Slashdot Mirror


Impressive Robot Hand From Shadow

kkleiner writes "The Shadow Dextrous Hand is a robotic arm that allows for fine motor control and precise movements. It's accurate enough to pick up an egg, screw in a light bulb, or thread a needle. Even cooler, researchers can control it with a 'Cyber glove,' allowing for 24 distinct human movements that mimic the user's own hand. A British based company, Shadow, has been displaying the hand for several years now, and recently demonstrated its latest model at IREX 2009. The hand, toted as the world's most advanced, is available for sale to researchers (pricing has not been made public)."

18 of 101 comments (clear)

  1. I want one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of these, a rubber glove, lube and a bottle of wine and I'm set.

    1. Re:I want one by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      One of these, a rubber glove, lube and a bottle of wine and I'm set.

      I don't care how much lube you use, your ass is still gonna be smarting after that.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  2. Egg fraud by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is almost impossible to smash an egg by grasping it. This dissipates the crushing force over the entire surface of the egg. Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze. Where was the well-educated, erudite journalist on this one, exposing this hoary old "Newton's Apple" gimmick to the world? Oh wait, the linked article is a press release passed off as an article, and slashdot is just a blog not a news source.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Egg fraud by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny
      WARNING: Do not actually try this!!

      Try it yourself, you can't crush an egg in your hand no matter how hard you squeeze.

      Hey douchebag, that's not true at all. I've got egg all over my desk, my monitor, my pants, and my shirt now.

      Of course, it could just be because I used my masturbating hand to do it... that hand is much stronger.

      Anyway, it's not the distribution of force over the shell that makes hand-crushing an egg difficult. It's the fact that most people simply can't generate enough force at that position due to how the hand is shaped -- a lot of the force is dispersed by deforming the hand tissue, not the egg. The trick is to have the narrow end of the egg towards your thumb, and to squeeze like you're milking a cow but with the palm, not with the fingers). This loads the first portion of the force exerted into deforming your palm, and the last portion is almost entirely directed into the egg.

      Note also that a robotic hand does not have the physiological limitations a human hand does.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Egg fraud by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Note also that a robotic hand does not have the physiological limitations a human hand does.

      To be more accurate, a robot hand does not have the same limitations as a human hand. For instance, while camping, a little warm bacon grease from the skillet will suffice to allow the human hand to fulfill it's duties. What kind of a battery pack would you need to drag along with this thing, and how much does it weigh? You'd probably need some kind of pack-llama to carry it, and if you've got a llama anyhow...

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Egg fraud by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Funny

      For instance, while camping, a little warm bacon grease from the skillet will suffice to allow the human hand to fulfill it's duties.

      I didn't think it was possible to love bacon too much until I read this...

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  3. Looks useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This might be something to remember if your father ever cuts off your hand.

  4. combine this with the story below... by scapermoya · · Score: 3, Funny

    robot hand + machine-written journalism = infinite fun!

    --
    Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun the frumious Bandersnatch.
  5. how many robot hands does it take to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Q: how many robot hands does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
    A: Just one... didn't you RTFA?

  6. Lesser known corollaries by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is also impossible to crush an egg against your own eye socket, or in your armpit, as these perfectly cup the egg, again dissipating the forces.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Lesser known corollaries by BronsCon · · Score: 2, Funny

      But is it possible to crush an egg in your ass? I would think it depends how firm your buttocks are.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  7. DARPA research from the 80s by StCredZero · · Score: 4, Informative

    DARPA funded research on haptics and "Waldoes" (nickname for remotely operated manipulators from Heinlein) starting in the 80s. A lot of this know-how ended up in Sarcos corporation.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhj3Z9o6t0g

    http://www.sarcos.com/teleop_videos.html

    The problem with haptics technology is that mechanisms complicated enough to mimic parts of the human body, like the arms and hands, will tend to be more expensive and less robust than simpler manipulators. Much of the DARPA research from the 80s was motivated by the need to work underwater at great depths. Most current underwaters RPVs don't use advanced haptics, because the work can be done with simpler and more robust manipulators.

    Prosthesis can change this, however. A mass produced prosthetic arm could drive down the cost of such mechanisms. This could lead to further advances and cost reduction in haptics technology.

    We are actually at the point where we could build a Gundam style mecha. (Has to be large enough to contain a whole-body haptic harness with complete freedom of motion.) But there is no practical reason to do so. (Other than to provide an even cooler spectacle at "monster truck" rallies.)

    (Also it would probably have an Evangelion-like extension cord coming out the back for power and possibly hydraulics.)

  8. Re:Virtual Prostitution? by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A device like this could create a whole new industry of virtual prostitution. Although, I wouldn't get too excited because as soon as that happens, the nanny-state politicians from both sides of the aisle will no doubt move to outlaw it. I still don't understand how a government in a free society is able to tell people what they can and can't do with their body, especially when it comes to sex.

    It'd work out great until some 4chan jerk hacks the connection and you have to call the hospital to have a robot hand surgically removed from your p33n0r

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
  9. waldo, not robot? by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this a waldo, rather than a robot? My understanding is that a robot is defined as something that is at least somewhat autonomous, at least to the extent that it incorporates a feedback loop. For instance, some of the earliest robots from the mid-20th century were little things that rolled around on the floor searching for bright light. A Roomba is a robot. If all it does is shadow the motion of your hand, then I think it's called a waldo (named after a science fiction story by Robert Heinlein) or a remote manipulator. Most likely they're using the term "robot" because it makes a better marketing term.

    1. Re:waldo, not robot? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is unfortunate that we use the term "robot" to refer both to truly autonomous vehicles and to what are essentially remote controlled vehicles (e.g. Robot Wars. While I would prefer the term "robot" only be used for machines that can think for themselves, I suspect that "Waldo Wars" would not a huge marketing success.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:waldo, not robot? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My understanding is that a robot is defined as something that is at least somewhat autonomous

      It is not. In fact "robot" is quite ill defined.

      Some people want it to only mean autonomous machines, others only human-shaped machines, but in its originating play, it referred to what we'd now call replicants. It's used to refer to androids and remote controlled planes and everything in between.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  10. *This* is a robotic hand by KnownIssues · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Video on YouTube of High-Speed Robot Hand.

  11. Re:I must say, by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yep, I gotta hand it to them, this is the first model I've seen which isn't all thumbs. Looks like we've finally got a grip on this technology!