Slashdot Mirror


End of the Road For NASA's Mars Rover?

An anonymous reader writes "NASA celebrated Mars rover Spirit's bountiful, six-year stint on the red planet on Sunday – way longer than its forecast three-month mission. But it all may soon come to an end, stuck as it is in Martian sand."

40 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid. by Web+Goddess · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wish the poster had done a better job summarizing the situation. Spirit is stuck in the sand and can't rock itself free; because it's not moving, sand and dust is collecting on the solar panels; winter is coming on Mars, making the solar energy that much weaker anyway.

    But even as cute little rover sits there spinning, its wheels are doing Science, they dug down to a layer with sulfur. Sulfur indicates hydrothermal vents, and hydro is the greek word for water. Woot!

    A miracle could happen; a sandstorm could clean off the solar panels, allowing enough energy for a mighty push that could free the machine.

  2. look on the bright side by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    some exoarcheology student in a couple hundred years is going to make the find of his life

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  3. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by sopssa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does it need continuous power to stay capable of operating? Or could it just wait over winter without power to see if there was a storm that cleaned its solar panels, and continue when more power is available again?

  4. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does it need continuous power to stay capable of operating?

    Yes. It requires some nominal amount of power for heating to avoid freezing and damaging components. This is what happened to the Phoenix lander (as anticipated in that case). With the panels covered in dust, plus the additional cold and lack of sunlight during the winter, Spirit is unlikely to survive the winter unless something changes.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  5. Way to go, NASA! by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As spectacular as some of its failures have been -- like slamming a probe into Mars because one group failed to convert the units the other group was using -- it's important to recognize that NASA is capable of equally spectacular successes. These rovers have done way more than anyone expected and helped us learn a tremendous amount about Mars. We definitely got more than our money's worth on this project, and the scientists and engineers whose hard work made it happen deserve some serious accolades.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Way to go, NASA! by amabbi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As spectacular as some of its failures have been -- like slamming a probe into Mars because one group failed to convert the units the other group was using -- it's important to recognize that NASA is capable of equally spectacular successes. These rovers have done way more than anyone expected and helped us learn a tremendous amount about Mars. We definitely got more than our money's worth on this project, and the scientists and engineers whose hard work made it happen deserve some serious accolades.

      I think it's also important to note that NASA is something like 5/6 in Mars landings.... no other agency in the world has even landed 1 successfully. People (correctly?) shit on NASA for its perceived failings in manned spaceflight but it has an unbeatable record in interplanetary exploration.

    2. Re:Way to go, NASA! by Rakishi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sort of, the soviets managed to land intact on Mars twice. Of course since both lander stopped working within half a minute it's hard to really call them successful.

    3. Re:Way to go, NASA! by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...no other agency in the world has even landed 1 successfully...

      Huh? While mission of Soviet Mars 3 lander was pretty much a failure (transmission ended 20s after landing due to unknown reasons; what it transmitted and observations suggest it had the misfortune of landing in extreme dust storm), it has successfully landed. It was the first man-made objest on Mars that did.

      There is something about worth of accomplishments if only own ones are remembered...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:Way to go, NASA! by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The USSR bounced plenty of probes off and past Mars before and after the Mars 3 lander. Getting onto the surface of Mars is no trivial task. I think they had 7 failures (not including launchpad kerfuffles) where the probe either stopped responding, missed the planet or created a new crater.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    5. Re:Way to go, NASA! by eples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is something about worth of accomplishments if only own ones are remembered...

      Just landing isn't much of an accomplishment. Did the Soviets get any useful science from the landing itself? They don't even know why it stopped working after it landed (successfully). Please, remember this all you want - I have no objection.

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
    6. Re:Way to go, NASA! by DrVxD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's an old trueism - "you get something right, nobody remembers. You get something wrong, nobody forgets."
      Sadly, no organisation in history has suffered from that more than NASA.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    7. Re:Way to go, NASA! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's hard to verify that something landed when you hardly get any data back. It may be indistinguishable from a semi-crash.

  6. Hats off to the rover designers by Alcimedes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd just like to take this opportunity to tip my hat to the folks that designed this rover. It was slated for a 180 day mission, and they just finished up day 2,190. That's some pretty high quality engineering that must have gone into this project, especially when you take into account it's on *another planet*, so no tech to fiddle with something that's just a bit off here or there.

    No parts, no cleaning, no help at all. To top that off, it's doing all of this on Mars, which isn't really an electronics friendly environment. It crash landed on another planet from a rocket ship and worked 10x longer than it was supposed to.

    Well done.

  7. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It needs enough power to at the very least maintain the heating of the components to a level where they will not be compromised. If the rover gets too cold over the winter, the actual materials of the rover could be damaged by the cold temperatures. In theory, it is possible that the rover could recover from a minimal power state if the panels were cleared of dust by a storm or something, but it's not all that likely. Mars is not a very hospitable place to begin with, and is a *very* bad place to run out of gas (proverbially).

  8. All is not lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    One option being considered is spinning the wheels on one side in the hope of tilting the solar panels to face the winter sun. Even if Spirit never travels again, all is not lost. There is a radio experiment for measuring the wobble of Mars as it spins that requires the rover to stay in one place. The key is surviving the upcoming winter, which may depend on a fortuitous wind blowing accumulated dust off the solar panels.

  9. Re:Anyone seen the movie Saw? by khallow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clearly the rover isn't making much progress with it's 'dead foot' stuck in the sand, so why can't we cut it off?

    As I understand it, there are no "stuck" feet. The rover simply doesn't have the traction (perhaps combined with low motive power) to leave this area of sand.

  10. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by natehoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IIRC they put it in "low power mode" last Martian winter and were pleasantly surprised when it survived, booted up, and restarted communications with Earth again when there was enough sunlight available. The trouble is, this year it's stuck at a less-than-ideal angle for collecting sunlight so there may be less of a chance of a springtime startup unless they can adjust the position, which of course takes, well, power. It's a risk either way. Plus, I think it's just locked up a second wheel, leaving it with 4 of 6.

    So we'll see. If it can't move again but gets power, its utility as a science platform is going to be severely impacted. Still, it will be able to collect data and pictures of the changing landscape in its immediate vicinity, and it seems to have gotten stuck in an interesting spot, so there will still be useful data coming out of it.

    And since the warranty ran out 5+ years ago, I think even a partly functional stationary science platform is pretty darned impressive.

    Even after six years, the simple fact that Mankind has working scientific instruments on Mars gives me a geekgasm all over again.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  11. End of the Road by Russianspi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny you should use that euphemism. A road would have helped the rover considerably.

  12. Re:What happened to their plan from a few days ago by khallow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also, if you're putting a robot on a sand planet, wouldn't it kind of make sense to have some fans to blow off the sand from the solar panels?

    Air pressure averages about 1% of Earth's. There simply isn't enough atmosphere to justify a fan or the power it would draw.

  13. a doctoral dissertation, 2250: by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "the lost century: the millennial archive hole"

    abstract: paper archives from the 1900s are still useable today, the only barrier being language conventions of that time period. additionally, digital records from the 2100s are usable today, due to mandated standardization of file formats and the prevalence of cheap, eternal nanoholographic storage. however, the 2000s consisted mainly of magnetic and optical storage on flimsy media. additionally, file formats were often proprietary, quirky, and ever changing due to the rapidly evolving nature of digital technology from that early era. if the actual media itself wasn't degraded, the file format itself was usually forgotten in a generation or two. finally, many early groundbreaking sites of the primitive internet are lost to posterity simply because they were designed to be ephemeral and ever changing, and no one thought to take archival snapshots of their content. it didn't seem important at the time. and so, the early decades of the digital age, when many fundamental crucial decisions were made that have defined our culture today, are forever lost to us

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:a doctoral dissertation, 2250: by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If we preserve 0.01% of the digital junk we keep around, the 2000s will be much better documented than the 1900s. Hell, I was reading not that long ago about a huge library of old newspapers (like dead tree from the 1800s) that was being thrown away, because no one wanted to pay for storage. It's all been digitized though, probably OCRs too so you can do things like search it instead of sifting through endless microfiles. One reason alone digital will survive because it's valuable, I just recently noticed a newspaper I read would let you access every edition back to 1945 for a fee. That earns money, having a vault of newspapers? I doubt it.

      Besides, who does anything valuable that's bound to a media format anymore? It's called a disc image, and let you store it on any digital medium without having a real floppy or CD or DVD or whatnot. I talked to a relative of mine, they were getting fiber installed now, 15/15 Mbit was the slowest they'd offer. With that, you can have version-preserving, offsite backups in multiple bunkers half-way around the globe, safe for all but armageddon. Even if half the world was nuked pretty much all music would survive if Spotify's servers do. And don't think there'd be any lost episodes of Doctor Who.

      The format stuff is overrated. Emulation and virtualization means no one cares if there's no more C64s and Spectrums and Amigas and Motorola Macs, the images still run. And just because you can't open an ancient doc file in Office 2007 on Windows 7, does anyone really think we honestly couldn't find a binary of Office 95, fire it up in a virtualized Windows 95 and look? The only things that are really lost are some obscure science formats that nobody had or saw the purpose of or stuff that could only be captured once, like the original moon landing tape.

      Sure there will be personal tragedies of people who didn't pay any attention but they already do. Many, many people have realized when their homes burned down that uh-oh, all our family photos went with it. But the abundance of bandwidth and storage we're seeing is also an incredible opportunity to make easy, lazy solutions. Also wireless broadband can eventually become cheap enough that you backup as you go, if you lose the camera you might lose that day's picture but not your month-long trip. The greatest danger you'll lose something is because your relatives had a little "accident" when you tried to show the 10431 pictures and 2554 minutes of video grandaunt Selma took of her little wonderbrat.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  14. Late-Breaking News from the Council: VICTORY! by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Today the Council of Elders confirmed the rumours that the sinister blue planet third from our star has waved the white flag of surrender regarding one of its mechanical invaders. K'Breel, Speaker for the Council of Elders, reported the leak of an intelligence report from the blue world:

    http://planetary.org/news/2010/1231_Mars_Exploration_Rovers_Update_Spirit.html

    Continuing his pronouncement, K'Breel continued: "The trap which we laid for the robotic invader has proven successful; the monstrosity from the blue world now lies half-buried in a Snarpat pit, impaled upon a spire of rock."

    "Rejoice, podmates, one invader has been immobilized, and even as I speak to you, our teams are dutifully hunting down the second. It is of identical design as to the first, and we anticipate that it will succumb long before it reaches its destination!"

    When a junior analyst suggested that both invaders had already exceeded their designed lifetimes by a factor of ten, and that even the immobilized one was one gust of wind away from being able to return operationally-useful scientific data from its current position for years to come, K'Breel had the analyst's gelsacs placed between the invader's slowly-spinning wheel and the crusty sulfates of Scamander Crater.

  15. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by Web+Goddess · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I dunno what's with the blame game, it's alone on Mars, something was going to go wrong eventually. If the designers had made an improvement that would alleviate THIS problem, something else would be missing making THAT a problem.

    Oh if only someone had thought to turn the radioactive heating units into emergency backup power! (sarcasm) If only someone had thought to install fans to blow the dust off! (previous poster, more sarcasm.)

    It is an incredibly well-designed machine; just like with the human body, everything has a cost. Improving one item means less for the rest.

    When I toured JPL it was obvious that the people there have an emotional bond with this little animal robot, its gritty determination, it's spirit of exploration.

  16. So? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The covering stones of the Pyramids have been used to build other buildings. The Chinese wall has been dismantled for resources as well. Painting have been painted over for the want of a canvas. Tapes for tv-shows have been re-used because tapes were expensive and who cared about another sitcom.

    It is nothing new. We learned most of the egyptians from their dump site where they dropped tons of daily, and in their eyes, worthless communication. One accidently saved backup of MySpace will tell future researchers more then museums of our age. It is the data we don't care about that tells the most about us.

    Some floppies will survive, purely by accident, and it will be, enough. The holocaust is important for our generation and yet its most influential book, The Diary of Anne Frank, is an accident. You could have all the records of the holocaust in tact, and it still wouldn't speak as loudly. If all the diaries of all the victims still existed, then they would be meaningless, a huge pile of paper nobody would ever bother to read. Precisely because records of the past are rare, we value them. If we knew every move of the roman empire, had it all on paper, what would be there to explore? Proof? How many people study ancient history vs the present? You can get all the records of the current senate of the world most powerful nation... C-span. Nobody is watching.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  17. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by Lifyre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is actually a windshield/glass technology out there now that can prevent (or at least slow) the dust from building up on the glass of the solar panels. Unfortunately it wasn't around when these guys were built, proven, and then shipped off to a strange hostile world where they have run around like little conquering heroes.

    These little guys (and by extension their designers, etc...) are a shining examples of going above and beyond the call of duty.

    --
    I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
  18. Re:What happened to their plan from a few days ago by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "wouldn't it kind of make sense to have some fans to blow off the sand from the solar panels?"

    It was only expected to go 90 days, and not expected to suffer much dust or winter over.

    Another in the long line of 'why didn't they'. As in:

    "Why didn't they build these things to last 6 years?" Answer: They weren't expected to.

    "Why didn't they think of this or that?" Answer: The mission requirements did not include that.

    "Why did they do this or that?" Answer: They exercised their best judgement at the time. So far, so good.

    What part of exceeding your expectations by 24 times are you complaining about? Your GF expected a 1.0+ct diamond, and she got a 24-ct one? She complains it's VSS-1? That it's heavy? That it catches on her clothes? That it blinds people on the street?

    And does she ask you how much you paid for it, and you end up telling her the truth, you paid for a 1/4 ct brilliant, and wow, 6 years later ya got this...

    Again, no complaints about the Rovers. Spectacular performance. And NASA is scouting around for the next robotic mission. Ask some of these guys for ideas, anyone?

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  19. Spirit to NASA by roots0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    “There are levels of survival we are willing to accept.”

  20. Re:What happened to their plan from a few days ago by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Two cans of computer duster in quick draw holsters. DUH!

    This is not rocket science here...... Oh wait....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  21. Send more! by J05H · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These rovers are a very mature design that has worked flawlessly. Build and send a dozen of them.

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  22. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by Mercano · · Score: 2, Informative

    Weight. If you use nuclear power source, you've got to bring your fuel with you, where as with solar, the fuel is already packed away safely in the sun; you just need to bring a collector. Mars, unlike the outer planets, is still close enough to the sun that you get a reasonable amount of power from solar cells, if you have enough square footage, so solar wins the power/weight ratio contest. Besides, these things weren't built to survive the winter at all; the design requirements only called for three months.

    --
    #include <signature.h>
  23. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Informative

    I though they did not use electric heaters on the rovers but used radioactive heating and aerogel insulation..

    You are correct that they do have a radioisotope heater and aerogel insulation, but they do use electrical heating as well to augment the base level created by the radioisotope heater. Without electrical power, it most likely won't have enough heat to survive winter.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  24. Correction of misinformation by tlambert · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The rovers run a VxWorks embedded operating system on a radiation-hardened 20 MHz RAD6000 CPU with 128 MB of DRAM with error detection and correction and 3 MB of EEPROM. Each rover also has 256 MB of flash memory. To survive during all of the various mission phases, the rover's vital instruments must stay within a temperature of 40 C to +40 C (40 F to 104 F). At night the rovers are heated by eight radioisotope heater units (RHU) which each continuously generate 1 W of thermal energy from the decay of radioisotopes, along with electrical heaters that operate only when necessary. A sputtered gold film and a layer of silica aerogel are used for insulation."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars_Exploration_Rover

    -- Terry

  25. Yes, it needs power; here's why by tlambert · · Score: 4, Informative

    Tthe OS reboots periodically if there's no communication to ensure that it doesn't hang because of the OS. It's a hardware watchdog, which is NOT shut down when the rover is put to sleep, so it will wake periodically over the winter, try to establish communications, ask for a software update (if any), and then go back to sleep. Given that the original mission anticipated a 90 life expectancy, expect these reboots to be relatively frequent.

    http://www.flightsoftware.org/files/FSW08_Deliman.pdf

    -- Terry

  26. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by uncqual · · Score: 2, Funny

    In retrospect, counting on the rovers landing near some homeless Martians who would insist on cleaning the solar panels every time the rovers stopped may not have been the best plan.

    --
    Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
  27. Re:What happened to their plan from a few days ago by mike260 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems to me that the simplest solution would be to send a manned mission and have the astronauts follow the rovers around with a rag and a bottle of windex.

  28. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Couldn't they have programmed some kind of self-cleaning cycle so these robots can fix themselves after sandstorms? The mission cost of a few extra actuators and a bottle of Windex seems pretty minimal versus robot death because of a particularly nasty storm.

    Well, NASA considered that themselves, and their cost-benefit analysis said it wasn't worth it.

    And that was back before they knew that the Martian wind would blow strongly enough to do a decent job of cleaning the panels on its own, and thus had estimated that in 90 days the panels would be covered in too much dust for the rover to operate.

    "A few extra actuators and a bottle of Windex", snarkiness aside, is easier to say than to actually engineer without compromising other parts of the mission.

    And now that we know that the Martian wind does blow, and as a result the rovers lasted for a good six years, then I have to say with hindsight that neglecting any sort of cleaning mechanism and the associated weight cost was unequivocally the correct choice.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  29. Re:Spoiler: Why it's dying; emits one last factoid by rwv · · Score: 2, Funny

    "A few extra actuators and a bottle of Windex", snarkiness aside

    Lighten up. It was a joke. On the other hand, if I had suggested adding an extra roll of duct tape to the mission payload, that would have been a clue that I was making a serious suggestion because duct tape can solve any problem.

  30. Re:I don't understand this by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a 1928 Duesenberg that has never had any maintenance whaever, not even an oil change, and it's still working. However, it has a flat tire and can't get to the gas station and it's almost out of gas.

    Except it's on Mars.

  31. Can RAT save Spirit? by zchris_gr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really wonder if the Rock Abrasion Tool (RAT) arm (the grinder arm) is strong enough to help Spirit move away from its sand trap... Christos/Greece

    1. Re:Can RAT save Spirit? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I really wonder if the Rock Abrasion Tool (RAT) arm (the grinder arm) is strong enough to help Spirit move away from its sand trap

      I've read that its motor is simply not nearly powerful enough. And it risks damage to the instruments, which perform its primary job. As I remember it, they said they might try it if they felt it needed only slightly more lift to achieve freedom. But so far the math doesn't favor it. It's not even close to the threshold where it may help.