Slashdot Mirror


DARPA Kick-Starts Flying Car Program

coondoggie writes to share that DARPA is finally trying to make good on the promise of flying cars for our future with the new "Transformer" (TX) project. "DARPA said the vehicle will need to be able to drive on prepared surface and light off-road conditions, as well as support Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) features. The TX will also support range and speed efficiencies that will allow for missions to be performed on a single tank of fuel. DARPA said the TX will 'provide the flexibility to adapt to traditional and asymmetric threats by providing the operator unimpeded movement over difficult terrain. In addition, transportation is no longer restricted to trafficable terrain that tends to makes movement predictable.'"

5 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. What do they know? by migla · · Score: 4, Funny

    Darpa schmarpa!

    Whatever happened to that DARPANET they used to have? Losers.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    1. Re:What do they know? by sentientbeing · · Score: 5, Funny

      Youre right. These flying cars will never take off.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    2. Re:What do they know? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Informative
      No kidding. The KR2 can do 180 mph at 50 miles per gallon. Of course, it does this by having the internal volume of a refrigerator rather than a bathroom, like most SUV's.

      The ADI Stallion homebuilt is more efficient than a 747, as regards fuel spent per person carried, and if you're willing to only carry 2 people rather than 6, you can take along a motorcycle as well, at 230mph, while still using less gas than many larger SUV's.

      However, for the VTOL demands, maybe they should consider an autogyro with a prerotator like the Carter Copter or several others, that can manage vertical takeoff and landing (and has the happy side-effect that it flies the same after an engine failure as before, except its climbing capability is severely limited.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  2. Re:no, no no by sunderland56 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We don't need flying cars. Flying cars = Falling cars. Add in volatile fuel and you have bombs.

    So, who is going to perform the security search before I leave for work in a flying car? Does the TSA come to my house every morning, or does my wife get to strip search me? And can I be checked before I put on my shoes, or do I have to put them on, then take them off, and then put them on again?

    And if I bring a cup of coffee, does it have to be smaller than 3.4 ounces??

  3. Re:"kick-starts flying car"? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 5, Informative

    You kid, but Barnaby Wainfan's unique Facetmobile aircraft originally had a pull-start motor that could only be started from the outside of the aircraft, which made life complicated. For that matter, most older aircraft, pre-1950, didn't have starters at all, and were started by hand-pulling the propeller hard enough to get the engine to fire. As you can imagine, this injured and killed a lot of people -- a lot more people killed than crank-starting cars -- and ended up with a fairly large number of aircraft flying off with no pilot. Some of them managed to fly hundreds of miles this way, in fact.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.