Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

At Current Rates, Only a Few More Years' Worth of IPv4 Addresses

Posted by timothy on from the so-last-decade dept.

An anonymous reader excerpts from an interesting article at Ars Technica, which begins "There are 3,706,650,624 usable IPv4 addresses. On January 1, 2000, approximately 1,615 million (44 percent) were in use and 2,092 million were still available. Today, ten years later, 2,985 million addresses (81 percent) are in use, and 722 million are still free. In that time, the number of addresses used per year increased from 79 million in 2000 to 203 million in 2009. So it's a near certainty that before Barack Obama vacates the White House, we'll be out of IPv4 address[es]. (Even if he doesn't get re-elected.)"

12 of 460 comments (clear)

  1. No, that's propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    We'll never run out of IPv4 addresses. "Peak-IPv4" is a myth created by those who hate America and want Asia's IPv6 to take over. 4 octets forever!

    1. Re:No, that's propaganda by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's a liberal myth created by Nazi Corporist Jews to take over the IP world and land a fake man on the moon while shooting JFK wearing an Elvis mask from a black helicopter with "UFO" painted on the side just before crashing into the twin towers.

      --
      Table-ized A.I.
    2. Re:No, that's propaganda by Nocterro · · Score: 2, Funny

      IANA has in place an agreement

      Is anyone else's brain tripping on this as badly as mine? I Am Not A "Has in place an agreement"? What the hell is a "has in place an agreement", and why would your lack of being one make you unqualified?

      Stupid memes, acronyms.

      --
      [clever sig]
  2. ::1 by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've already got MY ipv6 address.

    1. Re:::1 by furball · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can't reach loopback?

  3. Let me be the first to say ... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 5, Funny

    4 octets should be enough for everyone.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  4. Bono should be pleased... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anybody not paying for a business line will being going through so many layers of NAT in the near future that getting bittorrent to work will be quite difficult...

  5. Re:Ah but...! by hedwards · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ha ha, I'm pwning it as we spe

  6. Re:How many more times are we going to run out? by sopssa · · Score: 2, Funny

    As long as they don't take away 69.69.69.69 from it's owner:

    $ host 69.69.69.69
    69.69.69.69.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer the-coolest-ip-on-the-net.com.

  7. Re:Every two years? Hah. More like twice a year by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No no, after December 21, 2012 all the addresses will be available!!

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  8. idea: switch to alphanumeric by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Funny
    So, an address might look like:

    1h2.tyj.56j.0as

    I think that would solve the problem permanently.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  9. The real answer... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is to go back to UUCP bang addresses. Pathalias can handle routing.
    --
    ihnp4!stolaf!bungia!foundln!john

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.