Slashdot Mirror


Net Users In Belarus May Soon Have To Register

Cwix writes "A new law proposed in Belarus would require all net users and online publications to register with the state: 'Belarus' authoritarian leader is promising to toughen regulation of the Internet and its users in an apparent effort to exert control over the last fully free medium in the former Soviet state. He told journalists that a new Internet bill, proposed Tuesday, would require the registration and identification of all online publications and of each Web user, including visitors to Internet cafes. Web service providers would have to report this information to police, courts, and special services.'"

13 of 89 comments (clear)

  1. How is this different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apart from internet cafes, which are blanketed with CCTV cameras, all users in Western nations also need to register to use the internet. Registration is with a third party, but the government has access to all third party information, so effectively the same thing. This is simply "the east" catching up with "the west".

    People who felt the government shouldn't turn too big have largely been proved right when it comes to the area of surveillance - every Western nation will have total online oversight.

    1. Re:How is this different? by Andorin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apart from internet cafes, which are blanketed with CCTV cameras, all users in Western nations also need to register to use the internet.

      No, you only have to register to have a connection at your house or business or whatever. There are lots of places where you can anonymously use open wifi networks- McDonald's has free wifi. Most public libraries have free wifi (although some might require you to log in with your library ID). Neighbors that don't secure their networks essentially give you free wifi. Those are just three examples and there are lots more.

      This proposed law is totally different; from my interpretation of TFA, it requires each individual citizen to have his or her own account through which they can access the Internet.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    2. Re:How is this different? by paxcoder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now that's just totally wrong. I hope it fails miserably and turns out to be a disgrace for whoever supported it, and I hope everyone sees that and learns from it (so that they never consider any similar idea again).

    3. Re:How is this different? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most public libraries have free wifi (although some might require you to log in with your library ID). Neighbors that don't secure their networks essentially give you free wifi.

      Not in Germany they don't. Over here, libraries are generally more interested in squeezing out money from people than they are in providing information and access to information, so if you want Internet access there, you'll have to pay. Oh, and of course, you'll have to use the library's own computers, you'll be restricted to the World Wide Web (no other Internet services for you!), and there'll be filtering software. Oh, and small kids will be shoulder-surfing all the time...

      Of course, there's also the fact that German law has this annoying thing called "Störerhaftung" where someone who "enables" you to do illegal things (not necessarily crimes) can be held responsible for what you do if you can't be caught. This is why nobody in their right mind would deliberately allow people to get onto an unsecured WLAN, for example; if someone did, and then did something illegal and couldn't be found, you'd be held responsible instead.

      Given that, I'd be surprised if McDonald's etc. will ever offer free no-login wireless, too. (Well, I haven't checked they don't already do, but given the legal aspects, I'd be surprised.)

      Anyhow, all in all - using the Internet without SOMEONE knowing who you are (and thus, indirectly, with the government being able to find out who you are) is pretty much impossible in Germany.

  2. D'oh by Andorin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    President Alexander Lukashenko is going a long way towards making identity theft even easier. Imagine how much simpler it would be to steal an identity with the existence of 'accounts' like this- especially as they aren't tied to specific addresses or machines, as TFA mentions that the requirements also apply to Internet cafes.

    I wonder how much Prez Luka would like it if someone posted on 4chan under his "Internet passport?"

    --
    That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    1. Re:D'oh by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Funny

      President Alexander Lukashenko is going a long way towards making identity theft even easier.

      The main reason I read Slashdot is for the instant reality check on news. It relieves me from the need to think; I read the news and right next to it I see the consequences those news will have on the real world.

      Slashdot transforms the need to find the dire consequences of all the events I don't like into the need to check which one of the "end of the world as we know it" scenarios is actually likely. /sarcasm?

  3. only a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems unthinkable that this could happen in western democracies, but it is only a matter of time. The freewheeling and uncontrolled nature of the net was a grand experiment, but it is not tolerable to political power structures because they do not control it or even quite understand it. It can also threaten them (see Iran).

    It's not politically feasible for most western governments to come out and take such steps directly, but it'll be rolled out slowly over time "for our own good", with each step along the way being justifiable to protect us against something that everyone agrees is bad.

    The only way to fight this is for everyone to start using strong encryption for everything and protecting their anonymity even if it isn't always convenient, and even if they have nothing to hide. But that is less likely to happen than for Paris Hilton to win the 2010 Nobel Prize in physics.

    I give the mostly-uncensored internet a total lifetime of less than 25 more years from the present, if we're lucky. For a while it'll be possible, but criminal, to access it anonymously, but eventually that'll become impractical as governments clamp down to protect IP/the children/stop terror/prevent civil unrest.

    Wait, and watch.

    1. Re:only a matter of time by Andorin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only way to fight this is for everyone to start using strong encryption for everything and protecting their anonymity even if it isn't always convenient, and even if they have nothing to hide.

      Also this.

      Seriously, this sort of thing is why Freenet was created.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
  4. And the question remains: by hyades1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    How many times will "Hubicha Kokov", "Miles O'Toole" and "Leck Depolski" turn up before the scumbag authorities notice something weird? Along with appropriate "catch me if you can" software, of course.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  5. just like in Italy? by itsme1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can somebody with more knowledge comment on what are the significant differences between Belarus and Italy? In Italy they are obliged to scan your ID when you want internet access and also they have to log many things and be sure to be able to correlate them with you. Free anonymous internet ("normal" open wifi) is forbidden as far as I know.

    As a side-note in Italy if you're a guest your host (at least the "organized" ones, like hotels and such) are obliged to take all your data and report you to some authority. I'm sure there are many countries with the same requirement but the first one that comes to mind is Cuba...

  6. Belarus is a predictive signal for Russia. by reporter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The relationship between Belarus and Russia is similar to the relationship among the members of the European Union. The governments of the 2 nations occasionally talk about Belarus' becoming a province of Russia. Both governments have similar oppressive laws, and both nations are run, for all intents and purposes, by dictators.

    The imminent suppression of free speech on the Internet likely foreshadows the same sort of suppression in Russia.

    The gravity of the situation cannot be overstated. The Internet-capable folks in both countries are the only people who have access to uncensored news from the West. These people know the horrible state of their countries. Knowledge is power. Only these knowledgeable poeple can change both countries into liberal, Western democracies.

    If the government censors the Internet, then both nations will become Chinese-style states. We Westerners will not see any political improvements in both Belarus and Russia within our lifetimes.

    1. Re:Belarus is a predictive signal for Russia. by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the government censors the Internet, then both nations will become Chinese-style states.

      All nations drift toward Chinese style. The difference is only in speed. In the USA, for example, TSA demonstrated a few days ago who is the boss. You are posting on /. only at pleasure of the government, as it appears. You are perfectly safe, though, as long as you don't discuss certain topics of public interest.

      We Westerners will not see any political improvements in both Belarus and Russia within our lifetimes.

      People in Belarus and Russia will, however, see financial improvements in their life. That's what matters to them. They don't particularly care about random politicians coming out of the woodwork for a few years to rob the treasury, promote their pet projects and then be gone. Voting public usually wants stability, wealth, peace. Whoever provides that gets the vote. If the guy is good he is welcome to stick around and be responsible, in long term, for his policies. In the USA, for example, it seems to be a sport among Presidents to do as much harm as they can within their term and then run away from the wreck.

  7. Re:Today it's them... by orasio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In fact, about "dissapearances", Facebook is a lot worse than this kind of thing.
    People who were in danger in my country used to hide with acquaintances of acquaintances, making it hard for state intelligence to find them and kill them. Now that an easily accesible database links you to all you possible escapes, dissidence has turned a lot harder.