty OK. Then the decision sits on other factors, such as room, brand, appearance, color and -yes- accessoiries.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    33. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but 30mpg isn't very good.

    34. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I knew American cars always had a blind spot for manual transmissions, but popping out of gear at high temperatures? Is your friend revving the nuts off it or what?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    35. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      American cars manage straight lines perfectly well, but fail miserably around a small feature of most road networks - corners with a radius of under 300 yards.

      Come to Europe and we'll explain concepts such as handling, fuel efficiency and build quality.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    36. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      In Europe, it's necessary to have those features because they are required. In the US, so far, those haven't been sought after very highly. Average US commute distance is 16 miles. Given the suburban sprawl, miles put on cars is huge, and those miles are mostly spend on freeways going in straight lines. As a result, people want to have room and they want the ride to be smooth. Hence, SUVs. They don't turn worth a darn and get miserable mileage, but they've met the requirements of a lot of people for quite a while. If we have 5-8 dollar/gallon gas, things would be different. If we had to negotiate the narrower roads of Europe, they'd be different. The point is that European cars aren't necessarily "better" they simply have met the needs of the populace. As an American who likes smaller cars that handle better, I'm fond of the shift toward smaller vehicles.

    37. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      American cars manage straight lines perfectly well, but fail miserably around a small feature of most road networks - corners with a radius of under 300 yards.

      Come to Europe and we'll explain concepts such as handling, fuel efficiency and build quality.

      Right! That's why the Ford Focus RS (performance) and the Ford Fiesta Econotec (economy) have been winning so many "Car of the Year" awards in Europe lately. (actually, these american cars are not available for sale in america, but still...)

    38. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by geekoid · · Score: 1

      imagine every car having wifi and creating a dynamic network.
      This means you could have a signal anywhere there is traffic.

      By the way, if a hotspot tells me its available to use and doesn't demand credentials, it's not trespassing or stealing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    39. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And if I want AC in my car, I'll roll down my window, dang gumit!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    40. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but 30mpg IS pretty good.

      After that you start hitting the point of diminishing returns. When 75% of the cars on the road get more then 30mpg then the point of diminishing returns will be around 40 MPG.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    41. Re:Worthless gimmicks for worthless cars by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      Fusion bitch!!

  8. Some other subsidy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a great idea... except it's in the wrong people's hands.

    With it, I'd like peer2peer like distribution. I know these people, and they write scripts (using google wave), performances - both visual and aural.
    These are the mobile version. The distribution unit can be housed in the bottom of a block of flats.

    This is how my 21st century utopia would begin.

    1. Re:Some other subsidy by citab · · Score: 1

      Auto Porn? Now I'm listening (not actually watching, can't do that while driving)

      plus ...
      I can see people might be a little interested at first..
      Then kinda warm up to it...
      and start really liking it...

      then OMG THIS IS THE BEST STUFF EVER!!! ..

      then lose all interest and turn the radio back to NPR.

    2. Re:Some other subsidy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am curious about reverse wardriving, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  9. BMW's trials . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last year BMW made some noise about FOSS for their cars, but they seem to have since stopped talking about it.

    I can't imagine why: http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-41146.html

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:BMW's trials . . . by mirix · · Score: 1

      erm... isn't that a skoda?

      yeah, woosh...

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    2. Re:BMW's trials . . . by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nice try but that car is a Skoda Octavia which is made by Skoda Auto not BMW. At the time of the crash, the car was going at nearly 90 mph which was about 3x the speed limit of the area. The driver was in the wrong lane and was intoxicated. The cause of the crash was entirely the fault of the driver not the car its self.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  10. Radio condenser by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I seem to recall that my older Honda had something called a 'radio condenser' or something similar linked in with the electrical system. It was supposed to stop the EMF from the spark plugs/solenoids/etc and if I recall correctly from my old haynes guide, the car wouldn't start without it.

    So this is just a question for anyone who works in the field: what effect, if any, does broadcasting and drawing current from a car's electrical system have on these hotspots?

    I'm just curious because the wireless things in my house seem to slow down all the time for things like my microwave, furnace, tv, etc being on.

    -b

    --
    No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    1. Re:Radio condenser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "condenser" is just an old name for a capacitor. Its purpose was just to prevent spikes in the electrical system, which disrupt AM radio. (FM radio isn't really affected as much.)

      As for your question, probably not much. Radio waves from sparks tends to be very broad in frequency, but not that intense. It'd probably be below the noise floor for a sophisticated modulation like the spread spectrum used by WiFi devices.

    2. Re:Radio condenser by adolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Answer to your question: Nothing. The power supply for the radio will inherently be rather well isolated, as it's very easy to do in the conversion from 12V that the car produces to the 5V that the USB radio uses.

      Answers to your quandary: Microwaves the same bit of spectrum that WiFi does, except with something in the neighborhood of 1,000 Watts instead of the ~0.060 Watts that your access point uses; it doesn't take much microwave leakage before interference happens. Try different channels; it sometimes seems to help, often to the point that the symptom goes away completely.

      Furnace: Your blower motors are dirty or tired. They should not create enough RF noise to cause WiFi to notice. A skilled electrician can install a capacitor ("radio condenser") at the furnace, which might help some.

      TV: Who knows. There's a lot of stuff going on in a modern entertainment system, and I won't conject without more information.

      Finally: Do the lights in your house ever get brighter when a heavy load (dishwasher pump, clothes washer, vacuum cleaner, etc) switches on?

    3. Re:Radio condenser by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      The sparks from the plugs are inside the Faraday cage of the combustion chamber. If the leads to the plugs are shielded (I haven't gotten around to dissecting a set yet.), there should be no radiation.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    4. Re:Radio condenser by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alternators do not power your car, they recharge your battery using AC current and a rectifier, your electrical equipment would absolutely HATE being powered by the alternator. Its not even like AC in your house, which is a constant 50/60hz pretty much all the time. AC from your car alternator varies with your engine RPMs. In short, both Alternators and generators are EXTREMELY DIRTY power sources, especially when you consider most of them are directly connected, unfiltered to the battery, which also directly connects, unfiltered to the ignition system, which generates MASSIVE amounts of noise as it generates thousands of volts of energy for your spark plugs 2-80k times a minute or more, depending on engine configuration and operating range.

      Generators could be used to power your car electronics because they produce DC current straight out, but generators are extremely rare since an alternator can be controlled far easier as to what kind of output current it provides. I.E. an alternator requires external power to power electromagnets in it, which in then are used in conjunction with the mechanical rotating energy provided from the engine to produce more electrical output. By varying the input energy to the electromagnets the voltage regulator can charge your battery as needed without over charging and frying your battery. This can be done easily with a mechanical device for very little cost and an extremely high reliability. Doing so with a generator either requires high current capacity resistors to shunt the excess energy to the ground or to limit the flow to the battery. Because of the load potential, these resistors (or now days large power FETs are more efficient and reliable) have to be rather large and capable of dealing with dumping MASSIVE amounts of heat when the current is high.

      Generators provide an advantage in one case because you can still push start your car with a completely dead or missing battery. An alternator on the other hand MUST have external power to work, even if its just a little, so a battery is required.

      Back to the point, either way, you never power any devices directly from the generator or alternator because the voltage and current output from these devices is unreliable. Do you want everything in your car to stop working when a belt breaks or the generator/alternator or voltage regulator fail while you're driving? Do you want all the electronics in your car dealing with unpredictable voltage levels, like sitting at a stop light where most will not actually produce enough energy to sustain ALL the electrical requirements in your car if you use EVERYTHING at once. At this point your battery fills in the gap and drains slowly, but thats no big deal because you drive off shortly afterwords and the charge is replaced.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:Radio condenser by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Answer to your question: Nothing. The power supply for the radio will inherently be rather well isolated, as it's very easy to do in the conversion from 12V that the car produces to the 5V that the USB radio uses.

      Easy to do, but often overlooked. The cheapest way to do it is a resistor voltage divider which does no filtering and is extremely common in electronics because they expect to already be powered from a reliable clean source, which of course, is probably true for any factory installed device designed to power a USB port as well :)

      What you'll find that doesn't do it is all the cheapass lighter plug USB ports to charge cell phones in cars. These things you buy at radio shack, walmart and the Apple store have very little filtering, and the lighter outlet in most cars has no filtering since lighters themselves don't really need any and they generally draw a heavy load, which would require an expensive filter for a device that doesn't need a filter.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:Radio condenser by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The problem with your radio is that your alternator works at frequency ranges that are audible. Hence they put electrical 'chokes' on the power lines feeding the radio in order to filter out the noise to the point that you can't hear it. Its still there, just the alternator noise has been suppressed to the point that you can't hear it.

      Wifi operates in the microwave region and above. There isn't anything in your car that naturally operates at this frequency, so all you have to worry about would be sideband generation from other equipment. Since anything capable of generating these side bands SHOULD be required to carry proper shielding its probably a non-issue.

      Your home wifi screwing up because of your microwave is likely. Your furnace or TV is extremely unlikely. The furnace doesn't have anything in it generally that will produce frequencies in the range that wifi uses, its not your problem unless you have a microprocessor controlled thermostat or controlling system that is somehow generating extremely powerful (relatively) side band interference 1000 times its base frequency, which is EXTREMELY unlikely.

      Do you or your neighbors have a cordless phone in the 2.4 ghz range? Those are a problem, their quality is typically sub par and they are sharing the same band as wifi. You're neighbors wifi or microwave could also be a problem. How far away is your WAP from the device having connection issues? To close can be a problem, my laptops for instance will not communicate AT ALL with the WAP if they are within 5 feet of the device. They'll see it, they'll 'connect' but no data will flow. One of the two is borking up when it gets a signal thats too high. You also have to pay attention to the orientation of your antennas on your wifi device. Most if not all are designed to radiate the signal horizontally. If your access point is on the second floor, with the antenna's configured to radiate horizontally, and you move your laptop or PC directly under it, theres a good chance you're signal is going to suck or be unusable.

      If you view available wifi networks, how many do you see in your list? There are only 11 channels in standard A/B/G. More than 11 networks and you are already sharing bandwidth someone else regardless of what you do. With less than 11, theres still a good chance you're sharing with someone else since most WAPs are too stupid to pick a clean channel initially, and even if yours did, it didn't get any help when someone else plugged in a cheap WAP that used your channel as well.

      View available networks with a wifi browser, find out if there are any channels that aren't in use, those are the first ones to switch to. If I recall correctly, 1, 6, and 11 are good ones to use to avoid microwave interference

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:Radio condenser by adolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [[citation needed]]

      Voltage dividers, in this application, are only useful when the power is of a fixed (already regulated) voltage. Car batteries are nominally 12V, but charge at somewhere between 13.8 and 14.4V.

      Please show me an example of an example of a modern (say, last 5 years?) cheapass lighter plug charger.

      Disclaimer: Where I work, among our various trades, we sell cellular phones and accessories. We get cheap Chinese chargers for less than $2 each (and mark them up x15, but that's a different story), and inside of each of these little widgets is a tiny switching regulator circuit.

    8. Re:Radio condenser by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Nobody uses voltage dividers on electronics. A voltage divider might be cheaper for you to hook up on a breadboard, but it probably isn't for a factory to build into a product. For that you use a voltage regulator which is (1) more efficient, (2) can deal with varying supply voltages and (3) is a single component rather than two (or more) resistors that must be soldered onto the board.

      A cheap lighter plug generally doesn't do ANYTHING. If you're lucky there's a fuse in there in case the thing shorts. It just provides a connection to the 12 volt (ish) battery supply. All the power conditioning and conversion is done in the electronic device, usually by a voltage regulator or, in some cases, might be done in some of the fancier lighter to USB plugs that supply five volts, also by a voltage regulator.

    9. Re:Radio condenser by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The sparks from the plugs are inside the Faraday cage of the combustion chamber. If the leads to the plugs are shielded (I haven't gotten around to dissecting a set yet.), there should be no radiation.

      Ignition wires are only shielded for special applications. It can be done in a couple of ways (braid over standard ignition wires or wire replacement with high voltage coaxial cable) but the effort required is not trivial. HAM operators who work HF or weak signal linear modes (AM, SSB, QAM, various digital) sometimes do this.

      Automotive manufacturers rely on spark plugs and ignition wires designed with controlled resistive loss for EMI suppression. If you cut apart a standard wire, you will not find copper.

    10. Re:Radio condenser by adolf · · Score: 1

      Right. So.

      The problem with everything you just wrote is that these things are all connected together. The alternator, the battery, and the rest of the car are all in parallel. No diodes, no switching, no magic -- just a bit of heavy copper wire.

      How, pray tell, do the little electrons destined for (say) the headlamps know that they'd better be starting out at the battery instead of at the alternator? How does the alternator know that it is only there to recharge the battery?

      Especially since the alternator is outputting a higher voltage potential than the battery's nominal charge.

      I'll answer these questions for you: They don't, and it can't.

      It's the alternator's primary job to charge the battery, for sure. But, in doing so, it must power the rest of the electrical load. Sure, it's noisy as hell compared to straight DC, but much of that noise is filtered by the battery (or additional capacitance in noise-sensitive devices), and...well, that's it. There's nothing more to say.

  11. Understanding Wi-Fi fail by anglophobe_0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How the heck would you black out wi-fi for the driver? Cone of silence, engage! Besides, when I use my laptop while driving, I sit it on the passenger seat anyway. :P Also, the same people who would be guilty of "distracted driving" with wi-fi are the ones who do it with their phone. Take away their phone, they'll read a book (I've seen this). Take away the book, they'll get so engrossed in talking with their passenger, they don't pay attention. The best method of protecting other drivers is to get people to pay more attention to driving than anything else, not take away everything else. There'll always be some distraction you can't take away.

    1. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Besides, when I use my laptop while driving, I sit it on the passenger seat anyway.

      How do you reach the pedals?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by anglophobe_0 · · Score: 1

      Mayhaps "set" would have been a better choice than "sit".

    3. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by causality · · Score: 1

      How the heck would you black out wi-fi for the driver? Cone of silence, engage! Besides, when I use my laptop while driving, I sit it on the passenger seat anyway. :P Also, the same people who would be guilty of "distracted driving" with wi-fi are the ones who do it with their phone. Take away their phone, they'll read a book (I've seen this). Take away the book, they'll get so engrossed in talking with their passenger, they don't pay attention. The best method of protecting other drivers is to get people to pay more attention to driving than anything else, not take away everything else. There'll always be some distraction you can't take away.

      Proposed solution: don't try to stop them. Just pass a law stating that if you cause an accident (i.e. it is your fault) and there is evidence that willful/preventable driver distraction was a factor, you lose your license for ten years with no exceptions and no possibility to obtain it sooner than those ten years, no matter how minor or major that accident was. Now if we can also get something like this for tailgaters who rear-end the guy in front of them (easily the most preventable and most stupid accident you could ever have), we'd have a good thing going.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by Belial6 · · Score: 0

      As long as you are prepared for the economic collapse that will happen when every single driver who has a radio in their car loses their license.

    5. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as you are prepared for the economic collapse that will happen when every single driver who has a radio in their car loses their license.

      This is effectively a claim that such a law would have no deterrent effect. I know of no evidence for that claim and any measurable deterrent caused by any traffic law would contradict it. It stands to reason that holding people accountable for such a blatant disregard for the safety of others could only reduce this behavior.

      To put it another way, anyone who thinks their 'Net access is more important than the safety of others around them is being extremely selfish. Selfish people are already demonstrating that any arguments about the harm they cause others are ineffective on them. What is effective against selfish people is the knowledge that they will be held personally responsible for their actions.

      Besides, getting bad drivers off the road and with them, the accidents that they cause and all the lost productivity associated with that might help the economy. To suggest the opposite, that the autobody repair work and hospital/funeral expenses that go with those accidents is helping anyone would be an example of the broken window fallacy.

      Furthermore, there is such a thing as public transportation.

      One more thing. Just because you have a radio does not mean it must distract you while driving. It's abundantly possible to adjust the radio while you're stopped at a traffic light, parked, etc. It's also possible to be familiar with a radio's controls so that you can adjust it by touch alone without ever taking your eyes off of the road (good luck doing that with a Web browser -- makes me wonder why you mention radios). If you absolutely must adjust your radio and simply cannot wait, and you know it will be a distraction, you can pull over or something. That's an incredibly minor inconvenience compared to trying to sleep at night with the knowledge that someone got hurt (or worse) because you couldn't be bothered.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    6. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, when I use my laptop while driving, I sit it on the passenger seat anyway.

      In the US, most if not all states have laws against having equipment like a TV or laptop in the front part of the car. At least if it's turned on. Some have laws where the device must be out of reach even if it's off. So good luck with your distracted driving, you're just asking for a serious fine.

      There are exceptions for some devices but probably a lot of the in-dash DVD and even GPS devices are technically breaking the law. Which means your insurance might not cover you if anything happens.

    7. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by causality · · Score: 1

      As long as you are prepared for the economic collapse that will happen when every single driver who has a radio in their car loses their license.

      Sorry to reply twice. Sometimes I wish Slashdot had an edit feature.

      Note that I said such a loss of licenses would occur only after your distracted driving has caused an accident that is your fault. Those who can deal with radios/etc without causing accidents would have nothing to fear. Those who cannot can either refrain from messing with their electronic devices or can choose to do so while the vehicle is not moving. Seems really simple to me.

      Besides, look at it from the perspective of the other party. Why should I have my car smashed up and why should I be injured or worse because of someone else's willful and preventable negligence? Why would it be unjust for that kind of negligence to carry a high price tag?

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    8. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by anglophobe_0 · · Score: 1

      The problem with your idea is that it is based on a foundation of personal responsibility. That hasn't been much of a factor is American life since the New Deal.

    9. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      because over the top penalties are deterrences to behavior of those disposed to behaving in such manors... oh... wait... they're not.

    10. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      how well do traffic fines prevent speeding or dick head drivers?

      The fact is, the traffic laws provide guidance for those who care, and those who think they can bend and break teh rules are willing to play that game of risk. Laws and penalties do not deter those who do not care.

    11. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      The problem with your ideas is that you think there is no such thing as social responsibility. That hasn't been much of a factor since Reagan.

    12. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by anglophobe_0 · · Score: 0

      My Roosevelt trumps your Reagan. :P Also, next time you want to project stupid ideas onto me, please preface it by asking my permission, which I most certainly would not grant. I do believe in social responsibility. I just believe it should be mandated by society, not government. And if you have to ask, "What's the difference?", I'm just wasting my time.

    13. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shush. Wi-Fi enabled cars bring us one necessary step closer to self-driving cars, so that distracted idiots can just go ahead and be distracted with fewer ill effects. And, oh yes, so that I can use my hour-long daily commute for some more constructive task than keeping the car's nose pointed forward. To hell with flying cars; I'm disappointed that we're leaving the new century's Aughts without significant progress on the self-steering car front.

      GPS alone does not enable headless driving; some two-way communication is going to be essential. I can see no handier time to lay some infrastructure than when we're already warming up to a pretty big revolution in automotive power technology. Two-way comm plus a modicum of sensor technology means that every enhanced car becomes a survey point for road conditions and traffic. Once such technologies reach a certain critical mass, self-guidance becomes much more trivial.

    14. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      I know the difference.

      Societal methods do not produce enough resources for the need because they are held up in stupid silos of overlapping charities with impossible to navigate requirements for application and people do not give enough to said charities (as a whole) to meet the needs of society.

    15. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by anglophobe_0 · · Score: 1

      Aha. I understand your point. I do believe that, given the chance, society would rise to the occasion and help those in need. I believe that private charity is and always has been more efficient than government...dmv blah blah blah...and I do believe that people would give more if the government got its hands out of their pockets. I give on top of what the government forces me to give, but maybe I am just a bit too optimistic about the human race. Would it be fair of me to make the extrapolation that your concerns are practical more than philosophical?

    16. Re:Understanding Wi-Fi fail by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      It is absolutely practical.
      We had plenty of opportunity to give enough to support the poor. It worked well when we all lived in tribes of about 100 people or less. When the state was born, societal altruism died with it because of the desire for personal power.

      In a society that values power and wealth, you will never be able to support those who are unable to support themselves on voluntary support.

  12. Ok, how the hell do you manage that? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Unless Wi-Fi is blacked out for the driver, the safety implications of this development are worrisome.

    Good grief. Yes - by all means, let's put the driver in a freaking faraday cage so they don't surf porn while they drive. That will make the world safe from the abomination that is mobile internet.

    The only worrisome thing on the road to me is the judgment of the people around me. The idiots who can't read the "keep left" signs on the on ramp. Those people. Deal with them first - then you won't need the faraday cage.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Ok, how the hell do you manage that? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      And the people reading Slashdot while driving?

    2. Re:Ok, how the hell do you manage that? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      And the people posting on /. while driving?

  13. How funny by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Over 12 years ago, I was part of a company that was going to do this concept for Buses in the Denver basin (RTD). The idea was to have one hotspot on the bus, and another doing the link. Then then we were to be given access to the Public Service lights to rig up more hotspots. Sadly, we turned it down.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  14. Typo in headline: by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Correct headline: “Ford's New Cars To Be Wi-Fi Hackspots ”

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  15. I want it to my car's stereo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not for driving, but when my car is parked in my garage, the only currently way I have to copy MP3s to it is to stick them on a USB stick and walk them down there.

    Why isn't my car stereo having 802.11 and letting me scp files over to it from my home network? I could then select whatever mp3s I wanted to listen to that week from my computer, or heck, even set up a cron job to rotate through my collection each night.

    Maybe there are some head units which support this, but mine doesn't (it's about 1 year old, Pioneer model).

    1. Re:I want it to my car's stereo! by adolf · · Score: 1

      I've wanted that for at least a decade.

      However: With space being so cheap lately, it's rapidly becoming practical to have all of your music in your car all of the time, anyway, on a cheap FLASH device that doesn't mind the temperature variations like an HDD does.

      Furthermore, with bandwidth being so cheap and available lately, it's rapidly becoming practical to have all of your music in your house streamable to your car, wherever it is. I've been doing this with my Droid, lately, and it works fine.

    2. Re:I want it to my car's stereo! by twmcneil · · Score: 1

      He said "one year old Pioneer" so he's got a cheap usb flash chip on it now. What he's talking about is updating the flash with new music he acquires. I use a pair of 8 gig micro SDs (~100 cds). I keep one in the car and one in the house. I update the one in the house with the new music and it goes out to the car with me the next day, the old one goes back in the house. I see his point. It would be cool to be able to D/L new music directly to the SD in the car but swapping SDs is a minor inconvenience really.

      --
      "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
  16. Use your imagination by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 2, Interesting

    > Unless Wi-Fi is blacked out for the driver, the safety implications of this development are worrisome.

    I'm not the least bit worried. Just think of the apps you can create for the driver if a car were wi-fi connected. Heads up displays for upcoming traffic problems, weather, etc. Constantly upgrade your car's navigation system with updates and patches that download while the car is parked. etc, etc.

    Your fear is based on what you know now. You should instead base your hopes on those good things you can imagine.

    1. Re:Use your imagination by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What use is a wifi hotspot without an uplink?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Use your imagination by dintlu · · Score: 1

      Cell plans might become simple data contracts in the near future, and if that happens cell providers will have no problem with letting you run up your bill by tethering. Even if they don't, there are other possibilities:

      An ad-hoc network of cars communicating information in real-time about the traffic ahead, able to inform drivers about the average congestion speed so that traffic jams clear up ten times faster?

      Social driving, you can cuss out the asshole who cut you off as he speeds away from you, have a good morning chat with people you recognize in other cars along the commute?

    3. Re:Use your imagination by vanyel · · Score: 1

      Come back from a quick trip to pick something up:

      Driver to car: start
      car to driver: Please wait, download 1% finished estimated time 20 minutes...

    4. Re:Use your imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, I'm sure if the stack was FOSS we wouldn't be worrying so much about the safety implications.

    5. Re:Use your imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your fear is based on what you know now. You should instead base your hopes on those good things you can imagine."

      Wow, you must be a Democrat.

      But seriously, I can see that ads now: "Want to be a lethal danger on the roadway? There's an app. for that!"
       

    6. Re:Use your imagination by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Wifi is no help for anything you would provide the driver in that manner since wifi isn't going to get you connected to the Internet while driving around town in less you happen to live in that 0.0001% of the villages/towns/cities in the world that have public wifi blankets.

      The USB dongle would be useful for that however, with or without a WAP

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  17. Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by Tynin · · Score: 1

    Having a wifi in my car sounds interesting. But I cannot imagine you'd keep a good connection while driving around. Is anyone aware of a solution of getting a shoutcast stream to play in a car that doesn't cost an arm and a leg? Their is simply no industrial / ebm / futurepop music on the air in the US, not even satellite radio carries any (last I checked, please tell me if anyone knows if that has changed), I just want to be able to listen to Digital Gunfire in my car. I keep asking Santa to bring me this tech, but each year its just more coal.

    1. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by Puls4r · · Score: 1

      Really? That's interesting. I just drove all the way across the state of Michigan, from Port Huron to Grand Rapids, and was streaming video and downloading files using my Sprint USB mobile broadband. All so we could get ready for a robotics presentation we needed to do. No black outs, no lost connections, I had 60-100% connection the whole time. I would imagine 3g coverage in well-covered high-density cities would be even better.

    2. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      Allow me to shamelessly plug my own station (in my sig) if you're into that type of music.

      That said, my friend brought my station up on his iPhone. Seems to me that'd be a way to do it -- stream it on a phone and plug that into your head unit's aux jack.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    3. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by Tynin · · Score: 1

      128 kilobyte stream is 131,072 bytes/s. Listening to music to and from work is a 60 minute round trip 5 days a week.

      131072 * 60 seconds * 60 minutes * 5 days * 4 weeks = 9,437,184,000 bytes for the month = 8.789 gigabytes of data usage. This doesn't count the weekends or before/after work activities that involve driving.

      Sprints $60 a month mobile broadband plan only allows 5 gigabytes of transfer, then it is $0.05/megabyte. That leaves me with 3879.93 megabytes (i.e. the remaining 3.789 gigabytes) of transfer at .05/megabyte for the price of $193.99. So to get a 128kb stream of music for 20 hours a month would cost me $253.99. Like I mentioned, I'm interested in something cheapish. But not something that is going to be a reoccurring cost of $3047.96 a year.

      I honestly hope their is something wrong with my math that someone can point out. I'd really like to be wrong and find out I misplaced the decimal. If not, does anyone else have a cheaper suggestion?

    4. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, I'll have to give you a listen :)

    5. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 1

      get an mp3 player and buy the cds?

    6. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that has been my solution. I'd just like the freedom of not having to chose what band / song is playing or bothering to put in the time to get together a good set of music. I prefer just to turn on the music and let whomever is broadcasting worry about the mix. I guess I'll keep waiting for the price on phone data plans to come down. I just find it pretty crazy that 20 hours of a 128kb stream comes out to $254 a month.

    7. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by grumbel · · Score: 1

      A 128kb MP3 is bits, not bytes, so divide the whole thing by a factor of 8.

    8. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Doh! Thank you very kindly! Time to work the math again.

    9. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Excellent, that works out to 1.1 gigabytes used for 20 hours of 128kb stream, so I could get by comfortably with the Sprint plan. grumbel, thank you again for pointing out my error.

    10. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I would imagine 3g coverage in well-covered high-density cities would be even better.

      Not for AT&T customers :/ Verizon is a bunch of douche bags, but their commercials about AT&T are nice in my opinion.

      I made the trip from Raleigh NC, to San Antonio Tx, then Dallas and then back. EDGE coverage was everywhere. 3G was available in the major cities (Atlanta, Dallas, San Antonio, Houston, Waco, Raleigh) but no where along the Gulf cost on I10, which isn't that surprising as it was only a year or so after Katrina so I'm not surprised cell networks weren't back to 100% capacity there, but on the way back we took I20, Well away from the coast and the shitty coverage was FREAKING ANNOYING AS SHIT :)

      In Raleigh, a 'well covered 3G area' according to AT&T, I've found its far faster to browse on edge than 3g.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I should point out however, driving across the state of Michigan isn't exactly a cross country trip :)

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re:Shoutcast in my car, can it be done cheapish? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I prefer just to turn on the music and let whomever is broadcasting worry about the mix.

      In what way is this not free, OTA, FM radio? The kind we've had in cars for decades.

  18. Wardriving for the Rest of Us by bistromath007 · · Score: 0

    I can't think of anything else to type, but the title is really good enough.

    1. Re:Wardriving for the Rest of Us by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      Aw man, and I just realized that this could give rise to the practice of "warsitting." Why couldn't I think of that earlier?

  19. WTF? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unless Wi-Fi is blacked out for the driver, the safety implications of this development are worrisome.

    Seriously, kdawson, WTF is the above supposed to mean? WiFi is a wireless connection system. How the FUCK is the driver going to be distracted by a 2400mHz radio signal? This isn't like a TV on the dashboard, or a GPS full of fiddly touch screens, it's a bloody network standard. Even assuming that WiFi to the driver is somehow distracting (maybe a netbook balanced on the steering wheel) how the hell do you suggest they "[black it] out for the driver"? Magic radio curtains? A WEP key that randomly scrambles when you put the car in gear and appears somewhere the driver can't see it?

    Give up the attempts at clever editorializing. You don't have the gray matter for it.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    1. Re:WTF? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Unless Wi-Fi is blacked out for the driver, the safety implications of this development are worrisome.

      Seriously, kdawson, WTF is the above supposed to mean?

      The quote of his is actually a coded or encrypted message. He has posted this message several hundred times. Actually, he has posted it in nearly EVERY single one of the articles he has edited. The simple message you have stumbled upon is this:

      "I am yet another in a line of shittacular slashdot editors."

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that WiFi signal is 1000 watts I'm pretty sure you'd find it distracting as your eyeballs melt.

    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you know wi-fi makes some people sick. Now this poor guy will have to get a faraday cage installed in his car to protect himself from all the cars that will now have wifi, you can even have a cage around the driver to protect the driver in cars the people choose to have fitted with wifi.

    4. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the humour impaired, I don't actually believe that story, and I'm not being serious.

  20. Bad Idea? by Efialtis · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone else that thinks this is a BAD IDEA? We already have people crashing and killing each-other because of distracted driving... do we need to add to that with giving them something like this?

    --
    --E--
  21. who let the driver behind the wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the car

    1. Re:who let the driver behind the wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whiskey bottle let driver drink it. The driver's shoes let the driver get into the car in the first place and the road let the driver drive on it.

  22. Hello, dealership? Can I have the service dept? by Glasswire · · Score: 1

    Problem? Yes, I'm getting a failure to establish my IPSEC tunnel from the car router to my fixed site and I don't seem to be able to setup for WPA2 enterprise authenticated clients and... hello? hello?

  23. R.I.P. Self-Control? by InsertCleverUsername · · Score: 1

    Yeah... all the technology could be distracting. As an adult you kind of need to have some self-control and the sense to avoid doing stupid things that could get you killed or injured, like texting while adjusting the radio while eating while driving a speeding ton of metal down the road.

    --
    Ask me about my sig!
  24. Wardriving by awyeah · · Score: 1

    Wardriving is going to become quite a bit more difficult and confusing.

    Wait a second. Come to think of it... with the right kind of hacking/reverse engineering, this could be a real boon to wardriving!

    Not that I condone wardriving. I'm just saying.

    --
    Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
  25. Recall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you thought Ford had recall problems before, just wait.

  26. Hmmm. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Ford's New Cars To Be Wi-Fi Hotspots

    What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  27. put in real explosives instead of the air bag by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    If you really want drivers to pay attention, mandate some C4 and a metal casing in place of the steering wheel air bag, such that any event that would have triggered the air bag instead sets off the grenade. Require older cars to be retrofitted or destroyed. Publicize the consequences of hitting something widely.

  28. Hack Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reuters, December 21-2011
    By Anonymous Coward.

    Massive traffic congestion clogged major US cities as Ford vehicles equipped with WIFI were hacked by the turd botnet and provided mobile bases for distributed denial of service to traffic computers, According to earlier investigations a Latvian "blackhat" group was found responsible for the evil deed, Microsft could not be reached, as their servers were also compromised by the intrusion.

    Ford teamsters said they have no comments yet about what happened, or what they believe should have happened, but they are going to suggest a strike to have their wages increased.

  29. Soviet by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, drives war you!

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
  30. Obligatory XKCD by rdnetto · · Score: 1

    Can't believe no one has posted this yet: http://xkcd.com/440/

    --
    Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  31. FOSS as Infotainment platform by miahfost · · Score: 1

    BMW is seriously committed to FOSS as an Infortainment platform in their cars - they are not the only ones. They have set up something called the GenIVI Alliance which is an automotive industry consortium which is working together on this type of software: http://genivi.org/ Many other companies have joined as well, like GM, Nokia, Navteq, Intel, Freescale, Nissan, Monta Vista, Pugeot, and Texas Instruments.

  32. Allow me to channel Adama here by damburger · · Score: 1

    Do we have to have networking capabilities in every gods damn thing now?

    I'm really hoping that whoever designed this car kept the in car WiFi physically separate from the onboard computer - otherwise you have opened the door for potential DoS (Denial of Steering) attacks. It would of course be the smart thing to do, but seeing as a modern microprocessor can probably handle the car and the WiFi at once, it wouldn't be the cheap thing to do...

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  33. SCP too good to be true by ickleberry · · Score: 1

    If any manufacturer made a stereo like this, they'd force you to use their Windows-only bloatware. and ironically the stereo itself will run embedded linux, possibly even with scp installed but not usable

  34. Wifi sounds great by Niubi · · Score: 1

    It's pretty much the way things are evolving though, isn't it? Just think how awesome it would be on those long car trips to keep the kids quiet by letting them play online games, and your wife happy by letting her shop on DubLi/eBay/Amazon. I guess I'd like to use it to play any music I want, anywhere. Already got a SatNav.

  35. hny im txting frm car by Brett+Glass · · Score: 1

    rd is wet and icy oops aaaaaaaaagh

  36. SYNC is awesome by Zerimar · · Score: 1

    SYNC works really well and is a huge reason I would consider a Ford vehicle (Fusion or Mustang) over competitors. Of course kdawson will find negatives about it since it's a Microsoft product.

  37. Another fine example by geekoid · · Score: 1

    of kdawson showing the world his ignorance.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect