Slashdot Mirror


North Magnetic Pole Moving East Due To Core Flux

National Geographic is reporting that the migration of Earth's magnetic pole has accelerated again and is now racing in Russia's direction at a blazing 40 miles per year. This movement began in earnest around 1904 at about 9 miles per year and has been accelerating since. "Geologists think Earth has a magnetic field because the core is made up of a solid iron center surrounded by rapidly spinning liquid rock. This creates a 'dynamo' that drives our magnetic field. Scientists had long suspected that, since the molten core is constantly moving, changes in its magnetism might be affecting the surface location of magnetic north. Although the new research seems to back up this idea, Chulliat is not ready to say whether magnetic north will eventually cross into Russia. 'It's too difficult to forecast,' Chulliat said. Also, nobody knows when another change in the core might pop up elsewhere, sending magnetic north wandering in a new direction."

8 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. How convenient by SlothDead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is actually pretty cool that this happens at the time our technology is so advanced that we can have electronic compasses that simply use GPS to figure out where they are so they can point to the geographic north pole, instead of towards the magnetic one. Imagine how inconvenient it would have been for people if this had happened a view hundred years earlier; they would have to do some extra calculations to navigate their ships.

    Yay for technology!

  2. Re:Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope congress immediately passes a 3000 page bill to solve this issue now! Something must be done and there isn't time to read or think about it!

  3. Software - a perfect analogy! by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, allow me to commend you for the perfect analogy — laws are programs, and law-making is programming... Now, to answer your questions...

    Would you arbitrary limit the Linux kernel to 30,000 lines of code? Who gets to decide what kind of complexity is reasonable?

    Linux kernel is reviewed by thousands of people back and forth all the time. There are automatic tools verifying syntactic and even (rudimentary) semantic correctness. Thousands of "tinderboxes" test any changes for hours every days and report any deviations. The history of changes (diffs) is publicly available at all times, studied and discussed by even more people.

    The two thousands pages of the bill in question has never been read in full by a single person — and when such a feat was undertaken, by the time the hero finished, the bill was already amended to bribe another Senator, etc. No automatic verification tools exist, of course — even a spell-checker would break. The entire country will be the tinderbox — production testing the below alpha-quality software. Oh, and the earlier prototypes (State-wide programs) have been failures...

    And you object to somebody rejecting that software because it is too complex? What happened to coding guidelines, with each function and non-trivial block being carefully commented?

    You? Rush Limbaugh? Based on what metric?

    The metric is very simple — if I can't finish reading (and understanding!) it without somebody "committing" a significant change somewhere, it is too long... The "Senate version" was moved to vote after an all-nigher in the Speaker's office, for crying out loud. All those fancy promises (by the most technically advanced Administration, like, ever, dude) of legislation being posted online for days prior to vote have turned into lies. Unreadable, spaghetti-like code, no testing, and not even code review. Who could possibly object?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Software - a perfect analogy! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would be just happy having a chance for anyone other than the writers having a chance to peak at said bill, before it is rushed to vote by people who don't know what is in the bill any more than I do.

      How about a two week public review period before voting on it, so that many eyes have a chance to spot the flaws before irrevocably being instituted as law.

      But hey, I don't expect anything different from a bunch of drunk, check kiting, womanizing, failures who can't run anything, but feels entitled to run everyone else's life, while exempting themselves from all the crap they expect everyone else to live by.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  4. Re:Global Warming by WED+Fan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reasonable people differ on the substance of legislation, but opposing something based on its complexity alone smacks of corrosive know-nothingism.

    O.k., Sparky, have you read the health bill? If you say you have, you are a liar.

    Blindly accepting that self-interested career politicians can bring together a patchwork of often contradictory sections of proposed law and amendments that will somehow fix an arguably broken system without creating more problems than it solves is just plain idiocy. The mantra in D.C. is "Fire...Ready...Duck...Aim...Why is everyone angry at us?"

    The simple fact that they rammed it through, at full speed without a fair reading and explanation is enough to make anyone wary.

    This is very much like you giving up on trying to get your wife to let you fuck her anally, so you just jam it in there before she has a chance to say, "no". You got what you wanted, she's going to have deal with the pain, then, she'll deal with you. We are the wife and congress is the jackass husband.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  5. Re:Global Warming by DrLang21 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a world of difference between Law which affects every person in a country, or potentially in the world, without choice and an operating system that a customer chooses to use. On top of that, there are systems designers who do have a fairly complete upper level understanding of an entire operating system. In addition, there are software quality control measures in place to fend off garbage. Legislation has only those voting on it as quality control. If those voting are not given sufficient time to at least mostly comprehend the entire bill, then there is no quality control.

    --
    I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
  6. Re:Global Warming by Firehed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I can't be expected to understand the laws as a normal human, then I can't reasonably be expected to follow them either.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  7. Mods on crack again by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Insightful? Why hasn't this whole thread been modded off-topic? What I see here is a political discussion, nothing about the movement of the magnetic pole due to core flux....

    --
    A house divided against itself cannot stand.