Slashdot Mirror


Windows 7 May Finally Get IPv6 Deployed

Esther Schindler writes "According to this article at IT Expert Voice, Windows 7 and IPv6: Useful at Last?, we've had so many predictions that this will be 'the year of IPv6' that most of us have stopped listening. But the network protocol may have new life breathed into it because IPv6 is a requirement for DirectAccess. DirectAccess, a feature in Windows 7, makes remote access a lot easier — and it doesn't require a VPN. (Lisa Vaas interviews security experts and network admins to find out what they think of that idea.) The two articles examine the advantages and disadvantages of DirectAccess, with particular attention to the possibility that Microsoft's sponsorship may give IPv6 the deployment push it has lacked."

4 of 283 comments (clear)

  1. Re:IPv6 addresses are overly complex by kennedy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Uhh... 3 letters for you. D.N.S.

  2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You don't need NAT to run a firewall that has the same security functionality as NAT

  3. Re:IPv6 addresses are overly complex by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, typing in IP addresses is a pain in those situations. Maybe in future Microsoft will add a "cut" and "paste" feature to Windows 7, like they have in OSX - that should make life easier.

  4. Re:IPv6 addresses are overly complex by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Informative

    Off-offtopic, but I'd much rather you typed in example.com. Don't refer to what might be a real URL as an example when you've got a name reserved by RFP for that purpose.