I'm sorry, but you really need to actually deal with some disabled people before you dismiss their problems so lightly. One of my best friends is severely disabled (multiple sclerosis, as it happens.) He's bedridden, of course, and due to his condition is often unable to use his hands well enough to pull on a drawstring and a simple motion sensor would be worthless given the complexity of his controls requirements. Indeed, your solutions simply would not work for him (or the bulk of similarly disabled individuals.)
I've spent years giving him as much control of his environment as I can: custom X10 software so that he can use his computer to control lights, fans and appliances, voice recognition for work (he's a practicing attorney), a pneumatic actuator for his balcony sliding door, etc. There are times when properly applied technology can significantly enhance someone's quality of life.
Nuance's Dragon Naturallyspeaking is about the most frustrating, ill-conceived, effectively-unsupported, crash-prone, erratic and generally flaky application of its kind on the market. It's unstable, unpredictable, and regularly drives every user I know into apoplexy. The problem is, they just don't care. Really, they don't: bugs are left unaddressed for years, often through several major "revisions", because they know that there's nowhere else for users to go. That's especially true if one needs their specialized vocabularies.
If anyone wants to know why monopolies are bad... this is it.
Google's entire approach to speech recognition is based on big data, so yes, they will be "mining" it in the sense that they will use it to continually improve the technology, and improve accuracy for the individual user. I would be surprised if they didn't use that data for targeted ads (after all, that is what they do) but being Google there will likely be an easy opt-out.
'Washington should be very thoughtful how they go forward here,' he said. 'This uncertainty is not good for investment, and it's not good for jobs here in America.'"
Why not? Uncertainty drives change, and uncertainty at this point was created _by Verizon._ Granted, something had to change, because what the big ISPs have been doing is abusive at best.
Besides, it was Verizon that started this mess by trying to change the rules for its own benefit. Complaining now is just sour grapes. Enjoy your new Title II status.
Most of you probably don't remember back in the sixties when Radio Shack was the retail distribution arm of Allied Radio (yes, it was known as Allied Radio Shack), a major components distributor. It was a real parts store the. Eventually Tandy picked up the chain, began selling branded parts, and it was never quite the same. The reality is that the advent of the personal computer, the death of manufacturing in the U.S., and an educational system that no longer valued engineering skills combined to kill the electronics hobbyist market that the Radio Shack depended upon. Their change of focus to consumer electronics was a reflection of that new reality, but unfortunately that is a saturated market. This was, alas, a long time in coming.
Reading between the lines, I think this is a company that specializes in greasing palms/pulling levers in Congress and the Senate, as well as constructing sophisticated internet campaigns that include releases to key susceptible news outlets/columnists and hiring fake posters to post on certain widely read comment boards.
Cost reduction, maybe. It really involves management that is afraid to trust the very people it hired, and wants to keep them under constant surveillance. It's the modern way: trust no-one, watch everyone. It never seems to occur to such types that if you hire good people, pay them well, treat them well, and give them reasonable goals, you don't need to be so paranoid.
As a long-time software developer, I know that such an environment would severely impact my ability to focus and do what I'm being paid to do. Furthermore, any employer that would trust me so little is one for whom I would not choose too work.
Technically, what they care about is control of distribution, because in their (relatively tiny) minds, that equates directly to profit. Loss of control is likewise perceived as inevitably causing loss of profit. That they might make even more money with a less dickish business model is way outside their comfort zone, because all they understand is what always worked before.
So yes, they are analogs to the recording industry. Those legitimate customers who are harmed by the quest to control content distribution are acceptable collateral damage.
voiced by 'muricans online it is very hard to tell.
Just a quick note: insulting people with differing opinions (no matter how right you may think you are) doesn't actually help you make your case, although it may increase your innate sense of superiority. In addition, those "'muricans" who might otherwise agree with you may just write you off as another bigoted foreign asshole who lumps everyone in a given country together.
Slashdot Mirror
But of course. Immensity can be bought very cheaply in space.
I'm sorry, but you really need to actually deal with some disabled people before you dismiss their problems so lightly. One of my best friends is severely disabled (multiple sclerosis, as it happens.) He's bedridden, of course, and due to his condition is often unable to use his hands well enough to pull on a drawstring and a simple motion sensor would be worthless given the complexity of his controls requirements. Indeed, your solutions simply would not work for him (or the bulk of similarly disabled individuals.)
I've spent years giving him as much control of his environment as I can: custom X10 software so that he can use his computer to control lights, fans and appliances, voice recognition for work (he's a practicing attorney), a pneumatic actuator for his balcony sliding door, etc. There are times when properly applied technology can significantly enhance someone's quality of life.
"Show me your budgies."
"Budgies? Budgies? We don't need no stinkin' budgies."
The problem with alternatives is that any successful ones will immediately run afoul of Nuance's intellectual property lawyers.
Nuance's Dragon Naturallyspeaking is about the most frustrating, ill-conceived, effectively-unsupported, crash-prone, erratic and generally flaky application of its kind on the market. It's unstable, unpredictable, and regularly drives every user I know into apoplexy. The problem is, they just don't care. Really, they don't: bugs are left unaddressed for years, often through several major "revisions", because they know that there's nowhere else for users to go. That's especially true if one needs their specialized vocabularies.
... this is it.
If anyone wants to know why monopolies are bad
Google's entire approach to speech recognition is based on big data, so yes, they will be "mining" it in the sense that they will use it to continually improve the technology, and improve accuracy for the individual user. I would be surprised if they didn't use that data for targeted ads (after all, that is what they do) but being Google there will likely be an easy opt-out.
So, they're only now acknowledging that perimeter security alone cannot prevent security failures?
And these are security experts?
'Washington should be very thoughtful how they go forward here,' he said. 'This uncertainty is not good for investment, and it's not good for jobs here in America.'"
Why not? Uncertainty drives change, and uncertainty at this point was created _by Verizon._ Granted, something had to change, because what the big ISPs have been doing is abusive at best.
Besides, it was Verizon that started this mess by trying to change the rules for its own benefit. Complaining now is just sour grapes. Enjoy your new Title II status.
Implementing your own encryption is probably the worst idea ever.
I suspect he meant "an implementation using existing encryption software that you selected yourself."
Why ... me, of course. I don't keep anything of consequence on any cloud-based storage system.
Most of you probably don't remember back in the sixties when Radio Shack was the retail distribution arm of Allied Radio (yes, it was known as Allied Radio Shack), a major components distributor. It was a real parts store the. Eventually Tandy picked up the chain, began selling branded parts, and it was never quite the same. The reality is that the advent of the personal computer, the death of manufacturing in the U.S., and an educational system that no longer valued engineering skills combined to kill the electronics hobbyist market that the Radio Shack depended upon. Their change of focus to consumer electronics was a reflection of that new reality, but unfortunately that is a saturated market. This was, alas, a long time in coming.
What about Kickass Torrents?
I had hoped that SpaceX might hold higher principles :(
Why would you say that?
Reading between the lines, I think this is a company that specializes in greasing palms/pulling levers in Congress and the Senate, as well as constructing sophisticated internet campaigns that include releases to key susceptible news outlets/columnists and hiring fake posters to post on certain widely read comment boards.
So, highly-paid, professional astroturfers.
Cost reduction, maybe. It really involves management that is afraid to trust the very people it hired, and wants to keep them under constant surveillance. It's the modern way: trust no-one, watch everyone. It never seems to occur to such types that if you hire good people, pay them well, treat them well, and give them reasonable goals, you don't need to be so paranoid.
As a long-time software developer, I know that such an environment would severely impact my ability to focus and do what I'm being paid to do. Furthermore, any employer that would trust me so little is one for whom I would not choose too work.
I suspect that China does. They just haven't had a Snowden happen to them.
Awesome Captain Kirk impression.
... is to be disbanded.
I really hope you are trying to be funny.
One can always hope, but it seems we've managed to go from "climate change isn't real" to "it causes everything bad that happens."
Of course, a big enough eruption would actually trigger a global cooling trend for a while. Think Krakatoa and Mount Pinatubo.
I read that as "A Woman's Mind in a Leggy Body."
I'm going to bed now.
"Mickey Mouse" search engine.
Heh.
I just love how bribery is called "lobbying" in the US.
As an American, I don't. Like it that is.
Technically, what they care about is control of distribution, because in their (relatively tiny) minds, that equates directly to profit. Loss of control is likewise perceived as inevitably causing loss of profit. That they might make even more money with a less dickish business model is way outside their comfort zone, because all they understand is what always worked before.
So yes, they are analogs to the recording industry. Those legitimate customers who are harmed by the quest to control content distribution are acceptable collateral damage.
Hewlett-Packard did much the same under Carly FIorina.
voiced by 'muricans online it is very hard to tell.
Just a quick note: insulting people with differing opinions (no matter how right you may think you are) doesn't actually help you make your case, although it may increase your innate sense of superiority. In addition, those "'muricans" who might otherwise agree with you may just write you off as another bigoted foreign asshole who lumps everyone in a given country together.