Slashdot Mirror


Giant Black Hole At Milky Way's Core Stays Slim

thomst writes "A team of researchers from Harvard and MIT announced at the 215th meeting of the American Astronomical Society a new theoretical model of how the super-massive black hole at the center of the Milky Way consumes gas from surrounding star clusters, based on a million seconds of observation by the orbital Chandra X-ray telescope. Astronomers had previously believed that the object, known as Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star') consumed only around one percent of the gases it stripped from the star clusters around it, but the new model reduces its consumption to 0.01 percent (i.e. — two orders of magnitude). Physorg.com's uncredited reporter gets the story right, while space.com's Andrea Thomspon clearly doesn't understand the mechanism behind the phenomenon (essentially, thermal conduction from the extremely-hot accretion disk heats the surrounding gas, causing it to expand, and thus move away from Sagittarius A*'s gravity well)."

12 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. Clearly not named by a Canadian. by drainbramage · · Score: 4, Funny

    Then it would be Sagittarius A* eh?

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  2. So who cares? by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So is this story about the black hole, or about the fact that one place got the story right, while another author got confused? Sounds like a hit job to me, and probably better ways to fulfill vendettas.. Just sayin'...

    1. Re:So who cares? by thomst · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Nope. I personally don't know or care about Andrea Thompson at all. But her name was on the space.com story, so I mentioned it. That's called "creditng the source."

      As for my story, it is, of course, about both things - the new theory about Sagittarius A*, and the reporting about the theory - because both are relevant to me.

      You're welcome not to care about either, though. Just try not to impute motives to other people without justification, lest you, yourself be judged a cynical troll with way too much time on its grubby little hands.

      Just sayin' ...

      --
      Check out my novel.
  3. 1 million seconds by qazsedcft · · Score: 3, Informative

    A million seconds is about 11.5 days.

  4. Authorship and accuracy by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the Space.com story does mention the correct mechanism ("It also creates pressure that helps some stellar winds avoid the black hole's gravitational grasp altogether."), but also a second one ("The conduction causes some of the heat in the gas to travel outwards, reducing the strength of the radiation that results from the black hole's consumption.") that sounds a bit odd. Physorg doesn't credit a reporter because they're printing a CfA-authored story (as evidenced by the "Provided by Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics").

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  5. gas expansion means...? by MadCow42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >> essentially, thermal conduction from the extremely-hot accretion disk heats the surrounding gas, causing it to expand, and thus move away from Sagittarius A*'s gravity well

    If there is a dense enough concentration of gas that thermal expansion (i.e. pressure) can keep it out of the gravity well, then is there enough density to actually call that an atmosphere? It's an interesting thought... although going from "atmosphere" to anything else (life, etc.) has about a billion hurdles in-between.

    I would assume that in the disc there is a range of concentration/pressure, but never thought it would reach/exceed our atmospheric pressure. That would be cool.

    MadCow.

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  6. Re:And let me be the first to say... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After reading that yawner of a story, I am SO FUCKING GLAD I never pursued astro research after that summer of my junior year in college.

    If the story's boring it's the writer's fault. A good writer can write "how to mow a lawn" and make it interesting. Bad writing and boring teachers are what turns school kids off on learning, and most people off on science.

  7. paper by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is the scientific paper.

  8. should be called the 'Sagittarius A-Hole' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously. How can you skip a joke like that? It's reaching out and grabbing you, pulling you in to never let go and never let anything escape.

    PS: How much more do I have to type to get past the lameness filter?

  9. A Rose By Any Other Name by digitalgiblet · · Score: 2, Funny

    >"Sagittarius A* (pronounced 'Sagittarius A-Star')"

    So... it isn't a star but they call it A-Star?

    Perhaps "The Saggitarius Object Formerly Known As A-Star"...

  10. Re:7g of saturated fat by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Low Fat Milky Way" sounds better to you?

    --
    Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
  11. Re:And let me be the first to say... by ReedYoung · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Similarly, bad pay and zero prestige are what turn interesting and talented people off teaching.

    --
    "I can't imagine how things could get any worse!" (some guy) "That could just be failure of imaginatioÂn on your p